Viral-inducible Argonaute18 confers broad-spectrum virus resistance in rice by sequestering a host microRNA

  1. Jianguo Wu
  2. Zhirui Yang
  3. Yu Wang
  4. Lijia Zheng
  5. Ruiqiang Ye
  6. Yinghua Ji
  7. Shanshan Zhao
  8. Shaoyi Ji
  9. Ruofei Liu
  10. Le Xu
  11. Hong Zheng
  12. Yijun Zhou
  13. Xin Zhang
  14. Xiaofeng Cao
  15. Lianhui Xie
  16. Zujian Wu
  17. Yijun Qi
  18. Yi Li  Is a corresponding author
  1. Peking University, China
  2. Tsinghua University, China
  3. Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China
  4. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China
  5. Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, China
  6. Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China

Abstract

Viral pathogens are a major threat to rice production worldwide. Although RNA interference (RNAi) is known to mediate antiviral immunity in plant and animal models, the mechanism of antiviral RNAi in rice and other economically important crops is poorly understood. Here, we report that rice resistance to evolutionarily diverse viruses requires Argonaute18 (AGO18). Genetic studies reveal that the antiviral function of AGO18 depends on its activity to sequester microRNA168 (miR168) to alleviate repression of rice AGO1 essential for antiviral RNAi. Expression of miR168-resistant AGO1a in ago18 background rescues or increases rice antiviral activity. Notably, stable transgenic expression of AGO18 confers broad-spectrum virus resistance in rice. Our findings uncover a novel cooperative antiviral activity of two distinct AGO proteins and suggest a new strategy for the control of viral diseases in rice.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jianguo Wu

    State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Zhirui Yang

    State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yu Wang

    State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Lijia Zheng

    State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ruiqiang Ye

    Center for Plant Biology, Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yinghua Ji

    Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Shanshan Zhao

    State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shaoyi Ji

    State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Ruofei Liu

    State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Le Xu

    Center for Plant Biology, Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Hong Zheng

    State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yijun Zhou

    Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Xin Zhang

    Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Xiaofeng Cao

    State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics and National Center for Plant Gene Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Lianhui Xie

    Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Zujian Wu

    Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Yijun Qi

    Center for Plant Biology, Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Yi Li

    State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    liyi@pku.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2015, Wu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,424
    downloads
  • 206
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jianguo Wu
  2. Zhirui Yang
  3. Yu Wang
  4. Lijia Zheng
  5. Ruiqiang Ye
  6. Yinghua Ji
  7. Shanshan Zhao
  8. Shaoyi Ji
  9. Ruofei Liu
  10. Le Xu
  11. Hong Zheng
  12. Yijun Zhou
  13. Xin Zhang
  14. Xiaofeng Cao
  15. Lianhui Xie
  16. Zujian Wu
  17. Yijun Qi
  18. Yi Li
(2015)
Viral-inducible Argonaute18 confers broad-spectrum virus resistance in rice by sequestering a host microRNA
eLife 4:e05733.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05733

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05733

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Tetsuro Matano
    Research Article

    HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infections are known for impaired neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses. While sequential virus–host B cell interaction appears to be basally required for NAb induction, driver molecular signatures predisposing to NAb induction still remain largely unknown. Here we describe SIV-specific NAb induction following a virus–host interplay decreasing aberrant viral drive of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K). Screening of seventy difficult-to-neutralize SIVmac239-infected macaques found nine NAb-inducing animals, with seven selecting for a specific CD8+ T-cell escape mutation in viral nef before NAb induction. This Nef-G63E mutation reduced excess Nef interaction-mediated drive of B-cell maturation-limiting PI3K/mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2). In vivo imaging cytometry depicted preferential Nef perturbation of cognate Envelope-specific B cells, suggestive of polarized contact-dependent Nef transfer and corroborating cognate B-cell maturation post-mutant selection up to NAb induction. Results collectively exemplify a NAb induction pattern extrinsically reciprocal to human PI3K gain-of-function antibody-dysregulating disease and indicate that harnessing the PI3K/mTORC2 axis may facilitate NAb induction against difficult-to-neutralize viruses including HIV/SIV.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Zach Hensel
    Short Report

    Accurate estimation of the effects of mutations on SARS-CoV-2 viral fitness can inform public-health responses such as vaccine development and predicting the impact of a new variant; it can also illuminate biological mechanisms including those underlying the emergence of variants of concern. Recently, Lan et al. reported a model of SARS-CoV-2 secondary structure and its underlying dimethyl sulfate reactivity data (Lan et al., 2022). I investigated whether base reactivities and secondary structure models derived from them can explain some variability in the frequency of observing different nucleotide substitutions across millions of patient sequences in the SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic tree. Nucleotide basepairing was compared to the estimated ‘mutational fitness’ of substitutions, a measurement of the difference between a substitution’s observed and expected frequency that is correlated with other estimates of viral fitness (Bloom and Neher, 2023). This comparison revealed that secondary structure is often predictive of substitution frequency, with significant decreases in substitution frequencies at basepaired positions. Focusing on the mutational fitness of C→U, the most common type of substitution, I describe C→U substitutions at basepaired positions that characterize major SARS-CoV-2 variants; such mutations may have a greater impact on fitness than appreciated when considering substitution frequency alone.