1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
  2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
Download icon

Three-dimensional electron crystallography of protein microcrystals

  1. Dan Shi
  2. Brent L Nannenga
  3. Matthew G Iadanza
  4. Tamir Gonen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States
Research Article
Cite this article as: eLife 2013;2:e01345 doi: 10.7554/eLife.01345
8 figures, 4 videos, 3 tables and 1 data set

Figures

Images of lysozyme microrystals.

(A) Light micrograph showing lysozyme microcrystals (three examples indicated by arrows) in comparison with larger crystals of the size normally used for X-ray crystallography. Scale bar is 50 μm. (B) Lysozyme microcrystals visualized in over-focused diffraction mode on the cryo-EM prior to data collection. The length and width of the crystals varied from 2 to 6 µm with an estimated thickness of ∼0.5–1 µm. Scale bar is 1 µm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.003
Resolution and data quality of lysozyme microcrystals.

(A) Analysis of the effects of crystal thickness on maximum resolution of observed reflections from thick crystals. The analysis shows adverse effects of crystal thickness on the obtainable resolution as large crystals are tilted. (B) For assessing the quality of our cryo preparations, diffraction data were obtained from 100 lysozyme microcrystals. 43/100 were thin crystals that showed reflections in the 2–4 Å range, with the best crystal in this set yielding data to ∼1.7 Å resolution. (C) An example of lysozyme diffraction data collected at 0.01e2/second and a 10 s exposure. The pattern shows strong and sharp spots surpassing 2 Å resolution. This diffraction pattern was processed with ImageJ and despeckled for ease of viewing. (D) Analysis of the effects of crystal thickness on maximum resolution of observed reflections from thin crystals. The small crystal shows a relatively constant maximum resolution that does not appear to be affected by crystal tilt.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.004
Effects of cumulative electron dose on diffraction data quality.

A single lysozyme microcrystal was subjected to 120 sequential exposures without tilting, each of a dose of ∼0.1 e2 for a total accumulated dose of ∼12 e2. Normalized intensity vs total accumulated dose for three diffraction spots observed over all 120 sequential frames was plotted. A decrease in diffraction intensity becomes apparent at a dosage of ∼9 e2 (‘critical dose’). Bars represent standard error of the mean.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.005
Prediction of reflections and indexing in the diffraction patterns.

(A and B) Two examples of diffraction patterns obtained from a single crystal at tilt angles of 0° and 20° respectively. Locations indicated by circles were predicted to contain diffraction spots by our spot prediction algorithm. Additional examples from the same crystal are presented in Video 2. The resolution limit was set at 2.9 Å resolution for this study.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.007
Three-dimensional profiles of the intensity of a single reflection over three consecutive diffraction patterns at −0.1°, 0°, and 0.1° degree tilts.

The plots show the approximate dimensions of the full reflection with a width (full width at half maximum height) of 3–5 pixels in the x, y, and z direction.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.009
Results of phasing by molecular replacement prior to crystallographic refinement.

Molecular replacement was performed with both the full model of lysozyme (PDB 4AXT, top panels) as well as a poly-alanine model (bottom panels) and the resulting 2Fobs−Fcalc maps around residues 1–20 are shown. (A and B) The phases following molecular replacement with the full model were of good quality demonstrated by how well the density surrounding the model fits, even before any refinement is performed. (C) A composite-omit map calculated by omitting 5% at a time showed good agreement with the unrefined structure indicating the phases were not dominated by model bias. (DF) As an additional test of model bias, phasing was done with a poly-alanine homology search model of lysozyme. The resulting 2Fobs−Fcalc map is of good quality (D) and shows density extending beyond the poly-alanine model (E and F, arrows). (F) The same density map as E but with the structure of lysozyme fit. Arrows in D and E show examples of clear side chain density from the poly-alanine map. All maps are contoured at 1.0σ.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.012
MicroED structure of lysozyme at 2.9 Å resolution.

(A) The 2Fobs−Fcalc (contoured at 1.5σ) map covers protein residues 5–45 of lysozyme. (B) Fobs−Fcalc difference map contoured at +3.0σ (green) and −3.0σ (red) for the same protein region. The map (A) shows well-defined density around the vast majority of side chains and the difference map (B) shows no large discrepancies between the observed data (Fobs) and the model (Fcalc). The final structure of lysozyme is shown in panel C and the complete three-dimensional map is presented in Video 3.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.013
Dynamic scattering in lysozyme 3D crystals.

