The critical role of membralin in postnatal motor neuron survival and disease

  1. Bo Yang
  2. Mingliang Qu
  3. Rengang Wang
  4. Jon E Chatterton
  5. Xiao-Bo Liu
  6. Bing Zhu
  7. Sonoko Narisawa
  8. Jose Luis Millan
  9. Nobuki Nakanishi
  10. Kathryn Swoboda
  11. Stuart A Lipton
  12. Dongxian Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Eugenom, Inc., United States
  2. Shanghai Yuanqi Clinical Lab Ltd., China
  3. Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, United States
  4. University of California, Davis, United States
  5. Massachusetts General Hospital, United States

Abstract

Hitherto, membralin has been a protein of unknown function. Here, we show that membralin mutant mice manifest a severe and early-onset motor neuron disease in an autosomal recessive manner, dying by postnatal day 5-6. Selective death of lower motor neurons, including those innervating the limbs, intercostal muscles, and diaphragm, are predominantly responsible for this fatal phenotype. Neural expression of a membralin transgene completely rescues membralin mutant mice. Mechanistically, we show that membralin interacts with Erlin2, an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane protein that is located in lipid rafts and known to be important in ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD). Accordingly, the degradation rate of ERAD substrates is attenuated in cells lacking membralin. Membralin mutations or deficiency in mouse models induce ER stress, rendering neurons more vulnerable to cell death. Our study reveals a critical role of membralin in motor neuron survival and suggests a novel mechanism for early-onset motor neuron disease.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Bo Yang

    Eugenom, Inc., San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Mingliang Qu

    Shanghai Yuanqi Clinical Lab Ltd., Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rengang Wang

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jon E Chatterton

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Xiao-Bo Liu

    Electron Microscopy Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Bing Zhu

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sonoko Narisawa

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jose Luis Millan

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Nobuki Nakanishi

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kathryn Swoboda

    Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Stuart A Lipton

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Dongxian Zhang

    Neuroscience and Aging Research Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    dzhang@sbmri.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Freda Miller, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, University of Toronto, Canada

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All described procedures for animal were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute and conducted in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Animal Use Form #14-060). Both sexes of mice were used for experiments and maintained in an institute facility accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC).

Version history

  1. Received: January 15, 2015
  2. Accepted: May 15, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 15, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 10, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Yang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,687
    views
  • 355
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Bo Yang
  2. Mingliang Qu
  3. Rengang Wang
  4. Jon E Chatterton
  5. Xiao-Bo Liu
  6. Bing Zhu
  7. Sonoko Narisawa
  8. Jose Luis Millan
  9. Nobuki Nakanishi
  10. Kathryn Swoboda
  11. Stuart A Lipton
  12. Dongxian Zhang
(2015)
The critical role of membralin in postnatal motor neuron survival and disease
eLife 4:e06500.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06500

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06500

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Vezha Boboeva, Alberto Pezzotta ... Athena Akrami
    Research Article

    The central tendency bias, or contraction bias, is a phenomenon where the judgment of the magnitude of items held in working memory appears to be biased toward the average of past observations. It is assumed to be an optimal strategy by the brain and commonly thought of as an expression of the brain’s ability to learn the statistical structure of sensory input. On the other hand, recency biases such as serial dependence are also commonly observed and are thought to reflect the content of working memory. Recent results from an auditory delayed comparison task in rats suggest that both biases may be more related than previously thought: when the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) was silenced, both short-term and contraction biases were reduced. By proposing a model of the circuit that may be involved in generating the behavior, we show that a volatile working memory content susceptible to shifting to the past sensory experience – producing short-term sensory history biases – naturally leads to contraction bias. The errors, occurring at the level of individual trials, are sampled from the full distribution of the stimuli and are not due to a gradual shift of the memory toward the sensory distribution’s mean. Our results are consistent with a broad set of behavioral findings and provide predictions of performance across different stimulus distributions and timings, delay intervals, as well as neuronal dynamics in putative working memory areas. Finally, we validate our model by performing a set of human psychophysics experiments of an auditory parametric working memory task.

    1. Neuroscience
    Michael Berger, Michèle Fraatz ... Henrike Scholz
    Research Article

    The brain regulates food intake in response to internal energy demands and food availability. However, can internal energy storage influence the type of memory that is formed? We show that the duration of starvation determines whether Drosophila melanogaster forms appetitive short-term or longer-lasting intermediate memories. The internal glycogen storage in the muscles and adipose tissue influences how intensely sucrose-associated information is stored. Insulin-like signaling in octopaminergic reward neurons integrates internal energy storage into memory formation. Octopamine, in turn, suppresses the formation of long-term memory. Octopamine is not required for short-term memory because octopamine-deficient mutants can form appetitive short-term memory for sucrose and to other nutrients depending on the internal energy status. The reduced positive reinforcing effect of sucrose at high internal glycogen levels, combined with the increased stability of food-related memories due to prolonged periods of starvation, could lead to increased food intake.