Expression signature based on TP53 target genes doesn't predict response to TP53-MDM2 inhibitor in wild type TP53 tumors

  1. Dmitriy Sonkin  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Cancer Institute, United States
1 figure, 2 tables and 1 additional file

Figures

Cell lines sensitivity to NVP-CGM097 in validation set of 40 likely TP53 WT cell lines.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10279.005

Tables

Table 1

List of 12 cell lines with inactivated TP53 in the validation set of 52 cancer cell lines considered to be TP53 wild-type by Jeay et al., (2015).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10279.003
Cell line nameTP53 inactivating mutation(s)Alternative reads/reference readsTP53 mRNA (MAS5-150 201746_at)TP53 CN ratioJeay et al. 13-gene signature predictionNVP-CGM097 sensitivity
KASUMI-1p. R248Q52/02650.54insensitiveinsensitive
COLO-818p. C135R34/02571.14insensitiveinsensitive
IGR-37p. C229fs110/1190.59insensitiveinsensitive
HCC202p. T284fs35/4140.8insensitiveinsensitive
EFM-192Ap. F270fs7/1100.74insensitiveinsensitive
NCI-H1568p. H179R89/12020.82insensitiveinsensitive
COLO-783p. P27L38/03041.05sensitiveinsensitive
GA-10p. I232N, p. P152L94/50, 52/764930.81insensitiveinsensitive
VMRC-RCWp. I332_splice192/68631.65insensitiveinsensitive
JHH-5p. PPQH190del107/412721.03insensitiveinsensitive
HDLM-210.94insensitiveinsensitive
RERF-LC-KJ251.3insensitiveinsensitive
Table 2

Performance of Jeay et al., (2015) 13-gene signature prediction in validation set of 40 likely TP53 wild-type cancer cell lines.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10279.004
Performance measureCell sensitivity defined by NVP-CGM097
Sensitivity89% (24/27)
Specificity15% (2/13) {DAN-G removal 8% (1/12) *}
PPV68.6% (24/35)
NPV40% (2/5) {DAN-G removal 25% (1/4) *}
Response rate67.5% (27/40)
  1. * DAN-G has TP53 mRNA expression of 33 (MAS5-150 201746_at) indicating the probable loss of TP53 mRNA.

  2. (Stringent TP53 mRNA expression cutoff is set at 32 (MAS5-150 201746_at) to indicate loss of TP53 mRNA).

  3. NPV - negative predicted value; PPV - positive predicted value.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

(A) 40 likely TP53 WT cancer cell lines from Jeay et al. (2015) validation set. (BPerformance of Jeay et al. (2015) 13-gene Signature Prediction in validation set of 28 likely TP53 WT cancer cell lines with sensitivity defined by NVP-CFC218. (NVP-CFC218 data was available for 28 out of 40 likely TP53 WT cancer cell lines.) (CList of 29 cell lines with inactivated TP53 in the set of 113 cancer cell lines considered to be TP53 wild type by Jeay et al. (2015). (D) 84 likely TP53 WT cancer cell lines from Jeay et al. (2015). (E) COSMIC information on mutations in cell lines listed in the Table 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10279.006

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dmitriy Sonkin
(2015)
Expression signature based on TP53 target genes doesn't predict response to TP53-MDM2 inhibitor in wild type TP53 tumors
eLife 4:e10279.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10279