mTOR inhibition in Q175 Huntington’s disease model mice facilitates neuronal autophagy and mutant huntingtin clearance

  1. Philip Stavrides
  2. Chris N Goulbourne
  3. James Peddy
  4. Chunfeng Huo
  5. Mala Rao
  6. Vinod Khetarpal
  7. Deanna M Marchionini
  8. Ralph A Nixon  Is a corresponding author
  9. Dun-Sheng Yang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Center for Dementia Research, Nathan S. Kline Institute, United States
  2. Department of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, United States
  3. CHDI Management/CHDI Foundation, United States
  4. Neuroscience Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, United States
  5. Department of Cell Biology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, United States
8 figures, 1 table and 1 additional file

Figures

Identification of inclusions and huntingtin protein (HTT) molecular species in Q175 mice.

(A) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) detects age-dependent increase in the number of mutant huntingtin protein (mHTT) inclusions. Brain sections from 6-mo- and 10-mo-old wild-type (WT) and Q175 mice were processed for IHC with antibody mEM48 (MAB5374) directed against mHTT (A). Images from sections without (A1-3) or with (A4) a cresyl violet counterstain are shown where the dark-brown puncta represent mHTT-positive inclusions. Arrowheads depict neuronal intranuclear inclusions (NIIs), determined with the assistance from the nuclear labeling by cresyl violet, while arrows indicate extranuclear inclusions, primarily the neuritic inclusion in the neuropil. Bars = 20 μm. n=4 mice/genotype, 4 sections/mouse. (B) mHTT inclusions are detected in nucleus, dendrites, and axons of Q175 brains by immuno-gold electron microscopy (IEM). Sagittal vibratome brain sections of 17-mo-old Q175 were cut and went through electron microscope (EM) processing. Small blocks were obtained from the striatal areas for ultrathin sectioning. Tissue containing grids were processed for immunogold labeling procedure with antibody mEM48, using 10 nm gold followed by silver enhancement. Structures showing high level of silver-enhanced gold labeling were considered as mHTT-positive. (C) Various forms of HTT molecules are detected with different antibodies by immunoblotting. Equal amounts of proteins from hemibrain homogenates of 17-mo-old WT, TRGL, Q175, and TRGL/Q175 (labeled as ‘Cross’) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and processed for WB with different antibodies directed against HTT/mHTT, including MAB1574 (C1, C2), mAb PHP2 (C1) and MAB5490 (C2). Images were collected by a digital gel imager (Syngene G:Box XX9). The arrowhead and arrow (C2) depict a 120 kDa and a 48 kDa fragment, respectively. (C3) Densitometry was performed with Image J for the blots shown in (C2) and the results were normalized by the immunoblot(s) of given loading control protein(s) (e.g., GAPDH). Values are the Mean ± SEM for each group (n=7 TRGL, 4 Q175, and 10 TRGL/Q175). Significant differences among the groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Colocalization of mutant huntingtin protein (mHTT) with p62, Ub, and cathepsin D (CTSD).

(A) Triple labeling detects colocalization of mHTT with both autophagy adaptor proteins p62 and Ub. Brain sections from 6-mo- and 10-mo-old mice were immunostained with antibodies to huntingtin protein (HTT) (antibody MW8; red), p62 (green), or pan-Ub (blue), followed by an additional DAPI (cyan) labeling, and confocal images from the striatum are shown. Boxed areas are enlarged and shown in the last column. Arrows and arrowheads depict the white areas representing triply labeled inclusions containing the signals of the three proteins, where arrows are for NIIs, determined with the assistance from the nuclear DAPI labeling, while the arrowheads are for extranuclear inclusions. Bar = 10 μm. n=4 mice/genotype, 4 sections/mouse. (B) mHTT is detected in vesicles of the autophagic-lysosomal pathway (ALP). (B1) Brain sections from 10-mo-old Q175 were double-immunolabeled with antibodies to HTT (antibody MW8; green) and CTSD (red), followed by an additional DAPI (blue) labeling, and a three-color-merged confocal image from the striatum is shown. Large and small green arrows depict HTT nuclear and extranuclear inclusions, respectively, while yellow arrowheads depict yellow puncta showing HTT and CTSD signal colocalization. Bar = 10 μm. n=4 mice/genotype, 4 sections/mouse. (B2) Immuno-gold electron microscopy (IEM) with anti-HTT antibody (MAB1574) specifically detects HTT signal, represented by the silver-enhanced gold particles (red arrowheads), in autophagic vacuoles (AV)/lysosomes (LY) in cell bodies, dendrites, and axons. (B3) To demonstrate the labeling specificity of the HTT antibody in this IEM study, the number of silver-enhanced gold particles in AV/LY existing in neuronal cell bodies and neurites was counted from 69 electron microscope (EM) images from two 10-mo-old Q175 mice against the number of silver-enhanced gold particles in mitochondria on the same images, and the result is shown in the bar graph. Statistical significances between the two groups were analyzed by unpaired, two-tailed t-test. ****p<0.0001.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Colocalization of huntingtin protein (HTT)/Ub and Ub/p62 in IBs in the striatum (STR).

