Human myogenic progenitor cells display tenogenic differentiation potential and facilitate tendon regeneration

Xiexiang Shao; Xingzuan Lin; Hao Zhou; Lili Han; Xin Fu; Sheng Li; Siyuan Zhu; Shenao Zhou; Jianhua Wang; Ping Hu

doi:10.7554/eLife.98636.1

eLife assessment

The authors made an important finding that CD29+/CD56+ progenitor cells isolated from human muscles have the potential to differentiate to tendons in vitro and in vivo. The author's approach to testing the tenogenesis of the CD29+/CD56+ progenitors is solid, and the conclusion is supported by enough evidence with minor flaws. This work will be of interest to the population who need tendon regeneration from their injury.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.98636.1.sa4

Significance of findings

important: Findings that have theoretical or practical implications beyond a single subfield

landmark
fundamental
important
valuable
useful

Strength of evidence

solid: Methods, data and analyses broadly support the claims with only minor weaknesses

exceptional
compelling
convincing
solid
incomplete
inadequate

During the peer-review process the editor and reviewers write an eLife assessment that summarises the significance of the findings reported in the article (on a scale ranging from landmark to useful) and the strength of the evidence (on a scale ranging from exceptional to inadequate). Learn more about eLife assessments

Abstract

Tendon injury occurs at high frequency and is difficult to repair. Identification of human stem cells being able to regenerate tendon will greatly facilitate the development of regenerative medicine for tendon injury. We identified CD29+/CD56+ human muscle stem/progenitor cells having tendon differentiation potential both in vitro and in vivo. Transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells contributes to injured tendon repair and thus improves locomotor function. Interestingly, the tendon differentiation potential in mouse muscle stem cells is minimal and the higher TGFβ signaling level in human myogenic progenitor cells may be the key for the distinct feature of human myogenic progenitor cells. These findings reveal that CD29+/CD56+ human muscle stem/progenitor cells are bi-potential adult stem cells and can serve as a new source for tendon regeneration.

Introduction

Skeletal muscle is a tissue with great regeneration ability due to the existence of muscle stem cells (MuSCs). MuSCs are adult stem cells located at the periphery of myofibers between the basal lamina and the plasmalemma of the myofibers and responsible for muscle regeneration^1,2. MuSCs have been considered to be unipotent stem cells to have a sole differentiation potential to myofibers³. MuSCs undergo expansion and differentiate to multinuclei myofibers after injury in vivo. MuSCs have remarkable abilities to support muscle regeneration. After transplantation, the engrafted mouse MuSCs go through active expansion and regenerate myofibers⁴. Isolation by FACS and expansion of MuSCs have been reported from several species including mouse, pig, and human^5,6. Single cell sequencing analysis from human skeletal muscles have also revealed the existence of Pax7+ MuSCs^6,7. Due to the different motion patterns, the regeneration capacity may be different between human and rodents. Current investigations have suggested that human myogenic progenitor cells didn’t share same markers as that in mice⁸, and the expression pattern of oxidative enzymes and cytokines between these two species are also different⁹, suggesting that human muscle progenitor cells may have distinct features from mice.

FACS method to isolate cells with myogenic differentiation potential from human muscle biopsies has been established. CD56 (NCAM)+ and CD56+ CD29+ cells from skeletal muscle display myogenic differentiation potential^9,10,11,12. The CD56+ CD34+ progenitor cells isolated from human skeletal muscle biopsies have been reported to have chondrogenic, adipogenic, and osteogenic potentials besides myogenic potential^13–15. CD56+CD34-progenitor cells are free of adipogenic potential¹¹. The differentiation potential of human muscle progenitor cells remains to be further explored.

Skeletal muscle directly connects to tendons which is responsible for transmitting forces from skeletal muscle to bone to generate active movement. Tendinopathy affects more than 10% of the population under 45 and compromises the tendon functions^16,17. Tendon injury healing is slow and incomplete due to the low number of cells in tendon and the hypovascular and anaerobic environment^18,19. Tendon stem/progenitor cells (TDSCs) are a cell population derived from tendon and considered to be a subgroup of mesenchymal stem cells that have abilities to improve tendon injury healing^20,21. However, the number of TDSCs in tendon is low and retrieving TDSCs is invasive and exacerbates tendon injury. Morphology and proliferation ability loss in the culture system also hampers the efforts to obtain sufficient amounts of active TDSCs. To find more cell types supporting tendon regeneration will facilitate the development of regenerative medicine to treat tendon injury.

The activity of tenogenesis is tightly regulated by many signaling pathways, while TGFβ/SMAD2/3 is a crucial molecular axis²². TGFβ signaling is indispensable for tendon development²³, and it could systematically promote the tenogenic differentiation of stem cells^24,25. The downstream effectors SMAD2 and SMAD3 are able to activate the transcription of tendon-specific genes which further facilitates tendon development and tenogenic differentiation^22,26,27. After tendon injury, TGFβ/SMAD2/3 promotes the proliferation, migration and differentiation of TDSCs²⁸, increases tendon collagen synthesis²⁹, and contributes to matrix anabolism for tendon remodeling³⁰.

Here we found that CD56+ CD29+ human myogenic progenitor cells can be differentiated to tendon cells both in vitro and in vivo. Transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells to injured tendon in mice improved the tendon regeneration, suggesting that human muscle myogenic progenitor cells are bipotential adult stem cells. Interestingly, the tendon differentiation potential in mouse muscle stem cells is minimal and the higher TGFβ signaling level in human myogenic progenitor cells may be the key for the distinct feature of human myogenic progenitor cells.

Results

Potential tenogenic differentiation potential of myogenic progenitor cells identified by single cell sequencing

To analyze the cell components of human skeletal muscle, single cell sequencing analysis was performed using skeletal muscle biopsy. A total of 15,102 cells were included for analysis. The cells were grouped to 8 cell populations (Fig. 1a and b). Consistent with the previous single cell sequencing results from human muscles³¹, Fibro/Adipogenic progenitors (FAPs), endothelial cells, muscle cells, and myogenic progenitor cells were among the identified cell types (Fig. 1a and b).

Potential tendon differentiation ability of human myogenic progenitor cells
a. UMAP plot of all cells colored by cell types.
b. fDot blot of representative genes in each cell type.
c. Pseudotime trajectory inference of muscle progenitor cells, tenocytes and muscle cells. Different celltypes were annotated.
d. Heatmap showing the different expression levels of specific markers during the trajectory.
e. RNA FISH of PAX7 and SCX in human skeletal muscle section. Scale bars, 10μm.
f. Statistical analysis of the percentage of PAX7+ or SCX+ cells by RNA FISH in human skeletal muscle section. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5).
g. Immunofluorescence staining of PAX7, MYOD1 and MYF5 in primary human myogenic progenitor cells. Scale bars, 100µm.
h. Statistical analysis of the percentage of PAX7+, MYOD1+ and MYF5+ cells in the isolated myogenic progenitor cells. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5).
i. Immunofluorescence staining of MyHC in myotubes differentiated from human myogenic progenitor cells. Primary human myogenic progenitor cells were isolated and differentiated to myotubes for 5 days followed by MyHC immunofluorescence staining. Scale bars, 100 µm.
j. Statistical analysis of the percentage of the percentage of nuclei in MyHC+ myotubes after differentiation of the myogenic progenitor cells. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5).
k. Relative expression level of PAX7, MYF5, and MYOD1 in human myogenic progenitor cells and differentiated myotubes. RT-qPCR assays were performed with human myogenic progenitor cells. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=3). *** indicated p<0.001.
l. Relative expression level of MYOG, MYH1, and MYH3 in human myogenic progenitor cells and differentiated myotubes. RT-qPCR assays were performed with human muscle myogenic progenitor cells after myogenic differentiation. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=3). *** indicated p<0.001.

A population of tenocytes was identified in human muscle biopsies (Fig. 1a and b). Surprisingly, when we performed unsupervised trajectory analysis using the single cell sequencing data, two branches were identified by the analysis (Fig. 1c and d), while one branch linked muscle progenitor cells and tenocytes (Fig. 1c and d). RNA FISH of skeletal muscle section revealed that SCX, a key transcription factor determining tendon lineage, could be expressed in muscle stem/progenitor cells (Fig. 1e and f). These analysis results suggest that muscle stem cells could have tenocyte differentiation potential.

To confirm the single cell analysis results, we first isolated myogenic progenitor cells from human muscle biopsy using FACS as described previously^6,12. CD45-CD31-CD56+ CD29+ cells were collected from the single cell suspension dissociated from muscle tissue. The collected cells were stained with anti-PAX7, anti-MYOD1 and anti-MYF5 antibody to confirm the purity of isolated myogenic progenitor cells (Fig. 1g and h). When induced to differentiate by 0.4% Ultroser G, human myogenic progenitor cells differentiate to myotubes robustly. Approximately 90% of nuclei were present in Myosin heavy chain (MyHC) positive myotubes (Fig. 1i and j). Consistently, the expression of PAX7, MYF5 and MYOD1 were enriched in the myogenic progenitor cells, their expression decreased after differentiation as shown by RT-qPCR assays (Fig. 1k). In contrast, the expression of genes marking differentiation such as Myogenin (MYOG), Myosin heavy chain 1 (MYH1), and Myosin heavy chain 3 (MYH3) were up-regulated in differentiated myotubes (Fig. 1l). Taken together, these results suggest that the myogenic progenitor cells isolated from human muscle biopsies have robust myogenic differentiation potential.

