Abstract
A parental cancer diagnosis is psychologically straining for the whole family. We investigated whether a parental cancer diagnosis is associated with a higher-than-expected risk of injury among children by using a Swedish nationwide register-based cohort study. Compared to children without parental cancer, children with parental cancer had a higher rate of hospital contact for injury during the first year after parental cancer diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR]=1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.22-1.33), especially when the parent had a comorbid psychiatric disorder after cancer diagnosis (HR=1.41, 95% CI=1.08-1.85). The rate increment declined during the second and third year after parental cancer diagnosis (HR=1.10, 95% CI=1.07-1.14) and became null afterwards (HR=1.01, 95% CI=0.99-1.03). Children with parental cancer also had a higher rate of repeated injuries than the other children (HR=1.13, 95% CI= 1.12-1.15). Given the high rate of injury among children in the general population, our findings may have important public health implications.
Article and author information
Author details
Ethics
Human subjects: The study was approved by the Central Ethical Review Board (Centrala etikpr�vningsn�mnden) in Stockholm, Sweden (Reg No. 2013/244-31/4). In accordance with their decision, we did not obtain informed consent from participants involved in the study. All individuals' information was anonymized and de-identified prior to analysis.
Reviewing Editor
- Eduardo Franco, McGill University, Canada
Publication history
- Received: May 4, 2015
- Accepted: October 27, 2015
- Accepted Manuscript published: October 31, 2015 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: February 9, 2016 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2015, Chen et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,157
- Page views
-
- 207
- Downloads
-
- 4
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.