Abstract
The complex of methyltransferase-like proteins 3 and 14 (METTL3-14) is the major enzyme that deposits N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications on mRNA in humans. METTL3-14 plays key roles in various biological processes through its methyltransferase (MTase) activity. However, little is known about its substrate recognition and methyl transfer mechanism from its cofactor and methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM). Here, we study the MTase mechanism of METTL3-14 by a combined experimental and multiscale simulation approach using bisubstrate analogues (BAs), conjugates of a SAM-like moiety connected to the N6-atom of adenosine. Molecular dynamics simulations based on crystal structures of METTL3-14 with BAs suggest that the Y406 side chain of METTL3 is involved in the recruitment of adenosine and release of m6A. A crystal structure with a bisubstrate analogue representing the transition state of methyl transfer shows a direct involvement of the METTL3 side chains E481 and K513 in adenosine binding which is supported by mutational analysis. Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) free energy calculations indicate that methyl transfer occurs without prior deprotonation of adenosine-N6. Furthermore, the QM/MM calculations provide further support for the role of electrostatic contributions of E481 and K513 to catalysis. The multidisciplinary approach used here sheds light on the (co)substrate binding mechanism, catalytic step, and (co)product release catalysed by METTL3, and suggests that the latter step is rate-limiting. The atomistic information on the substrate binding and methyl transfer reaction of METTL3 can be useful for understanding the mechanisms of other RNA MTases and for the design of transition state analogues as their inhibitors.
One sentence summary
A combined structural, biochemical, and computational approach reveals two distinct binding conformations of adenosine, the transition state of methyl transfer, and the catalytic mechanism of the human m6A RNA methyltransferase METTL3-14.
Introduction
METTL3-14 is the main human mRNA m6A MTase
There are more than 170 RNA modifications forming the epitranscriptome.1 N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most frequent internal modification of messenger RNA (mRNA) within the consensus sequence GGACU that is enriched near stop codons and in 3’ untranslated regions.2–4 m6A affects most aspects of RNA regulation, i.e., alternative polyadenylation5, splicing6, nuclear export7, stability8, and translation initiation.3,9 The complex of methyltransferase-like protein 3 (METTL3) and METTL14 (abbreviated as METTL3-14 in the following) is the main m6A-RNA methyltransferase (MTase).10
The METTL3-14 heterodimer is involved in a wide variety of diseases including type 2 diabetes11, viral infections12, and several types of cancer.13 METTL3-mediated m6A deposition is directly involved in the development of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) by promoting the translation of genes involved in cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis.14,15 It has been demonstrated that inhibition of the METTL3 catalytic function is sufficient to induce apoptosis and differentiation in AML cells and in a mouse model of the disease but not in normal non-leukaemic haematopoietic cells.16,17 While it has been well established that METTL3-14 dysregulation is related to cancer development, the role of METTL3-14 varies in different cancer types, i.e., it can act as oncogene or tumour suppressor.18 Despite growing knowledge of the diverse pathways involving METTL3-14, the mechanism of how m6A regulates gene expression remains poorly understood. Little is known about the recognition of specific RNA transcripts, the binding and release of the adenosine substrate, and the methyl transfer mechanism catalysed by METTL3. Furthermore, inhibiting the MTase function of METTL3-14 is a promising therapeutic strategy for several diseases.17,19 Hence, understanding the mechanism of this complex would be helpful to develop new therapies.
METTL3-14 is the catalytic complex that transfers the methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the substrate adenosine (Figure 1).20–23 METTL3 comprises a low-complexity region at the N-terminus, a zinc finger responsible for substrate binding, and the catalytic MTase domain at the C-terminus (Figure 1A).24 The METTL3 MTase domain has the catalytically active SAM binding site and adopts a Rossmann fold that is characteristic of Class I SAM-dependent MTases (Figure 1B). METTL14 has an MTase domain, too, however, with a redundant active site of hitherto unknown function, and so-called RGG repeats at its C-terminus essential for RNA binding.23 METTL14 plays a structural role for complex stabilization and RNA-binding. It forms a positively charged groove at the interface with METTL3 which is predicted to be the RNA binding site.
MD simulations for mechanistic studies of RNA MTases
Thus far, and to the best of our knowledge, no computational study of the conformational landscape or catalytic mechanism of eukaryotic RNA MTases has been reported. Molecular dynamics (MD) studies have mainly focused on protein MTases, and MTases from bacteria.25–28 In the latter, dynamic cross correlation analysis, a technique usually applied for the study of allosteric processes,29 showed that MTase conformational changes can influence the orientation of the substrate.28 In the former, Chen et al. explored the conformational landscape of SETD8, a histone MTase.30 The study showed how slow conformational motions and conformational states of the MTase are relevant to catalysis.
Among RNA MTases, research has focused on viral enzymes. One example is the MD simulation analysis of the binding mechanism of SAH and m7GTP to the Zika virus NS5 protein.31 This enabled a detailed analysis of their interaction and understanding of the effects of MTase inhibitors as antiviral drugs. Another study focused on the mechanisms of the SARS-CoV-2 MTase nsp16 and its heterodimeric partner nsp10 which acts as a stimulator of SAM binding.32 The study provides a comprehensive understanding of the dynamic, thermodynamic, and allosteric processes of MTase complex formation and function.
Bisubstrate analogues as structural tools to investigate the mechanisms of MTases
Only a few structures of RNA-bound MTases are currently available due to the intrinsic instability of RNA and RNA-enzyme complexes and resulting difficulties in obtaining their structures. Of the known m6A RNA MTases, only METTL16, a SAM homeostasis factor, has been crystallized in complex with substrate RNA.33 The lack of more such structures results in poorly understood RNA recognition and methyl transfer mechanisms. In contrast, structures are available for many MTases in complex with either the cosubstrate SAM or the coproduct S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), allowing for a well-understood cofactor binding within this protein family. Cofactor binding guided the initial design of bisubstrate analogues (BAs) as chemical tools to study the catalytic mechanisms of m6A-MTases (Figure 2).34
BAs aim to mimic the transition state in which both the substrate nucleoside and the cosubstrate SAM are bound in the catalytic pocket of the enzyme while the methyl group is transferred from SAM to the adenosine N6-atom of the substrate RNA during catalysis (Figure 2A).34–38 They consist of a SAM analogue (5’N-SAM) covalently linked to the N6-position of an adenosine of a ribonucleotide(-like) fragment (Figure 2B).35,39 The only structural information on these molecules is their binding mode in the bacterial m6A RNA MTase RlmJ.34,37 There, in the mononucleoside containing compounds BA2 and BA4, the substrate adenosine is positioned in the presumed substrate binding pocket of RlmJ, and for the cofactor moiety, the methionine chain is bound like SAM. However, the structural studies resulted in a (co)substrate conformation that is not always biologically relevant, as the adenosine of the SAM analogue was rotated out of the canonical SAM binding pocket caused by π-stacking with the substrate adenine ring.34 Therefore, the binding modes revealed therein are diverse and not always suitable for mechanistic studies. In a subsequent study, using a dinucleotide containing BA (GA* in Figure 2B), the SAM moiety had the correct orientation.37 Furthermore, the N6-atom of adenosine was positioned, through the alkyl chain of the linker, at 3 Å distance from the carbon corresponding to the Cε-atom of the methionine moiety in the cosubstrate SAM. Such a distance, in two non-linked moieties, would allow for an SN2 methyl transfer from SAM to the N6-atom of adenosine.40 We therefore hypothesized that targeting human RNA MTases, in particular METTL3, with BAs might lead to structures that provide a suitable basis for understanding their MTase mechanism.