Human myogenic progenitor cells display tenogenic differentiation potential in vitro

The isolated primary human myogenic progenitor cells were induced to differentiate to tenocytes by 100ng/ml GDF5, 100ng/ml GDF7 and 0.2mM ascorbic acid for 12 days. After 12 days of tendon differentiation, the morphology of cells display dramatic differences from those undergoing myogenic differentiation (SFig. 1a). Furthermore, the expression of tendon markers such as TNC and SCX was significantly increased (Fig. 2a, b, and c). Moreover, some other tendon related genes, such as COL I, MKX, THBS4, and COMP, were also enriched after tendon differentiation induction (Fig. 2c). In contrast, the expression of these genes was not enriched upon myogenic induction (Fig. 2a, b, and c). The expression of genes marking myogenic differentiation such as MYOG and MyHC were only detected in a small portion of cells after tenogenic differentiation (SFig. 1b and c). Compared to the over 90% of differentiation efficiency upon myogenic differentiation induction, only about 20% of cells showed MYOG and MyHC expression after 12 days of tenogenic induction (SFig. 1b and c). The genes marking differentiated myotubes such as MYH1, MYH3, DESMIN, and MYL1 showed moderate elevation after tenogenic differentiation, while dramatic upregulation of these genes was observed after myogenic differentiation (SFig. 1d and e). These results combined suggest that human myogenic progenitor cells are capable of tendon differentiation in vitro.

Human myogenic progenitor cells display tendon differentiation ability in vitro
a. Immunofluorescence staining of tendon marker TNC and SCX in human myogenic progenitor cells induced for myogenic and tenogenic differentiation, respectively. Scale bars, 100 µm.
b. Quantification of TNC and SCX fluorescent intensity in human myogenic progenitor cells undergone myogenic and tenogenic differentiation, respectively. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5).
c. Relative expression levels of genes enriched in tendon cells. RT-qPCR assays were performed with human myogenic progenitor cells upon myogenic and tenogenic differentiation, respectively. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=3). *** indicated p<0.001.
d. Scheme of clonal proliferation and differentiation assay.
e. Representative immunofluorescence staining images of MyHC as the marker for successful myogenic differentiation. Scale bars, 100 µm.
f. Representative immunofluorescence staining images of SCX as the marker for successful tenogenic differentiation. Scale bars, 100 µm.
g. Statistical analysis of the myogenic and tenogenic differentiation efficiency of human myogenic progenitor cells. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5).

To further confirm the results, we next performed clonal analysis. The freshly isolated primary human myogenic progenitor cells were seeded to 96 well plate with the concentration of 1 cell/well. The wells of single cell were allowed to proliferate for 10 days followed by tenogenic or myogenic induction. The plates with myogenic induction were differentiated for 4 days and immunofluorescence staining of MyHC was performed to determine muscle differentiation. The plates with tenogenic induction were differentiated for 12 days and immunofluorescence staining of SCX was performed to determine tenocyte differentiation (Fig. 2d). The number of wells showing positive MyHC staining was counted and the myogenic differentiation efficiency was calculated (Fig. 2e and g). MyHC+ myotubes was observed in over 95% of wells with alive cells (Fig. 2g). Similarly, the number of wells displaying positive SCX staining was counted and the tenogenic differentiation efficiency was calculated (Fig. 2f and g). Approximately 40% of myogenic progenitor cells displayed tenogenic differentiation ability (Fig. 2g), suggesting that human myogenic progenitor cells have tenogenic differentiation potential. Taken together, these results suggest that human myogenic progenitor cells have dual differentiation potentials towards muscle or tendon in vitro.

Tenocytes differentiated from human myogenic progenitor cells display similar expression profile to primary tenocytes

RNA sequencing was then performed to further determine the lineage of the tenocytes differentiated from myogenic progenitor cells. Myogenic progenitor cells were induced towards myogenic or tenogenic differentiation respectively. We also isolated primary human tenocytes as described previously³². These cells were subjected for RNA sequencing analysis. The differentiated myotubes and tenocytes displayed distinct expression patterns (Fig. 3a). The differentiated tendon cells share high similarity to fresh isolated tenocytes from human tendons (Fig. 3a), suggesting that human muscle stem/progenitor cells are capable of tendon differentiation. Consistently, two distinct sets of genes were up-regulated after myogenic induction and tenogenic induction, respectively (Fig. 3b and c). These results suggest that human myogenic progenitor cells are capable of dual direction differentiation

Human myogenic progenitor cells have tendon differentiation potential
a. Heat map of gene expression profiles of human myogenic progenitor cells, human muscle myogenic progenitor cells after myogenic differentiation, human myogenic progenitor cells after tenogenic differentiation, and primary tenocytes.
b.cVolcano plot of genes enriched in myogenic differentiation of human myogenic progenitor cells.
c. Volcano plot of genes enriched in tenogenic differentiation of human myogenic progenitor cells.
d. Bubble chart of GO analysis of cellular process up-regulated in myogenic differentiation of human myogenic progenitor cells.
e. Bubble chart of GO analysis of cellular process up-regulated in tenogenic differentiation of human myogenic progenitor cells.

Further GO analysis also displayed the activation of two distinct sets of cell features. Upon the skeletal muscle differentiation induction, terms related to skeletal muscle functions such as skeletal muscle thin filament assembly, skeletal muscle contraction, muscle organ development, and sarcomere organization were enriched (Fig. 3d), suggesting the muscular identity of the differentiated cells. In contrast, terms related to tendon formation, tendon development, and tendon cell differentiation were enriched after tenogenic differentiation (Fig. 3e), suggesting that tendon identity is achieved in the differentiated cells. Together, these results suggest that human myogenic progenitor cells are capable of both myogenic and tenogenic differentiation in vitro.

Murine MuSCs display poor tenogenic differentiation ability

We next investigated whether the tenogenic differentiation ability is present in rodent muscle stem cells (MuSCs). Mouse MuSCs were isolated by positive marker of Vcam1 as described previously⁶ and induced for tenogenic differentiation. In sharp contrast to human myogenic progenitor cells, murine MuSCs failed to be induced to tendon cells upon the same induction condition as that for human myogenic progenitor cells, though the myogenic differentiation is as efficient as the human myogenic progenitor cells. After myogenic differentiation, 93.9% of nuclei were present in MyHC+ myotubes (Fig. 4a and b). In sharp contrast, no Scx+ cells were observed after 12 days of induction for tenogenic differentiation (Fig. 4a). Consistent with the immunofluorescence staining results, RT-qPCR results revealed that myogenic differentiation marker genes such as MyoG, Myh1, and Myh3 were up-regulated under both myogenic and tenogenic differentiation conditions (Fig. 4c), suggesting that murine MuSCs predominantly commit myogenic differentiation under induction. Different from human myogenic progenitor cells, the expression of genes indicating tendon cell fate such as Scx, Tnc, Col I, Mkx, and Thbs4 did not increase after tenogenic differentiation (Fig. 4d), suggesting the failure to induce tenogenic cell fate from murine MuSCs. To further rule out the bias caused by different FACs strategies between human and mouse myogenic progenitor cells, mouse muscle CD29+/CD56+ cells were isolated for tenogenic induction. However, very few mouse muscle CD29+/CD56+ cells expressed myogenic progenitor cell marker Pax7, MyoD1 and Vcam1, indicating the failure strategy to purify mouse myogenic progenitor cells by gating CD29+/CD56+ (SFig. 2a and 2b). Furthermore, RT-qPCR results of tendon related markers Scx, Tnc, Mkx, and Thbs4 revealed that there was also no tenogenic or myogenic differentiation potential of mouse muscle CD29+/CD56+ cells (SFig. 2c). Together, these results suggest that murine MuSCs display almost no tenogenic differentiation potential in vitro.

We next performed the lineage tracing experiments in mice to further examine the tenogenic potential of mouse MuSCs in vivo (Fig. 4e). Pax7CreERT2 mice were crossed to flox-Stop-flox-tdTomato mice. MuSCs and the descendants of MuSCs will be labeled by tdTomato (SFig. 2d). Tendon injury in mice was generated by mimicking the peroneus longus tendon removal surgery in human (SFig. 2e). In human, it has been reported that the tendon could be regenerated to some extent after the peroneus longus tendon removal surgery based on MRI imaging³³. In this surgery, injury of the skeletal muscle adjacent to the removed tendon was inevitable. The accompanied skeletal muscle injury could activate MuSCs and make them available for tendon regeneration. To further activate MuSCs to guarantee that sufficient amount of activated MuSCs were available around the tendon injury site, we also injected cardiotoxin (CTX) at the muscle adjacent to the sites where the tendon was removed to induce more muscle injuries and further activate MuSCs. If MuSCs can participate tendon regeneration, tdTomato+ tendon cells would be observed after the reparation of tendon injury. As a control, muscle injury was induced by muscular injection of CTX at the muscles adjacent to the removed tendon.

Expectedly, large amount of tdTomato+ myofibers were observed after muscle injury (SFig. 2f-g), suggesting that the tracing system works well. Nevertheless, less than 0.2% tendon cells originated from mouse MuSCs were observed even four months after tendon removal (Fig. 4f-g). These results suggest that murine MuSCs have poor tendon differentiation abilities.

Transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells facilitates tendon regeneration

We next went on to investigate whether the transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells to mouse can improve tendon regeneration. An approximately 1.5mm long and 0.5mm width transverse incision was performed at 5mm from the calcaneus in Achilles tendon for NOD/SCID immunodeficient mice. Total 50,000 Pax7+ human myogenic progenitor cells packed in hydrogel were planted at the incision site (Fig. 5a). As a control, 50,000 murine MuSCs packed in hydrogel were transplanted in the SCID recipient mice undergoing the same tendon injury at the cleavage sites. Packing the cells with hydrogel concentrated the transplanted cells at the local injury sites. Two months after transplantation, the tendons carrying transplanted human myogenic progenitor cells or murine MuSCs were harvested, respectively (Fig. 5a).

