There is concern that crop plants are becoming less nutritious as the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere increase.
The rapid rise in the concentration of carbon dioxide, or CO2, in the atmosphere, which has occurred largely since the Industrial Revolution, is the most prominent cause of climate change. Moreover, atmospheric CO2 levels are predicted to double between now and the end of this century (IPCC, 2013). Most plants respond to elevated CO2 concentrations by growing faster, and it is possible that this enhanced growth might counteract some of the negative impacts of climate change on global food production, such as decreased agricultural output due to an increased frequency of floods and droughts.
However, alongside this enhanced growth, plants that are exposed to elevated levels of CO2 frequently show changes in the chemical composition of their leaves, stems, roots, fruits and tubers. While these effects have been known for some time (Porter and Grodzinski, 1984; Manderscheid et al., 1995), they have not been assessed in a systematic and comprehensive manner. Whether or not these changes in the chemical composition of food crops have wider implications for human nutrition is a matter of debate.
To address this question, Irakli Loladze of the Catholic University of Daegu has systematically collected and evaluated existing information on the effects of elevated levels of CO2 on plant tissues, notably the effects on minerals and trace elements that are important for human health, such as calcium, zinc, and iron. This meta-analysis—which is published in eLife—analysed more than 7500 observations that cover 130 different plant species and crop varieties (Loladze, 2014). Based on this unprecedentedly large dataset, Loladze was able to show that, when averaged across very different plant and tissue types, experimental approaches and locations, elevated CO2 reduced the overall mineral content of plants by about 8%. At the same time, elevated CO2 was shown to strongly increase the ratio of soluble carbohydrates (starch and sugars) to proteins.
Making general conclusions about the effects of elevated CO2 on the composition of plant tissues derived from existing studies is difficult. Although decreased concentrations of nitrogen, protein, and other minerals have been previously observed, the size of these effects is often small and thus difficult to confirm with small sample sizes. Furthermore, not all elements are affected in the same way in different plant species and experiments. Despite these caveats, Loladze's meta-analysis shows a remarkable consistency in the effects of elevated CO2 on the mineral concentrations across a wide range of plant species, including food crops.
There are less data available for edible parts of major food crops, and a general lack of data for other important food crops, such as maize, banana and cassava. Nevertheless, Loladze could show diminished mineral concentrations in edible parts of food crop plants from existing information. Further, he argues that the observed changes to the mineral content of food crops might exacerbate the problem of ‘hidden hunger’; that is, a person's diet can be deficient in minerals even if they consume enough calories. This type of malnutrition is common, particularly in developing countries, as many people eat only a limited number of staple crops, and do not eat enough mineral-rich foods—such as fruits, vegetables, dairy and meats. Loladze also speculates that the changes in the carbohydrate to protein ratio caused by elevated CO2 might contribute to the obesity epidemic.
In independent work, Samuel Myers of Harvard and co-workers have studied the effects of elevated CO2 on six food crops (Myers et al., 2014). They found that zinc and iron levels were diminished in the grains of wheat, rice and soybean that were grown in atmospheres containing the levels of CO2 that may be reached by the middle of this century.
Both Loladze and Myers et al. note that while many crops can photosynthesise more when they are grown under elevated CO2 levels, the photosynthesis of some crops (for example maize) is not directly influenced by elevated CO2. However, both types of crops are known to lose less water from their tissues when grown at elevated CO2, and thus the stimulation of photosynthesis and/or the improved water economy may contribute to the overall increase in growth. In contrast, the possible causes for the changes in plant tissue composition remain less clear. Previous studies have discussed the potential for a ‘dilution effect’ due to the surplus of carbohydrates, or a reduced plant uptake of minerals from the soil due to reduced water flow through the plant (McGrath and Lobell, 2013).
Although the exact mechanism remains unclear, the evidence suggests that an increase in CO2 levels is likely to be detrimental for human nutrition. Beyond food crops, these findings could also have implications for the quality of animal feed and for the overall element content of natural environments. Finally, there is a clear need for further research (Figure 1) that is specifically targeted to address the impact of climate change on the quality of food crops grown around the world.
Climate change 2014: climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. working group II contribution to AR5. http://www.ipcc-wg2.org/Climate change 2014: climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. working group II contribution to AR5. http://www.ipcc-wg2.org/.
Effects of season long CO2 enrichment on cereals: 2. nutrient concentration and grain qualityAgriculture Ecosystems & Environment 54:175–185.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(95)00602-O
Increasing CO2 threatens human nutritionNature, 10.1038/nature13179.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Ecological conditions are known to change the expression of mutualisms though the causal agents driving such changes remain poorly understood. Here we show that temperature stress modulates the harm threatened by a common enemy, and thereby induces a phoretic mite to become a protective mutualist. Our experiments focus on the interactions between the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides, an associated mite species Poecilochirus carabi and their common enemy, blowflies, when all three species reproduce on the same small vertebrate carrion. We show that mites compete with beetle larvae for food in the absence of blowflies, and reduce beetle reproductive success. However, when blowflies breed on the carrion too, mites enhance beetle reproductive success by eating blowfly eggs. High densities of mites are especially effective at promoting beetle reproductive success at higher and lower natural ranges in temperature, when blowfly larvae are more potent rivals for the limited resources on the carcass.
Understanding the consequences of ongoing biodiversity changes for ecosystems is a pressing challenge. Controlled biodiversity-ecosystem function experiments with random biodiversity loss scenarios have demonstrated that more diverse communities usually provide higher levels of ecosystem functioning. However, it is not clear if these results predict the ecosystem consequences of environmental changes that cause non-random alterations in biodiversity and community composition. We synthesized 69 independent studies reporting 660 observations of the impacts of two pervasive drivers of global change (chemical stressors and nutrient enrichment) on animal and microbial decomposer diversity and litter decomposition. Using meta-analysis and structural equation modeling, we show that declines in decomposer diversity and abundance explain reduced litter decomposition in response to stressors but not to nutrients. While chemical stressors generally reduced biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, detrimental effects of nutrients occurred only at high levels of nutrient inputs. Thus, more intense environmental change does not always result in stronger responses, illustrating the complexity of ecosystem consequences of biodiversity change. Overall, these findings provide strong evidence that the consequences of observed biodiversity change for ecosystems depend on the kind of environmental change, and are especially significant when human activities decrease biodiversity.