Intensity measurement along the a* axis of a raw diffraction pattern illustrating the relatively small contributions due to dynamic scattering. (A) Diffraction pattern from the major plane of a lysozyme crystal with visible intensity in the (2n+1,0,0) and (0,2n+1,0) Miller indices. (B) (2n+1, 0, 0) reflections (starred) are expected to be systematically absent and observed intensities at these indices are assumed to be the result of dynamic scattering. Image contrast was enhanced for clarity using ImageJ.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.017

Videos

Video 1
An example of a complete three-dimensional electron diffraction data set from a single lysozyme microcrystal.

In this example, diffraction patterns were recorded at 1° intervals from a single crystal, tilted over 47°. Cumulative dose was ∼5 e2 in this example.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.006
Video 2
An example of spot prediction in diffraction data from a single crystal.

Reflections predicted on representative diffraction patterns obtained from a single crystal tilted over 39° sampled every 2° in this video. Predictions were made to 2.9 Å resolution using our spot prediction algorithm.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.008
Video 3
Three-dimensional representation of merged intensity values.

2490 total unique reflections are present for an overall completeness of 92% at 2.9 Å resolution. Video begins with a* axis horizontal, b* axis vertical, and the c* axis normal to the image plane.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.011
Video 4
2Fobs−Fcalc density around the complete lysozyme model at 2.9 Å resolution (contoured at 1.5σ).
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.014

Tables

Table 1

MicroED crystallographic data

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.010
Data collection
 Excitation voltage200 kV
 Electron sourceField emission gun
 Wavelength (Å)0.025
 Total electron dose per crystal∼9 e2
 Number of patterns per crystal40–90
 No. crystals used3
 Total reflections to 2.9 Å84,889
Data refinement
 Space groupP43212
 Unit cell dimensions
 a = b77 Å
 c37 Å
 α = β = γ90°
 Resolution2.9–20.0 Å
 Total unique reflections2490
 Reflections in working set2240
 Reflections in test set250
 Multiplicity*34
 Completeness (2.9–3.1)92% (57%)
 Rwork/Rfree (%)25.5/27.8
 RMSD bonds0.051 Å
 RMSD angles1.587°
 Ramachandran (%) (allowed, generous, disallowed)99.1; 0.9; 0
  1. *

    Multiplicity is defined as total measured reflections divided by number of unique reflections.

  2. Statistics given by PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 1993).

Table 2

Results of model validation and bias tests

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.015
Data setMolecular replacement resultTFZFinal Rfree (%)
1*No solutionN/AN/A
2Solution**19.154.9
3No solutionN/AN/A
4§Solution12.635.2
5#Solution14.727.8
  1. *

    Random intensities.

  2. Shuffled Miller indices.

  3. Calmodulin replaced intensities.

  4. §

    Intensities ± 35%.

  5. #

    Original data.

  6. Final Rfree after a minimum of two cycles of refinement.

  7. **

    Solution was found; however, the space group was incorrect (P4121).

Table 3

Models for molecular replacement validation

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01345.016
ProteinPDB IDMolecular weight (kDa)SymmetryUnit cell dimensionsMR solution
Hen Egg White Lysozyme*4AXT14.3P43212a = b = 78.24 ÅYes
c = 37.47 Å
α = β = γ = 90°
T4 Lysozyme2LZM18.7P3212a = b = 61.20 ÅNo
c = 96.80 Å
α = β = 90°
γ = 120°
Calmodulin3CLN16.7P1a = 29.71 Å,No
b = 53.79 Å,
c = 24.99 Å
α = 94.13°,
β = 97.57°,
γ = 89.46°
Dodecin§4B2J8.5F4132a = b = c = 142.90 ÅNo
α = β = γ = 90°
αA Crystallin#3L1E11.9P41212a = b = 56.22 Å,No
c = 68.66 Å
α = β = γ = 90°
  1. *
  2. §
  3. #

Data availability

The following data sets were generated
  1. 1
    Structure of lysozyme solved by MicroED to 2.9Å
    1. D Shi
    2. B.L Nannenga
    3. M.G Iadanza
    4. T Gonen
    (2013)
    ID 3J4G. Publicly available at RCSB Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org).

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)