Brain sections from 10-mo-old mice were processed for double IF with antibodies against HTT (antibody MW8; red) and pan-Ub (green), or pan-Ub (red) and p62 (green), and confocal images from the striatum are shown. Arrowheads depict IBs showing colocalization signals.

Figure 3 with 4 supplements
Mild late-onset alterations in the autophagic-lysosomal pathway (ALP) in the striatum of 17-mo-old Q175.

(A) Quantitation of autophagic vacuoles (AV)/lysosomes (LY) subtypes of striatal neurons detect increases in AL, pa-AL, and a decrease in LY in 17-mo-old TRGL/Q175 vs. TRGL. (A1) Brain sections from TRGL and TRGL/Q175 (4 sections/mouse, 10 mice/genotype) were immunostained with an anti-CTSD antibody. Confocal images from the cranial-dorsal portion of the striatum (three images at 120 x/section) were collected and representative images for each eGFP-LC3 (green), mRFP-LC3 (red), and CTSD (blue) are shown. Arrowheads depict pa-AL. (A2) Hue angle-based analysis was performed for AV/LY subtype determination using the methods described in Lee et al., 2019 (see the Materials and methods). Data are presented as Vesicle #/Neuron (TRGL: n=713 neurons; TRGL/Q175: n=601 neurons). Statistical significances between the two groups for each vesicle type were analyzed by unpaired t-test. Two-tailed p-value: ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. (B) EM detects larger AL/lipofuscin granules in the Q175 striatum. Sagittal vibratome brain sections from 17-mo-old mice were cut and went through EM processing. Small blocks were obtained from the striatal area for ultrathin sectioning, followed by EM examinations of the grids. The red circle depicts NII, and the arrow depicts larger sized (>1 µm) lipofuscin granules, which were counted on randomly collected images of neurons from striatum of WT (420 neurons from n=6 mice) or Q175 (586 neurons from n=9 mice).

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Molecules involved in autophagy induction signaling of the autophagic-lysosomal pathway (ALP) are largely unchanged in 17-mo-old TRGL/Q175.

Equal amounts of proteins from brain homogenates of 17-mo-old TRGL and TRGL/Q175 were subjected to SDS-PAGE and processed for western blotting (WB) with antibodies directed against a number of interested marker proteins in autophagy induction signaling of the ALP. Immunoblotting for each marker protein was performed one or more times depending on the quality of the blots. The blot of the loading control protein GAPDH is boxed and placed under each protein of interest. Images were collected by a digital gel imager (Syngene G:Box XX9). Densitometry was performed with Image J and the result for each protein of interest was normalized by its corresponding GAPDH blot and presented in the bar graph. Values are the Mean +/- SEM for each group (n = 7 TRGL and 10 TRGL/Q175). Significant differences between the two groups were analyzed by unpaired, two-tailed t-test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2
Molecules involved in membrane nucleation/autophagosome (AP) formation of the autophagic-lysosomal pathway (ALP) are largely unchanged in 17-mo-old TRGL/Q175.

Equal amounts of proteins from brain homogenates of 17-mo-old TRGL and TRGL/Q175 were subjected to SDS-PAGE and processed for western blotting (WB) with antibodies directed against a number of interested marker proteins in membrane nucleation/AP formation of the ALP. Immunoblotting for each marker protein was performed one or more times depending on the quality of the blots. The blot of the loading control protein GAPDH is boxed and placed under each protein of interest. Images were collected by a digital gel imager (Syngene G:Box XX9). Densitometry was performed with Image J and the result for each protein of interest was normalized by its corresponding GAPDH blot and presented in the bar graph. Values are the Mean +/- SEM for each group (n = 7 TRGL and 10 TRGL/Q175). Significant differences between the two groups were analyzed by unpaired, two-tailed t-test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 3—figure supplement 3
Autophagy adaptor proteins in the autophagic-lysosomal pathway (ALP) are largely unchanged in 17-mo-old TRGL/Q175.

