Immune surveillance of the lung by migrating tissue-monocytes

  1. Mathieu P Rodero
  2. Lucie Poupel
  3. Pierre-Louis Loyher
  4. Pauline Hamon
  5. Fabrice Licata
  6. Charlotte Pessel
  7. David A Hume
  8. Christophe Combadière
  9. Alexandre Boissonnas  Is a corresponding author
  1. University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, France
  2. The Roslin Institute, United Kingdom

Abstract

Monocytes are phagocytic effector cells in blood and precursors of resident and inflammatory tissue macrophages. The aim of the current study was to analyse and compare their contribution to innate immune surveillance of the lung in the steady state with macrophage and dendritic cells. ECFP and EGFP transgenic reporters based upon Csf1r and Cx3cr1 distinguish monocytes from resident mononuclear phagocytes. We used these transgenes to study the migratory properties of monocytes and macrophages by functional imaging on explanted lungs. Migratory monocytes were found to be either patrolling within large vessels of the lung or locating at the interface between lung capillaries and alveoli. This spatial organisation gives to monocytes the property to capture fluorescent particles derived from both vascular and airway routes. We conclude that monocytes participate in steady-state surveillance of the lung, in a way that is complementary to resident macrophages and dendritic cells, without differentiating into macrophages.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mathieu P Rodero

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lucie Poupel

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Pierre-Louis Loyher

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Pauline Hamon

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Fabrice Licata

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Charlotte Pessel

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. David A Hume

    Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The Roslin Institute, Midlothian, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christophe Combadière

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Alexandre Boissonnas

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    alexandre.boissonnas@upmc.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ronald N Germain, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiment protocols were approved by the French animal experimentation and ethics committee and validated by "Service Protection et Santé Animales, Environnement" with the number A-75-2065. Sample sizes were chosen to assure reproducibility of the experiments and according to the 3R of animal ethic regulation.

Version history

  1. Received: April 1, 2015
  2. Accepted: July 10, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 13, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 3, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Rodero et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,927
    views
  • 1,067
    downloads
  • 87
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mathieu P Rodero
  2. Lucie Poupel
  3. Pierre-Louis Loyher
  4. Pauline Hamon
  5. Fabrice Licata
  6. Charlotte Pessel
  7. David A Hume
  8. Christophe Combadière
  9. Alexandre Boissonnas
(2015)
Immune surveillance of the lung by migrating tissue-monocytes
eLife 4:e07847.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07847

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07847

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    KC Farrell, Jennifer T Wang, Tim Stearns
    Research Article

    The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) temporally regulates mitosis by preventing progression from metaphase to anaphase until all chromosomes are correctly attached to the mitotic spindle. Centrosomes refine the spatial organization of the mitotic spindle at the spindle poles. However, centrosome loss leads to elongated mitosis, suggesting that centrosomes also inform the temporal organization of mitosis in mammalian cells. Here, we find that the mitotic delay in acentrosomal cells is enforced by the SAC in a MPS1-dependent manner, and that a SAC-dependent mitotic delay is required for bipolar cell division to occur in acentrosomal cells. Although acentrosomal cells become polyploid, polyploidy is not sufficient to cause dependency on a SAC-mediated delay to complete cell division. Rather, the division failure in absence of MPS1 activity results from mitotic exit occurring before acentrosomal spindles can become bipolar. Furthermore, prevention of centrosome separation suffices to make cell division reliant on a SAC-dependent mitotic delay. Thus, centrosomes and their definition of two spindle poles early in mitosis provide a ‘timely two-ness’ that allows cell division to occur in absence of a SAC-dependent mitotic delay.

    1. Cell Biology
    Elizabeth A Beath, Cynthia Bailey ... Francis J McNally
    Research Article

    Fertilization occurs before the completion of oocyte meiosis in the majority of animal species and sperm contents move long distances within the zygotes of mouse and C. elegans. If incorporated into the meiotic spindle, paternal chromosomes could be expelled into a polar body resulting in lethal monosomy. Through live imaging of fertilization in C. elegans, we found that the microtubule disassembling enzymes, katanin and kinesin-13 limit long-range movement of sperm contents and that maternal ataxin-2 maintains paternal DNA and paternal mitochondria as a cohesive unit that moves together. Depletion of katanin or double depletion of kinesin-13 and ataxin-2 resulted in the capture of the sperm contents by the meiotic spindle. Thus limiting movement of sperm contents and maintaining cohesion of sperm contents within the zygote both contribute to preventing premature interaction between maternal and paternal genomes.