Metabolism: Insulin control in fruit flies

Investigating how the production of insulin is regulated in fruit flies reveals surprising insights that may help to better understand how this process unfolds in humans.
  1. Omowumi Kayode  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Biochemistry, Mountain Top University, Nigeria

In humans, the pancreas plays a crucial role in regulating blood sugar levels by producing a hormone called insulin. In fruit flies, cells in the brain called insulin-producing cells (IPCs for short) perform a similar function. These tiny insects may seem like an unlikely choice for studying insulin regulation, but their biology shares many similarities with humans. By studying fruit flies, scientists can gain valuable insights into complex biological processes, including metabolism, insulin production and diseases like diabetes (Marder, 2012; Taghert and Nitabach, 2012).

Whether in insects or mammals, maintaining stable blood sugar levels requires insulin release to be carefully regulated (Meyer et al., 2021). In fruit flies, chemicals called neuromodulators ‘tell’ IPCs when and how to produce the hormone. This involves small protein-like molecules (known as neuropeptides), as well as biogenic amines such as dopamine and serotonin, binding to receptors on the surface of the cells. Each type of neuromodulator can increase or decrease insulin release, depending on what the body needs (Taghert and Nitabach, 2012). Yet, precisely how neuromodulators interact with IPCs in fruit flies is still poorly understood; in particular, it remains unclear whether these cells exhibit functional diversity – that is, whether individual IPCs respond to various neuromodulatory signals in different ways. Now, in eLife, Jan Ache and colleagues – including first authors Martina Held, Rituja Bisen and Meet Zandawala – report a comprehensive analysis of how IPCs are controlled in fruit flies (Held et al., 2025).

The team, who are based at Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, the University of Nevada Reno and Charité–Universitätmedizin Berlin, used a variety of techniques to manipulate and monitor brain signals in the insects. This allowed them to observe how both individual cells and populations of IPCs responded to various neuromodulators.

The experiments revealed that certain signals could influence the overall activity of the cells. Quick-acting biogenic amines like octopamine and dopamine, for example, made IPCs release more insulin. These chemicals control energy use: dopamine is linked to motivating and reward, while octopamine shapes the response to stress and excitement, much like adrenaline in humans. As such, these signals likely help the body prepare for activity by ensuring enough resources are available. On the other hand, long-acting neuropeptides like leucokinin and myosuppressin reduced IPC activity and slowed insulin release. This may help conserve energy when food is scarce or during stress (Rosikon et al., 2023).

At the level of individual cells, the work by Held et al. confirmed that IPCs have heterogeneous roles in balancing metabolism, with some cells reacting strongly to certain neuromodulators while others remained unresponsive. This is similar to how human pancreatic beta cells behave, with various cells responding differently to various signals (Meyer et al., 2021). This diversity may help fine-tune insulin release, preventing sudden changes in blood sugar levels (Bisen et al., 2024; Held et al., 2025).

Taken together, these findings will enable further research into insulin regulation in fruit flies, which may hold the key to unlocking long-sought answers in how this process unfolds in humans. For instance, further studies could focus on exploring how the different signals controlling insulin release work together. Do some of them override others? And how do long-term changes, like obesity or diabetes, affect these signals? Answering these questions could lead to better treatments for metabolic diseases, such as diabetes.

References

    1. Meyer D
    2. Richter F
    3. Schmitt H
    (2021)
    Cellular diversity in pancreatic beta cells: implications for insulin secretion
    Metabolic Biology 18:150–165.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Omowumi Kayode

    Omowumi Kayode is in the Department of Biochemistry, Mountain Top University, Makogi Oba, Nigeria

    For correspondence
    otkayode@mtu.edu.ng
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5831-3558

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2025, Kayode

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Omowumi Kayode
(2025)
Metabolism: Insulin control in fruit flies
eLife 14:e106220.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.106220
  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Lenia Amaral, Xiaosha Wang ... Ella Striem-Amit
    Research Article

    Research on brain plasticity, particularly in the context of deafness, consistently emphasizes the reorganization of the auditory cortex. But to what extent do all individuals with deafness show the same level of reorganization? To address this question, we examined the individual differences in functional connectivity (FC) from the deprived auditory cortex. Our findings demonstrate remarkable differentiation between individuals deriving from the absence of shared auditory experiences, resulting in heightened FC variability among deaf individuals, compared to more consistent FC in the hearing group. Notably, connectivity to language regions becomes more diverse across individuals with deafness. This does not stem from delayed language acquisition; it is found in deaf native signers, who are exposed to natural language since birth. However, comparing FC diversity between deaf native signers and deaf delayed signers, who were deprived of language in early development, we show that language experience also impacts individual differences, although to a more moderate extent. Overall, our research points out the intricate interplay between brain plasticity and individual differences, shedding light on the diverse ways reorganization manifests among individuals. It joins findings of increased connectivity diversity in blindness and highlights the importance of considering individual differences in personalized rehabilitation for sensory loss.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Gabriel Loewinger, Erjia Cui ... Francisco Pereira
    Tools and Resources

    Fiber photometry has become a popular technique to measure neural activity in vivo, but common analysis strategies can reduce the detection of effects because they condense within-trial signals into summary measures, and discard trial-level information by averaging across-trials. We propose a novel photometry statistical framework based on functional linear mixed modeling, which enables hypothesis testing of variable effects at every trial time-point, and uses trial-level signals without averaging. This makes it possible to compare the timing and magnitude of signals across conditions while accounting for between-animal differences. Our framework produces a series of plots that illustrate covariate effect estimates and statistical significance at each trial time-point. By exploiting signal autocorrelation, our methodology yields joint 95% confidence intervals that account for inspecting effects across the entire trial and improve the detection of event-related signal changes over common multiple comparisons correction strategies. We reanalyze data from a recent study proposing a theory for the role of mesolimbic dopamine in reward learning, and show the capability of our framework to reveal significant effects obscured by standard analysis approaches. For example, our method identifies two dopamine components with distinct temporal dynamics in response to reward delivery. In simulation experiments, our methodology yields improved statistical power over common analysis approaches. Finally, we provide an open-source package and analysis guide for applying our framework.