In mice transplanted with human myogenic progenitor cells, continuous cryosections containing muscle and tendon tissues were generated. Immunofluorescence staining was performed to detect tendon and muscle markers with two cryosections adjacent to each other, respectively. The two sets of images obtained on continuous cryosections were superimposed on each other to pinpoint the position of tendons. Immunofluorescence staining of antibody specifically recognizing human TNC indicated the position of regenerated tendon-like tissue from human cells in the harvested tissues (Fig. 5b). The presence of human cells was also illustrated by the immunofluorescence staining with the antibody specifically recognizing human Lamin A/C. In the control PBS injection group, where the mixture of PBS and hydrogel instead human myogenic progenitor cells was injected to the incision sites, no human Lamin A/C was detected. These results confirmed the specificity of human TNC and Lamin A/C antibody. Immunofluorescence staining revealed that over 75% of the human cells showed TNC expression (Fig. 5b and d), suggesting that the majority of the transplanted human myogenic progenitor cells differentiate to tendon cells in vivo. The immunofluorescence staining of MyHC and human Lamin A/C was performed to detect the muscle cells originated from the transplanted human myogenic progenitor cells. Only about 12.8% of the human cells detected expressed MyHC (Fig. 5c and d). Moreover, the human cells were predominantly enriched at the tendon region (Fig. 5b). Only a few MyHC+ cells originated from the transplanted human myogenic cells scattered in the muscle region (Fig. 5c). To further confirm the tendon differentiation potential of the transplanted human myogenic progenitor cells, immunofluorescence staining of SCX and TNMD was also performed. The majority (80.0% and 74.6%) of transplanted human myogenic progenitor cells also express SCX and TNMD (SFig. 3a, b and c). Furthermore, Col I was predominantly expressed in the regenerated tendon-like tissue rather than Col III after human cells transplantation (Fig. 5e), indicating human myogenic progenitor cells contributes to structural repair of injured tendon and facilitates the healing process. Taken together, these results suggest that human myogenic progenitor cells are capable of tendon differentiation in vivo and contributing to tendon regeneration.

In sharp contrast to human myogenic progenitor cells, when 50,000 murine MuSCs constitutively expressing tdTomato were transplanted to pre-injured tendon in NOD/SCID mice under the same condition, less than 0.3% of tdTomato+ TNC+ cells were detected (Fig. 5f and g). However, the myogenic differentiation potential of human myogenic progenitor cells and mouse MuSCs was similar. Muscle injury was induced by muscular injection of CTX in tibialis anterior (TA) muscle in NOD/SCID mice. TA muscles were irradiated to kill the local MuSCs as described previously³⁴. Transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells and mouse MuSCs to the irradiated pre-injured recipient mice was performed, respectively. TA muscles were harvested after 28 days. Transplantation of both human myogenic progenitor cells and murine MuSC displayed robust engraftment efficiency (SFig. 3d-i). These results suggest that human myogenic progenitor cells and murine MuSCs have similar myogenic differentiation potential.

Combined, the above results suggest that human myogenic progenitor cells have dual differentiation potentials towards myogenesis or tenogenesis in vivo, while murine MuSCs predominantly commit myogenesis.

Transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells improves locomotor function after tendon injury

We next checked whether the human myogenic progenitor cell transplantation improves tendon functions. First, transmission electron microscope analysis was used to evaluate microstructure of injured tendon two months after transplantation. Larger and denser collagen fibrils of the tendons were identified in transplanted group than control group with PBS injection, although the maturation level of collagen fibrils could still not reach uninjured tendon (Fig. 6a and b). We next examined whether transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells could improve the biomechanical property of tendon. The max failure load and stiffness of the tendons from the transplantation group were significantly better than PBS injection control group (Fig. 6c). These results combined suggest that transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells improves the collagen fibril maturation and biomechanical property of the injured tendon.

Transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells improves the locomotor function after tendon injury
a. TEM images of collagen fibrils in the injured tendon with PBS injection, injured tendon with human myogenic progenitor cell transplantation, and uninjured tendon. Scale bars, 500nm.
b. Statistical analysis of the collagen fibril diameter and percentage of collagen fibril area for the injured tendon with PBS injection, injured tendon with human myogenic progenitor cell transplantation, and uninjured tendon. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5). * indicated p<0.05, *** indicated p<0.001.
c. Statistical analysis of the max load and stiffness of the injured tendon with PBS injection, injured tendon with human myogenic progenitor cell transplantation, and uninjured tendon. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5). * indicated p<0.05, ** indicated p<0.01, *** indicated p<0.001.
d. Twitch and tetanus plantarflexion force of the involved limb with PBS injection after tendon injury, human myogenic progenitor cell transplantation after tendon injury, and uninjured tendon. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5). * indicated p<0.05, ** indicated p<0.01, *** indicated p<0.001.
e. The treadmill exercise for tendon injured mice with or without human myogenic progenitor cell transplantation. The endurance time and max fatigue speed were compared. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=4). * indicated p<0.05, ** indicated p<0.01, ***indicated p<0.001 and n.s. indicated p>0.05.

Whether the improved tendon regeneration could facilitate the whole organism locomotor function was next investigated. Since the Achilles tendon transmits the plantarflexion force from gastrocnemius muscle to calcaneus, the plantarflexion force of involved leg was also performed two months after tendon injury. Expectedly, transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells for injured tendon also contributed to improving both twitch and tetanus plantarflexion force when compared with PBS injection control group, although the plantarflexion force could still not reach to level of uninjured leg (Fig. 6d). Consistent with the improved plantarflexion force, the endurance time and max fatigue speed of the mice transplanted with human myogenic progenitor cells was better in treadmill test when compared to no transplantation group (Fig. 6e). Since immunofluorescence staining with human Lamin A/C revealed that only a small number of human myogenic progenitor cells engrafted in muscle sporadically (Fig. 5c and d), these results suggest that the transplanted human myogenic progenitor cells can improve locomotor function by directly repairing injured tendon.

TGFβ signaling pathway contributes to tenogenic differentiation of human myogenic progenitor cells

Since the human myogenic progenitor cells and murine MuSCs shared the same strain of recipient mice and the same tendon injury while being transplanted, they had the similar microenvironment. Therefore, the distinct differentiation potentials are due to the cell intrinsic differences between species. We further compared the expression profiles of human myogenic progenitor cells and murine MuSCs. Interestingly, TGFβ signaling were identified in KEGG enrichment analysis of upregulated genes in human myogenic progenitor cells when compared with mouse muscle stem cells (Fig. 7a), indicating that TGFβ signaling could be the key node for maintaining the tendon differentiation potential. Furthermore, SMAD2 and SMAD3 were identified in upregulated gene set which was enriched in TGFβ signaling pathway (Fig. 7b). Since TGFβ/SMAD2/SMAD3 axis plays a crucial role in tendon development and tenogenic differentiation^22,23,26, we next investigated the potential function of TGFβ signaling for tenogenic differentiation of human myogenic progenitor cells. Consistently, increased phosphorylated SMAD2/SMAD3 was confirmed after tenogenic induction of human myogenic progenitor cells (Fig. 7c). TGFβ signaling inhibitor SB-431542 was used to significantly impaired TGFβ/SMAD2/SMAD3 signaling during tenogenic induction (Fig. 7c). The immunofluorescent staining, western blot assay and RT-qPCR results showed SB-431542 significantly suppressed expression level of tendon related genes SCX, TNC, COL I, MKX, and THBS4 (Fig. 7d, e, f). On the contrary, myogenic differentiation ability of human myogenic progenitor cells was increased after treatment of SB-431542 during tenogenic induction (Fig. 7g and h). Taken together, these data indicated that TGFβ signaling pathway contributes to tenogenic differentiation of human myogenic progenitor cells.

Discussion

Here we show that human myogenic progenitor cells have dual differentiation potentials towards muscle and tendon. Transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells contributes to injured tendon repair and thus improves locomotor function. Thus, the human myogenic progenitor cells could be served as a new source for tendon regeneration.

Tendon disorders widely occur in people of all ages²². It disrupts the stability and mobility of joint, which deeply affects their locomotor function and quality of life. However, the natural healing of injured tendon is very slow due to hypocellularity and hypovascularity of tendon. The biomechanical property and structural integrity could be hardly completely recovered even with surgical treatment^35,36. It is still a great challenge in clinical work to treat tendon injury.

The relative inefficient outcome of routine therapy for tendon injury sparked the exploration of stem cell treatment. Seed cells with the ability to differentiate into tenocytes and secrete paracrine factors to repair tendon injury are preferred. Thus, tendon derived stem cells, embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells and mensenchymal stem cells have been introduced as seed cells to treat tendon injury³⁷. However, inadequate sources of tendon derived stem cells, ethical issue and risk of teratoma formation of embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cell, and heterogeneity of mensenchymal stem cells limit the development of these seed cells for tendon injury treatment. As for muscle progenitor cells, it is high in proliferation and abundant in sources, and donor site morbidity after muscle harvest was low. Thus, muscle stem cell might be a promising candidate as seed cells for tendon repair.

