Peer review process
Not revised: This Reviewed Preprint includes the authors’ original preprint (without revision), an eLife assessment, and public reviews.
Read more about eLife’s peer review process.Editors
- Reviewing EditorBamidele OwoyeleUniversity of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria
- Senior EditorMichael TaffeUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States of America
Reviewer #1 (Public Review):
Summary:
In this study the authors demonstrated that ablation of astrocytes in lumbar spinal cord not only reduced neuropathic pain but also caused microglia activation. Furthermore, RNA sequencing and bioinformatics revealed an activation of STING/type I IFNs signal pathway in spinal cord microglia after astrocyte ablation.
Strengths:
The findings are novel and interesting and provide new insights into astrocyte-microglia interaction in neuropathic pain. This study may also offer a new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of debilitating neuropathic pain in patients with SCI.
Weaknesses:
More details are needed to justify the sample size, statistics, and sex of animals.
Reviewer #2 (Public Review):
Summary:
In the manuscript, Zhao et al. have carried out a thorough examination of the effects of targeted ablation of resident astrocytes on behavior, cellular responses, and gene expression after spinal cord injury. Employing transgenic mice models alongside pharmacogenetic techniques, the authors have successfully achieved the selective removal of these resident astrocytes. This intervention led to a notable reduction in neuropathic pain and induced a shift in microglial cell reactivation states within the spinal cord, significantly altering transcriptome profiles predominantly associated with interferon (IFN) signaling pathways.
Strengths:
The findings presented add considerable value to the current understanding of the role of astrocyte elimination in neuropathic pain, offering convincing evidence that supports existing hypotheses and valuable insights into the interactions between astrocytes and microglial cells, likely through IFN-mediated mechanisms. This contribution is highly relevant and suggests that further exploration in this direction could yield meaningful results.
Weaknesses:
The methodology and evidence underpinning the study are solid, yet some areas would benefit from further clarification, particularly concerning methodological details and the choice of statistical analyses. Additionally, the manuscript's organization and clarity could be improved, as certain figures and schematics appear inconsistent or misleading.
