Synthetic CpG islands reveal DNA sequence determinants of chromatin structure

  1. Elisabeth Wachter
  2. Timo Quante
  3. Cara Merusi
  4. Aleksandra Arczewska
  5. Francis Stewart
  6. Shaun Webb
  7. Adrian Bird  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  2. Technische Universitaet Dresden, Germany

Abstract

The mammalian genome is punctuated by CpG islands (CGIs), which differ sharply from the bulk genome by being rich in G+C and the dinucleotide CpG. CGIs often include transcription initiation sites and display 'active' histone marks, notably histone H3 lysine 4 methylation. In embryonic stem cells (ESCs) some CGIs adopt a 'bivalent' chromatin state bearing simultaneous 'active' and 'inactive' chromatin marks. To determine whether CGI chromatin is developmentally programmed at specific genes or is imposed by shared features of CGI DNA, we integrated artificial CGI-like DNA sequences into the ESC genome. We found that bivalency is the default chromatin structure for CpG-rich, G+C-rich DNA. A high CpG density alone is not sufficient for this effect, as A+T-rich sequence settings invariably provoke de novo DNA methylation leading to loss of CGI signature chromatin. We conclude that both CpG-richness and G+C-richness are required for induction of signature chromatin structures at CGIs.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Elisabeth Wachter

    University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Timo Quante

    University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Cara Merusi

    University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Aleksandra Arczewska

    University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Francis Stewart

    Technische Universitaet Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Shaun Webb

    University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Adrian Bird

    University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    A.Bird@ed.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2014, Wachter et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,771
    views
  • 703
    downloads
  • 103
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03397

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Colum Walsh, Avinash Thakur
    Insight

    Inserting artificially-generated ‘DNA islands’ into a genome has shed new light on why some DNA sequences are methylated and others are not.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Gülnihal Kavaklioglu, Alexandra Podhornik ... Christian Seiser
    Research Article

    Repression of retrotransposition is crucial for the successful fitness of a mammalian organism. The domesticated transposon protein L1TD1, derived from LINE-1 (L1) ORF1p, is an RNA-binding protein that is expressed only in some cancers and early embryogenesis. In human embryonic stem cells, it is found to be essential for maintaining pluripotency. In cancer, L1TD1 expression is highly correlative with malignancy progression and as such considered a potential prognostic factor for tumors. However, its molecular role in cancer remains largely unknown. Our findings reveal that DNA hypomethylation induces the expression of L1TD1 in HAP1 human tumor cells. L1TD1 depletion significantly modulates both the proteome and transcriptome and thereby reduces cell viability. Notably, L1TD1 associates with L1 transcripts and interacts with L1 ORF1p protein, thereby facilitating L1 retrotransposition. Our data suggest that L1TD1 collaborates with its ancestral L1 ORF1p as an RNA chaperone, ensuring the efficient retrotransposition of L1 retrotransposons, rather than directly impacting the abundance of L1TD1 targets. In this way, L1TD1 might have an important role not only during early development but also in tumorigenesis.