Equal amounts of proteins from brain homogenates of 17-mo-old TRGL and TRGL/Q175 were subjected to SDS-PAGE and processed for western blotting (WB) with antibodies directed against a number of interested autophagy adaptor proteins in the ALP. Immunoblotting for each marker protein was performed one or more times depending on the quality of the blots. The blot of the loading control protein GAPDH is boxed and placed under each protein of interest. Images were collected by a digital gel imager (Syngene G:Box XX9). Densitometry was performed with Image J and the result for each protein of interest was normalized by its corresponding GAPDH blot and presented in the bar graph. Values are the Mean +/- SEM for each group (n = 7 TRGL and 10 TRGL/Q175). Significant differences between the two groups were analyzed by unpaired, two-tailed t-test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 3—figure supplement 4
Molecules involved in autolysosomes (AL) formation/substrate degradation of the autophagic-lysosomal pathway (ALP) are largely unchanged in 17-mo-old TRGL/Q175.

Equal amounts of proteins from brain homogenates of 17-mo-old TRGL and TRGL/Q175 were subjected to SDS-PAGE and processed for western blotting (WB) with antibodies directed against a number of interested marker proteins in AL formation/substrate degradation (e.g., lysosomal hydrolases or structural components) of the ALP. Immunoblotting for each marker protein was performed one or more times depending on the quality of the blots. The blot of the loading control protein GAPDH is boxed and placed under each protein of interest. Images were collected by a digital gel imager (Syngene G:Box XX9). Densitometry was performed with Image J and the result for each protein of interest was normalized by its corresponding GAPDH blot and presented in the bar graph. Values are the Mean +/- SEM for each group (n = 7 TRGL and 10 TRGL/Q175). Significant differences between the two groups were analyzed by unpaired, two-tailed t-test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Decrease of DARPP-32-IR in striatal neurons of 17-mo-old TRGL/Q175 in the absence of a NeuN signal reduction.

Brain sections from TRGL and TRGL/Q175 (n=10 mice/genotype, four sections/mouse) were double-immunostained with anti-DARPP-32 and -NeuN antibodies. Confocal images from the cranial-dorsal portion of the striatum (three images at 120 x/section) were collected and representative images are shown (A). Arrows depict examples of neurons showing strong NeuN signal while minimal DARPP-32-IR. (B) Images were quantified by Image J for Integrated Density of DARPP-32- (top) or NeuN-IR/Image field (middle), and for # of NeuN positive cells/Image field (bottom). Statistical significances between the two groups were analyzed by unpaired, two-tailed t-test. *p<0.05.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement
mTORi INK exhibits target engagement and induces downstream responses in the autophagic-lysosomal pathway (ALP) in 7-mo-old TRGL/Q175.

Equal amounts of proteins from brain homogenates of 7-mo-old TRGL/Q175 mice untreated (labeled as ‘Veh’) or mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor (mTORi) INK treated [4 mg/kg (4-mpk), daily, 3 wk; labeled as ‘INK’] were subjected to SDS-PAGE and processed for western blotting (WB) with antibodies directed against several marker proteins in the autophagy pathway, representing target engagement of INK or downstream responses. Immunoblotting for each marker protein was performed one or more times depending on the quality of the blots. Representative blots are shown on the left (A) while quantitative results of the blots are shown on the right (B). The bottom LC3 blots represent a repeated immunoblotting experiment. Values are the Mean ± SEM for each group (n=6–7 mice per condition). Significant differences between the two groups were analyzed by unpaired, two-tailed t-test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. tfLC3=mRFP-eGFP-LC3; Endo-LC3=endogenous LC3.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Dosing tests demonstrate mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor (mTORi) INK blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration and target engagement even at low dosages.