In the present study, we use a multidisciplinary approach to study the substrate binding, m6A methylation reaction, and release of m6A product in the human RNA MTase METTL3-14. To shed light on its catalytic mechanism we combine crystal structures of METTL3-14-bisubstrate analogue complexes with in vitro experiments, multiscale atomistic simulations, namely classical molecular dynamics (MD) and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) free energy calculations. Crystal structures show the binding mode of the substrate adenosine in two different conformations, representing an encounter complex of RNA binding and the transition state of catalysis, respectively. These structures are validated through mutational analysis. Classical MD simulations are used to investigate the binding of the substrates SAM and adenosine and dissociation of the products SAH and m6A. QM/MM free energy calculations reveal the details of the methylation reaction. Taken together, we elucidate the reaction catalysed by METTL3-14 at atomic level of detail. This knowledge will help in the further investigation of other MTases and the optimization of chemical probes that target their function.
Results and Discussion
Bisubstrate analogues bind in the METTL3 active site
We evaluated a series of bisubstrate analogues (BAs) as catalytic inhibitors and investigated the structural similarity between their binding mode in METTL3-14 and the putative RNA substrate and SAM cosubstrate during methyl transfer (see Figure 2B). First, we measured the inhibitory activity of the BAs on METTL3-14 enzymatic activity (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S1). For this, we used our in-house developed reader-based enzymatic assay that quantifies the N6-adenosine methyl transfer based on homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF).41 The assay detects m6A using the natural m6A-reader YTHDC1. The m6A-RNA and -reader are fluorescently labeled such that their proximity during binding causes Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). The BAs that inhibit METTL3 reduce the m6A level, and thus decrease the FRET signal, in a dose-dependent manner. The low micromolar inhibitory activity of the most potent BAs motivated us to conduct a structural investigation on their binding mode to METTL3-14. We conducted crystallization trials and obtained crystal structures of four of the BAs (BA1, BA2, BA4 and BA6) by soaking them into METTL3-14 crystals (see Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1).
All the crystallized BAs bind in the METTL3 active site (Figure 3A). BA1 and BA6, that are missing the methionine part of the SAM analogue or have a polar urea group in the linker, respectively, have the highest IC50 values of the crystallized compounds in the enzymatic assay (see Table 1). Furthermore, in their crystal structures with METTL3, they reveal divergent interactions of their SAM-like moiety compared to SAM (Supplementary Figure S2). For BA2 and BA4, however, the interaction of their SAM-like moiety is the same as for SAM (Figure 3B-F and Supplementary Figure S3). Both ligands bind with their SAM moiety in the active site lined with METTL3 hydrophobic residues and form polar contacts to conserved residues, namely D395, R536, H538, and N539 via the methionine part and D377, I378, F534, N549, and Q550 via the adenosine moiety of 5’N-SAM. These structures therefore validate their further analysis for the interpretation of the catalytic mechanism of METTL3.
Adenosine has two distinct binding conformations in the METTL3 active site
In the METTL3-BA2 and -BA4 structures, the SAM moiety is superimposable with the METTL3-bound conformation of SAM, and adenosine is bound in the presumed catalytic site (Figure 4A). Adenosine, based on BA2 and BA4, is involved in an intricate network of interactions with side chains of METTL3 (Figure 4B).
The classical m6A MTase catalytic 395DPPW398 motif (D/N-PP-Y/F/W) of METTL3 in its flexible active site loop 1 (ASL1, METTL3 residues 395-410) participates to the binding of adenosine. D395 forms a salt bridge to SAM and its mutation to alanine was previously shown to abolish METTL3 activity and SAM binding, confirming its involvement in cosubstrate binding.20–22 The METTL3-BA2 structure reveals that there can also be a hydrogen bond formed between D395 and the N6-atom of adenosine in the case of the non-alkylated RNA substrate (Figure 4B). P396 in the 395DPPW398 motif, through its carbonyl group, forms a hydrogen bond to the N6-atom of adenosine. In addition, P397 from the 395DPPW398 motif makes hydrophobic contacts with SAM. The BA2 structure further shows that adenosine is stabilized by additional hydrogen bonds from its N7- and O2’-atoms to the METTL3 side chains of E481 and K513, respectively. While W398 from the 395DPPW398 motif is not directly involved in adenosine binding, its backbone carbonyl group forms a water-bridged hydrogen bond with the Y406 side chain in the BA4 structure. The latter is involved in hydrophobic interactions with adenosine in the BA4 structure whereas it remains flexible in the BA2-bound METTL3 structure (see Figure 4A).
Taken together, adenosine swaps conformation from solvent exposed in the METTL3-BA4 structure to buried in the METTL3-BA2 structure where it forms hydrogen bonds with residues in the active site loop 2 (ASL2, METTL3 residues 507-515). Each moiety of the BAs is involved in hydrophobic interactions with METTL3 residues, and both adenines (of SAM and adenosine) form hydrogen bonds to conserved residues in METTL3. Alanine mutation of D395, Y406, E481, and K513, which are involved in adenosine binding as seen in the BA2 and BA4 structures, almost completely abolishes the METTL3 catalytic activity (Figure 4C). Importantly, these residues are highly conserved in METTL3 (Supplementary Figure S4). The loss of activity of the Y406, E481, and K513 mutants originates mainly from abolished binding capability to adenosine and not SAM, because they can still bind SAH, as seen from a thermal shift assay (Figure 4D). Upon binding SAH, the thermal shift for the Y406, E481, and K513 mutants is similar as for the WT which suggests that their side chains are not involved in binding SAM/SAH but rather the RNA substrate. In contrast, mutation of D395 impairs SAH binding, which is consistent with the involvement of the D395 side chain in SAM binding.20
Molecular dynamics simulations reveal BA2 as the stable adenosine binding pose
Because of the different conformations of METTL3 and adenosine in the BA2 and BA4 structures, we went on to characterize the enzyme dynamics in the presence of adenosine. We carried out multiple MD simulations of the METTL3-14 heterodimer in complex with (co)substrates and (co)products. Apo trajectories were generated in a previous study.43 The MD simulations were started from the crystal structures of the complex with bisubstrate analogues BA2 and BA4 described above. Based on the position of each BA, the (co)substrates SAM and adenosine monophosphate (AMP) or the (co)products SAH and m6AMP were positioned in the protein, aligning them to their respective moiety of the BA. The interaction of each ligand to the protein, and of intramolecular polar contacts, was monitored throughout the trajectories. The dissociation time for each of the substrates and products was analysed and modelled by fitting a single exponential to the fraction of bound ligands (Table 2 using block averaging and Supplementary Figure S5 considering all trajectories). The SAM and SAH cofactors remained bound in all but one of the sampled trajectories and thus fitting was not possible. The experimentally determined koff rates of SAM and SAH are 8×10-4 s-1 and 2×10-4 s-1, respectively, which corresponds to mean lifetimes of more than 20 min and 83 minutes, respectively.44 Hence, we would not expect to observe dissociations of SAM or SAH in our 500 ns MD simulations.