Here we also find that the differentiation potential of muscle stem cells is species dependent. Human muscle myogenic progenitor cells are bipotential adult stem cells. In contrast, murine muscle stem cells barely have tendon differentiation potential. The species difference might be due to the higher TGFβ/SMAD2/SMAD3 signaling level in human myogenic progenitor cells. TGFβ/SMAD2/SMAD3 axis plays a crucial role in tendon development and tenogenic differentiation^22,23,26. SMAD2/3-dependent TGFβ signaling also acts as a crucial molecular brake for myogenesis. It could suppress myogenic regulatory factors Myod1 and Myogenin^38,39, as well as inhibit myotube fusion and muscle regeneration^40,41. The elevated TGFβ/SMAD2/SMAD3 signaling may help inhibit the myogenic differentiation ability and stimulate the tenogenic differentiation potential of human myogenic progenitor cells under specific microenvironment.

Studies using mouse models contributed to the majority of our knowledge about muscle stem cells and laid the foundation for our understanding of mammalian muscle stem cells. However, human is dramatically different from mouse in many aspects such as size, life span, and manners of motions. It is more demanding for humans to maintain the homeostasis of the locomotion system and the whole organism locomotion ability in much longer life span and bigger body size. Though our knowledge about human muscle regeneration is limited, the current studies have revealed multiple differentiation potentials of Pax7+ human progenitor cells in skeletal muscles. CD56+ CD34+ progenitor cells in human skeletal muscle have been reported to have myogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic activity^14,15. The CD56+ CD34-progenitor cells in human skeletal muscle have been shown to be free of adipogenic potential¹¹. Our results suggest that the progenitor cells in skeletal muscles also have tenogenic differentiation ability besides their myogenic differentiation ability. It seems that there are multiple subpopulations of myogenic progenitor cells in skeletal muscle. They are all capable of muscle regeneration, while with potentials to regenerate other components of the motion system such as bone, tendon, and adipocytes. This could be an economic method to maintain the functions of the motion system for the longer life span and more complicated motion manner in human beings.

Methods

Animals

Animal care and use were in accordance with the guidelines of the animal facility hosted by Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the operations were approved by the ethical committee of Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology. All mice were maintained in specific pathogen-free (SPF) animal facility in individually ventilated cages (IVC) with controlled temperature (22±1°C) and light (12h light/dark cycle). NOD/SCID mice were purchased from Animal Model Research Center of Nanjing University. Pax7CreERT2 and Rosa26-Flox-Stop-Flox-tdTomato mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory. All experiments were conducted on 3-month-old adult male mice.

Human samples

Peroneal longus muscle and remanent tendon were obtained from the wastes of patients who underwent full-thickness peroneal longus tendon autograft for knee ligament reconstructive procedures. The study was approved by the ethical committee of Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine (Approval No. XHEC-D-2019-043) and written informed consents were obtained from all donors.

Isolation of human muscle stem/progenitor cells

Human skeletal muscle from peroneal longus were dissected and digested as described previously⁶. Briefly, muscle tissues were cut into small pieces and digested by collagenase II (Worthington biochemical, 700-800U/ml, cat#LS004177) for 60min followed by 30min of digestion with the mixtures of collagenase II and dispase (Life Technologies,11U/ml, cat#17105-041). Digested cells were passed 10 times through a 20-gauge needle. Cell suspension was filtered through a 40µm cell strainer (BD Falcon, cat#352340). Erythrocytes were removed by red blood cell lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat#00-433-57). The single cell suspension obtained from human muscle was stained with a cocktail containing PE-Cy5 anti-human CD45 (BD Pharmingen, cat#555484), Percp-Cy5.5 anti-human CD31 (BioLegend, cat#303132), AF-488 anti-human CD29 (BioLegend, cat#303016) and PE anti-human CD56 (BioLegend, cat#304606) for 45 min at 4°C. CD45-CD31-CD29+ CD56+ human muscle stem/progenitor cells were sorted by BD Influx sorter (BD Biosciences).

Isolation of mouse muscle stem cells

For mouse muscle stem cells isolation, dissected TA muscles were first digested with 10ml muscle digestion buffer (DMEM containing 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 0.125mg/ml Dispase II (Roche, 04942078001), and 10mg/ml Collagenase D (Roche, 11088866001)) for 90 minutes at 37°C. The digestion was stopped by adding 2ml of FBS. The digested cells were filtered through 70μm strainers. Red blood cells were lysed by 7ml RBC lysis buffer (0.802% NH4Cl, 0.084% NaHCO3, 0.037% EDTA in ddH2O, pH7.2-7.4) for 30s, then filter through 40μm strainers. After staining with antibody cocktails (AF700-anti-mouse Sca-1, PerCP/Cy5.5-anti-mouse CD11b, PerCP/Cy5.5-anti-mouse CD31, PerCP/Cy5.5-anti-mouse CD45, FITC anti-mouse CD34, APC-anti-mouse Integrin α7+), the mononuclear cells were subjected for FACS analysis using Influx (BD Biosciences). The population of PI-CD45-CD11b-CD31-Sca1-CD34+ Integrin α7+ cells was collected.

Primary human tenocytes isolation

Tendon tissues were obtained from the discarded materials of tendon autograft surgery. They were washed with PBS. Epi- and peri-tendon sheath were completely removed. Tenocytes were isolated as described previously²⁰. Briefly, the tendons were minced to 1mm³ pieces and digested with 3 mg/ml collagenase I (Worthington biochemical, cat# LS004194) in DMEM (Gibco, cat#11965118) at 37°C for 3hrs with gentle agitation. The digested tissue was filtered through a 40µm cell strainer (BD Falcon, cat#352340) and the isolated cells were plated for subsequent analysis.

Cell culture and differentiation

Primary human muscle stem/progenitor cells were plated in F10 basal medium (Gibco, cat#11550043) containing 20% FBS (Gibco, cat#10-013-CV), 2.5ng/ml bFGF (R&D, cat#233-FB-025) and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin (Gibco, cat#15140-122) on collagen-coated dishes. Mouse muscle stem cells were plated in F10 basal medium (Gibco, cat#11550043) containing 20% FBS (Gibco, cat#10-013-CV), 2.5ng/ml bFGF (R&D, cat#233-FB-025) and IL-1α, IL-13, IFN-γ and TNF-α as described previously³⁴. DMEM (Gibco, cat#11965118) containing 0.4% Ultroser G (Pall Corporation, cat#15950-17) and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin were used to differentiate human muscle stem/progenitor cells ⁵. DMEM containing 2% horse serum (HyClone, cat#HYCLSH30074.03HI) and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin were used to differentiate mouse muscle stem cells as described previously^42,43. DMEM containing 10% FBS, 100ng/ml GDF5 (R&D, cat#8340-G5-050), GDF7 (R&D, cat#8386-G7-050), 0.2mM ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, cat#A4403) and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin were used to induce tendon differentiation ^44–46. Primary tenocytes were cultured in DMEM containing 20% FBS, 2.5ng/ml bFGF (R&D, cat#233-FB-025) and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin.

Single-cell RNA sequencing and trajectory analysis

The single cell suspension obtained from human muscle was firstly prepared. PI (Sangon Biotech, cat#E607328) and Hoechst (Sangon Biotech, cat#A601112) were used to sort live cells by FACS. Then the sored cells were washed twice with PBS containing 0.04% BSA, followed by library preparasion with Chromium Single Cell 3’ Reagent Kits (10X genomics, cat# 1000121-1000157). The sequencing was performed on Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform (Illumina).

Single cell RNA-seq data were analyzed by Seurat R (Version 3.2.0) package. Cells with less than 200 genes, more than 6,000 genes detected, and more than 10% mitochondrial genes were excluded. A total of 15,102 cells were included for subsequent analysis. Sequencing reads for each gene were normalized to total UMIs in each cell to obtain normalized UMI values by “NormalizeData” function. The “ScaleData” function was used to scale and center expression levels in the data set for dimensional reduction. Total cell clustering was performed by “FindClusters” function at a resolution of 0.1 and dimensionality reduction was performed with “RunUMAP” function. Trajectory analysis was done by R package Monocle2⁴⁷.

Immunofluorescence staining

Cryosections were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 15min, permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100 for 15min, and stained with anti-Pax7 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), anti-Laminin (Abcam, cat#ab11575), anti-Lamin A/C (Abcam, cat#ab108595; cat#ab190380), anti-TNC (Abcam, cat#ab108930; cat#ab3970), anti-Scx (Abcam, cat#ab58655), anti-Tnmd (Abcam, cat#ab203676), anti-Col I (Abcam, cat#ab260043), anti-Col III (ABclonal, cat#A0817) or anti-MyHC (Millipore, cat#05-716) at 4°C overnight, and incubated with Alexa 488-, Alexa 594 or Alexa 647-labeled anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, 1:1000) at room temperature for one hour. The nuclei were stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Vector Laboratories, cat#H-1200). All images were acquired by Leica SP8 confocal microscope (Leica).

RNA scope in situ hybridization

Fresh cryosections of human muscle were obtained. Then the target gene-specific RNAscope probes (RNAscope Probe-Hs-SCX, cat#593041; RNAscope Probe-Hs-PAX7-C2, cat#546691) were used to investigate the cellular distributions of Pax7 and SCX. All staining steps strictly followed the manufacturer’s protocols by Advanced Cell Diagnostics. The nuclei were then stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Vector Laboratories, cat#H-1200), and sections were coverslipped with antifade mounting media (Vector Laboratories, cat#H-100). All images were acquired by Leica SP8 confocal microscope or Olympus BX53 fluorescence microscope (Leica).

Gene expression analysis

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, cat#15596-018) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. GAPDH served as internal control. The primers for RT-qPCR are listed as below:

Cloning assay

Primary human muscle stem/progenitor cells were first sorted in 96 well plates with density of single cell per well. Tenogenic induction or myogenic induction was performed after proliferation for each well. After induction, the immunofluorescence staining of SCX or MyHC was performed in each well. The differentiation efficiency was determined by calculating the ratio of total wells with positive fluorescence signal to total wells with alive cells.