(A) Dosing tests for INK. INK or the vehicle was administered by oral gavage. Two dosing tests were done in 6-mo-old wild-type (WT) mice, one with 10, 8 mg/kg (mpk) every other day or 4-mpk daily for 2 wk and the other with 7.5, 5, 2.5-mpk daily for 2 wk. Equal amounts of proteins from brain homogenates of mice receiving vehicle (labeled as ‘Veh’) or INK were subjected to SDS PAGE and processed for WB with antibodies directed against marker proteins representing target engagement of INK, such as p-ULK1 (S757) and p-S6 – the drug effects are reflected by the changes within the boxed areas compared to the signals of Veh outside the boxed areas. Immunoblotting for each marker protein was performed one or more times depending on the quality of the blots. (B) INK was detected in the brains of mice receiving a single dose via oral gavage. After 6, 12 or 24 hrs post INK administration to 6-mo-old WT mice, INK was detected in cerebellum of mice treated with 1, 3 or 10-mpk INK. Total 60 mice: n = 6 mice/dose/time point, where the Vehicle control group was just tested once at the 6-hr time point.

Mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor (mTORi) INK reverses the mild alteration of autophagic vacuole (AV)/lysosomes (LY) subtypes in the striatum of 7-mo-old TRGL/Q175.

(A) Brain sections from untreated or INK (4-mpk, 3 w)-treated TRGL/Q175 vs. TRGL (four sections/mouse, 5–6 mice per condition) were immunostained with an anti-cathepsin D (CTSD) antibody. Confocal images from the cranial-dorsal portion of the striatum (three images at 120 x/section) were collected and representative images for each eGFP-LC3 (green), mRFP-LC3 (red), and CTSD (blue) are shown. (B) Hue angle-based analysis was performed for AV/LY subtype determination using the methods described in Lee et al., 2019. Data are presented as Vesicle #/Neuron (TRGL-Veh: n=260 neurons; TRGL/Q175-Veh: n=218 neurons; TRGL/Q175-INK: n=287 neurons). Statistical significances among the groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001.

Mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor (mTORi) INK reduces HTT-, Ub-, or p62-IR-covered areas parallelly in the striatum of 7-mo-old TRGL/Q175.

(A) Brain sections from INK (4-mpk, 3 w)-treated or untreated TRGL/Q175 (four sections/mouse, 6–7 mice/condition) were immunostained with anti-HTT (MW8), -p62, or -pan-Ub antibodies. Confocal images from the cranial-dorsal portion of the striatum (three images at 120 x/section) were collected. Shown are single-channel images (i.e. without showing the eGFP and mRFP signals). (B1–B3) Areas covered by either the HTT-, p62-, or Ub-IR on a per cell basis are quantified (for HTT-IR, TRGL/Q175-Veh: n=196 neurons, TRGL/Q175-INK: n=385 neurons; for p62-IR, TRGL/Q175-Veh: n=311 neurons, TRGL/Q175-INK: n=378 neurons; for Ub-IR, TRGL/Q175-Veh: n=244 neurons, TRGL/Q175-INK: n=347 neurons) and grouped as ‘Total Area’ (B1), 'AV-associated Form’ (i.e. the IR which was associated with tfLC3 signals representing autophagic vacuoles, AVs) (B2) or ‘AV-unassociated Form’ (i.e. the IR which was not associated with the tfLC3 signals) (B3). Statistical significances between the two groups were analyzed by unpaired t-test. Two-tailed p-value: *p<0.05, ****p<0.0001.

INK treatment does not reverse the reduction of DARPP-32-IR in the striatum of 7-mo-old TRGL/Q175.

(A-C) Sagittal brain sections containing the striatum area were immunostained with an anti-DARPP-32 antibody, and 10 x images taken from the cranial-dorsal portion of the striatum are shown (first row). Boxed areas on the first row are enlarged and shown on the second row for easy viewing of the immunostaining patterns for each condition. (D) For quantitation purposes, each whole 10 x image (excluding the areas covered by the fiber bundles which usually exhibited minimal background staining – achieved by threshold setting) was quantified by ImageJ (one image/section, four sections/mouse) and the results are expressed as the Integrated Density of DARPP-32-IR. n=6–8 mice/condition. Statistical significances among the groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. **p<0.01 compared to TRGL-Veh.

