The critical role of membralin in postnatal motor neuron survival and disease

  1. Bo Yang
  2. Mingliang Qu
  3. Rengang Wang
  4. Jon E Chatterton
  5. Xiao-Bo Liu
  6. Bing Zhu
  7. Sonoko Narisawa
  8. Jose Luis Millan
  9. Nobuki Nakanishi
  10. Kathryn Swoboda
  11. Stuart A Lipton
  12. Dongxian Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Eugenom, Inc., United States
  2. Shanghai Yuanqi Clinical Lab Ltd., China
  3. Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, United States
  4. University of California, Davis, United States
  5. Massachusetts General Hospital, United States

Abstract

Hitherto, membralin has been a protein of unknown function. Here, we show that membralin mutant mice manifest a severe and early-onset motor neuron disease in an autosomal recessive manner, dying by postnatal day 5-6. Selective death of lower motor neurons, including those innervating the limbs, intercostal muscles, and diaphragm, are predominantly responsible for this fatal phenotype. Neural expression of a membralin transgene completely rescues membralin mutant mice. Mechanistically, we show that membralin interacts with Erlin2, an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane protein that is located in lipid rafts and known to be important in ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD). Accordingly, the degradation rate of ERAD substrates is attenuated in cells lacking membralin. Membralin mutations or deficiency in mouse models induce ER stress, rendering neurons more vulnerable to cell death. Our study reveals a critical role of membralin in motor neuron survival and suggests a novel mechanism for early-onset motor neuron disease.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Bo Yang

    Eugenom, Inc., San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Mingliang Qu

    Shanghai Yuanqi Clinical Lab Ltd., Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rengang Wang

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jon E Chatterton

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Xiao-Bo Liu

    Electron Microscopy Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Bing Zhu

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sonoko Narisawa

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jose Luis Millan

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Nobuki Nakanishi

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kathryn Swoboda

    Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Stuart A Lipton

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Dongxian Zhang

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    dzhang@sbmri.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Freda Miller, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, University of Toronto, Canada

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All described procedures for animal were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute and conducted in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Animal Use Form #14-060). Both sexes of mice were used for experiments and maintained in an institute facility accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC).

Version history

  1. Received: January 15, 2015
  2. Accepted: May 15, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 15, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 10, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Yang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,701
    views
  • 359
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Bo Yang
  2. Mingliang Qu
  3. Rengang Wang
  4. Jon E Chatterton
  5. Xiao-Bo Liu
  6. Bing Zhu
  7. Sonoko Narisawa
  8. Jose Luis Millan
  9. Nobuki Nakanishi
  10. Kathryn Swoboda
  11. Stuart A Lipton
  12. Dongxian Zhang
(2015)
The critical role of membralin in postnatal motor neuron survival and disease
eLife 4:e06500.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06500

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06500

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Josue M Regalado, Ariadna Corredera Asensio ... Priyamvada Rajasethupathy
    Research Article

    Learning requires the ability to link actions to outcomes. How motivation facilitates learning is not well understood. We designed a behavioral task in which mice self-initiate trials to learn cue-reward contingencies and found that the anterior cingulate region of the prefrontal cortex (ACC) contains motivation-related signals to maximize rewards. In particular, we found that ACC neural activity was consistently tied to trial initiations where mice seek to leave unrewarded cues to reach reward-associated cues. Notably, this neural signal persisted over consecutive unrewarded cues until reward-associated cues were reached, and was required for learning. To determine how ACC inherits this motivational signal we performed projection-specific photometry recordings from several inputs to ACC during learning. In doing so, we identified a ramp in bulk neural activity in orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)-to-ACC projections as mice received unrewarded cues, which continued ramping across consecutive unrewarded cues, and finally peaked upon reaching a reward-associated cue, thus maintaining an extended motivational state. Cellular resolution imaging of OFC confirmed these neural correlates of motivation, and further delineated separate ensembles of neurons that sequentially tiled the ramp. Together, these results identify a mechanism by which OFC maps out task structure to convey an extended motivational state to ACC to facilitate goal-directed learning.

    1. Neuroscience
    Tianhao Chu, Zilong Ji ... Si Wu
    Research Article

    Hippocampal place cells in freely moving rodents display both theta phase precession and procession, which is thought to play important roles in cognition, but the neural mechanism for producing theta phase shift remains largely unknown. Here, we show that firing rate adaptation within a continuous attractor neural network causes the neural activity bump to oscillate around the external input, resembling theta sweeps of decoded position during locomotion. These forward and backward sweeps naturally account for theta phase precession and procession of individual neurons, respectively. By tuning the adaptation strength, our model explains the difference between ‘bimodal cells’ showing interleaved phase precession and procession, and ‘unimodal cells’ in which phase precession predominates. Our model also explains the constant cycling of theta sweeps along different arms in a T-maze environment, the speed modulation of place cells’ firing frequency, and the continued phase shift after transient silencing of the hippocampus. We hope that this study will aid an understanding of the neural mechanism supporting theta phase coding in the brain.