Cell autonomous regulation of hippocampal circuitry via Aph1b-γ-secretase/Neuregulin 1 signalling

Abstract

Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) and the γ-secretase subunit APH1B have been previously implicated as genetic risk factors for schizophrenia and schizophrenia relevant deficits have been observed in rodent models with loss of function mutations in either gene. Here we show that the Aph1b-γ-secretase is selectively involved in Nrg1 intracellular signalling. We found that Aph1b-deficient mice display a decrease in excitatory synaptic markers. Electrophysiological recordings show that Aph1b is required for excitatory synaptic transmission and plasticity. Furthermore, gain and loss of function and genetic rescue experiments indicate that Nrg1 intracellular signalling promotes dendritic spine formation downstream of Aph1b-γ-secretase in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, our study sheds light on the physiological role of Aph1b-γ-secretase in brain and provides a new mechanistic perspective on the relevance of NRG1 processing in schizophrenia.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pietro Fazzari

    VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. An Snellinx

    VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Victor Sabonov

    KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Tariq Ahmed

    KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Lutgarde Serneels

    VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Annette Gartner

    VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. S. Ali M Shariati

    VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Detlef Balschun

    KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Bart De Strooper

    VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    bart.destrooper@cme.vib-kuleuven.be
    Competing interests
    Bart De Strooper, Reviewing editor, eLife, and it might be perceived as a potential conflict of interest that I (BDS) am consultant for Janssen Pharmaceutica, Remynd NV and Envivo Pharmaceutics.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Eunjoon Kim, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, South Korea

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All the experiments involving animals in this study were approved and performed in strict accordance with the recommendations of the Ethical Committee of Katholic Univesitet Leuven (Approval Nr. p047/2012). Every effort was taken to minimize suffering of mice according to the guidelines Ethical Committee.

Version history

  1. Received: January 2, 2014
  2. Accepted: May 29, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 2, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: June 5, 2014 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: July 1, 2014 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2014, Fazzari et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,968
    Page views
  • 203
    Downloads
  • 21
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pietro Fazzari
  2. An Snellinx
  3. Victor Sabonov
  4. Tariq Ahmed
  5. Lutgarde Serneels
  6. Annette Gartner
  7. S. Ali M Shariati
  8. Detlef Balschun
  9. Bart De Strooper
(2014)
Cell autonomous regulation of hippocampal circuitry via Aph1b-γ-secretase/Neuregulin 1 signalling
eLife 3:e02196.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02196

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02196

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Flora Moujaes, Jie Lisa Ji ... Alan Anticevic
    Research Article

    Background:

    Ketamine has emerged as one of the most promising therapies for treatment-resistant depression. However, inter-individual variability in response to ketamine is still not well understood and it is unclear how ketamine’s molecular mechanisms connect to its neural and behavioral effects.

    Methods:

    We conducted a single-blind placebo-controlled study, with participants blinded to their treatment condition. 40 healthy participants received acute ketamine (initial bolus 0.23 mg/kg, continuous infusion 0.58 mg/kg/hr). We quantified resting-state functional connectivity via data-driven global brain connectivity and related it to individual ketamine-induced symptom variation and cortical gene expression targets.

    Results:

    We found that: (i) both the neural and behavioral effects of acute ketamine are multi-dimensional, reflecting robust inter-individual variability; (ii) ketamine’s data-driven principal neural gradient effect matched somatostatin (SST) and parvalbumin (PVALB) cortical gene expression patterns in humans, while the mean effect did not; and (iii) behavioral data-driven individual symptom variation mapped onto distinct neural gradients of ketamine, which were resolvable at the single-subject level.

    Conclusions:

    These results highlight the importance of considering individual behavioral and neural variation in response to ketamine. They also have implications for the development of individually precise pharmacological biomarkers for treatment selection in psychiatry.

    Funding:

    This study was supported by NIH grants DP5OD012109-01 (A.A.), 1U01MH121766 (A.A.), R01MH112746 (J.D.M.), 5R01MH112189 (A.A.), 5R01MH108590 (A.A.), NIAAA grant 2P50AA012870-11 (A.A.); NSF NeuroNex grant 2015276 (J.D.M.); Brain and Behavior Research Foundation Young Investigator Award (A.A.); SFARI Pilot Award (J.D.M., A.A.); Heffter Research Institute (Grant No. 1–190420) (FXV, KHP); Swiss Neuromatrix Foundation (Grant No. 2016–0111) (FXV, KHP); Swiss National Science Foundation under the framework of Neuron Cofund (Grant No. 01EW1908) (KHP); Usona Institute (2015 – 2056) (FXV).

    Clinical trial number:

    NCT03842800

    1. Neuroscience
    Lies Deceuninck, Fabian Kloosterman
    Research Article Updated

    Storing and accessing memories is required to successfully perform day-to-day tasks, for example for engaging in a meaningful conversation. Previous studies in both rodents and primates have correlated hippocampal cellular activity with behavioral expression of memory. A key role has been attributed to awake hippocampal replay – a sequential reactivation of neurons representing a trajectory through space. However, it is unclear if awake replay impacts immediate future behavior, gradually creates and stabilizes long-term memories over a long period of time (hours and longer), or enables the temporary memorization of relevant events at an intermediate time scale (seconds to minutes). In this study, we aimed to address the uncertainty around the timeframe of impact of awake replay by collecting causal evidence from behaving rats. We detected and disrupted sharp wave ripples (SWRs) - signatures of putative replay events - using electrical stimulation of the ventral hippocampal commissure in rats that were trained on three different spatial memory tasks. In each task, rats were required to memorize a new set of locations in each trial or each daily session. Interestingly, the rats performed equally well with or without SWR disruptions. These data suggest that awake SWRs - and potentially replay - does not affect the immediate behavior nor the temporary memorization of relevant events at a short timescale that are required to successfully perform the spatial tasks. Based on these results, we hypothesize that the impact of awake replay on memory and behavior is long-term and cumulative over time.