Transport of soluble proteins through the Golgi occurs by diffusion via continuities across cisternae

  1. Galina V Beznoussenko
  2. Seetharaman Parashuraman
  3. Riccardo Rizzo
  4. Roman Polishchuk
  5. Oliviano Martella
  6. Daniele Di Giandomenico
  7. Aurora Fusella
  8. Alexander Spaar
  9. Michele Sallese
  10. Maria Grazia Capestrano
  11. Margit Pavelka
  12. Matthijn R Vos
  13. Yuri GM Rikers
  14. Volkhard Helms
  15. Alexandre A Mironov
  16. Alberto Luini  Is a corresponding author
  1. Fondazione IFOM, Italy
  2. Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR-IBP), Italy
  3. Telethon Institute for Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), Italy
  4. Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Italy
  5. Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  6. FEI Company, Netherlands
  7. Saarland University, Germany

Abstract

The mechanism of transport through the Golgi complex is not completely understood, insofar as no single transport mechanism appears to account for all of the observations. Here, we compare the transport of soluble secretory proteins (albumin and α1-antitrypsin) with that of supramolecular cargoes (e.g., procollagen) that are proposed to traverse the Golgi by compartment progression-maturation. We show that these soluble proteins traverse the Golgi much faster than procollagen while moving through the same stack. Moreover, we present kinetic and morphological observations that indicate that albumin transport occurs by diffusion via intercisternal continuities. These data provide evidence that this transport mechanism that applies to a major class of secretory proteins and indicate the co-existence of multiple intra-Golgi trafficking modes.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Galina V Beznoussenko

    Fondazione IFOM, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Seetharaman Parashuraman

    Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR-IBP), Naples, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Riccardo Rizzo

    Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR-IBP), Naples, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Roman Polishchuk

    Telethon Institute for Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), Naples, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Oliviano Martella

    Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Daniele Di Giandomenico

    Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Aurora Fusella

    Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Alexander Spaar

    Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Michele Sallese

    Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Maria Grazia Capestrano

    Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Margit Pavelka

    Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Matthijn R Vos

    FEI Company, Eindhoven, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Yuri GM Rikers

    FEI Company, Eindhoven, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Volkhard Helms

    Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Alexandre A Mironov

    Fondazione IFOM, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Alberto Luini

    Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR-IBP), Naples, Italy
    For correspondence
    luini@tigem.it
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2014, Beznoussenko et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,869
    views
  • 554
    downloads
  • 71
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Galina V Beznoussenko
  2. Seetharaman Parashuraman
  3. Riccardo Rizzo
  4. Roman Polishchuk
  5. Oliviano Martella
  6. Daniele Di Giandomenico
  7. Aurora Fusella
  8. Alexander Spaar
  9. Michele Sallese
  10. Maria Grazia Capestrano
  11. Margit Pavelka
  12. Matthijn R Vos
  13. Yuri GM Rikers
  14. Volkhard Helms
  15. Alexandre A Mironov
  16. Alberto Luini
(2014)
Transport of soluble proteins through the Golgi occurs by diffusion via continuities across cisternae
eLife 3:e02009.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02009

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02009

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Roy Ng ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle that cycles through assembly and disassembly. In many cell types, formation of the cilium is initiated by recruitment of ciliary vesicles to the distal appendage of the mother centriole. However, the distal appendage mechanism that directly captures ciliary vesicles is yet to be identified. In an accompanying paper, we show that the distal appendage protein, CEP89, is important for the ciliary vesicle recruitment, but not for other steps of cilium formation (Tomoharu Kanie, Love, Fisher, Gustavsson, & Jackson, 2023). The lack of a membrane binding motif in CEP89 suggests that it may indirectly recruit ciliary vesicles via another binding partner. Here, we identify Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (NCS1) as a stoichiometric interactor of CEP89. NCS1 localizes to the position between CEP89 and a ciliary vesicle marker, RAB34, at the distal appendage. This localization was completely abolished in CEP89 knockouts, suggesting that CEP89 recruits NCS1 to the distal appendage. Similarly to CEP89 knockouts, ciliary vesicle recruitment as well as subsequent cilium formation was perturbed in NCS1 knockout cells. The ability of NCS1 to recruit the ciliary vesicle is dependent on its myristoylation motif and NCS1 knockout cells expressing a myristoylation defective mutant failed to rescue the vesicle recruitment defect despite localizing properly to the centriole. In sum, our analysis reveals the first known mechanism for how the distal appendage recruits the ciliary vesicles.

    1. Cell Biology
    Ling Cheng, Ian Meliala ... Mikael Björklund
    Research Article

    Mitochondrial dysfunction is involved in numerous diseases and the aging process. The integrated stress response (ISR) serves as a critical adaptation mechanism to a variety of stresses, including those originating from mitochondria. By utilizing mass spectrometry-based cellular thermal shift assay (MS-CETSA), we uncovered that phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 (PEBP1), also known as Raf kinase inhibitory protein (RKIP), is thermally stabilized by stresses which induce mitochondrial ISR. Depletion of PEBP1 impaired mitochondrial ISR activation by reducing eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) phosphorylation and subsequent ISR gene expression, which was independent of PEBP1’s role in inhibiting the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway. Consistently, overexpression of PEBP1 potentiated ISR activation by heme-regulated inhibitor (HRI) kinase, the principal eIF2α kinase in the mitochondrial ISR pathway. Real-time interaction analysis using luminescence complementation in live cells revealed an interaction between PEBP1 and eIF2α, which was disrupted by eIF2α S51 phosphorylation. These findings suggest a role for PEBP1 in amplifying mitochondrial stress signals, thereby facilitating an effective cellular response to mitochondrial dysfunction. Therefore, PEBP1 may be a potential therapeutic target for diseases associated with mitochondrial dysfunction.