Metabolism: Insulin control in fruit flies
In humans, the pancreas plays a crucial role in regulating blood sugar levels by producing a hormone called insulin. In fruit flies, cells in the brain called insulin-producing cells (IPCs for short) perform a similar function. These tiny insects may seem like an unlikely choice for studying insulin regulation, but their biology shares many similarities with humans. By studying fruit flies, scientists can gain valuable insights into complex biological processes, including metabolism, insulin production and diseases like diabetes (Marder, 2012; Taghert and Nitabach, 2012).
Whether in insects or mammals, maintaining stable blood sugar levels requires insulin release to be carefully regulated (Meyer et al., 2021). In fruit flies, chemicals called neuromodulators ‘tell’ IPCs when and how to produce the hormone. This involves small protein-like molecules (known as neuropeptides), as well as biogenic amines such as dopamine and serotonin, binding to receptors on the surface of the cells. Each type of neuromodulator can increase or decrease insulin release, depending on what the body needs (Taghert and Nitabach, 2012). Yet, precisely how neuromodulators interact with IPCs in fruit flies is still poorly understood; in particular, it remains unclear whether these cells exhibit functional diversity – that is, whether individual IPCs respond to various neuromodulatory signals in different ways. Now, in eLife, Jan Ache and colleagues – including first authors Martina Held, Rituja Bisen and Meet Zandawala – report a comprehensive analysis of how IPCs are controlled in fruit flies (Held et al., 2025).
The team, who are based at Julius-Maximilians-University of Würzburg, the University of Nevada Reno and Charité–Universitätmedizin Berlin, used a variety of techniques to manipulate and monitor brain signals in the insects. This allowed them to observe how both individual cells and populations of IPCs responded to various neuromodulators.
The experiments revealed that certain signals could influence the overall activity of the cells. Quick-acting biogenic amines like octopamine and dopamine, for example, made IPCs release more insulin. These chemicals control energy use: dopamine is linked to motivating and reward, while octopamine shapes the response to stress and excitement, much like adrenaline in humans. As such, these signals likely help the body prepare for activity by ensuring enough resources are available. On the other hand, long-acting neuropeptides like leucokinin and myosuppressin reduced IPC activity and slowed insulin release. This may help conserve energy when food is scarce or during stress (Rosikon et al., 2023).
At the level of individual cells, the work by Held et al. confirmed that IPCs have heterogeneous roles in balancing metabolism, with some cells reacting strongly to certain neuromodulators while others remained unresponsive. This is similar to how human pancreatic beta cells behave, with various cells responding differently to various signals (Meyer et al., 2021). This diversity may help fine-tune insulin release, preventing sudden changes in blood sugar levels (Bisen et al., 2024; Held et al., 2025).
Taken together, these findings will enable further research into insulin regulation in fruit flies, which may hold the key to unlocking long-sought answers in how this process unfolds in humans. For instance, further studies could focus on exploring how the different signals controlling insulin release work together. Do some of them override others? And how do long-term changes, like obesity or diabetes, affect these signals? Answering these questions could lead to better treatments for metabolic diseases, such as diabetes.
References
-
Cellular diversity in pancreatic beta cells: implications for insulin secretionMetabolic Biology 18:150–165.
-
Regulation and modulation of biogenic amine neurotransmission in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegansFrontiers in Neural Circuits 14:970405.https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.970405
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2025, Kayode
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 216
- views
-
- 31
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Genetics and Genomics
- Neuroscience
The mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), situated in the ventral hypothalamus, directs daily cellular and physiological rhythms across the body. The SCN clockwork is a self-sustaining transcriptional-translational feedback loop (TTFL) that in turn coordinates the expression of clock-controlled genes (CCGs) directing circadian programmes of SCN cellular activity. In the mouse, the transcription factor, ZFHX3 (zinc finger homeobox-3), is necessary for the development of the SCN and influences circadian behaviour in the adult. The molecular mechanisms by which ZFHX3 affects the SCN at transcriptomic and genomic levels are, however, poorly defined. Here, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing to map the genomic localization of ZFHX3-binding sites in SCN chromatin. To test for function, we then conducted comprehensive RNA sequencing at six distinct times-of-day to compare the SCN transcriptional profiles of control and ZFHX3-conditional null mutants. We show that the genome-wide occupancy of ZFHX3 occurs predominantly around gene transcription start sites, co-localizing with known histone modifications, and preferentially partnering with clock transcription factors (CLOCK, BMAL1) to regulate clock gene(s) transcription. Correspondingly, we show that the conditional loss of ZFHX3 in the adult has a dramatic effect on the SCN transcriptome, including changes in the levels of transcripts encoding elements of numerous neuropeptide neurotransmitter systems while attenuating the daily oscillation of the clock TF Bmal1. Furthermore, various TTFL genes and CCGs exhibited altered circadian expression profiles, consistent with an advanced in daily behavioural rhythms under 12 h light–12 h dark conditions. Together, these findings reveal the extensive genome-wide regulation mediated by ZFHX3 in the central clock that orchestrates daily timekeeping in mammals.
-
- Neuroscience
Active inference integrates perception, decision-making, and learning into a united theoretical framework, providing an efficient way to trade off exploration and exploitation by minimizing (expected) free energy. In this study, we asked how the brain represents values and uncertainties (novelty and variability), and resolves these uncertainties under the active inference framework in the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Twenty-five participants performed a contextual two-armed bandit task, with electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. By comparing the model evidence for active inference and reinforcement learning models of choice behavior, we show that active inference better explains human decision-making under novelty and variability, which entails exploration or information seeking. The EEG sensor-level results show that the activity in the frontal, central, and parietal regions is associated with novelty, while the activity in the frontal and central brain regions is associated with variability. The EEG source-level results indicate that the expected free energy is encoded in the frontal pole and middle frontal gyrus and uncertainties are encoded in different brain regions but with overlap. Our study dissociates the expected free energy and uncertainties in active inference theory and their neural correlates, speaking to the construct validity of active inference in characterizing cognitive processes of human decisions. It provides behavioral and neural evidence of active inference in decision processes and insights into the neural mechanism of human decisions under uncertainties.