TRAF2 regulates TNF and NF-κB signalling to suppress apoptosis and skin inflammation independently of Sphingosine kinase-1

  1. Nima Etemadi
  2. Michael Chopin
  3. Holly Anderton
  4. Maria C Tanzer
  5. James A Rickard
  6. Waruni Abeysekra
  7. Cathrine Hall
  8. Sukhdeep K Spall
  9. Bing Wang
  10. Yuquan Xiong
  11. Timothy Hla
  12. Stuart M Pitson
  13. Claudine S Bonder
  14. Wendy Wei-Lynn Wong
  15. Matthias Ernst
  16. Gordon K Smyth
  17. David L Vaux
  18. Stephen L Nutt
  19. Ueli Nachbur
  20. John Silke  Is a corresponding author
  1. Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Australia
  2. Monash University, Australia
  3. Cornell University, United States
  4. SA Pathology, Australia
  5. University of Zurich, Switzerland
  6. Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Australia

Abstract

TRAF2 is a component of TNF superfamily signalling complexes and plays an essential role in the regulation and homeostasis of immune cells. TRAF2 deficient mice die around birth, therefore its role in adult tissues is not well-explored. Furthermore, the role of the TRAF2 RING is controversial. It has been claimed that the atypical TRAF2 RING cannot function as a ubiquitin E3 ligase but counterclaimed that TRAF2 RING requires a co-factor, sphingosine-1-phosphate, that is generated by the enzyme sphingosine kinase-1, to function as an E3 ligase. Keratinocyte specific deletion of Traf2, but not Sphk1 deficiency, disrupted TNF mediated NF-κB and MAP kinase signalling and caused epidermal hyperplasia and psoriatic skin inflammation. This inflammation was driven by TNF, cell death, non-canonical NF-κB and the adaptive immune system and might therefore represent a clinically relevant model of psoriasis. TRAF2 therefore has essential tissue specific functions that do not overlap with those of Sphk1.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nima Etemadi

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Michael Chopin

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Holly Anderton

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Maria C Tanzer

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. James A Rickard

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Waruni Abeysekra

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Cathrine Hall

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sukhdeep K Spall

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Bing Wang

    Center for Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Yuquan Xiong

    Center for Vascular Biology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Timothy Hla

    Center for Vascular Biology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Stuart M Pitson

    Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Claudine S Bonder

    Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Wendy Wei-Lynn Wong

    Institute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Matthias Ernst

    Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Gordon K Smyth

    Bioinformatics, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. David L Vaux

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Stephen L Nutt

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Ueli Nachbur

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. John Silke

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    For correspondence
    j.silke@latrobe.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mice were maintained at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI) under the approval of WEHI ethics committee and Institute guidelines. All procedures were specifcally approved under WEHI Ethics Project Number 2011.013 and 2014.015.

Copyright

© 2015, Etemadi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,938
    views
  • 992
    downloads
  • 81
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nima Etemadi
  2. Michael Chopin
  3. Holly Anderton
  4. Maria C Tanzer
  5. James A Rickard
  6. Waruni Abeysekra
  7. Cathrine Hall
  8. Sukhdeep K Spall
  9. Bing Wang
  10. Yuquan Xiong
  11. Timothy Hla
  12. Stuart M Pitson
  13. Claudine S Bonder
  14. Wendy Wei-Lynn Wong
  15. Matthias Ernst
  16. Gordon K Smyth
  17. David L Vaux
  18. Stephen L Nutt
  19. Ueli Nachbur
  20. John Silke
(2015)
TRAF2 regulates TNF and NF-κB signalling to suppress apoptosis and skin inflammation independently of Sphingosine kinase-1
eLife 4:e10592.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10592

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10592

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Raji E Joseph, Thomas E Wales ... Amy H Andreotti
    Research Advance

    Inhibition of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) has proven to be highly effective in the treatment of B-cell malignancies such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), autoimmune disorders, and multiple sclerosis. Since the approval of the first BTK inhibitor (BTKi), Ibrutinib, several other inhibitors including Acalabrutinib, Zanubrutinib, Tirabrutinib, and Pirtobrutinib have been clinically approved. All are covalent active site inhibitors, with the exception of the reversible active site inhibitor Pirtobrutinib. The large number of available inhibitors for the BTK target creates challenges in choosing the most appropriate BTKi for treatment. Side-by-side comparisons in CLL have shown that different inhibitors may differ in their treatment efficacy. Moreover, the nature of the resistance mutations that arise in patients appears to depend on the specific BTKi administered. We have previously shown that Ibrutinib binding to the kinase active site causes unanticipated long-range effects on the global conformation of BTK (Joseph et al., 2020). Here, we show that binding of each of the five approved BTKi to the kinase active site brings about distinct allosteric changes that alter the conformational equilibrium of full-length BTK. Additionally, we provide an explanation for the resistance mutation bias observed in CLL patients treated with different BTKi and characterize the mechanism of action of two common resistance mutations: BTK T474I and L528W.