Simulations that were started with AMP or m6AMP in the conformation of BA4 showed immediate dissociation of these ligands (see Table 2 and Supplementary Figures S6 and S7). This could mean that this conformation represents a short-lived intermediate during substrate binding or product release. Possibly, it represents an encounter complex between the METTL3-SAM holo complex and RNA substrate. This could be promoted through electrostatic steering of the negatively charged RNA backbone by the positively charged sulfonium ion of SAM.
The simulations started from the BA2 conformation show that the AMP and m6AMP ligands dissociated in several of the analysed MD simulation runs (Supplementary Figures S8 and S9). Binding of AMP is more stable, while the methylated product dissociates more quickly (see Table 2). This difference originates, at least in part, from the long-range monopole-monopole electrostatic interaction between the positively charged SAM and the negatively charged AMP. After the methyl transfer reaction, SAH is neutral which does not favour interaction with m6AMP resulting in its quicker dissociation.
One caveat is that we simulate only a mononucleotide, resulting in much quicker dissociation of both the substrate AMP and product m6AMP than would be expected for the longer, canonical RNA substrate/product. To the best of our knowledge, there are no published affinities of AMP and m6AMP for METTL3-14 binding. Based on the mean lifetimes determined from the MD simulations, and assuming diffusion-limited association rates of 109 M-1s-1, the dissociation constants of AMP and m6AMP are ∼2 and ∼78 mM, respectively. In contrast to these low affinities, the long GGACU motif-containing mRNA can interact with the binding groove at the METTL3-14 interface with dissociation constants in the nanomolar range, resulting in a more stable complex.45 Nevertheless, our model is useful as it emphasizes the differences in binding affinity due to the different electrostatic interactions between the SAM-AMP and SAH-m6AMP pairs. Besides the structural stability of the BA2-like pose of AMP, the MD simulations also suggest that AMP can transiently populate a binding mode similar to BA4 (Supplementary Figure S10). This further supports that BA4 could represent an intermediate binding conformation of adenosine.
A polar interaction network stabilizes the BA2 conformation of adenosine in METTL3
The crystal structure of the complex with BA2 reveals a string of ionic interactions which involves charged side chains of METTL3 and the amino and carboxyl groups of the SAM analogue. The string consists of seven charged groups (four of which are positive): R536+ – SAM COO- – SAM NH3+ – D395- – K513+ – E481- – K459+ (see Figure 4A,B). We decided to monitor these salt bridges and the following monopole-dipole interactions in the MD simulations: D395- – AMP-N6, K513+ – AMP-N7, and E481- – AMP-2’OH (see Supplementary Figures S6 to S9). In the BA2 conformation, the polar interactions between AMP and the charged side chains D395 and K513 are stronger than the interaction between E481 and the 2’ hydroxyl group of the ribose (see Supplementary Figure S8, black traces). For SAM, the interaction between its positively charged amine and D395 is more stable than the one between its negatively charged carboxy with R536 which can adopt different conformations (see Supplementary Figure S8, blue traces). The intramolecular salt bridges are also stable throughout the sampling (see Supplementary Figure S8, grey traces). The salt bridge D395- – K513+ seems to be the most stable, while E481- – K459+ seems to change frequently between direct and water-separated contacts. In METTL3 apo trajectories, the D395- – K513+ salt bridge is not present in the initial structure but is formed during the course of the simulation (Supplementary Figure S11). The bond between E481 and K513 is stable but separated by water when SAM and AMP are bound. This contrasts with the METTL3 apo simulations, where this bond forms transiently. The simulations with the products reveal similar interactions except for the faster dissociation of m6AMP (see Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S9). Another difference is the weaker interaction between SAH and D395 which fluctuates more than with SAM. The intramolecular interactions are also observed for the simulations initiated from the BA4 conformation of adenosine (see Supplementary Figures S6 and S7). These MD results validate the mechanistic interpretation of the BA-bound METTL3-14 crystal structures, and give a dynamic view of the behaviour of the complex before (substrate bound) and after (product bound) the methyl transfer reaction.
The flexibility of METTL3 Y406 supports the recruitment of adenosine
In structures of METTL3-14 in the apo state or bound to SAH or SAM, METTL3 residue Y406 is found in different conformations.20–22 One study suggested that Y406 makes a hydrogen bond with S511 in ASL2 and thereby caps the SAH product.22 However, another study suggested that Y406 might be important for the interaction with nucleotide bases.21 The different conformations of Y406 seen in our crystal structures with BA2 and BA4 support the latter and suggest an involvement of the Y406 side chain in RNA nucleotide binding, probably as a first step of RNA recognition (see Figure 4A). Indeed, mutation of Y406 to alanine (in this and a previous study) or a cysteine (in a previous study) abolishes MTase activity (see Figure 4C).21,22
The flexibility of Y406 in the MD simulations was analysed by monitoring the distance between its hydroxyl oxygen atom and the backbone carbonyl oxygen of METTL3 residue W398. There is a water-bridged polar interaction between these two oxygen atoms in the BA4 crystal structure (see Figure 3E). In the MD simulations, Y406 transitions multiple times (on the µs time scale) from orientations far away from the W398 carbonyl oxygen (distance of ∼15 Å) to shorter distances of ∼6 Å (Figure 5A). This corresponds to a transition from the extended ASL1, with Y406 pointing outside the pocket, to a conformation compatible with the water-bridged hydrogen bond observed in the crystal structure with BA4. Figure 5B shows a superposition of frames of a BA2 substrate MD trajectory illustrating this behaviour. We observe that the adenine ring system of AMP can be involved in a π-π interaction with Y406 for several ns before exiting the pocket, and is then captured again later by it, but is not brought back into the pocket (Supplementary Movie S1). The full binding mechanism thus probably requires the rest of the substrate RNA, though the role of Y406 emerges already from the present simulations with the mononucleotide. The different conformations of Y406 reflect different steps in the binding and catalysis reaction. In the METTL3 SAM-bound state, the Y406 side chain is flexible. To bind RNA effectively, Y406 needs to stabilize through the water-bridged polar interaction with the backbone of W398. The substrate adenosine can then bind through selection of this conformation. Additionally, Y406 plays a role in positioning the adenosine molecule at the catalytic site.
SAM binding primes the METTL3 active site for adenosine recognition
Given the high concentration of SAM in the cell (60 to 160 μM in the rat liver), the cosubstrate SAM is expected to bind before the RNA substrate.46 SAM binding results in large conformational changes of several side chains in the METTL3 active site (Figure 6). In the apo state, the K513 side chain points away from the putative RNA binding site and is involved in intramolecular polar contacts with the side chains of Y518, E532, and, via a water molecule, D395, that probably help to stabilize the apo protein (Figure 6A). SAM binding disrupts the water-mediated hydrogen bond between K513 and D395. This leads to a conformational change in the K513 side chain which then points in the direction of the RNA binding site where it can form a direct salt bridge with D395. In that conformation, the K513 side chain can also readily form a hydrogen bond to the adenosine-N7 of an RNA substrate as seen in the BA2 structure (Figure 6B). Furthermore, the side chain of H512, which is part of the SAM binding pocket environment, also undergoes a conformational change upon SAM binding (see Figure 6A). In the apo state, the H512 side chain points inwards and thus blocks the adenosine binding site. However, once SAM is bound, the H512 side chain is attracted to form a π-π interaction with H538 whose side chain rotates from the apo state to interact with SAM in the holo state. This conformational change of the H512 side chain makes space for adenosine to bind as seen in the BA2 structure (see Figure 6B). MD simulations show that the side chains of both H512 and K513 are flexible in the apo state, but undergo stabilization upon SAM and adenosine binding (Supplementary Figures S8, S11, and S12). Together, the conformational switches of the H512 and K513 side chains upon SAM binding can be seen as priming METTL3 for adenosine binding.