RNA-sequencing

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, cat#15596-018) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. mRNA was enriched with magnetic oligo (dT) beads (New England Biolabs, cat#S1419S). The cDNA library was constructed with mean inserts of 200bp with non-stranded library preparation using NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, cat#E7530L). Sequencing was performed by a paired-end 125 cycles rapid run on the Illumina HiSeq2500. Sequencing data were filtered by SolexaAQ (Q > 20 and length ≥ 25 bp)⁴⁸.The adapter sequences and low quality segments (Phred Quality Score<20) were trimmed using Cutadapt. Paired-end clean reads were then mapped to the reference genome GRCh38.98 using HISAT2. Htseq-count was used to quantify the gene expression value⁴⁹. Read count of each gene was normalized using FPKM (Fragments Per Kilo bases per Million fragments). Differential expression (DE) analysis was performed using DESeq and significant DE genes were defined as those with absolute log2FoldChange>1 and p< 0.05. Heatmap and volcano plot of DE genes was generated by R package Pheatmap (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/index.html) and EnhancedVolcano (https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/EnhancedVolcano/inst/doc/Enh ancedVolcano.html), respectively. Gene enrichment analysis was conducted by R package topGO with p < 0.05 as the cut-off. The differential expression analysis for RNA-seq data between human and mouse myogenic progenitor cells was performed according to previous literature⁵⁰.

Cell transplantation in TA muscle

A single dose of 18 Grey irradiation was administered to the hind legs of the recipient NOD/SCID mice. TA muscle was injured by injecting 15μl of 10μM CTX (Sigma), and 50,000 human myogenic progenitor cells or 50,000 murine MuSCs suspended in 10μl PBS were injected intramuscularly to the injury site as described ⁵.

Tendon injury for lineage tracing

Pax7^CreERT2:Rosa26^tdTomato mice were obtained and MuSC was labeled with tdTomato as aforementioned. We used dedicated surgical instruments to imitate a mouse model similar to previously published human surgery³³. Firstly, distal gastrocnemius tendon was woven with a 6-0 polypropylene non-absorbable suture (PROLENE, cat#EH7242H) and released by microsurgical scissor. After that, a dedicated mini tendon stripper was introduced over the free end of distal medial gastrocnemius tendon. The medial gastrocnemius tendon could be totally removed after advancement of tendon stripper. To further activate MuSCs to guarantee that sufficient amount of activated MuSCs were available around the tendon injury site, cardiotoxin (CTX) was injected at the muscle adjacent to the sites where the tendon was removed to induce more muscle injuries and further activate MuSCs. Then the subcutaneous tissue and skin were sutured.

Tendon injury and cell transplantation

An approximately 1.5mm long and 0.5mm width transverse incision was performed at 5mm from the calcaneus in Achilles tendon for recipient NOD/SCID mice. 50,000 human muscle stem/progenitor or mouse muscle stem cells resuspended in 20μl hydrogel were injected to the injury site with 28-gauge needles. PBS mixed with 20μl hydrogel were injected as control.

Biomechanical analysis

Two months after tendon injury, the tendons were harvested to biomechanical analysis using a universal tester (Instron 3345 load system, USA). The grippers were gradually moved apart with the speed of 5 mm/min until the tested tendon was completely ruptured. Then the max load was obtained and documented. The slope of the stress-strain curve was defined as stiffness. All these data were automatically presented in Instron 3345 load system.

Transmission electron microscope (TEM) examination

After washing the selected target tendon tissues with PBS, tissue fixation was performed for more than 2 hours. Post-fixation was conducted by 1% OsO₄ (Ted Pella Inc) in 0.1M PB for 1-2 hours. Then dehydration and drying were performed and target tendon samples were subsequently attached to metallic stubs for conductive metal coating. Images were obtained by TEM (HITACHI, SU8100) and at least 1000 collagen fibrils were evaluated for each sample. Density of fibrils was evaluated by the percentage of collagen fibril containing area.

Treadmill test

Mouse treadmill test was performed in Exer-3/6 treadmill apparatus with electrical stimulus. Treadmill exercise began with a 5 min warm-up, then each mouse was evaluated with specific protocol. For endurance test, mice ran on the treadmill at the constant speed of 22m/min until exhaustion. For exhaustion test, the treadmill speed was increased (2m/min each 3 min) at the beginning speed at 18m/min until exhaustion. Exhaustion was defined as inability to run on the treadmill for longer than10 seconds.

In vivo muscle force analysis

The 1300A 3-in-1 whole animal system (Aurora Scientific) was used for in vivo muscle force analysis. Mice were first anesthetized and kept warm by heat lamp. The foot was placed on a footplate and kept perpendicular to the tibia. The peroneal branch of the sciatic nerve was stimulated to evaluate the plantarflexion strength. Five repetitive tests were performed for each limb and DMA software (Aurora scientific) was used for results analysis.

Statistical analysis

At least three biological replicates and technical repeats were performed in each experimental group. All experiments were analyzed and evaluated by investigators in a blinded manner. Error bars indicated standard deviation. Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-tests were used when variances were similar (tested with F-test) for comparison of two independent groups. One-way ANOVA tests followed by Dunnett’s post-test or Tukey’s post-test were used for multiple comparisons. Shapiro-Wilk tests were performed to determine data normality. Statistical analysis was performed in GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA) or SPSS version 19.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). It was considered significant with P value less than 0.05. Data were presented as mean ± standard unless stated.

Accession numbers

The complete sequencing data have been uploaded on to Sequence Read Archive database (PRJNA1012476 and PRJNA1012828).

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Dangsheng Li for helpful discussions, the National Protein Science Center (Shanghai) for helps on FACS sorting, the cell biology facility of SIBCB for helps on imaging and FACS analysis. This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Science (XDA16020400), National Science Foundation of China (32170804, 81871096, 82372384, 82302657).

Supplemental Figure legend

Human myogenic progenitor cells display tenogenic differentiation potential
a. Phase contrast images of human myogenic progenitor cells before and after differentiation induction. Scale bars, 100 µm.
b. Immunofluorescence staining of myogenic differentiation marker genes MYOG and MyHC. Human myogenic progenitor cells were induced for tenogenic differentiation. The differentiated cells were stained with MYOG and MyHC antibody. Red indicated MYOG or MyHC; DAPI indicated nuclei staining; merge indicated the merged images of red and blue staining. Scale bars, 100µm.
c. Statistical analysis of the percentage of human cells expression MYOG or MyHC under tenogenic differentiation condition. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5).
d. Expression level of genes marking myogenic differentiation. Human myogenic progenitor cells were induced for myogenic and tenogenic differentiation, respectively. The undifferentiated and differentiated cells were subjected for RT-qPCR analysis of MYH1, MYH3, DESMIN, and MYL1. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5). *** indicated p<0.001.
e. Protein levels of TNC and MyHC. Human myogenic progenitor cells were induced towards myogenic and tenogenic differentiation, respectively. Total protein was extracted from cells before and after differentiation and subjected for TNC and MyHC immunoblotting. HSP70 and GAPDH were served as loading control.

Murine MuSCs display poor tenogenic differentiation ability
a. Immunofluorescence images of Pax7, MyoD1 and Vcam1 for mouse muscle CD29+/CD56+ cells and Vcam1+ cells isolated by FACs. Scale bars, 50μm.
b. Statistical analysis of percentage of Pax7, MyoD1 and Vcam1 positive cells in mouse muscle CD29+/CD56+ cells and Vcam1+ cells isolated by FACs. *** indicated p<0.001.
c. Relative expression levels of tendon related genes. RT-qPCR assays were performed with murine muscle CD29+/CD56+ cells before and after tenogenic differentiation, and tenocytes. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=3). *** indicated p<0.001.
d. Schematic illustration of the mouse line for murine MuSCs lineage tracing.
e. The surgery in mice mimicking human peroneus longus tendon removal surgery. The medial gastrocnemius tendon was completely removed. Scale bars, 1mm.
f. Immunofluorescence images of injured muscle adjacent to the removed tendon. The MuSCs were labeled with tdTomato before injury. The tdTomato positive myofibers after muscle injury were analyzed to evaluate the tracing system. Scale bars, 100μm.
g. Statistical analysis of the tdTomato positive myofibers adjacent to the removed tendon. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5).

Transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells facilitates tendon regeneration and transplantation of human/murine myogenic progenitor cells improve muscle regeneration
a. Immunofluorescence staining of SCX and human specific Lamin A/C in injured tendon. Two months after human cells transplantation, the injured tendon was stained with SCX and human specific Lamin A/C. DAPI indicated nuclei staining. Merge indicated the merged images of SCX, human specific Lamin A/C, and DAPI. Scale bars, 20 µm.
b. Immunofluorescence staining of TNMD and human specific Lamin A/C in injured tendon. Two months after human cell transplantation, the injured tendon was stained with TNMD and human specific Lamin A/C. DAPI indicated nuclei staining. Merge indicated the merged images of TNMD, human Lamin A/C, and DAPI. Scale bars, 20 µm.
c. Statistical analysis of the percentage of human cells expressing tendon related markers SCX or TNMD after being transplanted to the injured tendon. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5).
d. Scheme of human myogenic progenitor cell transplantation after muscle injury. TA muscles were first irradiated to kill the local MuSCs in NOD/SCID mice. Then transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells to the irradiated pre-injured recipient mice was performed and TA muscles were harvested after 28 days.
e. Immunofluorescence staining of MyHC and human specific Lamin A/C after human myogenic progenitor cells transplantation. Scale bars, 100μm.
f. Statistical analysis of the engraftment efficiency of human myogenic progenitor cell transplantation in muscle. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5).
g. Scheme of murine MuSC transplantation after muscle injury. TA muscles were first irradiated to kill the local MuSCs in NOD/SCID mice. Then transplantation of tdTomato positive MuSCs to the irradiated pre-injured recipient mice was performed and TA muscles were harvested after 28 days.
h. Immunofluorescence staining of Laminin and murine MuSCs constitutively expressing tdTomato after murine tdTomato positive MuSCs transplantation. Scale bars, 100μm.
i. Statistical analysis of the engraftment efficiency of murine MuSCs transplantation in muscle. Error bars indicated standard deviation (n=5).

