Cascade of neural processing orchestrates cognitive control in human frontal cortex

  1. Hanlin Tang
  2. Hsiang-Yu Yu
  3. Chien-Chen Chou
  4. Nathan E Crone
  5. Joseph R Madsen
  6. William S Anderson
  7. Gabriel Kreiman  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard University, United States
  2. Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
  3. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, United States
  4. Harvard Medical School, United States
  5. Johns Hopkins Medical School, United States

Abstract

Rapid and flexible interpretation of conflicting sensory inputs in the context of current goals is a critical component of cognitive control that is orchestrated by frontal cortex. The relative roles of distinct subregions within frontal cortex are poorly understood. To examine the dynamics underlying cognitive control across frontal regions, we took advantage of the spatiotemporal resolution of intracranial recordings in epilepsy patients while subjects resolved color-word conflict. We observed differential activity preceding the behavioral responses to conflict trials throughout frontal cortex; this activity was correlated with behavioral reaction times. These signals emerged first in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) before dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), followed by medial frontal cortex (mFC) and then by orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). These results disassociate the frontal subregions based on their dynamics, and suggest a temporal hierarchy for cognitive control in human cortex.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hanlin Tang

    Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Hsiang-Yu Yu

    Department of Neurology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Chien-Chen Chou

    Department of Neurology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nathan E Crone

    Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Joseph R Madsen

    Department of Neurosurgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. William S Anderson

    Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Gabriel Kreiman

    Program in Biophysics, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    gkreiman@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Hiram Brownell, Boston College, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent, and consent to publish, was obtained for each participant. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Boards at each institution (Methods).

Version history

  1. Received: October 15, 2015
  2. Accepted: February 13, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 18, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 17, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Tang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,203
    views
  • 538
    downloads
  • 29
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hanlin Tang
  2. Hsiang-Yu Yu
  3. Chien-Chen Chou
  4. Nathan E Crone
  5. Joseph R Madsen
  6. William S Anderson
  7. Gabriel Kreiman
(2016)
Cascade of neural processing orchestrates cognitive control in human frontal cortex
eLife 5:e12352.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12352

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12352

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Sara Ibañez, Nilapratim Sengupta ... Christina M Weaver
    Research Article

    Normal aging leads to myelin alterations in the rhesus monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), which are positively correlated with degree of cognitive impairment. It is hypothesized that remyelination with shorter and thinner myelin sheaths partially compensates for myelin degradation, but computational modeling has not yet explored these two phenomena together systematically. Here, we used a two-pronged modeling approach to determine how age-related myelin changes affect a core cognitive function: spatial working memory. First, we built a multicompartment pyramidal neuron model fit to monkey dlPFC empirical data, with an axon including myelinated segments having paranodes, juxtaparanodes, internodes, and tight junctions. This model was used to quantify conduction velocity (CV) changes and action potential (AP) failures after demyelination and subsequent remyelination. Next, we incorporated the single neuron results into a spiking neural network model of working memory. While complete remyelination nearly recovered axonal transmission and network function to unperturbed levels, our models predict that biologically plausible levels of myelin dystrophy, if uncompensated by other factors, can account for substantial working memory impairment with aging. The present computational study unites empirical data from ultrastructure up to behavior during normal aging, and has broader implications for many demyelinating conditions, such as multiple sclerosis or schizophrenia.

    1. Neuroscience
    Nicholas GW Kennedy, Jessica C Lee ... Nathan M Holmes
    Research Article

    How is new information organized in memory? According to latent state theories, this is determined by the level of surprise, or prediction error, generated by the new information: a small prediction error leads to the updating of existing memory, large prediction error leads to encoding of a new memory. We tested this idea using a protocol in which rats were first conditioned to fear a stimulus paired with shock. The stimulus was then gradually extinguished by progressively reducing the shock intensity until the stimulus was presented alone. Consistent with latent state theories, this gradual extinction protocol (small prediction errors) was better than standard extinction (large prediction errors) in producing long-term suppression of fear responses, and the benefit of gradual extinction was due to updating of the conditioning memory with information about extinction. Thus, prediction error determines how new information is organized in memory, and latent state theories adequately describe the ways in which this occurs.