BA2 represents a transition state analogue of the METTL3 catalysed reaction
We compared the structure of METTL3-BA2 with the structures of RNA MTases METTL4 and METTL16 bound to their substrates (Figure 7). When the SAM moiety of BA2 is superimposed with SAM bound to METTL4 and METTL16, the adenosine moiety of BA2 is situated in a very similar position as the substrates of the other MTases (Figure 7A). In METTL4 and METTL16, the N6-atom of their substrate adenosine is positioned at a distance of 2.8 and 2.1 Å from the methyl group of SAM, respectively (Figure 7B,C). The angle formed between SAM-5’S – Cε – adenosine-N6 in the substrate-cosubstrate pairs of METTL4 and METTL16 is 162.5° and 175.4°, respectively. In BA2, the adenosine-N6 is situated, through the alkyl chain of the linker, at 1.9 Å away from the carbon corresponding to the Cε-atom of the methionine moiety in the SAM cofactor (Figure 7D). The 1.9 Å distance in the crystal structure with BA2 is similar to the corresponding distance in METTL4 and METTL16, which, in two non-linked moieties, would allow for an SN2 transfer of the methyl group of a METTL3-bound SAM to the N6-atom of an adenosine substrate. Strikingly, the angle formed by the SAM-5’S – Cε – adenosine-N6 in METTL3 is 160.9° which is similar to the other MTases, and very close to the optimal 180° for an SN2 reaction in which the adenosine-N6 attacks the SAM-Cε and SAH becomes the leaving group. Hence, the adenosine of BA2 is in a suitable orientation for methyl transfer and BA2 represents a transition state mimic for METTL3. This is useful atomistic information for setting up QM/MM free energy calculations to study the catalytic reaction (see below).
The METTL3 catalytic pocket supports direct methyl transfer without prior deprotonation
We carried out hybrid quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM47–54) free energy simulations to establish the catalytic mechanism of RNA methylation by the METTL3-14 complex.22,55,56 The crystal structure with the bisubstrate analogue BA2 (see Figure 3C) was used as the starting point for the QM/MM simulations (Figure 8).
In the simplest mechanism (Figure 8A), the methyl cation in the SAM cofactor is transferred directly to the N6 position of the adenosine substrate, prior to the deprotonation of N6H2, which has a very high pKa of ∼17.57 Indeed, DFTB3/MM free energy simulations show that this mechanism is energetically favourable (by about ∼4 kcal/mol) with a barrier of 15-16 kcal/mol (Figure 8B and Supplementary Figure S13 and S14). The catalytic turnover of METTL3-14 as measured by an enzymatic RNA methylation assay is 0.2-0.6 min-1 at ambient temperature which implies a barrier of ∼20 kcal/mol.58–60 Hence, the methyl transfer is not the rate-limiting step. Taken together, the QM/MM and MD simulations suggest that the dissociation of the coproduct SAH and product RNA is likely the rate-limiting step.
Compared to the model reaction in solution computed using a continuum solvation model (Table 3), the reaction in the enzyme is substantially more exoergic, suggesting that the enzyme environment stabilizes the product of the methyl transfer reaction. Inspection of the active site structure based on DFTB3/MM simulations suggests that such stabilization primarily comes from the hydrogen-bonding interactions between the adenosine N6 group and nearby polar groups, in particular the side chain of D395 and the backbone carbonyl of P396 (Figure 8C).
This catalytic mechanism is similar to N6-adenine DNA methyl transferase M·TaqI, in which the adenosine N6 group is hydrogen-bonded to an Asn side chain and backbone carbonyl of a Pro in the protein.61 In the absence of any catalytic base, it was proposed that the methyl transfer occurs first, leading to an m6NH2+ group well stabilized by hydrogen bonding interactions with the Asn side chain and Pro backbone carbonyl. The mechanism was supported by QM/MM free energy simulations with a barrier height of ∼20 kcal/mol.62 On the other hand, the same QM/MM study suggested that when the active site Asn was replaced by an Asp, a mechanism in which deprotonation of the adenine N6 group by the Asp preceded the methyl transfer from SAM also had a comparable free energy barrier. Due to the involvement of the proton transfer, the corresponding transition state exhibited rather different charge distributions from that in the WT M·TaqI. DNA N6-methyltransferases in the α/β groups feature an Asp in the active site, while those in the γ group have an Asn at the equivalent position.63 Hence, the QM/MM computational results suggest that transition states with distinct charge distributions are involved in different groups of enzymes (i.e., α/β vs. γ), giving rise to the opportunity of designing transition state analogues as inhibitors unique to specific classes of methyl transferases.62
This raises the question whether methyl transfer in METTL3-14 may also occur following deprotonation of the adenosine N6H2. The structural features of the METTL3-14 active site do not support this mechanism. The N6 position has a very high pKa of ∼17, and thus its deprotonation requires a particularly strong base, which is absent in the active site of METTL3-14. For example, while there is a carboxylate nearby (D395), it forms a salt-bridge with K513, and therefore is expected to feature a too low pKa value to deprotonate the adenosine N6H2. These considerations are congruent with the observation that the computed DFTB3/MM free energy profile without N 6 deprotonation is possible within the reported experimental kinetics.58,64,65
The difference in the methylation energetics of adenosine in different protonation states shown in Table 3 is consistent with the pKa difference of adenosine before and after methylation. Thus, the large difference suggests that N6 becomes much more acidic following methylation, which is consistent with literature estimates of the pKa values of N6-protonated adenosine derivatives in the range of −3 to −10.66 Close inspection of the active site structure in the product state of DFTB3/MM simulations reveals that the proton release may occur readily through water wires that connect the N6 position to the protein-solvent interface (Figure 9). Therefore, favourable salt-bridges in the active site (e.g., D395-K513) do not have to break to allow the proton release following methylation of the substrate.
Finally, we note that the recently solved crystal structures of METTL4, which belongs to a subclade of MT-A70 family members of MTases, showed an active site very similar to that of METTL3.67 A nearby ion-pair (D233-K364) is engaged in a hydrogen-bonding network involving both the substrate and SAM. Therefore, we expect that the catalytic mechanism discussed here applies also to METTL4 and potentially other MT-A70 family members of MTases.
