Endothelin B receptor inhibition rescues aging-dependent neuronal regenerative decline

  1. Rui Feng
  2. Sarah F Rosen
  3. Irshad Ansari
  4. Sebastian John
  5. Michael B Thomsen
  6. Oshri Avraham
  7. Cedric G Geoffroy
  8. Valeria Cavalli  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, United States
  2. CS27 Bioinformatics, United States
  3. Department of Neuroscience & Experimental Therapeutics, Texas A&M Health Science Center, United States
  4. Center of Regenerative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, United States
  5. Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, United States
6 figures, 1 table and 2 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 2 supplements
Ednrb is highly expressed in satellite glial cells.

(A) Representative whole-mount-stained images of DRG from Lycopersicon Esculentum Lectin (LEL) injected Fabp7CreER::Ai14 mice, labeled for TUJ1 (green), tdTomato (magenta), and LEL (gray). 3D reconstruction of blood vessels via LEL labeling (scale bars, 200 μm). Note that TUJ1 antibody staining is limited by penetration of the antibody in the whole mount. (B) Representative images of sectioned DRG from Lycopersicon Esculentum Lectin (LEL) injected C57BL/6 mice, labeled for TUJ1 (green), Fabp7 (red), and LEL (cyan) (Scale bars, 100 μm). (C) UMAP analysis of adult DRG 10 X sequencing data identified 8 cell clusters based on known marker genes. (D) Dot plot analysis showing the average gene expression (color coded) and number of expressing cells (dot size) for the marker genes. (E–H) UMAP overlay for expression of Ednra (E), Ednrb (F), Edn1 (G), and Edn3 (H). (I) Representative RNAScope in situ hybridization images showing Ednrb (red), Fabp7 (cyan), and DAPI (blue) of L4 DRGs from 3-month-old mice (scale bars, 50 μm).

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Sample QC and DEG analysis for 10x scRNA-Seq data.

(A, B) Sample QC for 10 x scRNA-Seq. (C) UMAP plots of genes used for cell cluster annotations. (D) UMAP overlay for expression of Ednrb in SGCs in mouse and human. Images generated from https://painseq.shinyapps.io/harmonized_painseq_v2/, related to Bhuiyan et al., 2024.

Figure 1—video 1
Z-stack video of whole mount preparation of DRG from Lycopersicon Esculentum Lectin (LEL) injected Fabp7CreER::Ai14 mouse, which labels SGCs with tdTomato, immunostained for TUJ1 (neurons).
Endothelin B receptor inhibition increases axonal growth in vitro and ex vivo.

(A) Representative images showing TUJ1 (black) immunostaining of neurons in DRG cultures (scale bars, 100 μm). (B) Representative image of TUJ1 (green) and Fabp7 (magenta) immunostaining of neurons and SGCs in control DRG cultures (scale bars, 50 μm). (C, D) Quantification of axonal radial length (B) and TUJ1+ area (C) per neuron. Different colors indicate biological replicates. N=246 (Veh; 8 replicates), 318 (BQ788; 8 replicates), 320 (IRL1620; 8 replicates), and 244 (BQ123; 8 replicates). Data presented as mean ± SD. (E) Scheme of drug treatment and DRG explant model. (F) Representative images of DRG explants 7 days after drug treatment, immunostained for TUJ1 (black) (scale bars, 1000 μm). (G) Quantification of radial length of the 35 longest axons from DRG explants from indicated groups N=36 explants from 6 individual mice (BQ788; 18 replicates, Veh; 18 replicates). The data are presented as mean ± SD. (H) Representative images of DRG explants immunostained for TUJ1 (green), FABP7 (magenta), and merged (scale bars, 50 μm).

Figure 3 with 2 supplements
Bosentan treatment improves axon regeneration after peripheral nerve injury in adult mice.

