Transgenic shRNA pigs reduce susceptibility to foot and mouth disease virus infection

  1. Shengwei Hu
  2. Jun Qiao
  3. Qiang Fu
  4. Chuangfu Chen  Is a corresponding author
  5. Wei Ni
  6. Sai Wujiafu
  7. Shiwei Ma
  8. Hui Zhang
  9. Jingliang Sheng
  10. Pengyan Wang
  11. Dawei Wang
  12. Jiong Huang
  13. Lijuan Cao
  14. Hongsheng Ouyang
  1. Shihezi University, China
  2. Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, China
  3. Jilin University, China

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is an economically devastating viral disease leading to a substantial loss to the swine industry worldwide. A novel alternative strategy is to develop pigs that are genetically resistant to infection. Here, we produce transgenic (TG) pigs that constitutively expressed FMDV-specific siRNA derived from small hairpin RNA (shRNA). In vitro challenge of TG fibroblasts showed the shRNA suppressed viral growth. TG and non-transgenic (Non-TG) pigs were challenged by intramuscular injection with 100 LD50 of FMDV. High fever, severe clinical sign of FMD and typical histopathological changes were observed in all of the Non-TG pigs but in none of the high-siRNA pigs. Our results show that transgenic shRNA can provide a viable tool for producing animals with enhanced resistance to FMDV.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shengwei Hu

    College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jun Qiao

    College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Qiang Fu

    College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Chuangfu Chen

    College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
    For correspondence
    chencf1962@yahoo.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Wei Ni

    College of Animal Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sai Wujiafu

    College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Shiwei Ma

    College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Hui Zhang

    College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jingliang Sheng

    College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Pengyan Wang

    College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Dawei Wang

    College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jiong Huang

    Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Urumqi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Lijuan Cao

    College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Hongsheng Ouyang

    College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Stephen P Goff, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments involving animals were conducted under the protocol approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Shihezi University (SU-ACUC-12031).

Version history

  1. Received: February 10, 2015
  2. Accepted: June 18, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 19, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 15, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Hu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,114
    views
  • 501
    downloads
  • 33
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Shengwei Hu
  2. Jun Qiao
  3. Qiang Fu
  4. Chuangfu Chen
  5. Wei Ni
  6. Sai Wujiafu
  7. Shiwei Ma
  8. Hui Zhang
  9. Jingliang Sheng
  10. Pengyan Wang
  11. Dawei Wang
  12. Jiong Huang
  13. Lijuan Cao
  14. Hongsheng Ouyang
(2015)
Transgenic shRNA pigs reduce susceptibility to foot and mouth disease virus infection
eLife 4:e06951.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06951

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06951

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Patrick E Brown, Sze Hang Fu ... Ab-C Study Collaborators
    Research Article Updated

    Background:

    Few national-level studies have evaluated the impact of ‘hybrid’ immunity (vaccination coupled with recovery from infection) from the Omicron variants of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

    Methods:

    From May 2020 to December 2022, we conducted serial assessments (each of ~4000–9000 adults) examining SARS-CoV-2 antibodies within a mostly representative Canadian cohort drawn from a national online polling platform. Adults, most of whom were vaccinated, reported viral test-confirmed infections and mailed self-collected dried blood spots (DBSs) to a central lab. Samples underwent highly sensitive and specific antibody assays to spike and nucleocapsid protein antigens, the latter triggered only by infection. We estimated cumulative SARS-CoV-2 incidence prior to the Omicron period and during the BA.1/1.1 and BA.2/5 waves. We assessed changes in antibody levels and in age-specific active immunity levels.

    Results:

    Spike levels were higher in infected than in uninfected adults, regardless of vaccination doses. Among adults vaccinated at least thrice and infected more than 6 months earlier, spike levels fell notably and continuously for the 9-month post-vaccination. In contrast, among adults infected within 6 months, spike levels declined gradually. Declines were similar by sex, age group, and ethnicity. Recent vaccination attenuated declines in spike levels from older infections. In a convenience sample, spike antibody and cellular responses were correlated. Near the end of 2022, about 35% of adults above age 60 had their last vaccine dose more than 6 months ago, and about 25% remained uninfected. The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection rose from 13% (95% confidence interval 11–14%) before omicron to 78% (76–80%) by December 2022, equating to 25 million infected adults cumulatively. However, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) weekly death rate during the BA.2/5 waves was less than half of that during the BA.1/1.1 wave, implying a protective role for hybrid immunity.

    Conclusions:

    Strategies to maintain population-level hybrid immunity require up-to-date vaccination coverage, including among those recovering from infection. Population-based, self-collected DBSs are a practicable biological surveillance platform.

    Funding:

    Funding was provided by the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Pfizer Global Medical Grants, and St. Michael’s Hospital Foundation. PJ and ACG are funded by the Canada Research Chairs Program.