A simple retinal mechanism contributes to perceptual interactions between rod- and cone-mediated responses in primates

  1. William N Grimes
  2. Logan R Graves
  3. Mathew T Summers
  4. Fred Rieke  Is a corresponding author
  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, United States

Abstract

Visual perception across a broad range of light levels is shaped by interactions between rod- and cone-mediated signals. Because responses of retinal ganglion cells, the output cells of the retina, depend on signals from both rod and cone photoreceptors, interactions occurring in retinal circuits provide an opportunity to link the mechanistic operation of parallel pathways and perception. Here we show that rod- and cone-mediated responses interact nonlinearly to control the responses of primate retinal ganglion cells; these nonlinear interactions, surprisingly, were asymmetric, with rod responses strongly suppressing subsequent cone responses but not vice-versa. Human psychophysical experiments revealed a similar perceptual asymmetry. Nonlinear interactions in the retinal output cells were well-predicted by linear summation of kinetically-distinct rod- and cone-mediated signals followed by a synaptic nonlinearity. These experiments thus reveal how a simple mechanism controlling interactions between parallel pathways shapes circuit outputs and perception.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. William N Grimes

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Logan R Graves

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mathew T Summers

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Fred Rieke

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    rieke@u.washington.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: We obtained primate retinas (Macaca fascicularis, Macaca nemestrina and Macaca mulatta of either sex, ages 3-19 years) through the Tissue Distribution Program of the Regional Primate Research Center. All protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Washington (protocol 4140-01).

Human subjects: The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Washington (protocol 16934) and was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects gave informed consent in writing before participating in the experiment.

Copyright

© 2015, Grimes et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,261
    views
  • 356
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. William N Grimes
  2. Logan R Graves
  3. Mathew T Summers
  4. Fred Rieke
(2015)
A simple retinal mechanism contributes to perceptual interactions between rod- and cone-mediated responses in primates
eLife 4:e08033.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08033

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08033

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Mohsen Alavash
    Insight

    Combining electrophysiological, anatomical and functional brain maps reveals networks of beta neural activity that align with dopamine uptake.

    1. Neuroscience
    Masahiro Takigawa, Marta Huelin Gorriz ... Daniel Bendor
    Research Article

    During rest and sleep, memory traces replay in the brain. The dialogue between brain regions during replay is thought to stabilize labile memory traces for long-term storage. However, because replay is an internally-driven, spontaneous phenomenon, it does not have a ground truth - an external reference that can validate whether a memory has truly been replayed. Instead, replay detection is based on the similarity between the sequential neural activity comprising the replay event and the corresponding template of neural activity generated during active locomotion. If the statistical likelihood of observing such a match by chance is sufficiently low, the candidate replay event is inferred to be replaying that specific memory. However, without the ability to evaluate whether replay detection methods are successfully detecting true events and correctly rejecting non-events, the evaluation and comparison of different replay methods is challenging. To circumvent this problem, we present a new framework for evaluating replay, tested using hippocampal neural recordings from rats exploring two novel linear tracks. Using this two-track paradigm, our framework selects replay events based on their temporal fidelity (sequence-based detection), and evaluates the detection performance using each event's track discriminability, where sequenceless decoding across both tracks is used to quantify whether the track replaying is also the most likely track being reactivated.