Data availability

The datasets used in this study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflict of interest disclosure

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Science (XDA16020400), National Science Foundation of China (32170804, 81871096, 82372384, 82302657).

Contributors

XS, XL, HL, HZ, and XF designed the study, collected the experimental data and wrote the original draft. SL and SZ conducted the image analysis, statistical analysis. SZ designed the study, reviewed and edited the manuscript. JW and PH administrated the project and edited the manuscript. Xiexiang Shao, Xingzuan Lin and Hao Zhou contributed equally to this work.

References

1.
1. Fu X.
2. Wang H.
3. Hu P
2015Stem cell activation in skeletal muscle regenerationCell Mol Life Sci 72:1663–1677https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1819-5
2.
1. Relaix F.
2. Bencze M.
3. Borok M.J.
4. Der Vartanian A.
5. Gattazzo F.
6. Mademtzoglou D.
7. Perez-Diaz S.
8. Prola A.
9. Reyes-Fernandez P.C.
10. Rotini A.
11. Taglietti t.
2021Perspectives on skeletal muscle stem cellsNat Commun 12https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20760-6
3.
1. Seale P.
2. Asakura A.
3. Rudnicki M.A
2001The potential of muscle stem cellsDev Cell 1:333–342https://doi.org/10.1016/s1534-5807(01)00049-1
4.
1. Collins C.A.
2. Olsen I.
3. Zammit P.S.
4. Heslop L.
5. Petrie A.
6. Partridge T.A.
7. Morgan J.E
2005Stem cell function, self-renewal, and behavioral heterogeneity of cells from the adult muscle satellite cell nicheCell 122:289–301https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.010
5.
1. Ding S.
2. Wang F.
3. Liu Y.
4. Li S.
5. Zhou G.
6. Hu P
2017Characterization and isolation of highly purified porcine satellite cellsCell death discovery 3https://doi.org/10.1038/cddiscovery.2017.3
6.
1. Shao X.
2. Fu X.
3. Yang J.
4. Sui W.
5. Li S.
6. Yang W.
7. Lin X.
8. Zhang Y.
9. Jia M.
10. Liu H.
11. et al.
2023The asymmetrical ESR1 signaling in muscle progenitor cells determines the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosisCell Discov 9https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-023-00531-5
7.
1. Barruet E.
2. Garcia S.M.
3. Striedinger K.
4. Wu J.
5. Lee S.
6. Byrnes L.
7. Wong A.
8. Xuefeng S.
9. Tamaki S.
10. Brack A.S.
11. Pomerantz J.H
2020Functionally heterogeneous human satellite cells identified by single cell RNA sequencingElife 9https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51576
8.
1. Boldrin L.
2. Muntoni F.
3. Morgan J.E
2010Are human and mouse satellite cells really the same?J Histochem Cytochem 58:941–955https://doi.org/10.1369/jhc.2010.956201
9.
1. Bareja A.
2. Holt J.A.
3. Luo G.
4. Chang C.
5. Lin J.
6. Hinken A.C.
7. Freudenberg J.M.
8. Kraus W.E.
9. Evans W.J.
10. Billin A.N
2014Human and mouse skeletal muscle stem cells: convergent and divergent mechanisms of myogenesisPloS one 9https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090398
10.
1. Spinazzola J.M.
2. Gussoni E
2017Isolation of Primary Human Skeletal Muscle CellsBio Protoc 7https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.2591
11.
1. Pisani D.F.
2. Dechesne C.A.
3. Sacconi S.
4. Delplace S.
5. Belmonte N.
6. Cochet O.
7. Clement N.
8. Wdziekonski B.
9. Villageois A.P.
10. Butori C.
11. et al.
2010Isolation of a highly myogenic CD34-negative subset of human skeletal muscle cells free of adipogenic potentialStem cells 28:753–764https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.317
12.
1. Xu X.
2. Wilschut K.J.
3. Kouklis G.
4. Tian H.
5. Hesse R.
6. Garland C.
7. Sbitany H.
8. Hansen S.
9. Seth R.
10. Knott P.D.
11. et al.
2015Human Satellite Cell Transplantation and Regeneration from Diverse Skeletal MusclesStem Cell Reports 5:419–434https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.07.016
13.
1. Zheng B.
2. Cao B.
3. Crisan M.
4. Sun B.
5. Li G.
6. Logar A.
7. Yap S.
8. Pollett J.B.
9. Drowley L.
10. Cassino T.
11. et al.
2007Prospective identification of myogenic endothelial cells in human skeletal muscleNature biotechnology 25:1025–1034https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1334
14.
1. Castiglioni A.
2. Hettmer S.
3. Lynes M.D.
4. Rao T.N.
5. Tchessalova D.
6. Sinha I.
7. Lee B.T.
8. Tseng Y.H.
9. Wagers A.J
2014Isolation of progenitors that exhibit myogenic/osteogenic bipotency in vitro by fluorescence-activated cell sorting from human fetal muscleStem cell reports 2:92–106https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.12.006
15.
1. Pisani D.F.
2. Clement N.
3. Loubat A.
4. Plaisant M.
5. Sacconi S.
6. Kurzenne J.Y.
7. Desnuelle C.
8. Dani C.
9. Dechesne C.A
2010Hierarchization of myogenic and adipogenic progenitors within human skeletal muscleStem cells 28:2182–2194https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.537
16.
1. Gaida J.E.
2. Alfredson H.
3. Kiss Z.S.
4. Bass S.L.
5. Cook J.L
2010Asymptomatic Achilles tendon pathology is associated with a central fat distribution in men and a peripheral fat distribution in women: a cross sectional study of 298 individualsBMC Musculoskelet Disord 11https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-41
17.
1. Voleti P.B.
2. Buckley M.R.
3. Soslowsky L.J
2012Tendon healing: repair and regenerationAnnu Rev Biomed Eng 14:47–71https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150122
18.
1. Korcari A.
2. Nichols A.E.C.
3. Buckley M.R.
4. Loiselle A.E
2023Scleraxis-lineage cells are required for tendon homeostasis and their depletion induces an accelerated extracellular matrix aging phenotypeElife 12https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84194
19.
1. Pennisi E
2002Tending tender tendonsScience 295https://doi.org/10.1126/science.295.5557.1011
20.
1. Bi Y.
2. Ehirchiou D.
3. Kilts T.M.
4. Inkson C.A.
5. Embree M.C.
6. Sonoyama W.
7. Li L.
8. Leet A.I.
9. Seo B.M.
10. Zhang L.
11. et al.
2007Identification of tendon stem/progenitor cells and the role of the extracellular matrix in their nicheNat Med 13:1219–1227https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1630
21.
1. Kohler J.
2. Popov C.
3. Klotz B.
4. Alberton P.
5. Prall W.C.
6. Haasters F.
7. Muller-Deubert S.
8. Ebert R.
9. Klein-Hitpass L.
10. Jakob F.
11. et al.
2013Uncovering the cellular and molecular changes in tendon stem/progenitor cells attributed to tendon aging and degenerationAging Cell 12:988–999https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12124
22.
1. Nourissat G.
2. Berenbaum F.
3. Duprez D
2015Tendon injury: from biology to tendon repairNature reviews. Rheumatology 11:223–233https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2015.26
23.
1. Pryce B.A.
2. Watson S.S.
3. Murchison N.D.
4. Staverosky J.A.
5. Dunker N.
6. Schweitzer R
2009Recruitment and maintenance of tendon progenitors by TGFbeta signaling are essential for tendon formationDevelopment 136:1351–1361https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.027342
24.
1. Yang G.
2. Rothrauff B.B.
3. Lin H.
4. Yu S.
5. Tuan R.S
2017Tendon-Derived Extracellular Matrix Enhances Transforming Growth Factor-beta3-Induced Tenogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem CellsTissue engineering. Part A 23:166–176https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2015.0498
25.
1. Barsby T.
2. Guest D
2013Transforming growth factor beta3 promotes tendon differentiation of equine embryo-derived stem cellsTissue engineering. Part A 19:2156–2165https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0372
26.
1. Berthet E.
2. Chen C.
3. Butcher K.
4. Schneider R.A.
5. Alliston T.
6. Amirtharajah M
2013Smad3 binds Scleraxis and Mohawk and regulates tendon matrix organizationJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 31:1475–1483https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22382
27.
1. Wang D.
2. Pun C.C.M.
3. Huang S.
4. Tang T.C.M.
5. Ho K.K.W.
6. Rothrauff B.B.
7. Yung P.S.H.
8. Blocki A.M.
9. Ker E.D.F.
10. Tuan R.S
2020Tendon-derived extracellular matrix induces mesenchymal stem cell tenogenesis via an integrin/transforming growth factor-beta crosstalk-mediated mechanismFASEB J 34:8172–8186https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201902377RR
28.
1. Li M.
2. Jia J.
3. Li S.
4. Cui B.
5. Huang J.
6. Guo Z.
7. Ma K.
8. Wang L.
9. Cui C
2021Exosomes derived from tendon stem cells promote cell proliferation and migration through the TGF beta signal pathwayBiochemical and biophysical research communications 536:88–94https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.12.057
29.
1. You T.
2. Yuan S.
3. Bai L.
4. Zhang X.
5. Chen P.
6. Zhang W
2020Benzyl alcohol accelerates recovery from Achilles tendon injury, potentially via TGF-beta1/Smad2/3 pathwayInjury 51:1515–1521https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.03.058
30.
1. Jones E.R.
2. Jones G.C.
3. Legerlotz K.
4. Riley G.P
2013Cyclical strain modulates metalloprotease and matrix gene expression in human tenocytes via activation of TGFbetaBiochim Biophys Acta 1833:2596–2607https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.06.019
31.
1. Rubenstein A.B.
2. Smith G.R.
3. Raue U.
4. Begue G.
5. Minchev K.
6. Ruf-Zamojski F.
7. Nair V.D.
8. Wang X.
9. Zhou L.
10. Zaslavsky E.
11. et al.
2020Single-cell transcriptional profiles in human skeletal muscleScientific reports 10https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57110-6
32.
1. Han S.H.
2. Kim H.K.
3. Ahn J.H.
4. Lee D.H.
5. Baek M.
6. Ye G.
7. Lee J.M.
8. Min K.
9. Oh C.
10. Lee S
2018A Protocol to Acquire the Degenerative Tenocyte from HumansJ Vis Exp https://doi.org/10.3791/57634
33.
1. Shao X.
2. Shi L.L.
3. Bluman E.M.
4. Wang S.
5. Xu X.
6. Chen X.
7. Wang J
2020Satisfactory functional and MRI outcomes at the foot and ankle following harvesting of full thickness peroneus longus tendon graftThe bone & joint journal 102:205–211https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0949.R1
34.
1. Fu X.
2. Xiao J.
3. Wei Y.
4. Li S.
5. Liu Y.
6. Yin J.
7. Sun K.
8. Sun H.
9. Wang H.
10. Zhang Z.
11. et al.
2015Combination of inflammation-related cytokines promotes long-term muscle stem cell expansionCell Res 25:655–673https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2015.58
35.
1. Rossi L.A.
2. Atala N.
3. Bertona A.
4. Tanoira I.
5. Bongiovanni S.
6. Maignon G.
7. Ranalletta M
2018Return to Sports After in Situ Arthroscopic Repair of Partial Rotator Cuff TearsArthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.07.037
36.
1. Bianco S.T.
2. Moser H.L.
3. Galatz L.M.
4. Huang A.H
2018Biologics and stem cell-based therapies for rotator cuff repairAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13918
37.
1. Lui P.P
2015Stem cell technology for tendon regeneration: current status, challenges, and future research directionsStem cells and cloning : advances and applications 8:163–174https://doi.org/10.2147/SCCAA.S60832
38.
1. Liu D.
2. Black B.L.
3. Derynck R
2001TGF-beta inhibits muscle differentiation through functional repression of myogenic transcription factors by Smad3Genes Dev 15:2950–2966https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.925901
39.
1. Brennan T.J.
2. Edmondson D.G.
3. Li L.
4. Olson E.N
1991Transforming growth factor beta represses the actions of myogenin through a mechanism independent of DNA bindingProc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88:3822–3826https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.9.3822
40.
1. Melendez J.
2. Sieiro D.
3. Salgado D.
4. Morin V.
5. Dejardin M.J.
6. Zhou C.
7. Mullen A.C.
8. Marcelle C
2021TGFbeta signalling acts as a molecular brake of myoblast fusionNat Commun 12https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20290-1
41.
1. Girardi F.
2. Taleb A.
3. Ebrahimi M.
4. Datye A.
5. Gamage D.G.
6. Peccate C.
7. Giordani L.
8. Millay D.P.
9. Gilbert P.M.
10. Cadot B.
11. Le Grand F.
2021TGFbeta signaling curbs cell fusion and muscle regenerationNat Commun 12https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20289-8
42.
1. Luo Y.
2. Fu C.
3. Wang Z.
4. Zhang Z.
5. Wang H.
6. Liu Y
2015Mangiferin attenuates contusive spinal cord injury in rats through the regulation of oxidative stress, inflammation and the Bcl2 and Bax pathwayMol Med Rep 12:7132–7138https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4274
43.
1. Yin J.
2. Yang L.
3. Xie Y.
4. Liu Y.
5. Li S.
6. Yang W.
7. Xu B.
8. Ji H.
9. Ding L.
10. Wang K.
11. et al.
2018Dkk3 dependent transcriptional regulation controls age related skeletal muscle atrophyNat Commun 9https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04038-6
44.
1. Otabe K.
2. Nakahara H.
3. Hasegawa A.
4. Matsukawa T.
5. Ayabe F.
6. Onizuka N.
7. Inui M.
8. Takada S.
9. Ito Y.
10. Sekiya I.
11. et al.
2015Transcription factor Mohawk controls tenogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and in vivoJ Orthop Res 33:1–8https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22750
45.
1. Lou J.
2. Tu Y.
3. Burns M.
4. Silva M.J.
5. Manske P
2001BMP-12 gene transfer augmentation of lacerated tendon repairJ Orthop Res 19:1199–1202https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00042-0
46.
1. Wang D.
2. Jiang X.
3. Lu A.
4. Tu M.
5. Huang W.
6. Huang P
2018BMP14 induces tenogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitroExperimental and therapeutic medicine 16:1165–1174https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6293
47.
1. Qiu X.
2. Mao Q.
3. Tang Y.
4. Wang L.
5. Chawla R.
6. Pliner H.A.
7. Trapnell C
2017Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectoriesNat Methods 14:979–982https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4402
48.
1. Cox M.P.
2. Peterson D.A.
3. Biggs P.J
2010SolexaQA: At-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing dataBMC Bioinformatics 11https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-485
49.
1. Anders S.
2. Pyl P.T.
3. Huber W
2015HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing dataBioinformatics 31:166–169https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638
50.
1. Zhou Y.
2. Zhu J.
3. Tong T.
4. Wang J.
5. Lin B.
6. Zhang J
2019A statistical normalization method and differential expression analysis for RNA-seq data between different speciesBMC Bioinformatics 20https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2745-1

