Mitochondrial fusion but not fission regulates larval growth and synaptic development through steroid hormone production

  1. Hector Sandoval
  2. Chi-Kuang Yao
  3. Kuchuan Chen
  4. Manish Jaiswal
  5. Taraka Donti
  6. Yong Qi Lin
  7. Vafa Bayat
  8. Bo Xiong
  9. Ke Zhang
  10. Gabriela David
  11. Wu-Lin Charng
  12. Yamamoto Shinya
  13. Lita Duraine
  14. Brett H Graham
  15. Hugo J Bellen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  2. Academia Sinica, Taiwan
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College Of Medicine, United States
  4. Stanford Hospital and Clinics, United States
  5. University of Washington, United States
  6. John Hopkins University, United States
  7. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Mitochondrial fusion and fission affect the distribution and quality control of mitochondria. We show that Marf (Mitochondrial associated regulatory factor), is required for mitochondrial fusion and transport in long axons. Moreover, loss of Marf leads to a severe depletion of mitochondria in neuromuscular junctions (NMJs). Marf mutants also fail to maintain proper synaptic transmission at NMJs upon repetitive stimulation, similar to Drp1 fission mutants. However, unlike Drp1, loss of Marf leads to NMJ morphology defects and extended larval lifespan. Marf is required to form contacts between the endoplasmic reticulum and/or lipid droplets (LDs) and for proper storage of cholesterol and ecdysone synthesis in Ring Glands. Interestingly, human Mitofusin-2 rescues the loss of LD but both Mitofusin-1 and Mitofusin-2 are required for steroid-hormone synthesis. Our data show that Marf and Mitofusins share an evolutionarily conserved role in mitochondrial transport, cholesterol ester storage and steroid-hormone synthesis.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hector Sandoval

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Chi-Kuang Yao

    Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kuchuan Chen

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Manish Jaiswal

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Taraka Donti

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yong Qi Lin

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College Of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Vafa Bayat

    Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Bo Xiong

    University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Ke Zhang

    John Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Gabriela David

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Wu-Lin Charng

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yamamoto Shinya

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Lita Duraine

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Brett H Graham

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Hugo J Bellen

    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    hbellen@bcm.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2014, Sandoval et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,880
    views
  • 894
    downloads
  • 99
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hector Sandoval
  2. Chi-Kuang Yao
  3. Kuchuan Chen
  4. Manish Jaiswal
  5. Taraka Donti
  6. Yong Qi Lin
  7. Vafa Bayat
  8. Bo Xiong
  9. Ke Zhang
  10. Gabriela David
  11. Wu-Lin Charng
  12. Yamamoto Shinya
  13. Lita Duraine
  14. Brett H Graham
  15. Hugo J Bellen
(2014)
Mitochondrial fusion but not fission regulates larval growth and synaptic development through steroid hormone production
eLife 3:e03558.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03558

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03558

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Kara A Nelson, Kari F Lenhart ... Stephen DiNardo
    Research Article

    Niches are often found in specific positions in tissues relative to the stem cells they support. Consistency of niche position suggests that placement is important for niche function. However, the complexity of most niches has precluded a thorough understanding of how their proper placement is established. To address this, we investigated the formation of a genetically tractable niche, the Drosophila Posterior Signaling Center (PSC), the assembly of which had not been previously explored. This niche controls hematopoietic progenitors of the lymph gland (LG). PSC cells were previously shown to be specified laterally in the embryo, but ultimately reside dorsally, at the LG posterior. Here, using live-imaging, we show that PSC cells migrate as a tight collective and associate with multiple tissues during their trajectory to the LG posterior. We find that Slit emanating from two extrinsic sources, visceral mesoderm and cardioblasts, is required for the PSC to remain a collective, and for its attachment to cardioblasts during migration. Without proper Slit-Robo signaling, PSC cells disperse, form aberrant contacts, and ultimately fail to reach their stereotypical position near progenitors. Our work characterizes a novel example of niche formation and identifies an extrinsic signaling relay that controls precise niche positioning.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Elise S Bruguera, Jacob P Mahoney, William I Weis
    Research Article

    Wnt/β-catenin signaling directs animal development and tissue renewal in a tightly controlled, cell- and tissue-specific manner. In the mammalian central nervous system, the atypical ligand Norrin controls angiogenesis and maintenance of the blood-brain barrier and blood-retina barrier through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Like Wnt, Norrin activates signaling by binding and heterodimerizing the receptors Frizzled (Fzd) and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 or 6 (LRP5/6), leading to membrane recruitment of the intracellular transducer Dishevelled (Dvl) and ultimately stabilizing the transcriptional coactivator β-catenin. Unlike Wnt, the cystine knot ligand Norrin only signals through Fzd4 and additionally requires the co-receptor Tetraspanin12 (Tspan12); however, the mechanism underlying Tspan12-mediated signal enhancement is unclear. It has been proposed that Tspan12 integrates into the Norrin-Fzd4 complex to enhance Norrin-Fzd4 affinity or otherwise allosterically modulate Fzd4 signaling. Here, we measure direct, high-affinity binding between purified Norrin and Tspan12 in a lipid environment and use AlphaFold models to interrogate this interaction interface. We find that Tspan12 and Fzd4 can simultaneously bind Norrin and that a pre-formed Tspan12/Fzd4 heterodimer, as well as cells co-expressing Tspan12 and Fzd4, more efficiently capture low concentrations of Norrin than Fzd4 alone. We also show that Tspan12 competes with both heparan sulfate proteoglycans and LRP6 for Norrin binding and that Tspan12 does not impact Fzd4-Dvl affinity in the presence or absence of Norrin. Our findings suggest that Tspan12 does not allosterically enhance Fzd4 binding to Norrin or Dvl, but instead functions to directly capture Norrin upstream of signaling.