TRAF2 regulates TNF and NF-κB signalling to suppress apoptosis and skin inflammation independently of Sphingosine kinase-1

  1. Nima Etemadi
  2. Michael Chopin
  3. Holly Anderton
  4. Maria C Tanzer
  5. James A Rickard
  6. Waruni Abeysekra
  7. Cathrine Hall
  8. Sukhdeep K Spall
  9. Bing Wang
  10. Yuquan Xiong
  11. Timothy Hla
  12. Stuart M Pitson
  13. Claudine S Bonder
  14. Wendy Wei-Lynn Wong
  15. Matthias Ernst
  16. Gordon K Smyth
  17. David L Vaux
  18. Stephen L Nutt
  19. Ueli Nachbur
  20. John Silke  Is a corresponding author
  1. Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Australia
  2. Monash University, Australia
  3. Cornell University, United States
  4. SA Pathology, Australia
  5. University of Zurich, Switzerland
  6. Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Australia

Abstract

TRAF2 is a component of TNF superfamily signalling complexes and plays an essential role in the regulation and homeostasis of immune cells. TRAF2 deficient mice die around birth, therefore its role in adult tissues is not well-explored. Furthermore, the role of the TRAF2 RING is controversial. It has been claimed that the atypical TRAF2 RING cannot function as a ubiquitin E3 ligase but counterclaimed that TRAF2 RING requires a co-factor, sphingosine-1-phosphate, that is generated by the enzyme sphingosine kinase-1, to function as an E3 ligase. Keratinocyte specific deletion of Traf2, but not Sphk1 deficiency, disrupted TNF mediated NF-κB and MAP kinase signalling and caused epidermal hyperplasia and psoriatic skin inflammation. This inflammation was driven by TNF, cell death, non-canonical NF-κB and the adaptive immune system and might therefore represent a clinically relevant model of psoriasis. TRAF2 therefore has essential tissue specific functions that do not overlap with those of Sphk1.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nima Etemadi

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Michael Chopin

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Holly Anderton

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Maria C Tanzer

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. James A Rickard

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Waruni Abeysekra

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Cathrine Hall

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sukhdeep K Spall

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Bing Wang

    Center for Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Yuquan Xiong

    Center for Vascular Biology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Timothy Hla

    Center for Vascular Biology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Stuart M Pitson

    Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Claudine S Bonder

    Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Wendy Wei-Lynn Wong

    Institute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Matthias Ernst

    Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Gordon K Smyth

    Bioinformatics, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. David L Vaux

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Stephen L Nutt

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Ueli Nachbur

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. John Silke

    Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
    For correspondence
    j.silke@latrobe.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ivan Dikic, Goethe University Medical School, Germany

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mice were maintained at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI) under the approval of WEHI ethics committee and Institute guidelines. All procedures were specifcally approved under WEHI Ethics Project Number 2011.013 and 2014.015.

Version history

  1. Received: August 4, 2015
  2. Accepted: December 21, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 23, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 16, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: June 27, 2017 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2015, Etemadi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,842
    views
  • 982
    downloads
  • 79
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nima Etemadi
  2. Michael Chopin
  3. Holly Anderton
  4. Maria C Tanzer
  5. James A Rickard
  6. Waruni Abeysekra
  7. Cathrine Hall
  8. Sukhdeep K Spall
  9. Bing Wang
  10. Yuquan Xiong
  11. Timothy Hla
  12. Stuart M Pitson
  13. Claudine S Bonder
  14. Wendy Wei-Lynn Wong
  15. Matthias Ernst
  16. Gordon K Smyth
  17. David L Vaux
  18. Stephen L Nutt
  19. Ueli Nachbur
  20. John Silke
(2015)
TRAF2 regulates TNF and NF-κB signalling to suppress apoptosis and skin inflammation independently of Sphingosine kinase-1
eLife 4:e10592.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10592

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10592

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Katarzyna Marta Zoltowska, Utpal Das ... Lucía Chávez-Gutiérrez
    Research Article

    Amyloid β (Aβ) peptides accumulating in the brain are proposed to trigger Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, molecular cascades underlying their toxicity are poorly defined. Here, we explored a novel hypothesis for Aβ42 toxicity that arises from its proven affinity for γ-secretases. We hypothesized that the reported increases in Aβ42, particularly in the endolysosomal compartment, promote the establishment of a product feedback inhibitory mechanism on γ-secretases, and thereby impair downstream signaling events. We conducted kinetic analyses of γ-secretase activity in cell-free systems in the presence of Aβ, as well as cell-based and ex vivo assays in neuronal cell lines, neurons, and brain synaptosomes to assess the impact of Aβ on γ-secretases. We show that human Aβ42 peptides, but neither murine Aβ42 nor human Aβ17–42 (p3), inhibit γ-secretases and trigger accumulation of unprocessed substrates in neurons, including C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of APP, p75, and pan-cadherin. Moreover, Aβ42 treatment dysregulated cellular homeostasis, as shown by the induction of p75-dependent neuronal death in two distinct cellular systems. Our findings raise the possibility that pathological elevations in Aβ42 contribute to cellular toxicity via the γ-secretase inhibition, and provide a novel conceptual framework to address Aβ toxicity in the context of γ-secretase-dependent homeostatic signaling.