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Genetic reagent, KI-mouse (Mus musculus male and female)Q175 KICHDI-81003003N/AKnock-in Mouse
human HTT exon 1 sequence containing a ~190 CAG repeat tract
Genetic reagent,
Transgenic (Mus musculus male and female)
TRGL6Lee et al., 2019N/ATransgenic with Thy1 promoter
Genetic reagent,
Transgenic (Mus musculus male and female)
cross with KI (Mus musculus male and female)
Q175/TRGLThis studyN/ACrossed the zQ175 KI with the TRGL6 mice
Sequence-based reagentForward primer for genotyping TRGL:
50-CTT TCC CCA CAG AAT CCA AGT CGG AAC-30
Lee et al., 2019
Sequence-based reagentReverse primer for genotyping TRGL:
50-GCA CGA ATT CGG GCG CCG GTG GAG TGG CGG-30
Lee et al., 2019
AntibodytHTTCell Signaling TechnologyCat# 5656; RRID:AB_10827977WB: 1:1000
AntibodyntHTT mEM48Millipore sigmaCat# MAB5374; RRID:AB_177645WB 1:200
IHC 1:50
AntibodyHTT 1C2Millipore sigmaCat# mab1574; RRID:AB_94263WB 1:1000
AntibodyHTT humanMillipore sigmaCat# mab5490; RRID:AB_2233522WB 1:1000
IHC 1:200
AntibodyHTT MW8Develop Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of IowaCat# MW8; RRID:AB_528297
AntibodyHTT PHP2CHDI/CoriellCat# CHDI-90001516–2
AntibodyMTORCell Signaling TechnologyCat# 2983; RRID:AB_2105622WB: 1:1000
Antibodyp-MTOR S2481Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 2874WB 1:1000
Antibodyp-MTOR S2448Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 2971; RRID:AB_330970WB: 1:1000
Antibodyp70S6KCell Signaling TechnologyCat# 2708; RRID:AB_390722WB: 1:1000
Antibodyp-p70S6K S371Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#: 9208WB: 1:1000
Antibodyp-p70S6K T389Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 9234; RRID:AB_2269803WB: 1:1000
AntibodyS6 ribosomalCell Signaling TechnologyCat# 2317; RRID:AB_2238583WB: 1:1000
Antibodyp-S6 ribosomal S240/S244Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 5364; RRID:AB_10694233WB: 1:1000
AntibodyULK1Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 6439; RRID:AB_11178933WB: 1:500
Antibodyp-ULK S757Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 6888; RRID:AB_10829226WB: 1:500
Antibodyp-ULK S317Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 37762; RRID:AB_2922992WB: 1:500
AntibodyATG5Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 12994; RRID:AB_2630393WB: 1:1000
AntibodyATG5Millipore sigmaCat# abc14WB: 1:750
IHC 1:500
AntibodyATG14Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 5504; RRID:AB_10695397WB: 1:1000
Antibodyp-ATG14 S29Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 92340; RRID:AB_2800182WB: 1:1000
AntibodyBeclin 1BD BioscienceCat# 612113; RRID:AB_399484WB: 1:1000
Antibodyp-Beclin 1 S30Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 35955WB: 1:1000
AntibodyVPS34Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 4263WB 1:1000
Antibodyp-VPS34 S249Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 13857; RRID:AB_2798332WB 1:1000
AntibodyTRAF6Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 8028WB 1:1000
AntibodyLC3Millipore sigmaCat# abc929WB 1:500
IHC 1:100
AntibodyLC3Novus BiologicsCat# NB100-2220; RRID:AB_10003146WB 1:1000
IHC 1:200
Antibodyp62/sqstm1BD BiosciencesCat# 610832; RRID:AB_398152WB 1:2000
IHC 1:200
Antibodyp62/SQSTM1 c-termProgen BiotechnikCat# GP62-C; RRID:AB_2687531WB 1:1000
IHC 1:250
AntibodyUbiquitinDako AgilentCat# z0458; RRID:AB_2315524
AntibodyUbiquitinAbcamCat# ab7780; RRID:AB_306069
AntibodyLAMP1Develop Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of IowaCat# H4A3; RRID:AB_2296838IHC 1:50
AntibodyCTSBNeuromicsCat# GT15047; RRID:AB_2737184WB 1:5000
IHC 1:500
AntibodyCTSDIn houseRU4WB 1:10,000
IHC 1:5000
AntibodyCTSD sheepIn houseD-2–3WB 1:1000
IHC 1:500
AntibodyDARPP32AbcamCat# ab40801; RRID:AB_731843WB 1:1000
IHC 1:100
AntibodyNeuNMillipore SigmaCat# mab377; RRID:AB_2298772IHC 1:400
