Mismatch repair deficiency endows tumors with a unique mutation signature and sensitivity to DNA double-strand breaks

  1. Hui Zhao
  2. Bernard Thienpont
  3. Betül T Yesilyurt
  4. Matthieu Moisse
  5. Joke Reumers
  6. Lieve Coenegrachts
  7. Xavier Sagaert
  8. Stefanie Schrauwen
  9. Dominiek Smeets
  10. Gert Matthijs
  11. Stein Aerts
  12. Jan Cools
  13. Alex Metcalf
  14. Amanda Spurdle
  15. ANECS
  16. Frederic Amant
  17. Diether Lambrechts  Is a corresponding author
  1. VIB Vesalius Research Center, KU Leuven, Belgium
  2. University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Belgium
  3. KU Leuven, Belgium
  4. University of Leuven, Belgium
  5. Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Australia
  6. PO Royal Brisbane Hospital, Australia

Abstract

DNA replication errors that persist as mismatch mutations make up the molecular fingerprint of mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient tumors and convey them with resistance to standard therapy. Using whole-genome and -exome sequencing, we here confirm an MMR-deficient mutation signature that is distinct from other tumor genomes, but surprisingly similar to germ-line DNA, confirming that a substantial fraction of human genetic variation arises through mutations escaping MMR. Moreover, we identify a large set of recurrent indels that may serve to detect microsatellite instability (MSI). Indeed, using endometrial tumors with immunohistochemically-proven MMR deficiency, we optimize a novel marker set capable of detecting MSI and show it to have greater specificity and selectivity than standard MSI tests. Additionally, we show that recurrent indels are enriched for the 'DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination' pathway. Consequently, DSB repair is reduced in MMR-deficient tumors, triggering a dose-dependent sensitivity of MMR-deficient tumor cultures to DSB inducers.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hui Zhao

    VIB Vesalius Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Bernard Thienpont

    VIB Vesalius Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Betül T Yesilyurt

    VIB Vesalius Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Matthieu Moisse

    VIB Vesalius Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Joke Reumers

    VIB Vesalius Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Lieve Coenegrachts

    University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Xavier Sagaert

    University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Stefanie Schrauwen

    University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Dominiek Smeets

    VIB Vesalius Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Gert Matthijs

    KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Stein Aerts

    University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Jan Cools

    KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Alex Metcalf

    Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Amanda Spurdle

    Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. ANECS

    PO Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Frederic Amant

    University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Diether Lambrechts

    VIB Vesalius Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    diether.lambrechts@vib-kuleuven.be
    Competing interests
    Diether Lambrechts, an inventor on a patent application regarding the use of recurrent indels to detect MSI. The VIB is owner of this patent application, and the said patent application has been licensed to an outside company. Neither VIB nor any of the authors have equity stakes in the company. However, VIB stands to eventually receive royalties.

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent and consent to publish was obtained from all patients. Ethical approval was obtained at the ethical committee of University Hospital Gasthuisberg of Leuven with identifier ML2266.

Copyright

© 2014, Zhao et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,394
    views
  • 1,028
    downloads
  • 71
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hui Zhao
  2. Bernard Thienpont
  3. Betül T Yesilyurt
  4. Matthieu Moisse
  5. Joke Reumers
  6. Lieve Coenegrachts
  7. Xavier Sagaert
  8. Stefanie Schrauwen
  9. Dominiek Smeets
  10. Gert Matthijs
  11. Stein Aerts
  12. Jan Cools
  13. Alex Metcalf
  14. Amanda Spurdle
  15. ANECS
  16. Frederic Amant
  17. Diether Lambrechts
(2014)
Mismatch repair deficiency endows tumors with a unique mutation signature and sensitivity to DNA double-strand breaks
eLife 3:e02725.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02725

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02725

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Tanya Wolff, Mark Eddison ... Gerald M Rubin
    Research Article

    The central complex (CX) plays a key role in many higher-order functions of the insect brain including navigation and activity regulation. Genetic tools for manipulating individual cell types, and knowledge of what neurotransmitters and neuromodulators they express, will be required to gain mechanistic understanding of how these functions are implemented. We generated and characterized split-GAL4 driver lines that express in individual or small subsets of about half of CX cell types. We surveyed neuropeptide and neuropeptide receptor expression in the central brain using fluorescent in situ hybridization. About half of the neuropeptides we examined were expressed in only a few cells, while the rest were expressed in dozens to hundreds of cells. Neuropeptide receptors were expressed more broadly and at lower levels. Using our GAL4 drivers to mark individual cell types, we found that 51 of the 85 CX cell types we examined expressed at least one neuropeptide and 21 expressed multiple neuropeptides. Surprisingly, all co-expressed a small molecule neurotransmitter. Finally, we used our driver lines to identify CX cell types whose activation affects sleep, and identified other central brain cell types that link the circadian clock to the CX. The well-characterized genetic tools and information on neuropeptide and neurotransmitter expression we provide should enhance studies of the CX.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Christopher S McAllester, John E Pool
    Research Article

    Chromosomal inversion polymorphisms can be common, but the causes of their persistence are often unclear. We propose a model for the maintenance of inversion polymorphism, which requires that some variants contribute antagonistically to two phenotypes, one of which has negative frequency-dependent fitness. These conditions yield a form of frequency-dependent disruptive selection, favoring two predominant haplotypes segregating alleles that favor opposing antagonistic phenotypes. An inversion associated with one haplotype can reduce the fitness load incurred by generating recombinant offspring, reinforcing its linkage to the haplotype and enabling both haplotypes to accumulate more antagonistic variants than expected otherwise. We develop and apply a forward simulator to examine these dynamics under a tradeoff between survival and male display. These simulations indeed generate inversion-associated haplotypes with opposing sex-specific fitness effects. Antagonism strengthens with time, and can ultimately yield karyotypes at surprisingly predictable frequencies, with striking genotype frequency differences between sexes and between developmental stages. To test whether this model may contribute to well-studied yet enigmatic inversion polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster, we track inversion frequencies in laboratory crosses to test whether they influence male reproductive success or survival. We find that two of the four tested inversions show significant evidence for the tradeoff examined, with In(3 R)K favoring survival and In(3 L)Ok favoring male reproduction. In line with the apparent sex-specific fitness effects implied for both of those inversions, In(3 L)Ok was also found to be less costly to the viability and/or longevity of males than females, whereas In(3 R)K was more beneficial to female survival. Based on this work, we expect that balancing selection on antagonistically pleiotropic traits may provide a significant and underappreciated contribution to the maintenance of natural inversion polymorphism.