Abstract

TP53 is conventionally thought to prevent cancer formation and progression to metastasis, while mutant TP53 has transforming activities. However, in the clinic, TP53 mutation status does not accurately predict cancer progression. Here we report, based on clinical analysis corroborated with experimental data, that the p53 isoform Δ133p53β promotes cancer cell invasion, regardless of TP53 mutation status. Δ133p53β increases risk of cancer recurrence and death in breast cancer patients. Furthermore Δ133p53β is critical to define invasiveness in a panel of breast and colon cell lines, expressing WT or mutant TP53. Endogenous mutant Δ133p53β depletion prevents invasiveness without affecting mutant full-length p53 protein expression. Mechanistically WT and mutant Δ133p53β induces EMT. Our findings provide explanations to 2 long-lasting and important clinical conundrums: how WT TP53 can promote cancer cell invasion and reciprocally why mutant TP53 gene does not systematically induce cancer progression.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gilles Gadea

    CNRS, Centre de Recherche de Biochimie Macromoléculaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Nikola Arsic

    CNRS, Centre de Recherche de Biochimie Macromoléculaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kenneth Fernandes

    Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alexandra Diot

    Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sébastien M Joruiz

    Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Samer Abdallah

    CNRS, Centre de Recherche de Biochimie Macromoléculaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Valerie Meuray

    Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Stéphanie Vinot

    CNRS, Centre de Recherche de Biochimie Macromoléculaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Christelle Anguille

    CNRS, Centre de Recherche de Biochimie Macromoléculaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Judit Remenyi

    Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Marie P Khoury

    Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Philip R Quinlan

    Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Colin A Purdie

    Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Lee B Jordan

    Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Frances V Fuller-Pace

    Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5859-2932
  16. Marion de Toledo

    Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Maïlys Cren

    Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Alastair M Thompson

    Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Jean-Christophe Bourdon

    Division of Cancer Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    j.bourdon@dundee.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Pierre Roux

    CNRS, Centre de Recherche de Biochimie Macromoléculaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    For correspondence
    pierre.roux@crbm.cnrs.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0671-5413

Funding

Breast Cancer Campaign (2012MaySF127)

  • Jean-Christophe Bourdon

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Samples were examined following Local Research EthicsCommittee approval under delegated authority by the Tayside Tissue Bank(www.taysidetissuebank.org).

Copyright

© 2016, Gadea et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,091
    views
  • 617
    downloads
  • 49
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gilles Gadea
  2. Nikola Arsic
  3. Kenneth Fernandes
  4. Alexandra Diot
  5. Sébastien M Joruiz
  6. Samer Abdallah
  7. Valerie Meuray
  8. Stéphanie Vinot
  9. Christelle Anguille
  10. Judit Remenyi
  11. Marie P Khoury
  12. Philip R Quinlan
  13. Colin A Purdie
  14. Lee B Jordan
  15. Frances V Fuller-Pace
  16. Marion de Toledo
  17. Maïlys Cren
  18. Alastair M Thompson
  19. Jean-Christophe Bourdon
  20. Pierre Roux
(2016)
TP53 drives invasion through expression of its Δ133p53β variant
eLife 5:e14734.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14734

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14734

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ananda Kishore Mukherjee, Subhajit Dutta ... Shantanu Chowdhury
    Research Article

    Telomeres are crucial for cancer progression. Immune signalling in the tumour microenvironment has been shown to be very important in cancer prognosis. However, the mechanisms by which telomeres might affect tumour immune response remain poorly understood. Here, we observed that interleukin-1 signalling is telomere-length dependent in cancer cells. Mechanistically, non-telomeric TRF2 (telomeric repeat binding factor 2) binding at the IL-1-receptor type-1 (IL1R1) promoter was found to be affected by telomere length. Enhanced TRF2 binding at the IL1R1 promoter in cells with short telomeres directly recruited the histone-acetyl-transferase (HAT) p300, and consequent H3K27 acetylation activated IL1R1. This altered NF-kappa B signalling and affected downstream cytokines like IL6, IL8, and TNF. Further, IL1R1 expression was telomere-sensitive in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) clinical samples. Infiltration of tumour-associated macrophages (TAM) was also sensitive to the length of tumour cell telomeres and highly correlated with IL1R1 expression. The use of both IL1 Receptor antagonist (IL1RA) and IL1R1 targeting ligands could abrogate M2 macrophage infiltration in TNBC tumour organoids. In summary, using TNBC cancer tissue (>90 patients), tumour-derived organoids, cancer cells, and xenograft tumours with either long or short telomeres, we uncovered a heretofore undeciphered function of telomeres in modulating IL1 signalling and tumour immunity.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Maojin Tian, Le Yang ... Peiqing Zhao
    Research Article

    TIPE (TNFAIP8) has been identified as an oncogene and participates in tumor biology. However, how its role in the metabolism of tumor cells during melanoma development remains unclear. Here, we demonstrated that TIPE promoted glycolysis by interacting with pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) in melanoma. We found that TIPE-induced PKM2 dimerization, thereby facilitating its translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. TIPE-mediated PKM2 dimerization consequently promoted HIF-1α activation and glycolysis, which contributed to melanoma progression and increased its stemness features. Notably, TIPE specifically phosphorylated PKM2 at Ser 37 in an extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-dependent manner. Consistently, the expression of TIPE was positively correlated with the levels of PKM2 Ser37 phosphorylation and cancer stem cell (CSC) markers in melanoma tissues from clinical samples and tumor bearing mice. In summary, our findings indicate that the TIPE/PKM2/HIF-1α signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in promoting CSC properties by facilitating the glycolysis, which would provide a promising therapeutic target for melanoma intervention.