Immune Cells: Growing microglia in the lab

Transplanting microglia derived from human stem cells into mice reveals new possibilities for treating neurodegenerative eye diseases.
  1. Jonathan M Levenson
  2. Hio Tong Kam
  3. Dong Feng Chen  Is a corresponding author
  1. FireCyte Therapeutics, Inc, United States
  2. Schepens Eye Research Institute of Mass. Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, United States

As the global population gets older, age-related diseases are becoming more prevalent, with many linked to dysfunctional immune responses. In the central nervous system, microglia are resident immune cells that maintain homeostasis, respond to injury and regulate inflammation. However, these cells can become dysregulated over time, and the resulting inflammation has been implicated in age-related neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (Cai et al., 2022) and Parkinson’s disease (Tansey et al., 2022), as well as diseases that affect the retina, such as glaucoma (Wei et al., 2019; Pan et al., 2023). However, despite extensive research into methods for shifting microglia from a dysfunctional state back into a state that can protect the nervous system, there are currently no drugs that have been approved to do this.

Microglia derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) – adult cells that have been reprogrammed to have the same properties as embryonic stem cells – offer a powerful way to study human microglia in healthy and diseased states. When sourced directly from patients, these cells offer a renewable, patient-specific model with the potential to be used therapeutically to replace dysfunctional microglia with healthier versions without the risk of immune rejection. Now, in eLife, Wai T Wong (Tiresias Bio), Wei Li (National Eye Institute) and colleagues – including Wenxin Ma as first author – report the results of initial efforts to develop iPSC-derived microglia that can be used to treat retinal diseases (Ma et al., 2024).

First, Ma et al. optimized previously reported methods for the production of human microglial cells from iPSCs. This enabled them to continuously produce microglia at a purity (often greater than 95%) and a scale that could support both research and the commercialization of their approach. Testing the method in five distinct stem cell lines showed that it was broadly applicable, increasing the likelihood that it could be used to generate microglia from individual patients.

Gene expression profiles from the resulting microglia closely resembled those of native microglia and were clearly distinct from the progenitor iPSCs. Challenging the iPSC-derived microglia with bacteria revealed that they displayed two hallmark functional activities of native microglia: (i) they secreted proteins associated with inflammatory responses when exposed to bacterial toxins; (ii) they engulfed particles coated with bacteria.

Next, the team optimized a procedure for replacing dysfunctional microglia in the retina with healthy microglia derived from iPSCs. In mice, native microglia in the retina were depleted by inhibiting a receptor required for their survival, and fluorescent human iPSC-derived microglia were then injected into the subretinal space. Over the course of 3–6 months, the human microglial cells successfully repopulated the retina and integrated across all retinal layers (Figure 1). Some native mouse microglia were also present in the retina, but at greatly reduced numbers. The human microglia assumed characteristic shapes that indicated they had taken on a protective and supportive functional state.

A method for producing human iPSC-derived microglia and transplanting them into mice.

During the production stage (top left), embryoid bodies derived from human iPSCs (induced pluripotent stem cells; pink) develop into myeloid precursors, which then differentiate into microglia (green cells) after exposure to a cocktail of cytokines (IL-34, CSF1, TGFβ, and Cx3cl1). The microglia derived from the iPSCs express typical microglia markers (such as Cx3cr1, P2ry12, CD11b, and CD68). During the confirmation stage (top right), the properties of the microglia are validated through a combination of gene profiling, comparative Gene Pathway Analysis, phagocytosis assays (which probe the ability of the microglia to engulf particles coated with bacterial proteins), and xenotransplantation (which involves transplanting the microglia into the subretinal space of adult mice; bottom right). Xenotransplantation is followed by the repopulation stage (bottom left), in which the microglia derived from the iPSCs become integrated and distributed across the different retinal layers in a pattern consistent with endogenous microglia (red cell). GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.

