Spontaneous mutations and the origin and maintenance of quantitative genetic variation

  1. Wen Huang
  2. Richard F Lyman
  3. Rachel A Lyman
  4. Mary Anna Carbone
  5. Susan T Harbison
  6. Michael M Magwire
  7. Trudy FC Mackay  Is a corresponding author
  1. North Carolina State University, United States
  2. Washington University in St. Louis, United States
  3. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, United States
  4. Syngenta, United States

Abstract

Mutation and natural selection shape the genetic variation in natural populations. Here, we directly estimated the spontaneous mutation rate by sequencing new Drosophila mutation accumulation lines maintained with minimal natural selection. We inferred strong stabilizing natural selection on quantitative traits because genetic variation among wild-derived inbred lines was much lower than predicted from a neutral model and the mutational effects were much larger than allelic effects of standing polymorphisms. Stabilizing selection could act directly on the traits, or indirectly from pleiotropic effects on fitness. However, our data are not consistent with simple models of mutation-stabilizing selection balance; therefore, further empirical work is needed to assess the balance of evolutionary forces responsible for quantitative genetic variation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Wen Huang

    Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Richard F Lyman

    Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rachel A Lyman

    Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Mary Anna Carbone

    Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Susan T Harbison

    Laboratory of Systems Genetics, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Michael M Magwire

    Syngenta, Research Triangle Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Trudy FC Mackay

    Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States
    For correspondence
    trudy_mackay@ncsu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Molly Przeworski, Columbia University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: January 21, 2016
  2. Accepted: May 21, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 23, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 16, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: October 19, 2016 (version 3)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 10,529
    Page views
  • 719
    Downloads
  • 48
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Wen Huang
  2. Richard F Lyman
  3. Rachel A Lyman
  4. Mary Anna Carbone
  5. Susan T Harbison
  6. Michael M Magwire
  7. Trudy FC Mackay
(2016)
Spontaneous mutations and the origin and maintenance of quantitative genetic variation
eLife 5:e14625.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14625

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14625

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Pianpian Zhao, Zhifeng Sheng ... Hou-Feng Zheng
    Research Article

    The ‘diabetic bone paradox’ suggested that type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients would have higher areal bone mineral density (BMD) but higher fracture risk than individuals without T2D. In this study, we found that the genetically predicted T2D was associated with higher BMD and lower risk of fracture in both weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) and two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. We also identified ten genomic loci shared between T2D and fracture, with the top signal at SNP rs4580892 in the intron of gene RSPO3. And the higher expression in adipose subcutaneous and higher protein level in plasma of RSPO3 were associated with increased risk of T2D, but decreased risk of fracture. In the prospective study, T2D was observed to be associated with higher risk of fracture, but BMI mediated 30.2% of the protective effect. However, when stratified by the T2D-related risk factors for fracture, we observed that the effect of T2D on the risk of fracture decreased when the number of T2D-related risk factors decreased, and the association became non-significant if the T2D patients carried none of the risk factors. In conclusion, the genetically determined T2D might not be associated with higher risk of fracture. And the shared genetic architecture between T2D and fracture suggested a top signal around RSPO3 gene. The observed effect size of T2D on fracture risk decreased if the T2D-related risk factors could be eliminated. Therefore, it is important to manage the complications of T2D to prevent the risk of fracture.