Force transmission through the inner kinetochore is enhanced by centromeric DNA sequences

  1. Elise Miedlar
  2. Grace E Hamilton
  3. Samuel R Witus
  4. Sara J Gonske
  5. Michael Riffle
  6. Alex Zelter
  7. Rachel E Klevit
  8. Charles L Asbury
  9. Yoana N Dimitrova
  10. Trisha N Davis  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, United States
  2. Department of Neurobiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, United States
  3. Department of Structural Biology, Genentech, Inc, United States
2 figures, 5 tables and 1 additional file

Figures

Recombinantly wrapped nucleosome core particles (NCPs) with W601 or CCEN DNA.

(A) Sequences of the W601 and CCEN DNA used to wrap histone octamers. The black text is W601 DNA, the black text highlighted in yellow is the portion of CDEII corresponding to the Mif2 footprint (Xiao et al., 2017), the cyan text is CDEIII, the sequence underlined in green is the CBF3 binding site (Guan et al., 2021), and the blue text is the pericentromeric DNA sequence just downstream of CDEIII on chromosome III. (B) Chromatogram representing elution fractions from size-exclusion chromatography column used to purify wrapped NCPs from excess free DNA. 260 nm signal is shown for both W601 and CCEN NCPs. (C) Native gel of elution fractions indicated in the chromatogram in (B). NCPs from both SEC Fraction 6 and SEC Fraction 7 were used to collect data on the optical trap. There was no statistically significant difference between rupture forces of assemblies measured with NCPs from either Fraction 6 or Fraction 7.

Kinetochore assemblies built on CCEN-NCPs and OA form stronger attachments to microtubules.

(A) Percentages of beads that had microtubule binding capability. Error bars indicate the standard error of the proportion. Barnard’s test was used to compare contingency tables. The p-values for the significance of the difference between fraction of beads bound if either OA or Mif2 were included compared to if neither were included are given in Table 1. Data were combined from two biological replicates (see Figure 2—source data 1). (B) Boxplot of rupture forces for each of the kinetochore assemblies tested. Dots represent individual rupture events, and boxes enclose the interquartile range, with indicated medians. Whiskers extend to the inner fences. Data were combined from four biological replicates of each condition (see Figure 2—source data 1). A Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was performed to compare the probability distributions of rupture forces across conditions. *** indicates p-value of 1.87 × 10–6, n.s., not significant. (C) Survival probability curves for the data plotted in (B).

Figure 2—source data 1

Excel file of data for Figure 2A and B and a list of the number of technical and biological replicates for Figure 2A and B.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/105150/elife-105150-fig2-data1-v1.xlsx

Tables

Table 1
Statistical analyses for microtubule binding assay*.
ConditionCCEN NCP neither OA nor Mif2W601 NCP neither OA nor Mif2
W601 NCP, OAN/A2.61 × 10–12
CCEN NCP, OA3.55 × 10–13N/A
W601 NCP, Mif2N/A2.31 × 10–12
CCEN NCP, Mif24.27 × 10–7N/A
  1. N/A, not applicable.

  2. *

    p-Values for comparison of data in Figure 2A determined by a Barnard’s test.

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli)Rosetta (DE3) pLys competent cellsNovagenCat# 71403
AntibodyMonoRab anti-DYKDDDDK Affinity ResinGenScriptCat# L00766
Biological sample (Bos taurus)TubulinLab purificationIsolated from Bos taurus brains
Protocol adopted from Castoldi and Popov, 2003
AntibodyBiotinylated Anti-His tag antibodyR&D SystemsCat# BAM050
RRID:AB_356845
Chemical compound, drugGlucose oxidaseMilliporeSigmaCat# 345386
Chemical compound, drugCatalaseMilliporeSigmaCat# E3289
Chemical compound, drugBiotinylated bovine serum albumin (BSA)Vector laboratoriesCat# B-2007
Chemical compound, drugAvidin DNVector LaboratoriesCat# A-3100
Chemical compound, drugTCEPThermo FisherCat# 20490
OtherStreptavidin-coated polystyrene beadsSpherotechSVP-05-10
SoftwareLabviewNational InstrumentsRRID:SCR_014325
SoftwareIgor ProWavemetricsRRID:SCR_000325
Table 2
Plasmids used for expression of kinetochore proteins*.
ProteinPlasmidComponentsReferences
NucleosomepScKl2K. lactis His6-H2A,
K. lactis His6-H2B,
Cse4,
K. lactis His6-H4
Migl et al., 2020
OApGH3Okp1, Ame1-FLAGHamilton et al., 2020
Mif2pAZ144Mif2-MBPThis study
2D-MINDpGH62FLAG-Nsl1, S240D & S250D Dsn1, Mtw1, Nnf1Hamilton et al., 2020
(230-576) 2D-MINDpEHM4FLAG-Nsl1, (230-576) S240D & S250D Dsn1, Mtw1, Nnf1Hamilton et al., 2020
Ndc80cpJT48
Ndc80/Nuf2
Spc24-FLAG, Spc25
Ndc80, Nuf2
Kudalkar et al., 2015; Wei et al., 2005
Dam1cpJT44Spc34-FLAG, Dad1, Dad2, Dad3, Dad4 Duo1, Dam1, Hsk3, Spc19, Ask1Umbreit et al., 2014
  1. *

    All proteins are from Saccharomyces cerevisiae except as noted.