Article and author information

Author information

Xiexiang Shao
Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Shanghai,20023, China
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4837-1305
Xingzuan Lin
Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Shanghai,20023, China
Hao Zhou
Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Shanghai,20023, China
Lili Han
State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
Xin Fu
Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Shanghai,20023, China
Sheng Li
Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Shanghai,20023, China
Siyuan Zhu
Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Shanghai,20023, China
Shenao Zhou
State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
Jianhua Wang
Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Shanghai,20023, China
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6831-9593
- Corresponding author: Jianhua Wang, Email: wangjianhua@xinhuamed.com.cn; PingHu, Email: hup@sibcb.ac.cn;
Ping Hu
Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Shanghai,20023, China, Guangzhou Laboratory, Guangzhou, 510005, China, Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100101, China, State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
- Corresponding author: Jianhua Wang, Email: wangjianhua@xinhuamed.com.cn; PingHu, Email: hup@sibcb.ac.cn;

Version history

Sent for peer review: April 29, 2024
Preprint posted: May 2, 2024
Reviewed Preprint version 1: August 12, 2024

Copyright

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Not revised: This Reviewed Preprint includes the authors’ original preprint (without revision), an eLife assessment, public reviews, and a provisional response from the authors.

Reviewing Editor
Kihyun Lee
Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea, the Republic of
Senior Editor
Lori Sussel
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States of America

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Through a combination of in vitro and in vivo analyses, the authors demonstrate that CD56/CD29 positive progenitor cells from human muscle can be driven towards muscle or tendon fate in vitro and are able to contribute to muscle and tendon fates following transplantation in injured mice. This is in contrast to Pax7-lineage cells from mice which do not contribute to tendon repair in vivo. While the data strongly support that a subset of cells captured by this sorting strategy has tenogenic potential, their claims of progenitor bi-potency are not fully supported by the data as currently presented.

As discussed below, some aspects of the data analysis and sample preparation are incomplete and should be clarified to fully support the claims of the paper.

For the colony analysis, it is unclear from the methods and main text whether the initial individual sorted colonies were split and subject to different conditions to support the claim of bi-potency. The finding that 40% of colonies displayed tenogenic differentiation, may instead suggest heterogeneity of the sorted progenitor population. The methods as currently described, suggest that two different plates were subject to different induction conditions. It is therefore difficult to assess the strength of the claim of bi-potency.

This group uses the well-established CD56+/CD29+ sorting strategy to isolate muscle progenitor cells, however recent work has identified transcriptional heterogeneity within these human satellite cells (ie Barruet et al, eLife 2020). Given that they identify a tenocyte population in their human muscle biopsy in Figure 1a, it is critical to understand the heterogeneity contained within the population of human progenitors captured by the authors' FACS strategy and whether tenocytes contained within the muscle biopsy are also CD56+/CD29+.

The bulk RNA sequencing data presented in Figure 3 to contrast the expression of progenitor cells under different differentiation conditions are not sufficiently convincing. In particular, it is unclear whether more than one sample was used for the RNAseq analyses shown in Figure 3. The volcano plots have many genes aligned on distinct curves suggesting that there are few replicates or low expression. There is also a concern that the sorted cells may contain tenocytes as tendon genes SCX, MKX, and THBS4 were among the genes upregulated in the myogenic differentiation conditions (shown in Figure 3b).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.98636.1.sa3

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This work describes a novel bipotent differentiation capacity of human muscle progenitors marked by CD56 and CD29. In addition to previously well-known myogenic differentiation potential, the authors discovered these progenitors could also be induced into tenocyte-like cells. They describe the sorted CD56+/CD29+ cells not only differentiate into tenocytes in vitro; they were also able to engraft into injured tendons and repair damaged tendons when transplanted into nude mice. Human MuSC transplantation improved the locomotor function and physiological strength of the tendon-injured mice. The authors further observed that this bipotent differentiation potential was specific to human MuSC, the same cell population isolated from mice remains unipotent to myogenic differentiation and not capable of tenocytic differentiation.

