Using an achiasmic human visual system to quantify the relationship between the fMRI BOLD signal and neural response

  1. Pinglei Bao
  2. Christopher J Purington
  3. Bosco S Tjan  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Southern California, United States
  2. University of California, Berkeley, United States

Abstract

Achiasma in humans causes gross mis-wiring of the retinal-fugal projection, resulting in overlapped cortical representations of left and right visual hemifields. We show that in areas V1-V3 this overlap is due to two co-located but non-interacting populations of neurons, each with a receptive field serving only one hemifield. Importantly, the two populations share the same local vascular control, resulting in a unique organization useful for quantifying the relationship between neural and fMRI BOLD responses without direct measurement of neural activity. Specifically, we can non-invasively double local neural responses by stimulating both neuronal populations with identical stimuli presented symmetrically across the vertical meridian to both visual hemifields, versus one population by stimulating in one hemifield. Measurements from a series of such doubling experiments show that the amplitude of BOLD response is proportional to approximately 0.5 power of the underlying neural response. Reanalyzing published data shows that this inferred relationship is general.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pinglei Bao

    Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Christopher J Purington

    School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Bosco S Tjan

    Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
    For correspondence
    btjan@usc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jody C Culham, University of Western Ontario, Canada

Ethics

Human subjects: The Institutional Review Board of the University of Southern California approved the experimental protocol, and each subject provided written informed consent.

Version history

  1. Received: July 23, 2015
  2. Accepted: November 26, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 27, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 14, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2015, Bao et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,483
    views
  • 255
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pinglei Bao
  2. Christopher J Purington
  3. Bosco S Tjan
(2015)
Using an achiasmic human visual system to quantify the relationship between the fMRI BOLD signal and neural response
eLife 4:e09600.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09600

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09600

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Qianli Yang
    Insight

    Subpopulations of neurons in the subthalamic nucleus have distinct activity patterns that relate to the three hypotheses of the Drift Diffusion Model.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jakub Onysk, Nicholas Gregory ... Flavia Mancini
    Research Article

    The placebo and nocebo effects highlight the importance of expectations in modulating pain perception, but in everyday life we don’t need an external source of information to form expectations about pain. The brain can learn to predict pain in a more fundamental way, simply by experiencing fluctuating, non-random streams of noxious inputs, and extracting their temporal regularities. This process is called statistical learning. Here, we address a key open question: does statistical learning modulate pain perception? We asked 27 participants to both rate and predict pain intensity levels in sequences of fluctuating heat pain. Using a computational approach, we show that probabilistic expectations and confidence were used to weigh pain perception and prediction. As such, this study goes beyond well-established conditioning paradigms associating non-pain cues with pain outcomes, and shows that statistical learning itself shapes pain experience. This finding opens a new path of research into the brain mechanisms of pain regulation, with relevance to chronic pain where it may be dysfunctional.