FGF14 modulates resurgent sodium current in mouse cerebellar Purkinje neurons

  1. Haidun Yan
  2. Juan L Pablo
  3. Chaojian Wang
  4. Geoffrey S Pitt  Is a corresponding author
  1. Duke University Medical Center, United States
5 figures and 2 tables

Figures

FGF14 is a component of the NaV1.6 macromolecular complex in mouse cerebellum, but shRNA knockdown does not affect NaV current density in cultured cerebellar Purkinje neurons.

(A) Co-immunoprecipitation (IP) of NaV1.6 by FGF14 from mouse cerebellum and immunoblot (IB) with the indicated antibodies. Mw markers are indicated on right. Arrowheads indicate NaV1.6 (top panel) …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04193.003
FGF14 knockdown in cerebellar Purkinje neurons affects multiple NaV channel biophysical properties.

(A and B) Voltage-dependence of NaV channel activation and steady-state inactivation in cerebellar Purkinje neurons transfected with Scrambled control shRNA (Scrambled), FGF14 shRNA (shRNA), or …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04193.004
Expression of the dominant negative FGF14ΔNT affects multiple NaV channel biophysical properties indicating essential roles for the FGF14 N-terminus.

(A) Schematic of endogenous wild type (WT) FGF14 binding to the C-terminus of the NaV1.6 α subunit (top) and magnified schematic of the expressed FGF14ΔNT preventing binding of the WT FGF14 (in …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04193.006
The FGF14bR/A mutant that prevents interaction with the NaV C-terminus cannot rescue NaV kinetic effects of FGF14 knockdown.

(A) Surface representation of the crystal structure of a ternary complex containing the NaV1.5 C-terminus domain (CTD, green), FGF13 (yellow), and calmodulin (purple); the interaction surfaces are …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04193.007
Action potential dynamics and repetitive spiking are dependent upon FGF14 and its N-terminus.

(A) Overlay of single action potentials evoked with a 10 ms current injection (current amplitude shown in parentheses). (B) Current threshold to induce action potentials for the indicated …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04193.008

Tables

Table 1

NaV current activation and inactivation parameters in cerebellar Purkinje neurons

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04193.005
ActivationInactivation
V1/2 (mV)KnV1/2 (mV)Kn
Scrambled−34.4 ± 1.54.0 ± 0.321−49.7 ± 1.24.2 ± 0.119
shRNA−35.0 ± 1.94.3 ± 0.522−59.0 ± 1.2**4.7 ± 0.220
shRNA/FGF14bWT−35.5 ± 1.53.9 ± 0.314−52.0 ± 0.95.2 ± 0.39
shRNA/FGF14RA−33.2 ± 1.53.5 ± 0.212−50.9 ± 1.44.4 ± 0.311
FGF14bWT−33.1 ± 1.44.5 ± 0.514−50.6 ± 1.34.9 ± 0.310
FGF14∆NT−33.9 ± 2.03.9 ± 0.514−59.1 ± 0.8**4.7 ± 0.315
  1. Mean ± s.e.m. (n), **p < 0.01 compared to Scrambled control.

Table 2

Intrinsic membrane properties and single action potential (AP) characteristics measured in cerebellar Purkinje neurons

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04193.009
ScrambledshRNAshRNA/FGF14bWTshRNA/FGF14bRAFGF14∆NT
Input resistance (MΩ)221.8 ± 15.8 (7)238.0 ± 49.5 (11)266.6 ± 24.5 (11)225.9 ± 10.8 (6)269.5 ± 30.2 (6)
Resting membrane potential (mV)−54.5 ± 1.3 (21)−55.8 ± 1.2 (19)−54.4 ± 1.0 (16)−55.4 ± 0.7 (10)−54.9 ± 1.4 (11)
Current threshold (pA)77.8 ± 6.4 (21)142.1 ± 18.5 (19)**78.8 ± 10.4 (16)170.5 ± 16.7 (10)**191.0 ± 22.1 (11)**
AP threshold (mV)−35.6 ± 1.0 (21)−32.8 ± 1.2 (19)−34.5 ± 0.8 (16)−32.8 ± 1.4 (10)−32.7 ± 0.8 (11)
AP amplitude (mV)78.8 ± 3.2 (21)77.5 ± 2.8 (19)78.9 ± 4.5 (16)79.1 ± 4.3 (10)73.1 ± 4.7 (11)
AP duration (ms)2.3 ± 0.2 (21)2.0 ± 0.1 (19)2.2 ± 0.1 (16)1.8 ± 0.1 (10)2.1 ± 0.3 (11)
  1. Mean ± s.e.m. (n), **p < 0.01 compared to Scrambled control.

Download links