Abstract

Senescent cells accumulate in fat with aging. We previously found genetic clearance of senescent cells from progeroid INK-ATTAC mice prevents lipodystrophy. Here we show that primary human senescent fat progenitors secrete activin A and directly inhibit adipogenesis in non-senescent progenitors. Blocking activin A partially restored lipid accumulation and expression of key adipogenic markers in differentiating progenitors exposed to senescent cells. Mouse fat tissue activin A increased with aging. Clearing senescent cells from 18-month-old naturally-aged INK-ATTAC mice reduced circulating activin A, blunted fat loss, and enhanced adipogenic transcription factor expression within 3 weeks. JAK inhibitor suppressed senescent cell activin A production and blunted senescent cell-mediated inhibition of adipogenesis. Eight weeks-treatment with ruxolitinib, an FDA-approved JAK1/2 inhibitor, reduced circulating activin A, preserved fat mass, reduced lipotoxicity, and increased insulin sensitivity in 22-month-old mice. Our study indicates targeting senescent cells or their products may alleviate age-related dysfunction of progenitors, adipose tissue, and metabolism.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ming Xu

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Allyson K Palmer

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    Allyson K Palmer, This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies.
  3. Husheng Ding

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Megan M Weivoda

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Tamar Pirtskhalava

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    Tamar Pirtskhalava, This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies.
  6. Thomas A White

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Anna Sepe

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Kurt O Johnson

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Michael B Stout

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Nino Giorgadze

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    Nino Giorgadze, This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies.
  11. Michael D Jensen

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Nathan K LeBrasseur

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Tamar Tchkonia

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    Tamar Tchkonia, This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies.
  14. James L Kirkland

    Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    For correspondence
    Kirkland.James@mayo.edu
    Competing interests
    James L Kirkland, This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Andrew Dillin, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experimental procedures (A21013, A37715 and A16315) were approved by the IACUC at Mayo Clinic

Human subjects: The protocol (10-005236) was approved by the Mayo Clinic Foundation Institutional Review Board for Human Research. Informed consent and consent to publish was obtained from all human subjects.

Version history

  1. Received: November 13, 2015
  2. Accepted: December 18, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 19, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 4, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: September 22, 2016 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2015, Xu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,905
    views
  • 2,338
    downloads
  • 417
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ming Xu
  2. Allyson K Palmer
  3. Husheng Ding
  4. Megan M Weivoda
  5. Tamar Pirtskhalava
  6. Thomas A White
  7. Anna Sepe
  8. Kurt O Johnson
  9. Michael B Stout
  10. Nino Giorgadze
  11. Michael D Jensen
  12. Nathan K LeBrasseur
  13. Tamar Tchkonia
  14. James L Kirkland
(2015)
Targeting senescent cells enhances adipogenesis and metabolic function in old age
eLife 4:e12997.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12997

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12997

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Gang Xue, Xiaoyi Zhang ... Zhiyuan Li
    Research Article

    Organisms utilize gene regulatory networks (GRN) to make fate decisions, but the regulatory mechanisms of transcription factors (TF) in GRNs are exceedingly intricate. A longstanding question in this field is how these tangled interactions synergistically contribute to decision-making procedures. To comprehensively understand the role of regulatory logic in cell fate decisions, we constructed a logic-incorporated GRN model and examined its behavior under two distinct driving forces (noise-driven and signal-driven). Under the noise-driven mode, we distilled the relationship among fate bias, regulatory logic, and noise profile. Under the signal-driven mode, we bridged regulatory logic and progression-accuracy trade-off, and uncovered distinctive trajectories of reprogramming influenced by logic motifs. In differentiation, we characterized a special logic-dependent priming stage by the solution landscape. Finally, we applied our findings to decipher three biological instances: hematopoiesis, embryogenesis, and trans-differentiation. Orthogonal to the classical analysis of expression profile, we harnessed noise patterns to construct the GRN corresponding to fate transition. Our work presents a generalizable framework for top-down fate-decision studies and a practical approach to the taxonomy of cell fate decisions.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Zhuqing Wang, Yue Wang ... Wei Yan
    Research Article

    Despite rapid evolution across eutherian mammals, the X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs are located in a region flanked by two highly conserved protein-coding genes (SLITRK2 and FMR1) on the X chromosome. Intriguingly, these miRNAs are predominantly expressed in the testis, suggesting a potential role in spermatogenesis and male fertility. Here, we report that the X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs were derived from the MER91C DNA transposons. Selective inactivation of individual miRNAs or clusters caused no discernible defects, but simultaneous ablation of five clusters containing 19 members of the MIR-506 family led to reduced male fertility in mice. Despite normal sperm counts, motility, and morphology, the KO sperm were less competitive than wild-type sperm when subjected to a polyandrous mating scheme. Transcriptomic and bioinformatic analyses revealed that these X-linked MIR-506 family miRNAs, in addition to targeting a set of conserved genes, have more targets that are critical for spermatogenesis and embryonic development during evolution. Our data suggest that the MIR-506 family miRNAs function to enhance sperm competitiveness and reproductive fitness of the male by finetuning gene expression during spermatogenesis.