Identification of Pol IV and RDR2-dependent precursors of 24 nt siRNAs guiding de novo DNA methylation in Arabidopsis

  1. Todd Blevins
  2. Ram Podicheti
  3. Vibhor Mishra
  4. Michelle Marasco
  5. Jing Wang
  6. Douglas Rusch
  7. Haixu Tang
  8. Craig S Pikaard  Is a corresponding author
  1. Université de Strasbourg, France
  2. Indiana University, United States
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Indiana University, United States

Abstract

In Arabidopsis thaliana, abundant 24 nt siRNAs guide the cytosine methylation and silencing of transposons and a subset of genes. 24 nt siRNA biogenesis requires nuclear RNA Polymerase IV (Pol IV), RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2 (RDR2) and DICER-LIKE3 (DCL3). However, siRNA precursors are mostly undefined. We identified Pol IV and RDR2-dependent RNAs (P4R2 RNAs) that accumulate in dcl3 mutants and are diced into 24 nt RNAs by DCL3 in vitro. P4R2 RNAs are mostly 26-45 nt and initiate with a purine adjacent to a pyrimidine, characteristics shared by Pol IV transcripts generated in vitro. RDR2 terminal transferase activity, also demonstrated in vitro, may account for occasional non-templated nucleotides at P4R2 RNA 3' termini. 24 nt siRNAs primarily correspond to the 5' or 3' ends of P4R2 RNAs, suggesting a model whereby siRNAs are generated from either end of P4R2 duplexes by single dicing events.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Todd Blevins

    : Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes du CNRS, UPR2357, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ram Podicheti

    Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Vibhor Mishra

    Department of Biology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Michelle Marasco

    Department of Biology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jing Wang

    Department of Biology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Douglas Rusch

    Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Haixu Tang

    School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Craig S Pikaard

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    For correspondence
    cpikaard@indiana.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Daniel Zilberman, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Version history

  1. Received: June 21, 2015
  2. Accepted: October 1, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 2, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 8, 2015 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Blevins et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,111
    views
  • 1,160
    downloads
  • 174
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Todd Blevins
  2. Ram Podicheti
  3. Vibhor Mishra
  4. Michelle Marasco
  5. Jing Wang
  6. Douglas Rusch
  7. Haixu Tang
  8. Craig S Pikaard
(2015)
Identification of Pol IV and RDR2-dependent precursors of 24 nt siRNAs guiding de novo DNA methylation in Arabidopsis
eLife 4:e09591.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09591

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09591

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Allison Coté, Aoife O'Farrell ... Arjun Raj
    Research Article

    Splicing is the stepwise molecular process by which introns are removed from pre-mRNA and exons are joined together to form mature mRNA sequences. The ordering and spatial distribution of these steps remain controversial, with opposing models suggesting splicing occurs either during or after transcription. We used single-molecule RNA FISH, expansion microscopy, and live-cell imaging to reveal the spatiotemporal distribution of nascent transcripts in mammalian cells. At super-resolution levels, we found that pre-mRNA formed clouds around the transcription site. These clouds indicate the existence of a transcription-site-proximal zone through which RNA move more slowly than in the nucleoplasm. Full-length pre-mRNA undergo continuous splicing as they move through this zone following transcription, suggesting a model in which splicing can occur post-transcriptionally but still within the proximity of the transcription site, thus seeming co-transcriptional by most assays. These results may unify conflicting reports of co-transcriptional versus post-transcriptional splicing.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Maria L Adelus, Jiacheng Ding ... Casey E Romanoski
    Research Article

    Heterogeneity in endothelial cell (EC) sub-phenotypes is becoming increasingly appreciated in atherosclerosis progression. Still, studies quantifying EC heterogeneity across whole transcriptomes and epigenomes in both in vitro and in vivo models are lacking. Multiomic profiling concurrently measuring transcriptomes and accessible chromatin in the same single cells was performed on six distinct primary cultures of human aortic ECs (HAECs) exposed to activating environments characteristic of the atherosclerotic microenvironment in vitro. Meta-analysis of single-cell transcriptomes across 17 human ex vivo arterial specimens was performed and two computational approaches quantitatively evaluated the similarity in molecular profiles between heterogeneous in vitro and ex vivo cell profiles. HAEC cultures were reproducibly populated by four major clusters with distinct pathway enrichment profiles and modest heterogeneous responses: EC1-angiogenic, EC2-proliferative, EC3-activated/mesenchymal-like, and EC4-mesenchymal. Quantitative comparisons between in vitro and ex vivo transcriptomes confirmed EC1 and EC2 as most canonically EC-like, and EC4 as most mesenchymal with minimal effects elicited by siERG and IL1B. Lastly, accessible chromatin regions unique to EC2 and EC4 were most enriched for coronary artery disease (CAD)-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms from Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), suggesting that these cell phenotypes harbor CAD-modulating mechanisms. Primary EC cultures contain markedly heterogeneous cell subtypes defined by their molecular profiles. Surprisingly, the perturbations used here only modestly shifted cells between subpopulations, suggesting relatively stable molecular phenotypes in culture. Identifying consistently heterogeneous EC subpopulations between in vitro and ex vivo models should pave the way for improving in vitro systems while enabling the mechanisms governing heterogeneous cell state decisions.