Lastly, Ma et al. determined whether the transplanted human microglia could respond to retinal damage. Killing photoreceptors (the cells that detect light) by administering high doses of the chemical sodium iodate (Kannan and Hinton, 2014), caused the human microglia to transiently proliferate and migrate into the layer of the retina containing the photoreceptors. Moreover, the human microglia began to consume the cellular debris created by the dying photoreceptors. These responses mirror the actions of native microglia and reflect the critical ability of the iPSC-derived microglia to protect the remaining healthy photoreceptor cells.

With this innovative approach, a biopsy of skin cells from a patient with glaucoma could be transformed into the very cells that might halt or prevent blindness. Even more intriguing, the mouse model developed by Ma et al. to allow transplantation of iPSC-derived human microglia represents a valuable platform for discovering even more therapies for retinal diseases. Taken together, the findings of Ma et al. represent a significant step forward in developing new therapeutic approaches for treating age-related central nervous system disorders where microglial dysfunction plays a central role.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jonathan M Levenson

    Jonathan M Levenson is at FireCyte Therapeutics, Inc, Boston, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0009-0001-4209-0003
  2. Hio Tong Kam

    Hio Tong Kam is in the Schepens Eye Research Institute of Mass. Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8241-2874
  3. Dong Feng Chen

    Dong Feng Chen is in the Schepens Eye Research Institute of Mass. Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

    For correspondence
    dongfeng_chen@meei.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6283-8843

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2024, Levenson et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 547
    views
  • 46
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jonathan M Levenson
  2. Hio Tong Kam
  3. Dong Feng Chen
(2024)
Immune Cells: Growing microglia in the lab
eLife 13:e103535.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.103535

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Ruben Sebastian-Perez, Shoma Nakagawa ... Maria Pia Cosma
    Research Article

    Chromocenters are established after the 2-cell (2C) stage during mouse embryonic development, but the factors that mediate chromocenter formation remain largely unknown. To identify regulators of 2C heterochromatin establishment in mice, we generated an inducible system to convert embryonic stem cells (ESCs) to 2C-like cells. This conversion is marked by a global reorganization and dispersion of H3K9me3-heterochromatin foci, which are then reversibly formed upon re-entry into pluripotency. By profiling the chromatin-bound proteome (chromatome) through genome capture of ESCs transitioning to 2C-like cells, we uncover chromatin regulators involved in de novo heterochromatin formation. We identified TOPBP1 and investigated its binding partner SMARCAD1. SMARCAD1 and TOPBP1 associate with H3K9me3-heterochromatin in ESCs. Interestingly, the nuclear localization of SMARCAD1 is lost in 2C-like cells. SMARCAD1 or TOPBP1 depletion in mouse embryos leads to developmental arrest, reduction of H3K9me3, and remodeling of heterochromatin foci. Collectively, our findings contribute to comprehending the maintenance of chromocenters during early development.

    1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Tino Stauber, Greta Moschini ... Jess G Snedeker
    Research Article

    Tendinopathies are debilitating diseases currently increasing in prevalence and associated costs. There is a need to deepen our understanding of the underlying cell signaling pathways to unlock effective treatments. In this work, we screen cell signaling pathways in human tendinopathies and find positively enriched IL-6/JAK/STAT signaling alongside signatures of cell populations typically activated by IL-6 in other tissues. In human tendinopathic tendons, we also confirm the strong presence and co-localization of IL-6, IL-6R, and CD90, an established marker of reparative fibroblasts. To dissect the underlying causalities, we combine IL-6 knock-out mice with an explant-based assembloid model of tendon damage to successfully connect IL-6 signaling to reparative fibroblast activation and recruitment. Vice versa, we show that these reparative fibroblasts promote the development of tendinopathy hallmarks in the damaged explant upon IL-6 activation. We conclude that IL-6 activates tendon fibroblast populations which then initiate and deteriorate tendinopathy hallmarks.