Repeated vaccination with homologous influenza hemagglutinin broadens human antibody responses to unmatched flu viruses
Peer review process
This article was accepted for publication as part of eLife's original publishing model.
History
- Version of Record published
- Accepted
- Received
- Preprint posted
Decision letter
-
Tomohiro KurosakiReviewing Editor; The University of Osaka, Osaka, Japan
-
Aleksandra M WalczakSenior Editor; CNRS, France
-
Kosuke MiyauchiReviewer; RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Japan
Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.
Decision letter after peer review:
Thank you for submitting your article "Repeated vaccination with homologous influenza hemagglutinin broadens human antibody responses to unmatched flu viruses" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Aleksandra Walczak as the Senior Editor.
The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.
Essential Revisions:
Given the importance of GC reaction, incorporating the parameters for GC presitency would enhance the model to reflect the actual humoral responses.
Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):
Persistency of germinal center (GC) reaction in the secondary lymphoid organs plays a critical role in antibody diversification and affinity maturation, as exemplified in the case of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines, which induce robust and long-lasting GC responses in humans. Incorporating such parameters would enhance the model's ability to more accurately reflect the actual humoral immune responses observed in vaccinated and infected individuals.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.107042.sa1Author response
Essential Revisions:
Given the importance of GC reaction, incorporating the parameters for GC presitency would enhance the model to reflect the actual humoral responses.
We agree with the reviewer. Our simulations did account for this important phenomenon, but we did not explicitly note this. After booster shots, antigen-specific antibodies generated due to humoral processes from previous immunizations deposit more antigen on FDCs in GCs (Figure 5B). Recently we showed experimentally in a different context that enhanced antigen on FDCs at later time points is a consequence of past antibody responses [Bhagachandani et al., Science Immunology 2024]. This is an important reason that secondary GCs persist for onger times than GCs that form after primary immunization and our simulation results reflect this phenomenon. In our simulations, the GCs that form after primary immunization last for ~ 110 days, after the second immunization they persist for ~165 days, and then after subsequent immunizations last for ~ 180 days. We now provide an additional graph (Figure 5 —figure supplement 2; also reproduced below) in the revised manuscript, to explicitly note these results.
Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):
Persistency of germinal center (GC) reaction in the secondary lymphoid organs plays a critical role in antibody diversification and affinity maturation, as exemplified in the case of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines, which induce robust and long-lasting GC responses in humans. Incorporating such parameters would enhance the model's ability to more accurately reflect the actual humoral immune responses observed in vaccinated and infected individuals.
We agree with the reviewer. Our simulations did account for this important phenomenon, but we did not explicitly note this. After booster shots, antigen-specific antibodies generated due to humoral processes from previous immunizations deposit more antigen on FDCs in GCs (Figure 5B). Recently we showed experimentally in a different context that enhanced antigen on FDCs at later time points is a consequence of past antibody responses [Bhagachandani et al., Science Immunology 2024]. This is an important reason that secondary GCs persist for onger times than GCs that form after primary immunization and our simulation results reflect this phenomenon. In our simulations, the GCs that form after primary immunization last for ~ 110 days, after the second immunization they persist for ~165 days, and then after subsequent immunizations last for ~ 180 days. We now provide an additional graph (Figure 5 —figure supplement 2; also reproduced below) in the revised manuscript, to explicitly note these results.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.107042.sa2