Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide is a functional receptor for human hepatitis B and D virus

  1. Huan Yan
  2. Guocai Zhong
  3. Guangwei Xu
  4. Wenhui He
  5. Zhiyi Jing
  6. Zhenchao Gao
  7. Yi Huang
  8. Yonghe Qi
  9. Bo Peng
  10. Haimin Wang
  11. Liran Fu
  12. Mei Song
  13. Pan Chen
  14. Wenqing Gao
  15. Bijie Ren
  16. Yinyan Sun
  17. Tao Cai
  18. Xiaofeng Feng
  19. Jianhua Sui
  20. Wenhui Li  Is a corresponding author
  1. Peking University, China
  2. National Institute of Biological Sciences, China
  3. Graduate program in Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China

Peer review process

This article was accepted for publication as part of eLife's original publishing model.

History

  1. Version of Record published
  2. Accepted
  3. Received

Decision letter

  1. Zhijian J Chen
    Reviewing Editor; UT Southwestern Medical School, United States

eLife posts the editorial decision letter and author response on a selection of the published articles (subject to the approval of the authors). An edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the substantive concerns or comments; minor concerns are not usually shown. Reviewers have the opportunity to discuss the decision before the letter is sent (see review process). Similarly, the author response typically shows only responses to the major concerns raised by the reviewers.

Thank you for choosing to send your work entitled “Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide is a functional receptor for human hepatitis B and D virus” for consideration at eLife. Your article has been evaluated by a Senior Editor and 3 reviewers, one of whom is a member of eLife's Board of Reviewing Editors.

The Reviewing Editor and the other reviewers discussed their comments before we reached this decision, and the Reviewing Editor has assembled the following comments based on the reviewers' reports. Our goal is to provide the essential revision requirements as a single set of instructions, so that you have a clear view of the revisions that are necessary for us to publish your work.

This manuscript convincingly identifies NTCP as a receptor for HBV and HDV. The evidence in support of this conclusion includes: a) RNAi of NTCP in the virus-susceptible PTH and PHH cells reduced the virus infection; b) expression of NTCP in HBV non-permissive cell lines render these cells sensitive to HBV and HDV infections; c) swapping experiments showed that grafting of just 9 amino acids of human NTCP into monkey NTCP converts the monkey protein into a functional HBV/HDV receptor; d) The permissiveness of various cell lines to HBV/HDV infection correlates very well with the expression levels of NTCP; e) cross-linking experiments suggest that NTCP binds to the pre-S1 domain of the L envelope protein. The discovery of NTCP as the long-sought receptor for HBV and HDV is a major advance in the field and will have a large impact on both basic and clinical research in viral hepatitis.

This paper may be improved by addressing the following points:

1) It is not clear whether the viruses released from Huh7-NTCP or HepG2-NTCP could infect primary human hepatocytes (PHH). If so, what's the infectious titer?

2) Only 5–10% of stable HepG2-hNTCP cells were infected with HBV. How does this compare to primary human hepatocytes? An explanation for this low infection efficiency should be provided.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00049.026

Author response

1) It is not clear whether the viruses released from Huh7-NTCP or HepG2-NTCP could infect primary human hepatocytes (PHH). If so, what's the infectious titer?

To address this question, we performed new experiments. We found inoculation of primary human hepatocytes with the culture medium collected from HBV infected NTCP-expressing HepG2 cells only led to very limited infection on PHHs. This very low level of 2nd round infection was likely due to limited viral particles released from infected HepG2-NTCP cells. Indeed, only small amount of viral DNA was detected in the culture medium from the infected cells up to 13 days post primary infection. This is similar to HBV infection of PHHs. It has been known that HBV virion release from infected primary hepatocytes in culture is inefficient [1,2], only a level of less than 1% input virions could be detected in the culture medium at the maximum of HBV replication on PHH [2]. In our own experiments, the viral DNA level in culture medium is comparable between infected PHH and HepG2-NTCP cells: in both cultures, a level equivalent to ∼1% of input viral genome copies was detected. We included these data in new Figure 6—figure supplement 3. It is tempting to speculate that some host factors that are lacking in cell cultures in vitro might be needed for efficient viral particles formation or releasing; or some cellular factors in these cultures may hinder these processes during infection. Further studies are required to understand how the interactions between host cells and HBV viruses control the multiple steps of viral propagation and spreading after primary viral entry. The description for the new Figure 6—figure supplement 3 was added in the Results section.

2) Only 5–10% of stable HepG2-hNTCP cells were infected with HBV. How does this compare to primary human hepatocytes? An explanation for this low infection efficiency should be provided.

To compare the efficiency of HBV infection on HepG2-hNTCP cells and PHHs, we performed side-by-side experimental tests in which HepG2-hNTCP and PHHs from two independent donors were inoculated with same doses of HBV viruses, respectively. The results are shown in new Figure 6—figure supplement 2, with text added in the Results section. By staining intracellular HBV core antigen (HBcAg) on day 8 post infection (dpi 8), we estimated that about 10% of HepG2-hNTCP cells were infected at multiplicity of genome equivalents (mge) 100. For the two PHHs, the infection efficiency was up to ∼5% and ∼10%, respectively. HepG2-NTCP cells but not PHHs propagate in cultures, thus the actual infection efficiency of HepG2-hNTCP cells may be underestimated by the observed infection using HBcAg staining at the endpoint of infection. Nevertheless, the infection efficiency in HepG2-NTCP cells is comparable to PHHs of good quality at the same infection dose under the conditions tested. It has been reported that up to 5% of PHHs could be infected in vitro at ∼80 mge [3], more efficient infection on primary hepatocytes required HBV of thousands mge [3,4]. This is in contrast to the in vivo infection of HBV in chimpanzees, for which much lower HBV mge is sufficient [5]. It is possible that the microenvironment and architecture of hepatocytes in liver or other host factors, such as soluble ones in blood or other co-receptor/entry components that are lacking or lost in cultures, may also contribute to the efficiency of HBV infection.

References:

1 Gripon, P. et al. Hepatitis B virus infection of adult human hepatocytes cultured in the presence of dimethyl sulfoxide. J Virol 62, 4136–4143 (1988).

2 Boehm, ST., Thasler, WE., Weiss,TS., Jilg,W. in Models of Viral Hepatitis Vol. 25 (ed Roggendorf M, Von Weizsacker F) 119–134 (Karger, 2005).

3 Schulze, A., Mills, K., Weiss, T. S. & Urban, S. Hepatocyte polarization is essential for the productive entry of the hepatitis B virus. Hepatology 55, 373–383, (2012).

4 Glebe, D. et al. Pre-s1 antigen-dependent infection of Tupaia hepatocyte cultures with human hepatitis B virus. J Virol 77, 9511–9521 (2003).

5 Asabe, S. et al. The size of the viral inoculum contributes to the outcome of hepatitis B virus infection. J Virol 83, 9652–9662 (2009).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00049.027

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Huan Yan
  2. Guocai Zhong
  3. Guangwei Xu
  4. Wenhui He
  5. Zhiyi Jing
  6. Zhenchao Gao
  7. Yi Huang
  8. Yonghe Qi
  9. Bo Peng
  10. Haimin Wang
  11. Liran Fu
  12. Mei Song
  13. Pan Chen
  14. Wenqing Gao
  15. Bijie Ren
  16. Yinyan Sun
  17. Tao Cai
  18. Xiaofeng Feng
  19. Jianhua Sui
  20. Wenhui Li
(2012)
Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide is a functional receptor for human hepatitis B and D virus
eLife 1:e00049.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00049

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00049