(A) Scheme of drug treatment and peripheral nerve injury model. (B) Quantification of the length of the 10 longest axons in indicated conditions. (C) Quantification of the regeneration index, calculated as the distance along the nerve where the SGC10 intensity is 50% of the SCG10 intensity at crush site. (D) Representative longitudinal sections of sciatic nerves 24 h after SNC, immunostained for SCG10, from mice with the indicated treatment. Dotted line indicates the crush site, determined as the maximal SGC10 intensity (scale bars, 200 μm). (E) Quantification of SCG10 intensity at the indicated distance normalized to the intensity at the crush site for each condition. N=5 mice/condition. (F) Scheme of long-term Bosentan treatment. (G) Representative images of hindpaw skin after long-term Bosentan treatment immunostained for PGP9.5 (white) and DAPI (blue) (scale bars, 50 μm). (H) Quantification of intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) 24 days after sciatic nerve crush from the indicated groups. N=5 mice/condition. (I) Scheme of adult DRG neuronal culture and treatments. (J, L) Representative images showing TUJ1 (black) immunostaining of neurons in DRG cultures (scale bars, 100 μm). (K, M) Quantification of axonal radial length (K) and total TUJ1+ area (L). Different colors represent different biological replicates. N (neuron number)=177 (vehicle; three biological replicates, naïve mice), 168 (Ambrisentan, three biological replicates, naïve mice), 183 (Bosentan; three biological replicates, naïve mice), 186 (vehicle; three biological replicates, injured mice), 204 (Ambrisentan, three biological replicates, injured mice), and 210 (Bosentan; three biological replicates, injured mice), respectively. The data are presented as mean ± SD.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Bosentan treatment improves axon regeneration 3 days after peripheral nerve injury.

(A) Scheme of drug treatment and peripheral nerve injury model. (B) Quantification of the 10 longest axons in indicated groups. (C) Quantification of 50% regenerative index, calculated as the distance along the nerve where the SCG10 intensity is 50% of the SCG10 intensity at crush site. (D) Representative longitudinal sections of sciatic nerves 3 d after SNC immunostained for SCG10 from mice with the indicated treatment. Dotted line indicates the crush site, determined as the maximal SCG10 intensity (scale bars, 200 μm). (E) Quantification of SCG10 intensity at the indicated distance normalized to the intensity at the crush site for each condition. N=5 mice/condition. The data are presented as mean ± SD. (F) RT-qPCR of Atf3, Aif1, Fabp7, Edn1, Ednra, and Ednrb gene in contralateral (CON) and ipsilateral DRGs at 3 days post injury (SNC). N (mouse number)=4/each group. (G) Western blot analysis and quantification of ETBR protein expression in DRGs from the mice with/without injury. (H) Quantification of ETBR expression normalized to GAPDH expression (folder of control mice). N (mouse number)=8/group. The data are presented as mean ± SD.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1

Original files for western blot analysis.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/100217/elife-100217-fig3-figsupp1-data1-v1.zip
Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 2

PDF file containing original western blots, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/100217/elife-100217-fig3-figsupp1-data2-v1.zip
Figure 3—figure supplement 2
Bosentan treatment improves axon regeneration after dorsal root crush injury.

(A) Scheme of drug treatment and dorsal root crush injury model. (B) Representative longitudinal sections of sciatic nerves 3 d after DRC immunostained for SCG10 from mice with the indicated treatment. Dotted line indicates the crush site, determined as the maximal SCG10 intensity (scale bars, 200 μm). (C) Quantification of the 10 longest axons in indicated groups. (D) Quantification of 50% regenerative index, calculated as the distance along the nerve where the SCG10 intensity is 50% of the SCG10 intensity at crush site. (E) Quantification of SCG10 intensity at the indicated distance normalized to the intensity at the crush site for each condition. N=5 mice/condition. The data are presented as mean ± SD.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement
Bosentan treatment rescues aging-dependent neuronal regenerative decline.

(A) Scheme of drug treatment and DRG explant model. (B) Representative images of DRG explants 7 days after drug treatment (scale bars, 1000 μm). (C) Quantification of radial length of the 50 longest axons from DRG explants. N=36 explants from 6 individual mice (BQ788; 18 replicates, Veh; 18 replicates). (D) Representative longitudinal sections of sciatic nerves 3 d after SNC immunostained for SCG10 from mice with the indicated treatment. Dotted line indicates the crush site, determined as the maximal SCG10 intensity (scale bars, 200 μm). (E, F) Quantification of the 10 longest axons in indicated groups (E). Quantification of 50% regenerative index, calculated as the distance along the nerve where the SCG10 intensity is 50% of the SCG10 intensity at crush site (F). (G) Quantification of the SCG10 intensity at the indicated distance normalized to the intensity at the crush site for each condition. N (mouse number) = 4(adult, vehicle), 3 (aged, vehicle), and 3 (Bosentan +Age), respectively. The data are presented as mean ± SD.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
ET-1 protein expression increases in DRGs of aged mice.

