Schematic memory components converge within angular gyrus during retrieval

  1. Isabella C Wagner  Is a corresponding author
  2. Mariët van Buuren
  3. Marijn CW Kroes
  4. Tjerk P Gutteling
  5. Marieke van der Linden
  6. Richard G Morris
  7. Guillén Fernández
  1. Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands
  2. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Abstract

Mental schemas form associative knowledge structures that can promote the encoding and consolidation of new and related information. Schemas are facilitated by a distributed system that stores components separately, presumably in the form of inter-connected neocortical representations. During retrieval, these components need to be recombined into one representation, but where exactly such recombination takes place is unclear. Thus, we asked where different schema components are neuronally represented and converge during retrieval. Subjects acquired and retrieved two well-controlled, rule-based schema structures during fMRI on consecutive days. Schema retrieval was associated with midline, medial-temporal, and parietal processing. We identified the multi-voxel representations of different schema components, which converged within the angular gyrus during retrieval. Critically, convergence only happened after 24-hour-consolidation and during a transfer test where schema material was applied to novel but related trials. Therefore, the angular gyrus appears to recombine consolidated schema components into one memory representation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Isabella C Wagner

    Radboudumc, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    i.wagner@donders.ru.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Mariët van Buuren

    Radboudumc, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Marijn CW Kroes

    Nijmegen, Radboud University Nijmegen, New York, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Tjerk P Gutteling

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Marieke van der Linden

    Radboudumc, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Richard G Morris

    Centre for Cognitive and Neural Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Guillén Fernández

    Radboudumc, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Human subjects: All subjects gave written informed consent prior to participation. The study was conducted according to protocol approved by the institutional review board (CMO Region Arnhem-Nijmegen, The Netherlands).

Copyright

© 2015, Wagner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,314
    views
  • 562
    downloads
  • 72
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Isabella C Wagner
  2. Mariët van Buuren
  3. Marijn CW Kroes
  4. Tjerk P Gutteling
  5. Marieke van der Linden
  6. Richard G Morris
  7. Guillén Fernández
(2015)
Schematic memory components converge within angular gyrus during retrieval
eLife 4:e09668.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09668

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09668

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Jake Patrick Stroud, Michal Wojcik ... Mate Lengyel
    Research Article

    Cognitive flexibility requires both the encoding of task-relevant and the ignoring of task-irrelevant stimuli. While the neural coding of task-relevant stimuli is increasingly well understood, the mechanisms for ignoring task-irrelevant stimuli remain poorly understood. Here, we study how task performance and biological constraints jointly determine the coding of relevant and irrelevant stimuli in neural circuits. Using mathematical analyses and task-optimized recurrent neural networks, we show that neural circuits can exhibit a range of representational geometries depending on the strength of neural noise and metabolic cost. By comparing these results with recordings from primate prefrontal cortex (PFC) over the course of learning, we show that neural activity in PFC changes in line with a minimal representational strategy. Specifically, our analyses reveal that the suppression of dynamically irrelevant stimuli is achieved by activity-silent, sub-threshold dynamics. Our results provide a normative explanation as to why PFC implements an adaptive, minimal representational strategy.

    1. Neuroscience
    Lanfang Liu, Jiahao Jiang ... Guosheng Ding
    Research Article

    Speech comprehension involves the dynamic interplay of multiple cognitive processes, from basic sound perception, to linguistic encoding, and finally to complex semantic-conceptual interpretations. How the brain handles the diverse streams of information processing remains poorly understood. Applying Hidden Markov Modeling to fMRI data obtained during spoken narrative comprehension, we reveal that the whole brain networks predominantly oscillate within a tripartite latent state space. These states are, respectively, characterized by high activities in the sensory-motor (State #1), bilateral temporal (State #2), and default mode networks (DMN; State #3) regions, with State #2 acting as a transitional hub. The three states are selectively modulated by the acoustic, word-level semantic, and clause-level semantic properties of the narrative. Moreover, the alignment with both the best performer and the group-mean in brain state expression can predict participants’ narrative comprehension scores measured from the post-scan recall. These results are reproducible with different brain network atlas and generalizable to two datasets consisting of young and older adults. Our study suggests that the brain underlies narrative comprehension by switching through a tripartite state space, with each state probably dedicated to a specific component of language faculty, and effective narrative comprehension relies on engaging those states in a timely manner.