Complete atomistic model of METTL3 binding site plasticity and methyl transfer mechanism
The complementarity of the methodologies and the congruence of the experimental data and simulation results allow us to construct a model of the METTL3 catalytic reaction (Figure 10). This model shows that in the apo state (Figure 10, State 0), the side chain of K513 is involved in intramolecular interactions that stabilize the protein. SAM binding displaces the K513 side chain and brings it in the right conformation where it can form a hydrogen bond to the N7 of the adenosine substrate (Figure 10, State 1). Space for adenosine to bind is further conditioned by the conformational change of the H512 side chain which blocks the catalytic site in the apo state, but is drawn to interact with H538 in the SAM-bound state. The proper recognition of adenosine is conditioned by the interaction with the aromatic side chain of Y406 to which the adenosine substrate can bind and stabilize the ASL1 loop through interaction in the BA4 conformation (Figure 10, State 2). The Y406 side chain acts as gatekeeper and swaps out to allow the adenosine to flip and slip into the catalytic site where it is stabilized through hydrogen bonds to E481 and K513 in the BA2 conformation (Figure 10, State 3). The bond between K513 and adenosine is especially stable in the MD simulations started from the binding mode of BA2. Hydrogen bonds with the D395 side chain and P396 backbone enhance the nucleophilicity of the adenosine-N6 and trigger the SN2 reaction with the electrophilic methyl group (Figure 10, State 4). The deprotonation of m6NH2+ following the methyl transfer may proceed along multiple water-mediated pathways that lead to the protein-solvent-interface (Figure 10, State 5). The m6A product can then flip and slip back into the BA4 conformation (Figure 10, State 6) before the flexibility of the ASL1 loop then facilitates its release (Figure 10, State 7).
Conclusions
We have conducted a combined experimental and computational study of METTL3-14 to characterize the methyl transfer reaction from SAM to the N6 of adenosine in RNA. Crystal structures of METTL3-14 complexed with bisubstrate analogues were solved and allowed us to carry out classical MD simulations and QM/MM free-energy calculations. The encounter complex between the METTL3-SAM holo complex and RNA is promoted by electrostatic steering of the negatively charged RNA backbone by a surface groove of positively charged electrostatic potential centred around the sulfonium ion of SAM. The crystal structures together with mutational analysis and MD simulations have revealed a key role of Y406 in recruiting the adenosine of the RNA substrate into a catalytically competent position and orientation. The proper recognition of adenosine is conditioned by interaction with the aromatic side chain of Y406 positioned in the flexible active site loop of METTL3. The side chain of Y406 recruits the RNA-adenosine, accommodates it into the catalytic site, and facilitates release after methyl transfer. The adenosine ring forms hydrogen bonds to the side chains of E481 and K513 in the catalytic site. Alanine mutants of these newly identified adenosine binding residues show abolished MTase activity compared to the wild-type METTL3-14. Importantly, these mutants are still folded and able to bind the SAH cofactor. This confirms their contribution to RNA-substrate binding, as shown also by the stability of their hydrogen bonds to adenosine in the MD simulations. Hydrogen bonds with the D395 side chain and P396 backbone enhance the nucleophilicity of the adenosine-N6 and trigger the SN2 reaction with the electrophilic methyl group of SAM. The QM/MM calculations provide evidence that the transfer of the methyl group from SAM to adenosine proceeds without previous deprotonation of the adenosine-N6. Furthermore, the height of the QM/MM free-energy barrier indicates that the methyl transfer step is not rate-determining. MD simulations suggest that the release of the coproduct SAH is the rate-limiting step.
In conclusion, the present study provides evidence that bisubstrate analogues and multiscale atomistic simulations can be used to decipher RNA recognition by human RNA MTases. The multidisciplinary strategy described here can be used for other m6A MTases to probe their active site by adapting the RNA sequence of the BA to the RNA substrate of the MTase of interest.
Materials and Methods
Chemical synthesis of bisubstrate analogues
The synthesis of the bisubstrate analogues was as previously described: BA1/2/3/4/6, ref. 35; Compound 12, ref. 36; GA*, ref. 37.
METTL3-14 expression, purification, and site-directed mutagenesis
For determining the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) with the full-length complex and for crystallization studies with the truncated complex METTL3MTD:METTL14MTD containing just the methyltransferase domains (MTD) of METTL3 (residues 354–580) METTL14 (residues 107–395), the recombinant complex constructs were expressed using the baculovirus/Sf9 insect cell expression system and purified as described previously.22
For mutational analysis, alanine mutants were generated in the baculovirus vector pFastBacDual-StrepII-GFP-TEV-METTL3-His-TEV-METTL14 using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis protocol and confirmed by sequencing. Recombinant baculoviruses were generated using the Bac-to-Bac system. For protein expression, suspension cultures of Sf9 cells in Sf-90 II SFM medium (Thermo Fisher) were infected at a density of 2×106 ml−1. Cells were harvested 72 hours post infection, resuspended in Buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl) supplemented with Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany), phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), Salt Active Nuclease (Merck), and lysed by sonication. The protein complex was purified by Ni-affinity chromatography on a 5 mL HisTrap HP column (Cytiva) equilibrated and washed with Buffer A and eluted with 250 mM imidazole. Proteins were further purified by Strep-tag purification using a 5 mL StrepTrap XT column (Cytiva) equilibrated and washed with buffer A and eluted with 50 mM biotin. The affinity tags were removed by digestion with TEV protease overnight at 4°C, followed by further purification by size exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL column (Cytiva) in 20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, and 200 mM KCl. The proteins were concentrated, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until further use.
Protein crystallization
The SAH (S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine)-bound holo protein crystals of METTL3MTD:METTL14MTD were obtained as previously described.22 The bisubstrate analogues (BAs) were dissolved in DMSO at concentrations of 100 mM. Complex structures were solved by soaking BAs into holo protein crystals and replacing the bound SAH in the METTL3 catalytic pocket. First, 1 μL of the BA dissolved in DMSO was left overnight to evaporate the solvent at room temperature. The next day, 1 μL of mother liquor containing 30% PEG-3350 and 200 mM Mg-acetate was added on top of the dried compound stamp. One holo crystal was then transferred into the mother liquor over the target compound stamp. After 16 h of incubation at 22°C, the crystals were harvested and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen.
Data collection and structure solution
Diffraction data were collected at the PXIII beamline at the Swiss Light Source (SLS) of the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI, Villigen, Switzerland). Data were processed using XDS.68 The crystal structures were solved by molecular replacement by employing the 5L6D structure as the search model in the Phaser program (Phenix package).69 Crystallographic models were constructed through iterative cycles of manual model building with COOT and refinement with Phenix.refine.70–73
Reader-based TR-FRET assay
The inhibitory potencies of the bisubstrate analogues (BAs) for METTL3 were quantified by a homogeneous time resolved fluorescence (HTRF)-based enzyme assay as previously described.41 Briefly, the level of m6A in an RNA substrate after the reaction catalysed by METTL3-14 was quantified by measuring specific binding to the m6A reader domain of YTHDC1 (residues 345-509) by HTRF. BAs that inhibit METTL3 decrease the m6A level and thus reduce the HTRF signal. Dose response curves of titrations with the BAs were plotted in OriginLab 2018 and fitted with nonlinear regression “log(inhibitor) vs. normalized response with variable slope” from which IC50 values were determined.
