Transcriptomics: Resting easy with a sleep regulator

  1. William J Giardino
  2. Luis de Lecea  Is a corresponding author
  1. Stanford University, United States

We are able to sleep as a result of a delicate balance between competing signals from complex circuits of neurons. In the hypothalamus, neurons that produce a neuropeptide called hypocretin (Hcrt; also known as orexin) control the transition between being asleep and being awake (Adamantidis et al., 2007; de Lecea, 2015). These neurons also coordinate waking up (arousal) in response to various stimuli (Giardino and de Lecea, 2014; Bonnavion et al., 2015). Thus, finding out how the activity of Hcrt neurons is regulated will be vital for understanding how these neurons maintain a healthy balance between the sleep and the awake states, and how this equilibrium is disturbed in individuals with sleep disorders. Now, in eLife, Lior Appelbaum and colleagues – including Laura Yelin-Bekerman as first author – report a new role for a potassium ion channel in the regulation of arousal (Yelin-Bekerman et al., 2015).

Yelin-Bekerman et al. – who are based at Bar-Ilan University, Toldot Genetics, the Weizmann Institute of Science and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology – studied zebrafish (Danio rerio), which display decreased movement patterns during the night that are characteristic of sleep. Moreover, they only have 16–20 Hcrt neurons, compared to more than 5000 cells in mammals. Using transgenic zebrafish that express enhanced green fluorescent protein only in their Hcrt neurons (hcrt-eGFP) (Faraco et al., 2006), Yelin-Bekerman et al. used a technique called fluorescence-assisted cell sorting to isolate the hcrt-eGFP cells and extract messenger RNA (Figure 1A). They then amplified the RNA material before carrying out whole-transcriptome sequencing to measure gene expression. Applying their most conservative criteria, Yelin-Bekerman et al. generated a list of 20 gene transcripts that are found at higher levels in Hcrt neurons than in other brain cells. These genes included fam46a and other markers of Hcrt neurons that have previously been reported in higher vertebrates (Dalal et al., 2013). With a more relaxed threshold, 212 transcripts met the criteria for being enriched in Hcrt neurons.

The kcnh4a gene is enriched in Hcrt neurons and promotes sleep in zebrafish.

(A) Fluorescent-assisted cell sorting (FACS) of neurons from hcrt-eGFP zebrafish followed by all-mRNA sequencing (RNA-seq) identified 212 genes that are significantly enriched in Hcrt neurons, including the voltage-gated potassium channel kcnh4a. (B) In situ hybridization for knch4a confirmed its expression in 100% of hcrt-eGFP neurons. (C) Genomic analyses revealed that kcnh4a lies directly upstream of the hcrt gene, a phenomenon that is conserved from zebrafish to humans. (D) CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing produced a mutant zebrafish with a 60% reduction in kcnh4a levels, resulting in hyperactivity and disrupted patterns of nighttime sleep.

Using in situ hybridization, Yelin-Bekerman et al. then tested the degree to which the hcrt-eGFP and the 20 gene transcripts co-localize: they were able to confirm that several of the candidates are highly expressed within Hcrt neurons, and that others were actually expressed in nearby non-Hcrt neurons instead. Further analysis revealed that many of the genes contained conserved motifs for the binding of transcription factors, such as pax4, which is predicted to regulate as many as 44 genes in Hcrt neurons.

Of the transcripts that were verified as being enriched in Hcrt neurons, Yelin-Bekerman et al. focused on one called kcnh4a, which was the only one that was expressed in all hcrt-eGFP neurons in both zebrafish larvae and adults (Figure 1B). It encodes a potassium channel and further genetic analyses revealed that kcnh4a is located directly upstream of the hcrt gene in the zebrafish genome. In fact, these two genes are directly adjacent to each other throughout the animal kingdom, including in mice and humans (Figure 1C). The expression patterns and tight genetic linkage of the two genes suggests that well-preserved mechanisms govern their interactions at the protein level.

