A physical model describing the interaction of nuclear transport receptors with FG nucleoporin domain assemblies

  1. Raphael Zahn
  2. Dino Osmanović
  3. Severin Ehret
  4. Carolina Araya Callis
  5. Steffen Frey
  6. Murray Stewart
  7. Changjiang You
  8. Dirk Görlich
  9. Bart W Hoogenboom
  10. Ralf P Richter  Is a corresponding author
  1. CIC biomaGUNE, Spain
  2. University College London, United Kingdom
  3. NanoTag Biotechnologies, Germany
  4. Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, United Kingdom
  5. University of Osnabrück, Germany
  6. Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Germany

Abstract

The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) controls bulk nucleocytoplasmic exchange. It consists of nucleoporin domains rich in phenylalanine-glycine motifs (FG domains). As a bottom-up nanoscale model for the permeability barrier, we have used planar films produced with three different end-grafted FG domains and quantitatively analyzed the binding of two different nuclear transport receptors (NTRs), NTF2 and Importin β, together with the concomitant film thickness changes. NTR binding caused only moderate changes in film thickness; the binding isotherms showed negative cooperativity and could all be mapped onto a single master curve. This universal NTR binding behavior - a key element for the transport selectivity of the NPC - was quantitatively reproduced by a physical model that treats FG domains as regular, flexible polymers, and NTRs as spherical colloids with a homogeneous surface, ignoring the detailed arrangement of interaction sites along FG domains and on the NTR surface.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Raphael Zahn

    Biosurfaces Lab, CIC biomaGUNE, San Sebastian, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Dino Osmanović

    London Centre for Nanotechnology, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Severin Ehret

    Biosurfaces Lab, CIC biomaGUNE, San Sebastian, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Carolina Araya Callis

    Biosurfaces Lab, CIC biomaGUNE, San Sebastian, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Steffen Frey

    NanoTag Biotechnologies, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Murray Stewart

    Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Changjiang You

    Department of Biology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Dirk Görlich

    Department of Cellular Logistics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Bart W Hoogenboom

    London Centre for Nanotechnology, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Ralf P Richter

    Biosurfaces Lab, CIC biomaGUNE, San Sebastian, Spain
    For correspondence
    rrichter@cicbiomagune.es
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Copyright

© 2016, Zahn et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,076
    views
  • 726
    downloads
  • 75
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Raphael Zahn
  2. Dino Osmanović
  3. Severin Ehret
  4. Carolina Araya Callis
  5. Steffen Frey
  6. Murray Stewart
  7. Changjiang You
  8. Dirk Görlich
  9. Bart W Hoogenboom
  10. Ralf P Richter
(2016)
A physical model describing the interaction of nuclear transport receptors with FG nucleoporin domain assemblies
eLife 5:e14119.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14119

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14119

Further reading

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Andrei Vovk, Chad Gu ... Anton Zilman
    Research Article

    Nuclear Pore Complexes (NPCs) are key cellular transporter that control nucleocytoplasmic transport in eukaryotic cells, but its transport mechanism is still not understood. The centerpiece of NPC transport is the assembly of intrinsically disordered polypeptides, known as FG nucleoporins, lining its passageway. Their conformations and collective dynamics during transport are difficult to assess in vivo. In vitro investigations provide partially conflicting results, lending support to different models of transport, which invoke various conformational transitions of the FG nucleoporins induced by the cargo-carrying transport proteins. We show that the spatial organization of FG nucleoporin assemblies with the transport proteins can be understood within a first principles biophysical model with a minimal number of key physical variables, such as the average protein interaction strengths and spatial densities. These results address some of the outstanding controversies and suggest how molecularly divergent NPCs in different species can perform essentially the same function.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Tommaso Amico, Samuel Toluwanimi Dada ... Amos Maritan
    Research Article

    Many proteins have been recently shown to undergo a process of phase separation that leads to the formation of biomolecular condensates. Intriguingly, it has been observed that some of these proteins form dense droplets of sizeable dimensions already below the critical concentration, which is the concentration at which phase separation occurs. To understand this phenomenon, which is not readily compatible with classical nucleation theory, we investigated the properties of the droplet size distributions as a function of protein concentration. We found that these distributions can be described by a scale-invariant log-normal function with an average that increases progressively as the concentration approaches the critical concentration from below. The results of this scaling analysis suggest the existence of a universal behaviour independent of the sequences and structures of the proteins undergoing phase separation. While we refrain from proposing a theoretical model here, we suggest that any model of protein phase separation should predict the scaling exponents that we reported here from the fitting of experimental measurements of droplet size distributions. Furthermore, based on these observations, we show that it is possible to use the scale invariance to estimate the critical concentration for protein phase separation.