Coverage and system efficiencies of insecticide-treated nets in Africa from 2000 to 2017

  1. Samir Bhatt  Is a corresponding author
  2. Daniel J Weiss
  3. Bonnie Mappin
  4. Ursula Dalrymple
  5. Ewan Cameron
  6. Donal Bisanzio
  7. David L Smith
  8. Catherine L Moyes
  9. Andrew J Tatem
  10. Michael Lynch
  11. Cristin A Fergus
  12. Joshua Yukich
  13. Adam Bennett
  14. Thomas P Eisele
  15. Jan Kolaczinski
  16. Richard E Cibulskis
  17. Simon I Hay
  18. Peter W Gething
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. National Institutes of Health, United States
  3. World Health Organization, Switzerland
  4. Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, United States
  5. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  6. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Switzerland

Abstract

Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) for malaria control are widespread but coverage remains inadequate. We developed a Bayesian model using data from 102 national surveys, triangulated against delivery data and distribution reports, to generate year-by-year estimates of four ITN coverage indicators. We explored the impact of two potential 'inefficiencies': uneven net distribution among households and rapid rates of net loss from households. We estimated that, in 2013, 21% (17%-26%) of ITNs were over-allocated and this has worsened over time as overall net provision has increased. We estimated that rates of ITN loss from households are more rapid than previously thought, with 50% lost after 23 (20-28) months. We predict that the current estimate of 920 million additional ITNs required to achieve universal coverage would in reality yield a lower level of coverage (77% population access). By improving efficiency, however, the 920 million ITNs could yield population access as high as 95%.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Samir Bhatt

    Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Tinbergen Building, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    bhattsamir@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Daniel J Weiss

    Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Tinbergen Building, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Bonnie Mappin

    Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Tinbergen Building, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Ursula Dalrymple

    Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Tinbergen Building, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Ewan Cameron

    Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Tinbergen Building, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Donal Bisanzio

    Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Tinbergen Building, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. David L Smith

    Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Catherine L Moyes

    Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Tinbergen Building, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Andrew J Tatem

    Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Michael Lynch

    Global Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Cristin A Fergus

    Global Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Joshua Yukich

    Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Global Health Systems and Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Adam Bennett

    Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Thomas P Eisele

    Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Global Health Systems and Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Jan Kolaczinski

    Strategy, Investment and Impact Division, The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Richard E Cibulskis

    Global Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Simon I Hay

    Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Simon I Hay, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  18. Peter W Gething

    Spatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 3,253
    views
  • 689
    downloads
  • 132
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Samir Bhatt
  2. Daniel J Weiss
  3. Bonnie Mappin
  4. Ursula Dalrymple
  5. Ewan Cameron
  6. Donal Bisanzio
  7. David L Smith
  8. Catherine L Moyes
  9. Andrew J Tatem
  10. Michael Lynch
  11. Cristin A Fergus
  12. Joshua Yukich
  13. Adam Bennett
  14. Thomas P Eisele
  15. Jan Kolaczinski
  16. Richard E Cibulskis
  17. Simon I Hay
  18. Peter W Gething
(2015)
Coverage and system efficiencies of insecticide-treated nets in Africa from 2000 to 2017
eLife 4:e09672.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09672

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09672

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Felix Lankester, Tito J Kibona ... Sarah Cleaveland
    Research Article

    Lack of data on the aetiology of livestock diseases constrains effective interventions to improve livelihoods, food security and public health. Livestock abortion is an important disease syndrome affecting productivity and public health. Several pathogens are associated with livestock abortions but across Africa surveillance data rarely include information from abortions, little is known about aetiology and impacts, and data are not available to inform interventions. This paper describes outcomes from a surveillance platform established in Tanzania spanning pastoral, agropastoral and smallholder systems to investigate causes and impacts of livestock abortion. Abortion events were reported by farmers to livestock field officers (LFO) and on to investigation teams. Events were included if the research team or LFO could attend within 72 hr. If so, samples and questionnaire data were collected to investigate (a) determinants of attribution; (b) patterns of events, including species and breed, previous abortion history, and seasonality; (c) determinants of reporting, investigation and attribution; (d) cases involving zoonotic pathogens. Between 2017–2019, 215 events in cattle (n=71), sheep (n=44), and goats (n=100) were investigated. Attribution, achieved for 19.5% of cases, was significantly affected by delays in obtaining samples. Histopathology proved less useful than PCR due to rapid deterioration of samples. Vaginal swabs provided practical and sensitive material for pathogen detection. Livestock abortion surveillance, even at a small scale, can generate valuable information on causes of disease outbreaks, reproductive losses and can identify pathogens not easily captured through other forms of livestock disease surveillance. This study demonstrated the feasibility of establishing a surveillance system, achieved through engagement of community-based field officers, establishment of practical sample collection and application of molecular diagnostic platforms.

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Tianyu Zhao, Hui Li ... Li Chen
    Research Article

    Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex degenerative disease of the central nervous system, and elucidating its pathogenesis remains challenging. In this study, we used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) model as the major analysis method to perform hypothesis-free Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis on the data from MRC IEU OpenGWAS (18,097 exposure traits and 16 AD outcome traits), and conducted sensitivity analysis with six models, to assess the robustness of the IVW results, to identify various classes of risk or protective factors for AD, early-onset AD, and late-onset AD. We generated 400,274 data entries in total, among which the major analysis method of the IVW model consists of 73,129 records with 4840 exposure traits, which fall into 10 categories: Disease, Medical laboratory science, Imaging, Anthropometric, Treatment, Molecular trait, Gut microbiota, Past history, Family history, and Lifestyle trait. More importantly, a freely accessed online platform called MRAD (https://gwasmrad.com/mrad/) has been developed using the Shiny package with MR analysis results. Additionally, novel potential AD therapeutic targets (CD33, TBCA, VPS29, GNAI3, PSME1) are identified, among which CD33 was positively associated with the main outcome traits of AD, as well as with both EOAD and LOAD. TBCA and VPS29 were negatively associated with the main outcome traits of AD, as well as with both EOAD and LOAD. GNAI3 and PSME1 were negatively associated with the main outcome traits of AD, as well as with LOAD, but had no significant causal association with EOAD. The findings of our research advance our understanding of the etiology of AD.