1. Cell Biology
Download icon

A FRET-based study reveals site-specific regulation of spindle position checkpoint proteins at yeast centrosomes

  1. Yuliya Gryaznova
  2. Ayse Koca Caydasi
  3. Gabriele Malengo
  4. Victor Sourjik
  5. Gislene Pereira  Is a corresponding author
  1. German Cancer Research Centre, Germany
  2. Centre for Molecular Biology, Germany
Research Article
  • Cited 21
  • Views 1,978
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2016;5:e14029 doi: 10.7554/eLife.14029

Abstract

The spindle position checkpoint (SPOC) is a spindle pole body (SPB, equivalent of mammalian centrosome) associated surveillance mechanism that halts mitotic exit upon spindle mis-orientation. Here, we monitored the interaction between SPB proteins and the SPOC component Bfa1 by FRET microscopy. We show that Bfa1 binds to the scaffold-protein Nud1 and the γ-tubulin receptor Spc72. Spindle misalignment specifically disrupts Bfa1-Spc72 interaction by a mechanism that requires the 14-3-3-family protein Bmh1 and the MARK/PAR-kinase Kin4. Dissociation of Bfa1 from Spc72 prevents the inhibitory phosphorylation of Bfa1 by the polo-like kinase Cdc5. We propose Spc72 as a regulatory hub that coordinates the activity of Kin4 and Cdc5 towards Bfa1. In addition, analysis of spc72∆ cells shows that a mitotic-exit-promoting dominant signal, which is triggered upon elongation of the spindle into the bud, overrides the SPOC. Our data reinforce the importance of daughter-cell-associated factors and centrosome-based regulations in mitotic exit and SPOC control.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yuliya Gryaznova

    DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ayse Koca Caydasi

    DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Gabriele Malengo

    DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Centre for Molecular Biology, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Victor Sourjik

    DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Centre for Molecular Biology, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gislene Pereira

    DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
    For correspondence
    gislene.pereira@cos.uni-heidelberg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Yukiko M Yamashita, University of Michigan, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: December 23, 2015
  2. Accepted: May 8, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 9, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: May 20, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: May 24, 2016 (version 3)
  6. Version of Record updated: June 3, 2016 (version 4)

Copyright

© 2016, Gryaznova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,978
    Page views
  • 439
    Downloads
  • 21
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Jacopo Di Russo et al.
    Research Article

    Nanometer-scale properties of the extracellular matrix influence many biological processes, including cell motility. While much information is available for single-cell migration, to date, no knowledge exists on how the nanoscale presentation of extracellular matrix receptors influences collective cell migration. In wound healing, basal keratinocytes collectively migrate on a fibronectin-rich provisional basement membrane to re-epithelialize the injured skin. Among other receptors, the fibronectin receptor integrin α5β1 plays a pivotal role in this process. Using a highly specific integrin α5β1 peptidomimetic combined with nanopatterned hydrogels, we show that keratinocyte sheets regulate their migration ability at an optimal integrin α5β1 nanospacing. This efficiency relies on the effective propagation of stresses within the cell monolayer independent of substrate stiffness. For the first time, this work highlights the importance of extracellular matrix receptor nanoscale organization required for efficient tissue regeneration.

    1. Cell Biology
    Lisa M Strong et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Autophagy is a cellular process that degrades cytoplasmic cargo by engulfing it in a double-membrane vesicle, known as the autophagosome, and delivering it to the lysosome. The ATG12–5–16L1 complex is responsible for conjugating members of the ubiquitin-like ATG8 protein family to phosphatidylethanolamine in the growing autophagosomal membrane, known as the phagophore. ATG12–5–16L1 is recruited to the phagophore by a subset of the phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate-binding seven-bladedß -propeller WIPI proteins. We determined the crystal structure of WIPI2d in complex with the WIPI2 interacting region (W2IR) of ATG16L1 comprising residues 207–230 at 1.85 Å resolution. The structure shows that the ATG16L1 W2IR adopts an alpha helical conformation and binds in an electropositive and hydrophobic groove between WIPI2 ß-propeller blades 2 and 3. Mutation of residues at the interface reduces or blocks the recruitment of ATG12–5–16 L1 and the conjugation of the ATG8 protein LC3B to synthetic membranes. Interface mutants show a decrease in starvation-induced autophagy. Comparisons across the four human WIPIs suggest that WIPI1 and 2 belong to a W2IR-binding subclass responsible for localizing ATG12–5–16 L1 and driving ATG8 lipidation, whilst WIPI3 and 4 belong to a second W34IR-binding subclass responsible for localizing ATG2, and so directing lipid supply to the nascent phagophore. The structure provides a framework for understanding the regulatory node connecting two central events in autophagy initiation, the action of the autophagic PI 3-kinase complex on the one hand and ATG8 lipidation on the other.