(A,B) Western blot analysis and quantification of ET1 (A) and ETBR (B) protein expression in DRG from adult and aged mice N=3 for each age group. (C) Scheme of drug treatment and explant culture model. (D) Quantification of radial length of the 10 longest axons from DRG explants. N=20 (Bosentan; 9 replicates, Veh; 11 replicates) (E) Representative images of DRG explants 4 days after culture (scale bars, 1000 μm). The data are presented as mean ± SD.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1

Original files for western blot analysis.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/100217/elife-100217-fig4-figsupp1-data1-v1.zip
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 2

PDF file containing original western blots, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/100217/elife-100217-fig4-figsupp1-data2-v1.zip
Figure 5 with 1 supplement
Aging alters SGC abundance and morphology.

(A) UMAP plot of adult and aged snRNA-seq identified 16 cell clusters based on known marker genes. (B) Dot plot analysis showing the average gene expression (color coded) and number of expressing cells (dot size) for the marker genes. (C, D) UMAP plot of DRG cells from adult (C) and aged (D) mice. (E). Bar plot of cell proportions in DRGs of adult and aged mice. (F) Representative TEM images of DRG sections from adult (2 M), middle-aged (12 M), and aged (21 M) mice showing neuronal cell bodies and the enveloping SGCs (SGCs are pseudo-colored in red; scale bars, 5 μm). (G) Quantification of the average width of SGC sheath per neuron soma. (H) Frequency of neuron soma in TEM images with 0, 1, 2, or 3 SGC nuclei in 2 M, 12 M, and 21 M old mice. The data are presented as mean ± SD.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Quality control, DEG, and pathway analysis of aged vs. adult SGCs for Illumina snRNA-Seq.

(A, B) Sample QC for Illumina snRNA-Seq. (C) Volcano plot of upregulated and downregulated genes in SGCs of aged vs. adult mice. (D) Gene ontology analysis of upregulated genes in SGCs in aged mice compared to adults.

Figure 6 with 2 supplements
ETBR inhibition increases the expression of Cx43 in SGCs in adult and aged mice.

(A) UMAP overlay for expression of Gja1 in adult and aged mouse DRG. (B) Scheme of drug treatment and peripheral nerve injury model. (C) Quantification of the percentage of the Cx43/FABP7 expression area. (D) Quantification of the average number of Connexin 43 (Cx43) puncta per FABP7+ cell. The ratio of total Cx43 puncta to the number of FABP7+ cells surrounding a TUJ1+neuron was measured. N(cell number)=60(adult, uninjured), 62(aged, uninjured), 96(vehicle, adult, SNC), 117(bosentan, adult, SNC), 74(vehicle, aged, SNC), and 74 (bosentan, aged, SNC), respectively. The data are presented as mean ± SD. (E) Representative immunostaining images showing Connexin 43 (Cx43), FABP7, and TUJ1 in L4 DRGs from the indicated condition (scale bars, 50 μm). (F) Proposed model for the role of ETBR in age-dependent decline in axon regenerative capacity.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1
ETBR inhibition increases the expression of Cx43 in SGCs after DRC.

(A) Representative immunostaining images of connexin 43 (red), Fabp7 (gray), and TUJ1 (cyan) in L4 DRGs from mice of the indicated ages and treatments 3 d after dorsal root crush injury (scale bars, 50 μm). (B) Quantification of the percentage of the Cx43/FABP7 expression area in each condition. (C) Quantification of the average number of Connexin 43 (Cx43) puncta per FABP7+ cell. The ratio of total Cx43 puncta to the number of FABP7+ cells surrounding a TUJ1-positive neuron was measured. Different colors were used to indicate distinct biological replicates (mouse). N(cell number)=93 (uninjured), 97 (Vehicle, DRC), and 124 (Bosentan, DRC), respectively. The data are presented as mean ± SD.

Figure 6—video 1
Z-stack video of DRG section immunostained for FABP7 and CX43.