For the mutational analysis, the HTRF assay was used with some modifications. In the reaction step, METTL3-14 (wildtype or mutant) (40 nM final concentration) methylates the 5′-biotinylated ssRNA (5′-AAGAACCGGACUAAGCU-3′ (Microsynth)) (200 nM final concentration). The co-substrate SAM (Cisbio, 62SAHZLD) (450 nM final concentration) was added as the last component and thus initiated the methylation reaction. The final reaction volume was 15 μL in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.01% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA). The reaction was let to incubate for 1 hour at room temperature (RT) and then stopped by addition of 5 μL detection buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 200 mM KF, 0.05% (w/v) BSA, 25 nM GST-tagged m6A reader YTHDC1(345-509), 3 nM XL665-conjugated streptavidin (Cisbio, 610SAXLB), 1x anti-GST Eu3+-labelled antibody (from 400x stock (Cisbio, 61GSTKLB))). Capture of the m6A-modified RNA by the m6A reader and the biotinylated RNA by Streptavidin was allowed to proceed for 3 hours at RT and in the dark before the HTRF signal was measured using a Tecan Spark plate reader (Tecan). The plate reader recorded with a delay of 100 μs the emission at 620 and 665 nm after the excitation of the HTRF donor with UV light at 320 nm. The emission signal was read over an integration time of 400 μs. The ΔF (((ratiosample -ratiobackground) / ratiobackground) * 100) used as background the reaction without SAM as an internal control.
Differential scanning fluorimetry (thermal shift assay, TSA)
Experiments were conducted as previously described with some modifications.16 Briefly, METTL3-14 (wildtype or mutants) at a final concentration of 0.5 μM was mixed with SAH at a final concentrations of 500 μM in a final volume of 20 μL in a buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, and 200 mM KCl. DMSO concentration was kept at 1 % (v/v). SYPRO Orange was added at a final dilution of 1 : 1000 (v/v) as a fluorescence probe (ex/em 465/590 nm). Differential scanning fluorimetry was performed on a LightCycler® 480 Instrument II (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). The temperature was raised in steps of 3.6°C per minute from 20°C to 85°C and fluorescence readings were taken at each interval. The Tm values were determined as the transition midpoints of the individual samples. The ΔTm values were calculated as the difference between the transition midpoints of the individual samples and the reference wells containing the protein and DMSO only from the same plate. Samples were measured in triplicates.
Molecular Dynamics simulations
The crystal structures of the METTL3-14 heterodimer in complex with the BA2 and BA4 ligands were used as starting conformation for simulating the heterodimer with its substrates SAM and AMP and products SAH and m6AMP. The addition of the phosphate to adenosine and m6-adenosine aims to mimic one element of the substrate RNA chain. The ligands were aligned to their respective moiety of the BA, keeping the original coordinates for present atoms, and reconstructing the missing parts. The missing segments of the METTL3-14 crystal structures were reconstructed using the SWISSMODEL web server with the structures as templates. The simulated construct spans residues L354 to L580 of METTL3 and S104 to L289 of METTL14. All MD simulations were performed with GROMACS 2021.5 using the CHARMM36m July 2021 force field. The models were solvated in a 9 nm box and equilibrated with Na+ and Cl- ions to a concentration of 150 mM. Energy minimization was applied and a canonical equilibration under all-atom positional restraints was performed for 5 ns to reach 300 K. A further canonical equilibration was performed for 10 ns with the Cα atoms of the proteins, the adenine moiety of SAM/SAH and of AMP/m6AMP under positional restraints. These partial restraints were set to allow a relaxation of the side chains around the ligands. Sixteen independent runs of canonical MD simulations were then started for each of the systems, sampling 500 ns per run.
The existence and behaviour of salt bridges observed in the crystals were monitored throughout the runs. Furthermore, the stability of the binding was calculated by defining a binding pocket for the BA2 and the BA4 conformations. The distance between residues was calculated and contacts were defined as a distance smaller than 5 Å. For each of the simulation groups, the binding pocket was determined as the residues with a mean contact presence higher than the 90 percentiles of mean contacts. A dissociation event was defined as the mean of the ligand to pocket distances surpassing a threshold of 10 Å. The dissociation rates were predicted using exponential fitting, modelled as a single exponential. A single exponential with a multiplicative factor was used to check the quality of the fitting, with a preexponential factor close to 1 indicative of a good fit. No fitting was done for SAM/SAH as they remained bound in almost every single trajectory. The rates were calculated by fitting the dissociation time of two blocks of the trajectories at a time. The 16 choose 8 (12870) possible combinations were considered, and the mean of all the values was reported as the dissociation rate in Table 2. The standard deviation was used as error. The unbinding rates using all the trajectories without block averaging are shown in Supplementary Figure S5.
QM model calculations
To understand the intrinsic energetics of the methyl transfer reaction, we conducted QM calculations of an infinitely separated model substrate (adenosine) and a truncated model for the cofactor SAM in which the adenosine and amino moieties were replaced by ethyl groups. The N6 position of the model substrate was taken to be either protonated (-NH2) or deprotonated. Calculations were performed in the gas phase using two different density functional theory (DFT) methods (B3LYP with the D3 dispersion correction74–77 and ωB97XD78) and two different basis sets (aug-cc-pVDZ and aug-cc-pVTZ).79–81 Calculations were also conducted at the DFTB3/3OB level for calibration as the same QM method is used in subsequent QM/MM free energy simulations. To probe the effect of solvation on the methyl transfer energetics, single point calculations were carried out with the conductor-like polarizable continuum model (CPCM82,83) using the gas-phase optimized structures at both B3LYP-D3 and ωB97XD levels. DFT calculations using B3LYP-D3 and ωB97XD were conducted using the Gaussian16 software84, and DFTB385 calculations were carried out using the CHARMM program.86
QM/MM free energy simulations
We employed QM/MM free energy simulations to probe the mechanism of adenosine N6-methylation catalysed by the METTL3-14 complex. As illustrated in Figure 3C, the crystal structure (at 2.3 Å resolution) of the complex with a transition state analogue (the bisubstrate analogue BA2) suggests a rather straightforward mechanism through which the methyl group is transferred from SAM to the adenosine N6 position. The deprotonation of N6 by a nearby base in principle may occur either before or after the methyl transfer, but QM/MM calculations strongly suggest that deprotonation occurs after the methyl transfer.
In the QM/MM simulations, the bisubstrate analogue was first converted to a SAM non-covalently bonded to the adenosine: the nitrogen NBS atom in the crystal structure was replaced by a sulphur atom and the extra carbon atom was deleted. The O5*-PA bond was cut off and a hydrogen atom was patched to the location. The QM region included the cofactor SAM, the model substrate adenosine (Ade), the carbonyl groups of A394, D395, P396, and P397 without the backbone carbonyl group, and the side chain of K513. Link atoms were added between C and Cα of A394 and P397, and between Cβ and Cα of K513 to saturate the valence of the QM boundary atoms using the divided frontier charge (DIV) scheme.87 The QM atoms were treated with the third-order density functional tight binding (DFTB3) method with the 3OB parameter set88,89; benchmark calculations using model compounds (see Table 3) indicate that the DFTB3/3OB method describes the energetics of the methyl transfer reaction rather well in comparison to DFT calculations with a large basis set. The MM region was described with the CHARMM36 force field for proteins.90
In the generalized solvent boundary potential (GSBP91,92) framework, the inner region contained atoms within a 27 Å-radius sphere centred at the N6 in Ade. Newtonian equations of motion were solved for atoms within 25 Å. Protein atoms in the buffer region (25-27 Å) were harmonically restrained with force constants determined from the crystallographic B factors and Langevin equations of motion were solved with a bath temperature of 300 K.93 The remaining portion of the system in the outer region was frozen. All water molecules were subject to a weak geometrical (GEO) type of restraining potential to keep them inside the inner sphere.86 Weak GEO restraints were added on adenosine to make sure it was well-bounded during the simulations. Electrostatic interactions among inner region atoms were treated with extended electrostatics and a group-based cut-off scheme.94 The static field due to the outer region atoms was evaluated with the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) equations using a focusing scheme, which employed a coarse grid of 1.2 Å and a fine grid of 0.4 Å.95 The reaction field matrix was evaluated using spherical harmonics up to the 20th order. In the PB calculations, dielectric constants of the protein and water were set to 1 and 80, respectively, and the salt concentration was set to zero.
