Role of competition between polarity sites in establishing a unique front

  1. Chi-Fang Wu
  2. Jian-Geng Chiou
  3. Maria Minakova
  4. Benjamin Woods
  5. Denis Tsygankov
  6. Trevin R Zyla
  7. Natasha S Savage
  8. Timothy C Elston
  9. Daniel J Lew  Is a corresponding author
  1. Duke University School of Medicine, United States
  2. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
  3. University of Liverpool, United Kingdom

Abstract

Polarity establishment in many cells is thought to occur via positive feedback that reinforces even tiny asymmetries in polarity protein distribution. Cdc42 and related GTPases are activated and accumulate in a patch of the cortex that defines the front of the cell. Positive feedback enables spontaneous polarization triggered by stochastic fluctuations, but as such fluctuations can occur at multiple locations, how do cells ensure that they make only one front? In polarizing cells of the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, positive feedback can trigger growth of several Cdc42 clusters at the same time, but this multi-cluster stage rapidly evolves to a single-cluster state, which then promotes bud emergence. By manipulating polarity protein dynamics, we show that resolution of multi-cluster intermediates occurs through a greedy competition between clusters to recruit and retain polarity proteins from a shared intracellular pool.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Chi-Fang Wu

    Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jian-Geng Chiou

    Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Maria Minakova

    Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Benjamin Woods

    Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Denis Tsygankov

    Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Trevin R Zyla

    Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Natasha S Savage

    Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Timothy C Elston

    Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Daniel J Lew

    Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    For correspondence
    daniel.lew@duke.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2015, Wu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,587
    views
  • 633
    downloads
  • 59
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Chi-Fang Wu
  2. Jian-Geng Chiou
  3. Maria Minakova
  4. Benjamin Woods
  5. Denis Tsygankov
  6. Trevin R Zyla
  7. Natasha S Savage
  8. Timothy C Elston
  9. Daniel J Lew
(2015)
Role of competition between polarity sites in establishing a unique front
eLife 4:e11611.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11611

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11611

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Affiong Ika Oqua, Kin Chao ... Alejandra Tomas
    Research Article

    G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are integral membrane proteins which closely interact with their plasma membrane lipid microenvironment. Cholesterol is a lipid enriched at the plasma membrane with pivotal roles in the control of membrane fluidity and maintenance of membrane microarchitecture, directly impacting on GPCR stability, dynamics, and function. Cholesterol extraction from pancreatic beta cells has previously been shown to disrupt the internalisation, clustering, and cAMP responses of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R), a class B1 GPCR with key roles in the control of blood glucose levels via the potentiation of insulin secretion in beta cells and weight reduction via the modulation of brain appetite control centres. Here, we unveil the detrimental effect of a high cholesterol diet on GLP-1R-dependent glucoregulation in vivo, and the improvement in GLP-1R function that a reduction in cholesterol synthesis using simvastatin exerts in pancreatic islets. We next identify and map sites of cholesterol high occupancy and residence time on active vs inactive GLP-1Rs using coarse-grained molecular dynamics (cgMD) simulations, followed by a screen of key residues selected from these sites and detailed analyses of the effects of mutating one of these, Val229, to alanine on GLP-1R-cholesterol interactions, plasma membrane behaviours, clustering, trafficking and signalling in INS-1 832/3 rat pancreatic beta cells and primary mouse islets, unveiling an improved insulin secretion profile for the V229A mutant receptor. This study (1) highlights the role of cholesterol in regulating GLP-1R responses in vivo; (2) provides a detailed map of GLP-1R - cholesterol binding sites in model membranes; (3) validates their functional relevance in beta cells; and (4) highlights their potential as locations for the rational design of novel allosteric modulators with the capacity to fine-tune GLP-1R responses.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Alejandro Rosell, Agata Adelajda Krygowska ... Esther Castellano Sanchez
    Research Article

    Macrophages are crucial in the body’s inflammatory response, with tightly regulated functions for optimal immune system performance. Our study reveals that the RAS–p110α signalling pathway, known for its involvement in various biological processes and tumourigenesis, regulates two vital aspects of the inflammatory response in macrophages: the initial monocyte movement and later-stage lysosomal function. Disrupting this pathway, either in a mouse model or through drug intervention, hampers the inflammatory response, leading to delayed resolution and the development of more severe acute inflammatory reactions in live models. This discovery uncovers a previously unknown role of the p110α isoform in immune regulation within macrophages, offering insight into the complex mechanisms governing their function during inflammation and opening new avenues for modulating inflammatory responses.