Special Issue: Reproductive health
Reproductive health issues affect hundreds of millions of people around the world every year, shaping everything from fertility and pregnancy outcomes to broader societal concerns, including demographic trends and healthcare disparities (ACOG, 2024). However, our knowledge and understanding of human reproduction and its associated disorders is incomplete. This is partly because research into reproductive health has historically been overlooked, with funding and attention disproportionately favoring other areas of medical research (Mercuri and Cox, 2022).
The decision to launch this special issue on reproductive health was motivated by several factors. One key driver was the recognition of how little we still know about the fundamental biology of reproduction and its disorders. Compounding this gap is the pressing need for robust, evidence-based insights to inform public debate and policy on topics such as abortion and IVF. Moreover, recent breakthroughs in research – such as organoid models, multi-omics techniques, and CRISPR-mediated gene editing – have opened up unprecedented opportunities to explore longstanding questions, catalyzing fresh momentum in the field.
The articles in the special issue span a wide array of topics, reflecting the diversity and complexity of reproductive health research. Several articles delve into the neuroendocrine regulation of reproduction, exploring how the brain and endocrine system orchestrate reproductive processes (Sáenz de Miera et al., 2024; Qiu et al., 2024; Hackwell et al., 2024). Others highlight epigenetic mechanisms, offering insights into how epigenetic changes influence fertility, pregnancy, and even the health of future generations (Verdikt et al., 2023; Cincotta et al., 2024; Lehle et al., 2024). Pregnancy and placental biology is another key theme, with articles addressing the mechanisms of normal gestation as well as the causes of complications such as preeclampsia and recurrent pregnancy loss (Liao et al., 2024; Wu et al., 2024). Further contributions investigate gamete biology and fertilization, illuminating the molecular and cellular events critical to sperm and egg formation (Wang et al., 2023; Muroňová et al., 2024; Granados-Aparici et al., 2024), and to sperm-egg interactions (Elofsson et al., 2024). Other articles offer new perspectives on the decline in fertility associated with aging (Huang et al., 2024; Amir et al., 2024).
Despite these advances, significant challenges remain. A persistent issue is the lack of comprehensive data on how lifestyle (such as dietary habits and levels of physical activity) and environmental factors (such as exposure to chemicals that disrupt the endocrine system) affect reproductive health. Equally concerning are disparities in reproductive health outcomes, which disproportionately impact marginalized communities (ACOG, 2024). Moreover, the biological mechanisms underlying common reproductive disorders, such as polycystic ovary syndrome, infertility, and recurrent pregnancy loss, remain poorly understood, hampering the development of effective treatments (NASEM, 2024). Outstanding open questions include: how do interactions between genetics, epigenetics and environmental factors shape reproductive health? And do assisted reproductive technologies have any long-term impacts on offspring health? Emerging organoid systems offer great promise, but their potential to model complex reproductive disorders effectively is still being explored (Kim et al., 2020).
By bringing together a wide range of innovative studies, we hope that this special issue will spark new conversations and collaborations among researchers, clinicians and policymakers. Moreover, in addition to deepening our understanding of reproductive biology, we hope that some of work reported in these articles will pave the way for advances in clinical medicine and more equitable healthcare practices worldwide. Finally, by highlighting the outstanding scientific challenges within reproductive health research, and the potential health benefits to billions of people around the world, we hope to encourage more researchers to work in the field and to convince governments and funding agencies of the need to increase their investment in this research for the good of both science and society.
References
-
Addressing social and structural determinants of health in the delivery of reproductive health careObstetrics & Gynecology 144:e113–e120.https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005721
-
Human organoids: Model systems for human biology and medicineNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 21:571–584.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-0259-3
-
BookA New Vision for Women’s Health ResearchWashington, DC: National Academies Press.https://doi.org/10.17226/28586
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2025, Yan
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 25
- views
-
- 2
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Developmental Biology
During the trunk to tail transition the mammalian embryo builds the outlets for the intestinal and urogenital tracts, lays down the primordia for the hindlimb and external genitalia, and switches from the epiblast/primitive streak (PS) to the tail bud as the driver of axial extension. Genetic and molecular data indicate that Tgfbr1 is a key regulator of the trunk to tail transition. Tgfbr1 has been shown to control the switch of the neuromesodermal competent cells from the epiblast to the chordoneural hinge to generate the tail bud. We now show that in mouse embryos Tgfbr1 signaling also controls the remodeling of the lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) and of the embryonic endoderm associated with the trunk to tail transition. In the absence of Tgfbr1, the two LPM layers do not converge at the end of the trunk, extending instead as separate layers until the caudal embryonic extremity, and failing to activate markers of primordia for the hindlimb and external genitalia. The vascular remodeling involving the dorsal aorta and the umbilical artery leading to the connection between embryonic and extraembryonic circulation was also affected in the Tgfbr1 mutant embryos. Similar alterations in the LPM and vascular system were also observed in Isl1 null mutants, indicating that this factor acts in the regulatory cascade downstream of Tgfbr1 in LPM-derived tissues. In addition, in the absence of Tgfbr1 the embryonic endoderm fails to expand to form the endodermal cloaca and to extend posteriorly to generate the tail gut. We present evidence suggesting that the remodeling activity of Tgfbr1 in the LPM and endoderm results from the control of the posterior PS fate after its regression during the trunk to tail transition. Our data, together with previously reported observations, place Tgfbr1 at the top of the regulatory processes controlling the trunk to tail transition.
-
- Developmental Biology
- Neuroscience
Mutations in Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway genes, for example, Suppressor of Fused (SUFU), drive granule neuron precursors (GNP) to form medulloblastomas (MBSHH). However, how different molecular lesions in the Shh pathway drive transformation is frequently unclear, and SUFU mutations in the cerebellum seem distinct. In this study, we show that fibroblast growth factor 5 (FGF5) signaling is integral for many infantile MBSHH cases and that FGF5 expression is uniquely upregulated in infantile MBSHH tumors. Similarly, mice lacking SUFU (Sufu-cKO) ectopically express Fgf5 specifically along the secondary fissure where GNPs harbor preneoplastic lesions and show that FGFR signaling is also ectopically activated in this region. Treatment with an FGFR antagonist rescues the severe GNP hyperplasia and restores cerebellar architecture. Thus, direct inhibition of FGF signaling may be a promising and novel therapeutic candidate for infantile MBSHH.