To probe the energetics of the methyl transfer reaction catalysed by the METTL3-14 complex, well-tempered multiple-walker metadynamics simulations96,97 were carried out using the PLUMED-CHARMM interface.98,99 The antisymmetric stretch that describes the methyl transfer process between the N6 in adenosine and the SAM sulphur-methyl group was chosen as the collective variable (CV), i.e., ξ = r(CE−SD) − r(CE−N6). The corresponding C-S distance and C-N distance are also monitored but no bias potential was added. SHAKE was applied to all bonds involving hydrogen and used to avoid undesired proton transfer reactions.100
The first two metadynamic runs were not well-tempered for the efficiency of sampling. In the subsequent well-tempered runs, the bias factor was set to be 35. A new Gaussian biasing potential was added every 0.2 ps with an initial height of 0.3 kJ/mol and a width of 0.05. Twenty-four walkers with different initial velocities were used per simulation in parallel while sharing hill history among all walkers every 1 ps. Each walker was run for 250 ps for a total of 6 ns of sampling, and convergence was evaluated by comparing the PMF as a function of the number of Gaussians added.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant of the Swiss National Science Foundation to A.C. (grant number 310030−212195). The MD simulations were carried out at Eiger@Alps at the Swiss National Supercomputing Center (in Lugano, Switzerland). This work was further supported by a grant of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR), Project ARNTools, to M.E.Q. (grant ARNtools-19-CE07-0028-01). The QM/MM study was supported by the NIH Grant R35-GM141930 to Q.C. Computational resources from the project BIO230101 allocated through ACCESS are greatly appreciated; part of the computational work was performed on the Shared Computing Cluster which is administered by Boston University’s Research Computing Services (URL: www.bu.edu/tech/support/research/).
Competing interests
None of the authors declare a competing interest.
Data availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. The coordinates of the METTL3-14-bisubstrate analogue complexes have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession numbers 8PW9 (BA1 complex), 8PW8 (BA2 complex), 8PWA (BA4 complex), 8PWB (BA6 complex). The MD simulation trajectories and the PLUMED file that was used for the DFTB3/MM metadynamics simulations (plumed.dat) are available via Zenodo under the link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10277884.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Figures S1 to S14
Supplementary Table S1
Supplementary Movie S1
Supplementary references
References
- 1MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. 2021 updateNucleic Acids Res 50:D231–D235
- 2Dynamic RNA Modifications in Gene Expression RegulationCell 169:1187–1200
- 3Gene expression regulation mediated through reversible m(6)A RNA methylationNat Rev Genet 15:293–306
- 4Single-nucleotide-resolution mapping of m6A and m6Am throughout the transcriptomeNat Methods 12:767–772
- 5A majority of m6A residues are in the last exons, allowing the potential for 3’ UTR regulationGenes Dev 29:2037–2053
- 6m6A mRNA modifications are deposited in nascent pre-mRNA and are not required for splicing but do specify cytoplasmic turnoverGenes & Development 31:990–1006
- 7The m(6)A-methylase complex and mRNA exportBiochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech 1862:319–328
- 8Molecular Mechanisms Driving mRNA Degradation by m(6)A ModificationTrends Genet 36:177–188
- 9Epitranscriptomic Code and Its Alterations in Human DiseaseTrends Mol Med 24:886–903
- 10A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylationNat Chem Biol 10:93–95
- 11N. m(6)A mRNA Methylation Regulates Human beta-Cell Biology in Physiological States and in Type 2 DiabetesNat Metab 1:765–774
- 12N(6)-Methyladenosine and Viral InfectionFront Microbiol 10
- 13The role of m(6)A RNA methylation in human cancerMol Cancer 18
- 14Promoter-bound METTL3 maintains myeloid leukaemia by m(6)A-dependent translation controlNature 552:126–131
- 15The N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A)-forming enzyme METTL3 controls myeloid differentiation of normal hematopoietic and leukemia cellsNat Med 23:1369–1376
- 16METTL3 Inhibitors for Epitranscriptomic Modulation of Cellular ProcessesChemMedChem 16:3035–3043
- 17Small-molecule inhibition of METTL3 as a strategy against myeloid leukaemiaNature 593:597–601
- 18Roles of METTL3 in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic targetingJ Hematol Oncol 13
- 191,4,9-Triazaspiro[5.5]undecan-2-one Derivatives as Potent and Selective METTL3 InhibitorsJ Med Chem 64:12738–12760
- 20Structural basis of N(6)-adenosine methylation by the METTL3-METTL14 complexNature 534:575–578
- 21Structural Basis for Cooperative Function of Mettl3 and Mettl14 MethyltransferasesMol Cell 63:306–317
- 22Structural insights into the molecular mechanism of the m6A writer complexeLife 5
- 23Recognition of G-quadruplex RNA by a crucial RNA methyltransferase component, METTL14Nucleic Acids Res 50:449–457
- 24Solution structure of the RNA recognition domain of METTL3-METTL14 N(6)-methyladenosine methyltransferaseProtein Cell 10:272–284
- 25Exploration of the Substrate Preference of Lysine Methyltransferase SMYD3 by Molecular Dynamics SimulationsACS Omega 4:19573–19581
- 26Mechanism of the Conformational Change of the Protein Methyltransferase SMYD3: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation StudyInt J Mol Sci 22
- 27Structural insights into the mechanism of human methyltransferase hPRMT4J Biomol Struct Dyn :1–14
- 28Conformational Dynamics, Ligand Binding and Effects of Mutations in NirE an S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine Dependent MethyltransferaseSci Rep 6
- 29Collective motions in proteins: A covariance analysis of atomic fluctuations in molecular dynamics and normal mode simulations. Proteins: StructureFunction, and Bioinformatics 11:205–217
- 30The dynamic conformational landscape of the protein methyltransferase SETD8Elife 8
- 31A molecular dynamics simulation study decodes the Zika virus NS5 methyltransferase bound to SAH and RNA analogueSci Rep 8
- 32Computational Investigation of Structural Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Methyltransferase-Stimulatory Factor Heterodimer nsp16/nsp10 Bound to the Cofactor SAMFront Mol Biosci 7
- 33Structural Basis for Regulation of METTL16, an S-Adenosylmethionine Homeostasis FactorMol Cell 71:1001–1011
- 34Bisubstrate analogues as structural tools to investigate m(6)A methyltransferase active sitesRNA Biol 16:798–808
- 35Synthesis of SAM-Adenosine Conjugates for the Study of m6A-RNA MethyltransferasesEuropean Journal of Organic Chemistry 2018:4411–4425
- 36Synthesis of Triazole-Linked SAM-Adenosine Conjugates: Functionalization of Adenosine at N-1 or N-6 Position without Protecting GroupsMolecules 25
- 37Synthesis of RNA-cofactor conjugates and structural exploration of RNA recognition by an m6A RNA methyltransferaseNucleic Acids Res 50:5793–5806
- 38Synthesis of Bisubstrate Analogues for RNA Methylation Studies using two Transition-Metal-Catalyzed ReactionsChemistry
- 39Structural Chemistry of Human RNA MethyltransferasesACS Chem Biol 11:575–582
- 40Enzymes that catalyse SN2 reaction mechanismsNat Prod Rep 27:900–918
- 41A Reader-Based Assay for m(6)A Writers and ErasersAnal Chem 91:3078–3084
