Altered potassium channel distribution and composition in myelinated axons suppresses hyperexcitability following injury

  1. Margarita Calvo  Is a corresponding author
  2. Natalie Richards
  3. Annina B Schmid
  4. Alejandro Barroso
  5. Lan Zhu
  6. Dinka Ivulic
  7. Ning Zhu
  8. Philipp Anwandter
  9. Manzoor A Bhat
  10. Felipe A Court
  11. Stephen B McMahon
  12. David LH Bennett
  1. Wolfson CARD, United Kingdom
  2. King's College London, United Kingdom
  3. Oxford University, United Kingdom
  4. Kings College London, United Kingdom
  5. Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas- Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Chile
  6. Facultad de Medicina, - Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Chile
  7. UT Health Science Center at San Antonio, United States
  8. Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Chile
  9. university of oxford, United Kingdom

Abstract

Neuropathic pain following peripheral nerve injury is associated with hyperexcitability in damaged myelinated sensory axons, which begins to normalise over time. We investigated the composition and distribution of shaker-type-potassium channels (Kv1 channels) within the nodal complex of myelinated axons following injury. At the neuroma that forms after damage, expression of Kv1.1 and 1.2 (normally localised to the juxtaparanode) was markedly decreased. In contrast Kv1.4 and 1.6, which were hardly detectable in the naïve state, showed increased expression within juxtaparanodes and paranodes following injury, both in rats and humans. Within the dorsal root (a site remote from injury) we noted a redistribution of Kv1-channels towards the paranode. Blockade of Kv1 channels with αDTX after injury reinstated hyperexcitability of A-fibre axons and enhanced mechanosensitivity. Changes in the molecular composition and distribution of axonal Kv1 channels, therefore represents a protective mechanism to suppress the hyperexcitability of myelinated sensory axons that follows nerve injury.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Margarita Calvo

    Kings College London, Wolfson CARD, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    mcalvob@uc.cl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Natalie Richards

    Wolfson CARD, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Annina B Schmid

    Nuffield department of clinical neurosciences, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alejandro Barroso

    Wolfson CARD, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Lan Zhu

    Wolfson CARD, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Dinka Ivulic

    Departamento de Fisiologia, Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas- Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ning Zhu

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Philipp Anwandter

    Departamento Ortopedia y Traumatologia, Facultad de Medicina, - Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Manzoor A Bhat

    Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, UT Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Felipe A Court

    Millenium Nucleus for Regenerative Biology, Faculty of Biology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Stephen B McMahon

    Wolfson CARD, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. David LH Bennett

    Nuffield department of clinical neuroscience, university of oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with UK Home Office and Pontificia Universidad Catolica's regulations.Experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by "Coordinación de Ética, Bioética y Seguridad de las investigaciones UC" (experiments done in Chile- Protocol CBB230/2013) and were performed in accordance to the UK Home Office regulations (experiments done in the UK). We report this study in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (20 points checklist).

Human subjects: Informed consent, and consent to publish, was obtained from all subjects to collect and analyze nerve samples before surgery. Subjects underwent surgery by indication of their physician and samples were obtained from biological tissue that was otherwise due to be incinerated.The study protocol was assessed and approved by the Ethics Scientific Committee of the School of Medicine Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile (reference number 14-389)

Copyright

© 2016, Calvo et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,617
    views
  • 743
    downloads
  • 42
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Margarita Calvo
  2. Natalie Richards
  3. Annina B Schmid
  4. Alejandro Barroso
  5. Lan Zhu
  6. Dinka Ivulic
  7. Ning Zhu
  8. Philipp Anwandter
  9. Manzoor A Bhat
  10. Felipe A Court
  11. Stephen B McMahon
  12. David LH Bennett
(2016)
Altered potassium channel distribution and composition in myelinated axons suppresses hyperexcitability following injury
eLife 5:e12661.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12661

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12661

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Walter Senn, Dominik Dold ... Mihai A Petrovici
    Research Article

    One of the most fundamental laws of physics is the principle of least action. Motivated by its predictive power, we introduce a neuronal least-action principle for cortical processing of sensory streams to produce appropriate behavioral outputs in real time. The principle postulates that the voltage dynamics of cortical pyramidal neurons prospectively minimizes the local somato-dendritic mismatch error within individual neurons. For output neurons, the principle implies minimizing an instantaneous behavioral error. For deep network neurons, it implies the prospective firing to overcome integration delays and correct for possible output errors right in time. The neuron-specific errors are extracted in the apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons through a cortical microcircuit that tries to explain away the feedback from the periphery, and correct the trajectory on the fly. Any motor output is in a moving equilibrium with the sensory input and the motor feedback during the ongoing sensory-motor transform. Online synaptic plasticity reduces the somatodendritic mismatch error within each cortical neuron and performs gradient descent on the output cost at any moment in time. The neuronal least-action principle offers an axiomatic framework to derive local neuronal and synaptic laws for global real-time computation and learning in the brain.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Josse Poppinga, Nolan J Barrett ... Jan RT van Weering
    Research Article

    Sorting nexin 4 (SNX4) is an evolutionary conserved organizer of membrane recycling. In neurons, SNX4 accumulates in synapses, but how SNX4 affects synapse function remains unknown. We generated a conditional SNX4 knock-out mouse model and report that SNX4 cKO synapses show enhanced neurotransmission during train stimulation, while the first evoked EPSC was normal. SNX4 depletion did not affect vesicle recycling, basic autophagic flux, or the levels and localization of SNARE-protein VAMP2/synaptobrevin-2. However, SNX4 depletion affected synapse ultrastructure: an increase in docked synaptic vesicles at the active zone, while the overall vesicle number was normal, and a decreased active zone length. These effects together lead to a substantially increased density of docked vesicles per release site. In conclusion, SNX4 is a negative regulator of synaptic vesicle docking and release. These findings suggest a role for SNX4 in synaptic vesicle recruitment at the active zone.