The chemokine CXCL13 in lung cancers associated with environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons pollution

  1. Gui-Zhen Wang
  2. Xin Cheng
  3. Bo Zhou
  4. Zhe-Sheng Wen
  5. Yun-Chao Huang
  6. Hao-Bin Chen
  7. Gao-Feng Li
  8. Zhi-Liang Huang
  9. Yong-Chun Zhou
  10. Lin Feng
  11. Ming-Ming Wei
  12. Li-Wei Qu
  13. Yi Cao
  14. Guang-Biao Zhou  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  2. Sun Yat-Sen University, China
  3. Kunming Medical University, China
  4. The First People's Hospital of Qujing, China
  5. The People's Liberation Army General Hospital, China
  6. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Abstract

More than 90% of lung cancers are caused by cigarette smoke and air pollution, with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as key carcinogens. In Xuanwei City of Yunnan Province the lung cancer incidence is among the highest in China attributed to smoky coal combustion-generated PAH pollution. Here we screened for abnormal inflammatory factors in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) from Xuanwei and control regions (CR) where smoky coal was not used, and found that a chemokine CXCL13 was overexpressed in 63/70 (90%) of Xuanwei NSCLCs and 44/71 (62%) of smoker and 27/60 (45%) of non-smoker CR patients. CXCL13 overexpression was associated with the region Xuanwei and cigarette smoke. The key carcinogen bezo(a)pyrene (BaP) induced CXCL13 production in lung epithelial cells and in mice prior to development of detectable lung cancer. Deficiency in cxcl13 or its receptor, cxcr5, abrogated BaP-induced lung cancer in mice, demonstrating CXCL13's critical role in PAH-induced lung carcinogenesis.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gui-Zhen Wang

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Xin Cheng

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Bo Zhou

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Zhe-Sheng Wen

    Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yun-Chao Huang

    Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yunnan Tumor Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Hao-Bin Chen

    Department of Pathology, The First People's Hospital of Qujing, Qujing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Gao-Feng Li

    Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yunnan Tumor Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Zhi-Liang Huang

    Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Yong-Chun Zhou

    Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yunnan Tumor Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Lin Feng

    Department of Pathology, The People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ming-Ming Wei

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Li-Wei Qu

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Yi Cao

    Laboratory of Molecular and Experimental Pathology, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Guang-Biao Zhou

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    gbzhou@ioz.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. David Barbie, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal studies were conducted according to protocols approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, with the approval ID of AEC2010070202.

Human subjects: The study was approved by the local research ethics committees of all participating sites; all lung cancer samples were collected with informed consent.

Version history

  1. Received: June 13, 2015
  2. Accepted: November 4, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 13, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 9, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Wang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,558
    views
  • 828
    downloads
  • 60
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gui-Zhen Wang
  2. Xin Cheng
  3. Bo Zhou
  4. Zhe-Sheng Wen
  5. Yun-Chao Huang
  6. Hao-Bin Chen
  7. Gao-Feng Li
  8. Zhi-Liang Huang
  9. Yong-Chun Zhou
  10. Lin Feng
  11. Ming-Ming Wei
  12. Li-Wei Qu
  13. Yi Cao
  14. Guang-Biao Zhou
(2015)
The chemokine CXCL13 in lung cancers associated with environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons pollution
eLife 4:e09419.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09419

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09419

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Savvas Nikolaou, Amelie Juin ... Laura M Machesky
    Research Article Updated

    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma carries a dismal prognosis, with high rates of metastasis and few treatment options. Hyperactivation of KRAS in almost all tumours drives RAC1 activation, conferring enhanced migratory and proliferative capacity as well as macropinocytosis. Macropinocytosis is well understood as a nutrient scavenging mechanism, but little is known about its functions in trafficking of signalling receptors. We find that CYRI-B is highly expressed in pancreatic tumours in a mouse model of KRAS and p53-driven pancreatic cancer. Deletion of Cyrib (the gene encoding CYRI-B protein) accelerates tumourigenesis, leading to enhanced ERK and JNK-induced proliferation in precancerous lesions, indicating a potential role as a buffer of RAC1 hyperactivation in early stages. However, as disease progresses, loss of CYRI-B inhibits metastasis. CYRI-B depleted tumour cells show reduced chemotactic responses to lysophosphatidic acid, a major driver of tumour spread, due to impaired macropinocytic uptake of the lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1. Overall, we implicate CYRI-B as a mediator of growth and signalling in pancreatic cancer, providing new insights into pathways controlling metastasis.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Chenxi Gao, Huaibin Ge ... Jing Hu
    Research Article

    BRAFV600E mutation is a driver mutation in the serrated pathway to colorectal cancers. BRAFV600E drives tumorigenesis through constitutive downstream extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation, but high-intensity ERK activation can also trigger tumor suppression. Whether and how oncogenic ERK signaling can be intrinsically adjusted to a ‘just-right’ level optimal for tumorigenesis remains undetermined. In this study, we found that FAK (Focal adhesion kinase) expression was reduced in BRAFV600E-mutant adenomas/polyps in mice and patients. In Vil1-Cre;BRAFLSL-V600E/+;Ptk2fl/fl mice, Fak deletion maximized BRAFV600E’s oncogenic activity and increased cecal tumor incidence to 100%. Mechanistically, our results showed that Fak loss, without jeopardizing BRAFV600E-induced ERK pathway transcriptional output, reduced EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-dependent ERK phosphorylation. Reduction in ERK phosphorylation increased the level of Lgr4, promoting intestinal stemness and cecal tumor formation. Our findings show that a ‘just-right’ ERK signaling optimal for BRAFV600E-induced cecal tumor formation can be achieved via Fak loss-mediated downregulation of ERK phosphorylation.