Antibodyβ−actinMillipore SigmaCat# A1978; RRID:AB_476692WB 1:10,000
AntibodyGoat anti-rabbit secondaryVector LaboratoriesCat# 68–4140IHC: 1:500
AntibodyGoat anti-mouse secondaryVector LaboratoriesCat# BA-9200IHC: 1:500
AntibodyAlexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgGThermo Fisher ScientificCat# A11034; RRID:AB_2576217IHC: 1:500
AntibodyAlexa Fluor 568- goat anti-rabbit IgGThermo Fisher ScientificCat# A11036; RRID:AB_10563566IHC: 1:500
AntibodyAlexa Fluor 647- goat anti-rabbit IgGThermo Fisher ScientificCat# A21245; RRID:AB_2535813IHC: 1:500
AntibodyAlexa Fluor 405- goat anti-rabbit IgGThermo Fisher ScientificCat# A48254; RRID:AB_2890548IHC: 1:500
AntibodyAlexa Fluor 568- goat anti-mouse IgGThermo Fisher ScientificCat# A11031; RRID:AB_144696IHC: 1:500
AntibodyAlexa Fluor 647- goat anti-mouse IgGThermo Fisher ScientificCat# A21235; RRID:AB_2535804IHC: 1:500
AntibodyAlexa Fluor 568- goat anti-rat IgGThermo Fisher ScientificCat# A21247; RRID:AB_141778IHC: 1:500
AntibodyDonkey anti-Rabbit IgG HRPJackson ImmunoResearchCat# 711-035-152; RRID:AB_10015282WB: 1:5000
AntibodyDonkey anti-Mouse IgG HRPJackson ImmunoResearchCat# 712-035-150; RRID:AB_2340638WB: 1:5000
AntibodyDonkey anti-goat IgG HRPJackson ImmunoResearchCat# 705-035-003; RRID:AB_2340390WB: 1:5000
Antibody10 nm gold anti mouse IgGElectron Microscopy SciencesCat# 25129IEM 1:50
Antibody10 nm gold anti rabbit IgGElectron Microscopy SciencesCat# 25109IEM 1:50
Chemical compound, drugINK (mTOR i)ChemSceneCAS 1224844-38-5Dissolved in 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose (Sigma, Cat #5678) and 0.05% tween 80 in water
Chemical compound, drugPBSThermo Fisher ScientificCat# BP339-4
Chemical compound, drugSodium cacodylate bufferElectron Microscopy SciencesCat#116520.1 M for fixation of brains
Chemical compound, drugParaformaldehydeElectron Microscopy SciencesCat#157144% for fixation of brains
Chemical compound, drug25% glutaraldehydeElectron Microscopy SciencesCat# 16220
Chemical compound, drugUranyl acetateElectron Microscopy SciencesCat# 22400–4EM processing
Chemical compound, drugLead citrateElectron Microscopy SciencesCat#22410EM processing
Chemical compound, drugOsmium tetroxideTed PellaCat#18465EM processing
Chemical compound, drugSodium metaperiodateSigma-AldrichCat#S1878-25gEM processing
Chemical compound, drugPermountElectron Microscopy SciencesCat# 17986Dab IHC
Chemical compound, drugFlouro-gelElectron Microscopy SciencesCat# 17985–10IF IHC
Chemical compound, drugFBSThermo Fisher ScientificCat# 26140IHC blocking
Chemical compound, drugHorse serumThermo Fisher ScientificCat# 16050IHC blocking
Chemical compound, drugSpurr resinElectron Microscopy SciencesCat# 14300
Commercial assay kitVectastain ABCVector LaboratoriesCat# PK-4000; RRID:AB_2336818For DAB staining
Commercial assay kitDAB Peroxidase Substrate kitVector LaboratoriesCat# SK-4100; RRID:AB_2336382For DAB staining
Commercial assay kitHQ silver kitNanoProbesCat# 2012–45 mlEM processing
SoftwareImageJNIHhttps://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
SoftwareExcelMicrosoftMicrosoft 365
SoftwareGraphPad Prism 8.0.1GraphPad
OtherNitrocellulose membraneWhatmanWB 0.2µm-pore
OtherAclar embedding filmElectron Microscopy SciencesCat# 50425–25EM processing
Other75 mesh nickel grids with carbon coating and formvarElectron Microscopy SciencesCat# pi-75-ni-25EM processing
OtherEM blockElectron Microscopy SciencesCat# 25596EM processing

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Philip Stavrides
  2. Chris N Goulbourne
  3. James Peddy
  4. Chunfeng Huo
  5. Mala Rao
  6. Vinod Khetarpal
  7. Deanna M Marchionini
  8. Ralph A Nixon
  9. Dun-Sheng Yang
(2025)
mTOR inhibition in Q175 Huntington’s disease model mice facilitates neuronal autophagy and mutant huntingtin clearance
eLife 14:RP104979.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.104979.3