Table 3
DNA sequences tested for ability to wrap centromeric nucleosomes.
NameSequence*Wrapped?Stable duringSEC?
W601ATCGAGAATCCCGGTGCCGAGGCCGCTCAATTGGTCGTAGACAGC
TCTAGCACCGCTTAAACGCACGTACGCGCTGTCCCCCGCGTTTTA
ACCGCCAAGGGGATTACTCCCTAGTCTCCAGGCACGTGTCAGATA
TATACATCCGAT
YesYes
CEN 3 AAAGCTATTCATTGAAAAAATAGTACAAATAAGTCACATGATGATATTTGATTTTATTATATTTTTAAAAAAAGTAAAAAATAAAAAGTA
GTTTATTTTTAAAAAATAAAATTTAAAATATTAGTGTATTTGATT
TCCGAAAGTTAAAA
AAGAAATAGTAAGAAATATATATTT
SomeNo
CEN 5.1AAAGCTATTCATTGAAAAAATAGTACAAATAAGTCACATGATCGA
GAATCCCGGTGCCGAGGCCGCTCAATTGGTCGTAGACAGCTCTAG
CACCGCTTAAACGCACGTACGCGCTGTCCCCCGCGTTTTAACCGC
CAAGGGGATTACTCCCTAGTCTCCAGGCACGTGTCAGATATATAC
ATCCGATTATTTGATTTCCGAAAGTTAAAAAAGAAATAGTAAGAA
ATATATATTT
YesYes
CEN3-601 (Xiao et al., 2017)ATCGAGAATCCCGGTGCCGAGGCCGCTCAATTGGTCGTAGACAGC
TCTAGCACCGCTTAAACGCACGTACGCGCTGTCCCCCGCGTTTTA
ATATTAGTGTATTTGATTTCCGAAAGTTAAAAAAGAAATAGTAAG
AAATCATCCGAT
YesYes
CCENATCGAGAATCCCGGTGCCGAGGCCGCTCAATTGGTCGTAGACAGC
TCTAGCACCGCTTAAACAGTTTATTTTTAAAAAATAAAATTTAAA
ATATTAGTGTATTTGATTTCCGAAAGTTAAAA
AAGAAATAGTAAG
AAATCATCCGAT
YesYes
CEN 6.3ATCGAGAATCCCGGTGCCGAGGCCGCTCAATTGGTCGTAGACAGC
TCTAGCACCGCTTAAACAGTTTATTTTTAAAAAATAAAATTTAAA
ATATTAGAGGGGATTACTCCCTAGTCTCCAGGCACGTGTCAGATA
TATACATCCGAT
YesND §
CEN 6.4ATCGAGAATCCCGGTGCCGAGGCCGCTCAATTGGTCGTAGACAGC
TCTAGCACCGCTTAAACGCACGTACGCGCTGTCCCCCGCGTTTTA
ACCGCCAAGGGGATTACTCCCTAGTCTCCAGGCACGTGTCAGATA
TATACATCCGATGCCGCCAGTTTATTTTTAAAAAATAAAATTTAA
AATATTAG
SomeND §
CON3 (Dendooven et al., 2023)ATAAGTCACATGGTGCCGAGGCCGCTCAATTGGTCGTAGACAGCT
CTAGCACCGCTTAAACGCACGTACGCGCTGTCCCCCGCGTTTTAA
TATTAGTGTATTTGATTTCCGAAAGTTAAAAAAGAAATAGTAAGA
AATATATATTTCATTGAA
ND §ND §
  1. ND, not determined.

  2. *

    W601 DNA in black font; Genomic DNA upstream or downstream of CEN3 in blue font; CDEI in purple font; CDEII in red font; CDEII Mif2 footprint in red font and underlined; CDEIII in purple font and underlined; linker DNA highlighted in bold.

  3. These are the DNA sequences used to wrap the nucleosomes tested in the optical trapping assay in this paper.

  4. The construct used by Xiao et al., 2017 included only the 147 bp of CEN3 and none of the upstream or downstream sequences.

  5. §

    Not determined.

  6. Shown for comparison only.

Table 4
Kinetochore protein purification buffers.
ProteinPurification buffers
Dam1c-FLAGLysis: 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.9, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets
FLAG wash: 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.9, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets
FLAG elution: 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.9, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets, 200 ug/ml 3x FLAG peptide
SEC: 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.9, 500 mM NaCl
Mif2-MBPLysis: 30 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5, 2 M NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM TCEP, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets
Amylose resin elution: 30 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM TCEP, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets, 10 mM maltose
QA: 30 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM TCEP, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets
QB: 30 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5, 1 M NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM TCEP
MIND-FLAGLysis: 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.5% NP40, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets
FLAG wash: 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets
FLAG elution: 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets, 200 ug/ml 3x FLAG peptide
SEC: 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA
Ndc80c-FLAGLysis: 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.6, 200 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets
FLAG wash: 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.6, 200 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets
FLAG elution: 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.6, 200 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets, 200 ug/ml 3x peptide
SEC: 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.6, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA
OA-FLAGLysis: 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.5% NP40, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets
Low salt FLAG wash: 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets
High salt FLAG wash: 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5, 2 M NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets
FLAG elution: 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, Roche protease inhibitor tablets, 200 ug/ml 3x FLAG peptide
SEC: 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Elise Miedlar
  2. Grace E Hamilton
  3. Samuel R Witus
  4. Sara J Gonske
  5. Michael Riffle
  6. Alex Zelter
  7. Rachel E Klevit
  8. Charles L Asbury
  9. Yoana N Dimitrova
  10. Trisha N Davis
(2025)
Force transmission through the inner kinetochore is enhanced by centromeric DNA sequences
eLife 14:RP105150.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105150.3