Quantitative system drift compensates for altered maternal inputs to the gap gene network of the Scuttle Fly Megaselia abdita

  1. Karl R Wotton
  2. Eva Jiménez-Guri
  3. Anton Crombach
  4. Hilde Janssens
  5. Anna Alcaine-Colet
  6. Steffen Lemke
  7. Urs Schmidt-ott
  8. Johannes Jaeger  Is a corresponding author
  1. Centre for Genomic Regulation, Spain
  2. Ruprecht Karls University, Germany
  3. University of Chicago, United States

Abstract

The segmentation gene network in insects can produce equivalent phenotypic outputs despite differences in upstream regulatory inputs between species. We investigate the mechanistic basis of this phenomenon through a systems-level analysis of the gap gene network in the scuttle fly Megaselia abdita (Phoridae). It combines quantification of gene expression at high spatio-temporal resolution with systematic knock-downs by RNA interference (RNAi). Initiation and dynamics of gap gene expression differ markedly between M. abdita and Drosophila melanogaster, while the output of the system converges to equivalent patterns at the end of the blastoderm stage. Although the qualitative structure of the gap gene network is conserved, there are differences in the strength of regulatory interactions between species. We term such network rewiring 'quantitative system drift'. It provides a mechanistic explanation for the developmental hourglass model in the dipteran lineage. Quantitative system drift is likely to be a widespread mechanism for developmental evolution.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Karl R Wotton

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Eva Jiménez-Guri

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Anton Crombach

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hilde Janssens

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anna Alcaine-Colet

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Steffen Lemke

    Centre for Organismal Studies, Ruprecht Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Urs Schmidt-ott

    Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Johannes Jaeger

    European Molecular Biology Laboratory, CRG Systems Biology Research Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
    For correspondence
    yogi.jaeger@crg.eu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Naama Barkai, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel

Version history

  1. Received: September 16, 2014
  2. Accepted: January 2, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 5, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 5, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Wotton et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,045
    views
  • 255
    downloads
  • 64
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Karl R Wotton
  2. Eva Jiménez-Guri
  3. Anton Crombach
  4. Hilde Janssens
  5. Anna Alcaine-Colet
  6. Steffen Lemke
  7. Urs Schmidt-ott
  8. Johannes Jaeger
(2015)
Quantitative system drift compensates for altered maternal inputs to the gap gene network of the Scuttle Fly Megaselia abdita
eLife 4:e04785.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04785

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04785

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Gang Xue, Xiaoyi Zhang ... Zhiyuan Li
    Research Article

    Organisms utilize gene regulatory networks (GRN) to make fate decisions, but the regulatory mechanisms of transcription factors (TF) in GRNs are exceedingly intricate. A longstanding question in this field is how these tangled interactions synergistically contribute to decision-making procedures. To comprehensively understand the role of regulatory logic in cell fate decisions, we constructed a logic-incorporated GRN model and examined its behavior under two distinct driving forces (noise-driven and signal-driven). Under the noise-driven mode, we distilled the relationship among fate bias, regulatory logic, and noise profile. Under the signal-driven mode, we bridged regulatory logic and progression-accuracy trade-off, and uncovered distinctive trajectories of reprogramming influenced by logic motifs. In differentiation, we characterized a special logic-dependent priming stage by the solution landscape. Finally, we applied our findings to decipher three biological instances: hematopoiesis, embryogenesis, and trans-differentiation. Orthogonal to the classical analysis of expression profile, we harnessed noise patterns to construct the GRN corresponding to fate transition. Our work presents a generalizable framework for top-down fate-decision studies and a practical approach to the taxonomy of cell fate decisions.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Zhuqing Wang, Yue Wang ... Wei Yan
    Research Article

    Despite rapid evolution across eutherian mammals, the X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs are located in a region flanked by two highly conserved protein-coding genes (SLITRK2 and FMR1) on the X chromosome. Intriguingly, these miRNAs are predominantly expressed in the testis, suggesting a potential role in spermatogenesis and male fertility. Here, we report that the X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs were derived from the MER91C DNA transposons. Selective inactivation of individual miRNAs or clusters caused no discernible defects, but simultaneous ablation of five clusters containing 19 members of the MIR-506 family led to reduced male fertility in mice. Despite normal sperm counts, motility, and morphology, the KO sperm were less competitive than wild-type sperm when subjected to a polyandrous mating scheme. Transcriptomic and bioinformatic analyses revealed that these X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs, in addition to targeting a set of conserved genes, have more targets that are critical for spermatogenesis and embryonic development during evolution. Our data suggest that the MIR-506 family miRNAs function to enhance sperm competitiveness and reproductive fitness of the male by finetuning gene expression during spermatogenesis.