Cross-synaptic synchrony and transmission of signal and noise across the mouse retina

  1. William N Grimes
  2. Mrinalini Hoon
  3. Kevin L Briggman
  4. Rachel O Wong
  5. Fred Rieke  Is a corresponding author
  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, United States
  2. University of Washington, United States
  3. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, United States

Abstract

Cross-synaptic synchrony-correlations in transmitter release across output synapses of a single neuron-is a key determinant of how signal and noise traverse neural circuits. The anatomical connectivity between rod bipolar and A17 amacrine cells in the mammalian retina-specifically that neighboring A17s often receive input from many of the same rod bipolar cells-provides a rare technical opportunity to measure cross-synaptic synchrony under physiological conditions. This approach reveals that synchronization of rod bipolar cell synapses is near perfect in the dark and decreases with increasing light level. Strong synaptic synchronization in the dark minimizes intrinsic synaptic noise and allows rod bipolar cells to faithfully transmit upstream signal and noise to downstream neurons. Desynchronization in steady light lowers the sensitivity of the rod bipolar output to upstream voltage fluctuations. This work reveals how cross-synaptic synchrony shapes retinal responses to physiological light inputs and, more generally, signaling in complex neural networks.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. William N Grimes

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Mrinalini Hoon

    University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kevin L Briggman

    National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Rachel O Wong

    University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Fred Rieke

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    rieke@u.washington.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ronald L Calabrese, Emory University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This work was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All procedures followed protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol 3030-01) of the University of Washington.

Version history

  1. Received: July 4, 2014
  2. Accepted: August 26, 2014
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 1, 2014 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 25, 2014 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,129
    Page views
  • 219
    Downloads
  • 25
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. William N Grimes
  2. Mrinalini Hoon
  3. Kevin L Briggman
  4. Rachel O Wong
  5. Fred Rieke
(2014)
Cross-synaptic synchrony and transmission of signal and noise across the mouse retina
eLife 3:e03892.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03892

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03892

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Sydney Trask, Nicole C Ferrara
    Insight

    Gradually reducing a source of fear during extinction treatments may weaken negative memories in the long term.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Haibin Yu, Dandan Liu ... Kai Yuan
    Research Article

    O-GlcNAcylation is a dynamic post-translational modification that diversifies the proteome. Its dysregulation is associated with neurological disorders that impair cognitive function, and yet identification of phenotype-relevant candidate substrates in a brain-region specific manner remains unfeasible. By combining an O-GlcNAc binding activity derived from Clostridium perfringens OGA (CpOGA) with TurboID proximity labeling in Drosophila, we developed an O-GlcNAcylation profiling tool that translates O-GlcNAc modification into biotin conjugation for tissue-specific candidate substrates enrichment. We mapped the O-GlcNAc interactome in major brain regions of Drosophila and found that components of the translational machinery, particularly ribosomal subunits, were abundantly O-GlcNAcylated in the mushroom body of Drosophila brain. Hypo-O-GlcNAcylation induced by ectopic expression of active CpOGA in the mushroom body decreased local translational activity, leading to olfactory learning deficits that could be rescued by dMyc overexpression-induced increase of protein synthesis. Our study provides a useful tool for future dissection of tissue-specific functions of O-GlcNAcylation in Drosophila, and suggests a possibility that O-GlcNAcylation impacts cognitive function via regulating regional translational activity in the brain.