Pursuing this rationale, Yelin-Bekerman et al. examined whether the Kcnh4a protein is important for behaviors that are regulated by Hcrt neurons (Figure 1D). The authors used CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to produce mutant zebrafish that had reduced levels of kcnh4a expression. Compared to wild-type zebrafish, these mutants showed significantly increased movement in both the light and dark periods of a 24-hour cycle. In further analyses in which sleep was defined as a period of inactivity that is longer than six seconds (Yokogawa et al., 2007), Yelin-Bekerman et al. reported decreased overall sleep time and shorter average bouts of sleep in kcnh4a mutants relative to control zebrafish, specifically during the dark periods.

An obvious next step is to determine whether Kcnh4a is also co-expressed with the Hcrt neuropeptide in mammals, and whether it plays a similar role in the sleep-wake transition. In vivo imaging with genetically-encoded calcium or voltage sensors in kcnh4a mutants will likely be useful in understanding the role of this potassium channel in the intrinsic properties of Hcrt neurons. Also, the unique properties of the zebrafish model make it possible to image the activity of single neurons and entire networks during 24-hour periods, and to monitor changes induced by sleep or wake-promoting drugs. In fact, Kchn4a is an intriguing potential new drug target, and may be highly relevant for therapeutic approaches to treat conditions like insomnia and narcolepsy.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. William J Giardino

    Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Luis de Lecea

    Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    llecea@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: December 10, 2015 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2015, Giardino et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,160
    Page views
  • 154
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. William J Giardino
  2. Luis de Lecea
(2015)
Transcriptomics: Resting easy with a sleep regulator
eLife 4:e12093.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12093
  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Frédéric Roux, George Parish ... Simon Hanslmayr
    Research Article

    Theta and gamma oscillations in the medial temporal lobe are suggested to play a critical role for human memory formation via establishing synchrony in neural assemblies. Arguably, such synchrony facilitates efficient information transfer between neurons and enhances synaptic plasticity, both of which benefit episodic memory formation. However, to date little evidence exists from humans that would provide direct evidence for such a specific role of theta and gamma oscillations for episodic memory formation. Here we investigate how oscillations shape the temporal structure of neural firing during memory formation in the medial temporal lobe. We measured neural firing and local field potentials in human epilepsy patients via micro-wire electrode recordings to analyze whether brain oscillations are related to co-incidences of firing between neurons during successful and unsuccessful encoding of episodic memories. The results show that phase-coupling of neurons to faster theta and gamma oscillations correlates with co-firing at short latencies (~20-30 ms) and occurs during successful memory formation. Phase-coupling at slower oscillations in these same frequency bands, in contrast, correlates with longer co-firing latencies and occurs during memory failure. Thus, our findings suggest that neural oscillations play a role for the synchronization of neural firing in the medial temporal lobe during the encoding of episodic memories.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Emily L Heckman, Chris Q Doe
    Research Advance

    The organization of neural circuits determines nervous system function. Variability can arise during neural circuit development (e.g. neurite morphology, axon/dendrite position). To ensure robust nervous system function, mechanisms must exist to accommodate variation in neurite positioning during circuit formation. Previously we developed a model system in the Drosophila ventral nerve cord to conditionally induce positional variability of a proprioceptive sensory axon terminal, and used this model to show that when we altered the presynaptic position of the sensory neuron, its major postsynaptic interneuron partner modified its dendritic arbor to match the presynaptic contact, resulting in functional synaptic input (Sales et al., 2019). Here we investigate the cellular mechanisms by which the interneuron dendrites detect and match variation in presynaptic partner location and input strength. We manipulate the presynaptic sensory neuron by (a) ablation; (b) silencing or activation; or (c) altering its location in the neuropil. From these experiments we conclude that there are two opposing mechanisms used to establish functional connectivity in the face of presynaptic variability: presynaptic contact stimulates dendrite outgrowth locally, whereas presynaptic activity inhibits postsynaptic dendrite outgrowth globally. These mechanisms are only active during an early larval critical period for structural plasticity. Collectively, our data provide new insights into dendrite development, identifying mechanisms that allow dendrites to flexibly respond to developmental variability in presynaptic location and input strength.