Disease Transmission: Interactions between wild pigs and the spread of disease

Tracking wild pigs with GPS devices reveals how their social interactions could influence the spread of disease, offering new strategies for protecting agriculture, wildlife, and human health.
  1. Mercury Shitindo  Is a corresponding author
  1. Africa Bioethics Network, Kenya
  2. University of Zaragoza, Spain

Across landscapes worldwide, wild pigs are more than a nuisance – they are a global economic and ecological catastrophe. They pose threats to agriculture by destroying crops, to biodiversity by competing with native species, and to humans and farm animals by spreading disease. In the United States alone, wild pigs cause an estimated $120 billion in damages every year (Risch et al., 2021) and in Australia it has been estimated that a single outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease could cost the economy around $50 billion (Buetre, 2013).

To tackle the threat of disease outbreaks, it is important to understand how diseases spread through populations of wild (or feral) pigs, so it necessary to know how often wild pigs come into contact with each other. However, it is challenging to measure such contact rates for wild pigs because they are highly social and because they roam freely across vast landscapes. Now, in eLife, Tatiana Proboste (University of Queensland) and colleagues at Queensland and other research institutes in Australia report a new approach to collecting such data (Proboste et al., 2024).

Using GPS collars to track 146 wild pigs across diverse terrain in eastern Australia over six years, the team uncovered intricate patterns of animal movement and interaction. Their findings revealed crucial insights into how these animals socialize and move through their territories, offering new ways to predict and control the spread of dangerous diseases like foot-and-mouth disease, African swine fever, and zoonotic infections that can spread to humans.

The experiments showed that wild pigs organize themselves into distinct social groups, or "sounders", typically made up of adult females and their young. Adult males, in contrast, lead more solitary lives (Spencer et al., 2005). Using GPS data, Proboste et al. found that interactions between the pigs within sounders were frequent and cohesive, while interactions between different groups were relatively rare and mediated by roaming males. This dynamic is crucial for understanding disease transmission. Diseases are likely to spread quickly within a single sounder due to high levels of contact, but solitary males that move between groups create a potential pathway for diseases to spread more broadly. These findings echo patterns observed in wild boar populations in Europe, where males act as ‘bridges’ between otherwise isolated groups (Podgórski et al., 2018).

Conventional strategies for controlling disease outbreaks often focus on culling adult females to curb population growth (Bengsen et al., 2014). However, the results of Proboste et al. suggest a shift in strategy: culling adult males might be more effective because it could prevent the disease spreading from group to group. The researchers also uncovered seasonal variations in pig interactions, with contact rates peaking in summer – information that can be used to ensure that disease control measures are implemented when they are most likely to be effective. The inclusion of real-word data about wild pigs in models of disease transmission, such as the Australia Animal Disease Spread model (Bradhurst et al., 2015), will help the relevant authorities to respond to disease outbreaks more effectively.

As the global threat of diseases like African swine fever continues to grow, understanding the social networks of wild pigs has never been more important. The study by Proboste et al. highlights the power of combining technology and ecological insights to address complex challenges in public and animal health. While this study marks a significant step forward, questions remain.

How do environmental factors influence the seasonal patterns of pig interactions that were observed? Could machine learning help predict when and where disease transmission is most likely based on pig movement data? Answering these questions will require interdisciplinary approaches that combine ecology, epidemiology and advanced data analytics. By understanding how wild pigs interact and move across different habitats, we can develop more targeted and effective strategies to protect agriculture, biodiversity and human health from disease outbreaks.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mercury Shitindo

    Mercury Shitindo is in the Africa Bioethics Network, Nairobi, Kenya and the University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

    For correspondence
    mercury.shitindo@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3814-8786

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2024, Shitindo

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 167
    views
  • 12
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mercury Shitindo
(2024)
Disease Transmission: Interactions between wild pigs and the spread of disease
eLife 13:e105293.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105293
  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Rebecca D Tarvin, Jeffrey L Coleman ... Richard W Fitch
    Research Article

    Understanding the origins of novel, complex phenotypes is a major goal in evolutionary biology. Poison frogs of the family Dendrobatidae have evolved the novel ability to acquire alkaloids from their diet for chemical defense at least three times. However, taxon sampling for alkaloids has been biased towards colorful species, without similar attention paid to inconspicuous ones that are often assumed to be undefended. As a result, our understanding of how chemical defense evolved in this group is incomplete. Here, we provide new data showing that, in contrast to previous studies, species from each undefended poison frog clade have measurable yet low amounts of alkaloids. We confirm that undefended dendrobatids regularly consume mites and ants, which are known sources of alkaloids. Thus, our data suggest that diet is insufficient to explain the defended phenotype. Our data support the existence of a phenotypic intermediate between toxin consumption and sequestration — passive accumulation — that differs from sequestration in that it involves no derived forms of transport and storage mechanisms yet results in low levels of toxin accumulation. We discuss the concept of passive accumulation and its potential role in the origin of chemical defenses in poison frogs and other toxin-sequestering organisms. In light of ideas from pharmacokinetics, we incorporate new and old data from poison frogs into an evolutionary model that could help explain the origins of acquired chemical defenses in animals and provide insight into the molecular processes that govern the fate of ingested toxins.

    1. Ecology
    2. Neuroscience
    Ralph E Peterson, Aman Choudhri ... Dan H Sanes
    Research Article

    In nature, animal vocalizations can provide crucial information about identity, including kinship and hierarchy. However, lab-based vocal behavior is typically studied during brief interactions between animals with no prior social relationship, and under environmental conditions with limited ethological relevance. Here, we address this gap by establishing long-term acoustic recordings from Mongolian gerbil families, a core social group that uses an array of sonic and ultrasonic vocalizations. Three separate gerbil families were transferred to an enlarged environment and continuous 20-day audio recordings were obtained. Using a variational autoencoder (VAE) to quantify 583,237 vocalizations, we show that gerbils exhibit a more elaborate vocal repertoire than has been previously reported and that vocal repertoire usage differs significantly by family. By performing gaussian mixture model clustering on the VAE latent space, we show that families preferentially use characteristic sets of vocal clusters and that these usage preferences remain stable over weeks. Furthermore, gerbils displayed family-specific transitions between vocal clusters. Since gerbils live naturally as extended families in complex underground burrows that are adjacent to other families, these results suggest the presence of a vocal dialect which could be exploited by animals to represent kinship. These findings position the Mongolian gerbil as a compelling animal model to study the neural basis of vocal communication and demonstrates the potential for using unsupervised machine learning with uninterrupted acoustic recordings to gain insights into naturalistic animal behavior.