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Strain, strain background (Mus musculus)C57BL/6Envigo; Jackson LaboratoryEnvigo: 027; JAX: 000664
RRID:IMSR_CRL:027
RRID:IMSR_JAX:000664
Female and male, used at various ages
Genetic reagent (M. musculus)Ai14Jackson LaboratoryJAX: 007914
RRID:IMSR_JAX:007914
B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm14(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J
Genetic reagent (M. musculus)Fabp7CreERToshihiko Hosoya (gift)Crossed with Ai14 to generate Fabp7CreER::Ai14
Biological sample (M. musculus)DRG tissueThis paperL3-L5, L4-L5 DRGs isolated from adult and aged mice
Chemical compound, drugBosentanSigma-AldrichSigma: PHR270810 mg/kg, oral gavage
Chemical compound, drugAmbrisentanTocrisTocris: 582810 mg/kg, oral gavage
Chemical compound, drugBQ788Sigma-AldrichB1571 µM for in vitro use
Chemical compound, drugBQ123R&D Systems11881 mM for in vitro use
Chemical compound, drugIRL620Sigma-AldrichSCP0135100 nM for in vitro use
AntibodyRabbit anti-ETBR (polyclonal)Abcamab117529
RRID:AB_10902070
WB (1:500)
AntibodyMouse anti-ET-1 (monoclonal)InvitrogenMA3-005
RRID:AB_2096246
WB (1:500)
AntibodyRabbit anti-GAPDH (polyclonal)Cell Signaling5174 s
RRID:AB_10622025
WB (1:5000)
AntibodyRabbit anti-FABP7 (polyclonal)InvitrogenPA5-24949
RRID:AB_2542449
IHC (1:1000)
AntibodyRabbit anti-STMN2 (SCG10) (polyclonal)Novus/TechneNBP1-49461
RRID:AB_10011569
IHC (1:1000)
AntibodyRabbit anti-Cx43 (polyclonal)Cell Signaling3512s
RRID:AB_2294590
IHC (1:200)
AntibodyMouse anti-TUJ1 (βIII tubulin) (monoclonal)Biolegend801202
RRID:AB_2313773
IHC (1:1000)
AntibodyRabbit anti-PGP9.5 (polyclonal)LS BioLS-B5981-50
IHC (1:500)
AntibodySecondary antibodies Alexa Fluor 488/594/647InvitrogenVariousIHC (1:500)
Commercial assay, kitRNAscope Fluorescent Multiplex KitACD (Advanced Cell Diagnostics)For RNA in situ hybridization
Commercial assay, kitRNeasy Mini KitQIAGEN74104RNA extraction
Commercial assay, kitHigh-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription KitThermo Fisher4368814cDNA synthesis
Commercial assay, kitPowerUp SYBR Green Master MixThermo FisherA25780qPCR
Commercial assay, kitLIVE/DEAD Fixable Aqua Dead Cell Stain KitThermo FisherL34965Cell viability stain
Chemical compoundDAPISigma-AldrichD9542(300 nM) nuclear stain
Commercial assay, kitProLong Gold Antifade MountantInvitrogenP36930For mounting fluorescent samples
Chemical compoundPFA (paraformaldehyde)Various4% used for fixation
Chemical compoundOCT compoundTissue-TekFor cryosectioning
Peptide, recombinant proteinNGF (Nerve Growth Factor)AlomoneN-240Used in DRG explants
Chemical compoundHBSSThermo Fisher, Gibco14175–079Dissection medium
Chemical compoundHEPESThermo Fisher, Gibco15630080Buffering agent
chemical compoundPapainWorthington BiochemicalLS003126For tissue dissociation
Chemical compoundL-cysteineSigmaC7352Added to dissociation mix
Chemical compoundDNase IWorthington BiochemicalLS002139For DNA degradation during dissociation
Chemical compoundCollagenaseSigmaC6885Enzyme for tissue dissociation
Chemical compoundNeurobasal-A MediumThermo Fisher, Gibco12349015Culture medium
Commercial assay, kitB-27 Plus SupplementThermo Fisher, GibcoA3582801Culture supplement
Commercial assay, kitGlutaMAX SupplementThermo Fisher, Gibco35050061Glutamine substitute
Chemical compoundPoly-D-lysineCoating coverslips
Biological sample (M. musculus)DRG explantsThis paperFor explant culture
Software, algorithmFijiSchindelin et al., 2012RRID:SCR_002285Image analysis
Software, algorithmQuantStudio 6 Flex SystemThermo FisherFor qPCR analysis
Software, algorithmSeurat v5.1.0Satija LabRRID:SCR_007322For sc/snRNA-seq analysis
Software, algorithmCellRanger v7.1.010 X GenomicsRRID:SCR_017344For scRNA-seq processing
Software, algorithmPipseeker v3.3.0Fluent BioSciencesFor snRNA-seq processing
Software, algorithmImaris v9.7Oxford InstrumentsRRID:SCR_007370Vessel quantification

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rui Feng
  2. Sarah F Rosen
  3. Irshad Ansari
  4. Sebastian John
  5. Michael B Thomsen
  6. Oshri Avraham
  7. Cedric G Geoffroy
  8. Valeria Cavalli
(2025)
Endothelin B receptor inhibition rescues aging-dependent neuronal regenerative decline
eLife 13:RP100217.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.100217.3