Immune surveillance of the lung by migrating tissue-monocytes

  1. Mathieu P Rodero
  2. Lucie Poupel
  3. Pierre-Louis Loyher
  4. Pauline Hamon
  5. Fabrice Licata
  6. Charlotte Pessel
  7. David A Hume
  8. Christophe Combadière
  9. Alexandre Boissonnas  Is a corresponding author
  1. University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, France
  2. The Roslin Institute, United Kingdom

Abstract

Monocytes are phagocytic effector cells in blood and precursors of resident and inflammatory tissue macrophages. The aim of the current study was to analyse and compare their contribution to innate immune surveillance of the lung in the steady state with macrophage and dendritic cells. ECFP and EGFP transgenic reporters based upon Csf1r and Cx3cr1 distinguish monocytes from resident mononuclear phagocytes. We used these transgenes to study the migratory properties of monocytes and macrophages by functional imaging on explanted lungs. Migratory monocytes were found to be either patrolling within large vessels of the lung or locating at the interface between lung capillaries and alveoli. This spatial organisation gives to monocytes the property to capture fluorescent particles derived from both vascular and airway routes. We conclude that monocytes participate in steady-state surveillance of the lung, in a way that is complementary to resident macrophages and dendritic cells, without differentiating into macrophages.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mathieu P Rodero

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lucie Poupel

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Pierre-Louis Loyher

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Pauline Hamon

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Fabrice Licata

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Charlotte Pessel

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. David A Hume

    Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The Roslin Institute, Midlothian, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christophe Combadière

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Alexandre Boissonnas

    Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, University Pierre et Maria Curie, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    alexandre.boissonnas@upmc.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiment protocols were approved by the French animal experimentation and ethics committee and validated by "Service Protection et Santé Animales, Environnement" with the number A-75-2065. Sample sizes were chosen to assure reproducibility of the experiments and according to the 3R of animal ethic regulation.

Copyright

© 2015, Rodero et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,942
    views
  • 1,073
    downloads
  • 89
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mathieu P Rodero
  2. Lucie Poupel
  3. Pierre-Louis Loyher
  4. Pauline Hamon
  5. Fabrice Licata
  6. Charlotte Pessel
  7. David A Hume
  8. Christophe Combadière
  9. Alexandre Boissonnas
(2015)
Immune surveillance of the lung by migrating tissue-monocytes
eLife 4:e07847.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07847

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07847

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Chenlu Kang, Pengcheng Chen ... Congying Wu
    Research Article

    Cell migration towards stiff substrates has been coined as durotaxis and implicated in development, wound healing, and cancer, where complex interplays between immune and non-immune cells are present. Compared to the emerging mechanisms underlying the strongly adhesive mesenchymal durotaxis, little is known about whether immune cells - migrating in amoeboid mode - could follow mechanical cues. Here, we develop an imaging-based confined migration device with a stiffness gradient. By tracking live cell trajectory and analyzing the directionality of T cells and neutrophils, we observe that amoeboid cells can durotax. We further delineate the underlying mechanism to involve non-muscle myosin IIA (NMIIA) polarization towards the soft-matrix-side but may not require differential actin flow up- or down-stiffness gradient. Using the protista Dictyostelium, we demonstrate the evolutionary conservation of amoeboid durotaxis. Finally, these experimental phenomena are theoretically captured by an active gel model capable of mechanosensing. Collectively, these results may shed new lights on immune surveillance and recently identified confined migration of cancer cells, within the mechanically inhomogeneous tumor microenvironment or the inflamed fibrotic tissues.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Yi Sun, Zhe Chen ... Chengtian Zhao
    Short Report

    How cells regulate the size of their organelles remains a fundamental question in cell biology. Cilia, with their simple structure and surface localization, provide an ideal model for investigating organelle size control. However, most studies on cilia length regulation are primarily performed on several single-celled organisms. In contrast, the mechanism of length regulation in cilia across diverse cell types within multicellular organisms remains a mystery. Similar to humans, zebrafish contain diverse types of cilia with variable lengths. Taking advantage of the transparency of zebrafish embryos, we conducted a comprehensive investigation into intraflagellar transport (IFT), an essential process for ciliogenesis. By generating a transgenic line carrying Ift88-GFP transgene, we observed IFT in multiple types of cilia with varying lengths. Remarkably, cilia exhibited variable IFT speeds in different cell types, with longer cilia exhibiting faster IFT speeds. This increased IFT speed in longer cilia is likely not due to changes in common factors that regulate IFT, such as motor selection, BBSome proteins, or tubulin modification. Interestingly, longer cilia in the ear cristae tend to form larger IFT compared to shorter spinal cord cilia. Reducing the size of IFT particles by knocking down Ift88 slowed IFT speed and resulted in the formation of shorter cilia. Our study proposes an intriguing model of cilia length regulation via controlling IFT speed through the modulation of the size of the IFT complex. This discovery may provide further insights into our understanding of how organelle size is regulated in higher vertebrates.