The discovery of the tenocyte differentiation potential of human CD56+/CD29+ MuSCs provides a potential cell therapeutic option for tendon injury. This work may have a significant clinical impact on improving treatment outcomes for patients suffering from tendon injury.

Strength of the paper:

Multimodal experimental approach using both in vitro and in vivo experiments provided strong proof for the differentiation capacity of the human MuSCs into tenocytes, and the potential clinical implication of these cells in the treatment of tendon injury in patients by in vivo transplantation assay. Using RNA sequencing to characterise the differentiated myocytic and tenocytic populations proved global expression profile data which have shown non-biased efficiency information to the in vitro differentiated cells.

The comparison of differentiation potentials of human and mouse MuSCs is interesting and clinically meaningful. This work illustrates that animal studies may not always be clinically relevant in studying human diseases and treatment modalities.

Weaknesses:

scRNAseq assay using total mononuclear cell population did not provide meaningful insight that enriched knowledge on CD56+/CD29+ cell population. CD56+/CD29+ cells information may have been lost due to the minority identity of these cells in the total skeletal muscle mononuclear population, especially given the total cell number used for scRNAseq was very low and no information on participant number and repeat sample number used for this assay. Using this data to claim a stem cell lineage relationship for MuSCs and tenocytes may not convincing, as seeing both cell types in the total muscle mononuclear population does not establish a lineage connection between them.

The TGF-b pathway assay uses a small molecular inhibitor of TGF-b to probe Smad2/3. The assay conclusion regarding Smad2/3 pathway responsible for tenocyte differentiation may be overinterpretation without Smad2/3 specific inhibitors being applied in the experiments.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.98636.1.sa2

Reviewer #3 (Public Review):
Summary:

In this manuscript, the authors present compelling evidence that CD29+/CD56+ stem/progenitor cells from human muscle biopsies show tenogenic differentiation ability both in vitro and in vivo, alongside their myogenic potential.

Strengths:

The methodology and results are convincing. CD29+/CD56+ stem/progenitor cells were transplanted into immunodeficient mice with a tendon injury, and human cells expressing tenogenic markers contributed to the repair of the injured tendon. Furthermore, the authors also show better tendon biomechanical properties and plantarflexion force after transplantation.

Weaknesses:

This dual differentiation capability was not observed in mouse muscle stem cells.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.98636.1.sa1

Author response:

Public Reviews:

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

For the colony analysis, it is unclear from the methods and main text whether the initial individual sorted colonies were split and subject to different conditions to support the claim of bi-potency. The finding that 40% of colonies displayed tenogenic differentiation, may instead suggest heterogeneity of the sorted progenitor population. The methods as currently described, suggest that two different plates were subject to different induction conditions. It is therefore difficult to assess the strength of the claim of bi-potency.

Thanks for your valuable comment. We are sorry for the confusing illustration of colony assay. In fact, we first obtained CD29+/CD56+ cells by FACs. Then these freshly isolated cells were randomly seeded to 96-well plate with density of 1 cell/well. Subsequently, the single cell in each plate was cultured with growth medium to form colonies for ten days. Then myogenic induction was performed in three 96-well plates and tenogenic induction was performed in another three 96-well plates for subsequent analyses. Thus, we agree with your point that the sorted progenitor population could be heterogeneous. Almost all the cells highly expressed myogenic progenitor genes PAX7/MYOD1/MYF5 (Figure 1g) and over 95% colonies successfully differentiated into myotubes (Figure 2g). Thus, we believe these obtained CD29+/CD56+ cells were myogenic progenitor cells, while a subgroup of these cells obtained bi-potency.

This group uses the well-established CD56+/CD29+ sorting strategy to isolate muscle progenitor cells, however recent work has identified transcriptional heterogeneity within these human satellite cells (ie Barruet et al, eLife 2020). Given that they identify a tenocyte population in their human muscle biopsy in Figure 1a, it is critical to understand the heterogeneity contained within the population of human progenitors captured by the authors' FACS strategy and whether tenocytes contained within the muscle biopsy are also CD56+/CD29+.

Thanks for your constructive suggestion. We will include more samples to perform scRNA-seq and reanalyze the data.

The bulk RNA sequencing data presented in Figure 3 to contrast the expression of progenitor cells under different differentiation conditions are not sufficiently convincing. In particular, it is unclear whether more than one sample was used for the RNAseq analyses shown in Figure 3. The volcano plots have many genes aligned on distinct curves suggesting that there are few replicates or low expression. There is also a concern that the sorted cells may contain tenocytes as tendon genes SCX, MKX, and THBS4 were among the genes upregulated in the myogenic differentiation conditions (shown in Figure 3b).

Thanks for your comment. Each group consisted of three samples for RNAseq analyses. We are sorry there exist a minor analysis mistake in Figure 3b and Figure 3c, which will be reanalyzed in the revised version. As for contamination of tenocytes, almost all the obtained cells highly expressed myogenic progenitor marker PAX7/MYOD1/MYF5 (Figure 1g-h). Low expression levels of tendon markers were identified in these cells (Figure 2a-c). Furthermore, although tendon genes slightly upregulated in myogenic differentiation conditions, these markers dramatically upregulated in tenogenic differentiation conditions (Figure 2c). Thus, we believe the tenogenic differentiation ability of sorted cells were mainly ascribed to CD29+/CD56+ myogenic progenitor cells.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

scRNAseq assay using total mononuclear cell population did not provide meaningful insight that enriched knowledge on CD56+/CD29+ cell population. CD56+/CD29+ cells information may have been lost due to the minority identity of these cells in the total skeletal muscle mononuclear population, especially given the total cell number used for scRNAseq was very low and no information on participant number and repeat sample number used for this assay. Using this data to claim a stem cell lineage relationship for MuSCs and tenocytes may not convincing, as seeing both cell types in the total muscle mononuclear population does not establish a lineage connection between them.

Thanks for your constructive suggestion. We will include more samples to perform scRNA-seq and reanalyze the data.

The TGF-b pathway assay uses a small molecular inhibitor of TGF-b to probe Smad2/3. The assay conclusion regarding Smad2/3 pathway responsible for tenocyte differentiation may be overinterpretation without Smad2/3 specific inhibitors being applied in the experiments.

Thanks for your comment. We agree with your comment that we should revise it in the revision version.

Reviewer #3 (Public Review):

Comment: This dual differentiation capability was not observed in mouse muscle stem cells.

Thanks for your comment. We have explored the tenogenic differentiation potential of mouse MuSCs both in vivo and in vitro. However, low tenogenic differentiation ability was revealed (Figure 4), which might be due to species diversity. Maybe it is more demanding for humans to maintain the homeostasis of the locomotion system and the whole organism locomotion ability in much longer life span and bigger body size. Thus, the current study also indicated that anima studies may not clinically relevant when investigating human diseases.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.98636.1.sa0

Significance of findings

Strength of evidence

Abstract

Introduction

Results

Potential tenogenic differentiation potential of myogenic progenitor cells identified by single cell sequencing

Potential tendon differentiation ability of human myogenic progenitor cells

Human myogenic progenitor cells display tenogenic differentiation potential in vitro

Human myogenic progenitor cells display tendon differentiation ability in vitro

Tenocytes differentiated from human myogenic progenitor cells display similar expression profile to primary tenocytes

Human myogenic progenitor cells have tendon differentiation potential

Murine MuSCs display poor tenogenic differentiation ability

Murine MuSCs display poor tenogenic differentiation ability

Transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells facilitates tendon regeneration

Transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells facilitates tendon regeneration

Transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells improves locomotor function after tendon injury

Transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells improves the locomotor function after tendon injury

TGFβ signaling pathway contributes to tenogenic differentiation of human myogenic progenitor cells

TGFβ signaling pathway contributes to tenogenic differentiation of human myogenic progenitor cells

Discussion

Methods

Animals

Human samples

Isolation of human muscle stem/progenitor cells

Isolation of mouse muscle stem cells

Primary human tenocytes isolation

Cell culture and differentiation

Single-cell RNA sequencing and trajectory analysis

Immunofluorescence staining

RNA scope in situ hybridization

Gene expression analysis

Cloning assay

RNA-sequencing

Cell transplantation in TA muscle

Tendon injury for lineage tracing

Tendon injury and cell transplantation

Biomechanical analysis

Transmission electron microscope (TEM) examination

Treadmill test

In vivo muscle force analysis

Statistical analysis

Accession numbers

Acknowledgements

Supplemental Figure legend

Human myogenic progenitor cells display tenogenic differentiation potential

Murine MuSCs display poor tenogenic differentiation ability

Transplantation of human myogenic progenitor cells facilitates tendon regeneration and transplantation of human/murine myogenic progenitor cells improve muscle regeneration

Data availability

Conflict of interest disclosure

Funding

Contributors

References

Article and author information

Author information

Xiexiang Shao

Xingzuan Lin

Hao Zhou

Lili Han

Xin Fu

Sheng Li

Siyuan Zhu

Shenao Zhou

Jianhua Wang

Ping Hu

Version history

Copyright

Peer review process

Editors