Peer review process
Not revised: This Reviewed Preprint includes the authors’ original preprint (without revision), an eLife assessment, and public reviews.
Read more about eLife’s peer review process.Editors
- Reviewing EditorKeqiang YeChinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
- Senior EditorTony YuenIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States of America
Reviewer #1 (Public Review):
Summary:
Qi and colleagues investigated the role of the Kallistatin pathway in increasing hippocampal amyloid-β plaque accumulation and tau hyperphosphorylation in Alzheimer's disease, linking the increased Kallistatin level in diabetic patients with a higher risk of Alzheimer's disease development. A Kallistatin-overexpressing animal model was utilized, and memory impairment was assessed using Morris water maze and Y-maze. Kallistatin-related pathway protein levels were measured in the hippocampus, and phenotypes were rescued using fenofibrate and rosiglitazone. The current study provides evidence of a novel molecular mechanism linking diabetes and Alzheimer's disease and suggests the potential use of fenofibrate to alleviate memory impairment. However, several issues need to be addressed before further consideration.
Strengths:
The findings of this study are novel. The findings will have great impacts on diabetes and AD research. The studies were well conducted, and the results were convincing.
Weaknesses:
(1) The mechanism by which fenofibrate rescues memory loss in Kallistatin-transgenic mice is unclear. As a PPARalpha agonist, does fenofibrate target the Kallistatin pathway directly or indirectly? Please provide a discussion based on literature supporting either possibility.
(2) The current study exclusively investigated the hippocampus. What about other cognitive memory-related regions, such as the prefrontal cortex? Including data from these regions or discussing the possibility of their involvement could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the role of Kallistatin in memory impairment.
(3) Fenofibrate rescued phenotypes in Kallistatin-transgenic mice while rosiglitazone, a PPARgamma agonist, did not. This result contradicts the manuscript's emphasis on a PPARgamma-associated mechanism. Please address this inconsistency.
(4) Most of the immunohistochemistry images are unclear. Inserts have similar magnification to the original representative images, making judgments difficult. Please provide larger inserts with higher resolution.
(5) The immunohistochemistry images in different figures were taken from different hippocampal subregions with different magnifications. Please maintain consistency, or explain why CA1, CA3, or DG was analyzed in each experiment.
(6) Figure 5B is missing a title. Please add a title to maintain consistency with other graphs.
(7) Please list statistical methods used in the figure legends, such as t-test or One-way ANOVA with post-hoc tests.
Reviewer #2 (Public Review):
Summary:
The study links Alzheimer's disease (AD) with metabolic disorders through elevated Kallistatin levels in AD patients. Kallistatin-overexpressing mice show cognitive decline, increased Aβ and tau pathology, and impaired hippocampal function. Mechanistically, Kallistatin enhances Aβ production via Notch1 and promotes tau phosphorylation through GSK-3β activation. Fenofibrate improves cognitive deficits by reducing Aβ and tau phosphorylation in these mice, suggesting therapeutic potential in AD linked to metabolic syndromes.
Strengths:
This study presents novel insights into AD pathogenesis and provides strong evidence about the mechanistic roles of Kallistatin, and the therapeutic potential of fenofibrate in AD.
Weaknesses:
It was suggested that Kallistatin is primarily produced by the liver. The study demonstrates increased Kallistatin levels in the hippocampus tissue of AD mice. It would be valuable to clarify if Kallistatin is also increased in the liver of AD mice, providing a comprehensive understanding of its distribution in disease states.
Does Kallistatin interact directly with Notch1 ligands? Clarifying this interaction mechanism would enhance understanding of how Kallistatin influences Notch1 signaling in AD pathology.
Is there any observed difference in AD phenotype between male and female Kallistatin-transgenic (KAL-TG) mice? Including this information would address potential gender-specific effects on cognitive decline and pathology.
It is recommended to include molecular size markers in Western blots for clarity and accuracy in protein size determination.
The language should be revised for enhanced readability and clarity, ensuring that complex scientific concepts are communicated effectively to a broader audience.
Reviewer #3 (Public Review):
Summary:
The authors investigated the role of kallistatin in metabolic abnormalities associated with AD. They found that Kallistatin promotes Aβ production by binding to the Notch1 receptor and upregulating BACE1 expression. They identified that Kallistatin is a key player that mediates Aβ accumulation and tau hyperphosphorylation in AD.
Strengths:
This manuscript not only provides novel insights into the pathogenesis of AD, but also indicates that the hypolipidemic drug fenofibrate attenuates AD-like pathology in Kallistatin transgenic mice.
Weaknesses:
The authors did not illustrate whether the protective effect of fenofibrate against AD depends on kallistatin.
The conclusions are supported by the results, but the quality of some results should be improved.