TAF4, a subunit of transcription factor II D, directs promoter occupancy of nuclear receptor HNF4A during post-natal hepatocyte differentiation

  1. Daniil Alpern
  2. Diana Langer
  3. Benoit Ballester
  4. Stephanie Le Gras
  5. Christophe Romier
  6. Gabrielle Mengus
  7. Irwin Davidson  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/INSERM/UDS, France
  2. Aix-Marseille Université, UMR1090 TAGC, France

Abstract

The functions of the TAF subunits of mammalian TFIID in physiological processes remain poorly characterised. Here we describe a novel function of TAFs in directing genomic occupancy of a transcriptional activator. Using liver-specific inactivation in mice, we show that the TAF4 subunit of TFIID is required for post-natal hepatocyte maturation. TAF4 promotes pre-initiation complex (PIC) formation at post-natal expressed liver function genes and down-regulates a subset of embryonic expressed genes by increased RNA polymerase II pausing. The TAF4-TAF12 heterodimer interacts directly with HNF4A and in vivo TAF4 is necessary to maintain HNF4A-directed embryonic gene expression at post-natal stages and promotes HNF4A occupancy of functional cis-regulatory elements adjacent to the transcription start sites of post-natal expressed genes. Stable HNF4A occupancy of these regulatory elements requires TAF4-dependent PIC formation highlighting that these are mutually dependent events. Local promoter-proximal HNF4A-TFIID interactions therefore act as instructive signals for post-natal hepatocyte differentiation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Daniil Alpern

    Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/INSERM/UDS, Illkirch, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Diana Langer

    Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/INSERM/UDS, Illkirch, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Benoit Ballester

    Aix-Marseille Université, UMR1090 TAGC, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Stephanie Le Gras

    Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/INSERM/UDS, Ilkirch, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Christophe Romier

    Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/INSERM/UDS, Ilkirch, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Gabrielle Mengus

    Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/INSERM/UDS, Ilkirch, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Irwin Davidson

    Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/INSERM/UDS, Illkirch, France
    For correspondence
    irwin@igbmc.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal Experiments were performed in compliance with National Animal Care Guidelines (European Commission directive 86/609/CEE; French decree no.87-848).

Copyright

© 2014, Alpern et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,680
    views
  • 228
    downloads
  • 30
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Daniil Alpern
  2. Diana Langer
  3. Benoit Ballester
  4. Stephanie Le Gras
  5. Christophe Romier
  6. Gabrielle Mengus
  7. Irwin Davidson
(2014)
TAF4, a subunit of transcription factor II D, directs promoter occupancy of nuclear receptor HNF4A during post-natal hepatocyte differentiation
eLife 3:e03613.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03613

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03613

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.