- 42LigPlot+: multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discoveryJ Chem Inf Model 51:2778–2786
- 43Structure-Based Design of Inhibitors of the m6A-RNA Writer Enzyme METTL3ACS Bio & Med Chem Au
- 44Discovery of Small Molecules that Activate RNA Methylation through Cooperative Binding to the METTL3-14-WTAP Complex Active SiteCell Rep 26:3762–3771
- 45RNA binding to human METTL3-METTL14 restricts N(6)-deoxyadenosine methylation of DNA in vitroElife 11
- 46Methionine metabolism in mammals. Distribution of homocysteine between competing pathwaysJournal of Biological Chemistry 259:9508–9513
- 47Theoretical Studies of Enzymic Reactions - Dielectric, Electrostatic and Steric Stabilization of Carbonium-Ion in Reaction of LysozymeJ. Mol. Biol 103:227–249
- 48A Combined Quantum-Mechanical and Molecular Mechanical Potential for Molecular-Dynamics SimulationsJ. Comput. Chem 11:700–733
- 49QM/MM methods for biomolecular systemsAngew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48:1198–1229
- 50Reviews in Computational Chemistry:119–185
- 51Mixed Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Biological Systems in Ground and Electronically Excited StatesChem. Rev 115:6217–6263
- 52The ONIOM Method and Its ApplicationsChem. Rev. 115:5678–5769
- 53QM/MM Free Energy Simulations: Recent Progress and ChallengesMol. Simul 42:1056–1078
- 54Free Energies of Chemical Reactions in Solution and in Enzymes with Ab Initio Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics MethodsAnnu. Rev. Phys. Chem 59:573–601
- 55Readers, writers and erasers of N6-methylated adenosine modificationCurr. Opin. Struc. Biol 47:67–76
- 56A comprehensive review of m6A/m6Am RNA methyltransferase structuresNuc. Acids Res 49:7239–7255
- 57Alternations of nucleobase pKa values upon metal coordination: origins and consequencesProg. Inorg. Chem 54:385–447
- 58A Mass Spectrometric Assay of METTL3/METTL14 Methyltransferase ActivitySLAS Discov 25:361–371
- 59How Enzymes Work: Analysis by Modern Rate Theory and Computer SimulationsScience 303:186–195
- 60Taking Ockham’s razor to enzyme dynamics and catalysisNat Chem 4:169–176
- 61Structure of the N6-adenine DNA methyltransferase M•TaqI in complex with DNA and a cofactor analogNature Structural Biology 8:121–125
- 62Dynamics and reactivity in Thermus aquaticus N6-adenine methyltransferaseJ Am Chem Soc 136:16227–16239
- 63Structure-guided Analysis Reveals Nine Sequence Motifs Conserved among DNA Amino-methyl-transferases, and Suggests a Catalytic Mechanism for these EnzymesJournal of Molecular Biology 253:618–632
- 64Human MettL3-MettL14 complex is a sequence-specific DNA adenine methyltransferase active on single-strand and unpaired DNA in vitroCell Discov 5
- 65High-Throughput-Methyl-Reading (HTMR) assay: a solution based on nucleotide methyl-binding proteins enables large-scale screening for DNA/RNA methyltransferases and demethylasesNucleic Acids Res 50
- 66Amino Proton Exchange Processes in MononucleosidesJournal of the American Chemical Society 119:1108–1115
- 67Structural insights into molecular mechanism for N(6)-adenosine methylation by MT-A70 family methyltransferase METTL4Nat Commun 13
- 68Kabsch, W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 125–132 (2010).Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:125–132
- 69Phaser crystallographic softwareJ Appl Crystallogr 40:658–674
- 70Features and development of CootActa Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:486–501
- 71Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refineActa Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 68:352–367
- 72Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in PhenixActa Crystallogr D Struct Biol 75:861–877
- 73Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphicsActa Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60:2126–2132
- 74Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behaviorPhysical Review A 38:3098–3100
- 75Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchangeThe Journal of Chemical Physics 98:5648–5652
- 76Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron densityPhysical Review B 37:785–789
- 77A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-PuThe Journal of Chemical Physics 132
- 78Systematic optimization of long-range corrected hybrid density functionalsThe Journal of Chemical Physics 128
- 79Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculationsI. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. The Journal of Chemical Physics 90:1007–1023
- 80Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functionsThe Journal of Chemical Physics 96:6796–6806
- 81Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculationsIII. The atoms aluminum through argon. The Journal of Chemical Physics 98:1358–1371
- 82Quantum Calculation of Molecular Energies and Energy Gradients in Solution by a Conductor Solvent ModelThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A 102:1995–2001
- 83Energies, structures, and electronic properties of molecules in solution with the C-PCM solvation modelJournal of Computational Chemistry 24:669–681
- 84Gaussian 16 Rev. C.01 (Wallingford, CT, 2016).
- 85DFTB3: Extension of the Self-Consistent-Charge Density-Functional Tight-Binding Method (SCC-DFTB)Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 7:931–948
- 86CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation programJournal of Computational Chemistry 30:1545–1614
- 87A Critical Evaluation of Different QM/MM Frontier Treatments with SCC-DFTB as the QM MethodThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109:9082–9095
- 88Parametrization and Benchmark of DFTB3 for Organic MoleculesJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation 9:338–354
- 89Parameterization of DFTB3/3OB for Sulfur and Phosphorus for chemical and biological applicationsJ. Chem. Theory Comput 10:1518–1537
- 90CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR dataJ. Comput. Chem 34:2135–2145
- 91Generalized solvent boundary potential for computer simulationsJ. Chem. Phys 114:2924–2937
- 92Reliable treatment of electrostatics in combined QM/MM simulation of macromoleculesJ. Chem. Phys 123
- 93Deformable stochastic boundaries in molecular dynamicsThe Journal of Chemical Physics 79:6312–6325
- 94On the Treatment of Electrostatic Interactions in Biomolecular SimulationsAIP Conference Proceedings 239:117–117
- 95Continuum solvation model: Computation of electrostatic forces from numerical solutions to the Poisson-Boltzmann equationComputer Physics Communications 111:59–75
- 96Enhancing Important Fluctuations: Rare Events and Metadynamics from a Conceptual ViewpointAnnual Review of Physical Chemistry 67:159–184
- 97Well-Tempered Metadynamics: A Smoothly Converging and Tunable Free-Energy MethodPhysical Review Letters 100
- 98PLUMED: A portable plugin for free-energy calculations with molecular dynamicsComputer Physics Communications 180:1961–1972
- 99The, P. c. Promoting transparency and reproducibility in enhanced molecular simulationsNature Methods 16:670–673
- 100Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanesJournal of Computational Physics 23:327–341
Article and author information
Author information
Version history
- Preprint posted:
- Sent for peer review:
- Reviewed Preprint version 1:
- Reviewed Preprint version 2:
- Version of Record published:
Copyright
© 2023, Corbeski et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
- views
- 1,648
- downloads
- 190
- citations
- 3
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.