1. Neuroscience

Behavioral-state modulation of inhibition is context-dependent and cell type specific in mouse visual cortex

  1. Janelle MP Pakan
  2. Scott C Lowe
  3. Evelyn Dylda
  4. Sander W Keemink
  5. Stephen P Currie
  6. Christopher A Coutts
  7. Nathalie L Rochefort  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14985
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Janelle MP Pakan
  2. Scott C Lowe
  3. Evelyn Dylda
  4. Sander W Keemink
  5. Stephen P Currie
  6. Christopher A Coutts
  7. Nathalie L Rochefort
(2016)
Behavioral-state modulation of inhibition is context-dependent and cell type specific in mouse visual cortex
eLife 5:e14985.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14985
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Cortical responses to sensory stimuli are modulated by behavioral state. In the primary visual cortex (V1), visual responses of pyramidal neurons increase during locomotion. This response gain was suggested to be mediated through inhibitory neurons, resulting in the disinhibition of pyramidal neurons. Using in vivo two-photon calcium imaging in layers 2/3 and 4 in mouse V1, we reveal that locomotion increases the activity of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), somatostatin (SST) and parvalbumin (PV)-positive interneurons during visual stimulation, challenging the disinhibition model. In darkness, while most VIP and PV neurons remained locomotion responsive, SST and excitatory neurons were largely non-responsive. Context-dependent locomotion responses were found in each cell type, with the highest proportion among SST neurons. These findings establish that modulation of neuronal activity by locomotion is context-dependent and contest the generality of a disinhibitory circuit for gain control of sensory responses by behavioral state.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Janelle MP Pakan

    Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9384-8067

  2. Scott C Lowe

    Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Evelyn Dylda

    Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1883-4498

  4. Sander W Keemink

    Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Stephen P Currie

    Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Christopher A Coutts

    Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Nathalie L Rochefort

    Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    n.rochefort@ed.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3498-6221

Funding

Wellcome (102857/Z/13/Z)

  • Nathalie LI Rochefort

EuroSpin Erasmus Mundus Program

  • Sander W Keemink

Royal Society (102857/Z/13/Z)

  • Nathalie LI Rochefort

European Commission (Marie Curie Actions (FP7), MC-CIG 631770)

  • Nathalie LI Rochefort

Patrick Wild Centre

  • Nathalie LI Rochefort

The Shirley Foundation

  • Nathalie LI Rochefort

RS MacDonald Charitable Trust (Seedcorn Grant 21)

  • Nathalie LI Rochefort

University Of Edinburgh (Graduate School of Life Sciences)

  • Evelyn Dylda

European Commission (Marie Curie Actions (FP7), IEF 624461)

  • Janelle MP Pakan

EPSRC Doctoral Training Centre in Neuroinformatics (EP/F500385/1 and BB/F529254/1)

  • Sander W Keemink

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Thomas D Mrsic-Flogel, University of Basel, Switzerland

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were approved by the University of Edinburgh animal welfare committee, and were performed under a UK Home Office Project License (PPL No. 60/4570).

Version history

  1. Received: February 3, 2016
  2. Accepted: August 22, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 23, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: September 2, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: September 9, 2016 (version 3)
  6. Version of Record published: September 20, 2016 (version 4)
  7. Version of Record updated: September 6, 2017 (version 5)

Copyright

© 2016, Pakan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 8,637
    views
  • 1,800
    downloads
  • 221
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Janelle MP Pakan
  2. Scott C Lowe
  3. Evelyn Dylda
  4. Sander W Keemink
  5. Stephen P Currie
  6. Christopher A Coutts
  7. Nathalie L Rochefort
(2016)
Behavioral-state modulation of inhibition is context-dependent and cell type specific in mouse visual cortex
eLife 5:e14985.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14985

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14985

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience

    Determinantal point process attention over grid cell code supports out of distribution generalization

    Shanka Subhra Mondal, Steven Frankland ... Jonathan D Cohen
    Research Article

    Deep neural networks have made tremendous gains in emulating human-like intelligence, and have been used increasingly as ways of understanding how the brain may solve the complex computational problems on which this relies. However, these still fall short of, and therefore fail to provide insight into how the brain supports strong forms of generalization of which humans are capable. One such case is out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization – successful performance on test examples that lie outside the distribution of the training set. Here, we identify properties of processing in the brain that may contribute to this ability. We describe a two-part algorithm that draws on specific features of neural computation to achieve OOD generalization, and provide a proof of concept by evaluating performance on two challenging cognitive tasks. First we draw on the fact that the mammalian brain represents metric spaces using grid cell code (e.g., in the entorhinal cortex): abstract representations of relational structure, organized in recurring motifs that cover the representational space. Second, we propose an attentional mechanism that operates over the grid cell code using determinantal point process (DPP), that we call DPP attention (DPP-A) – a transformation that ensures maximum sparseness in the coverage of that space. We show that a loss function that combines standard task-optimized error with DPP-A can exploit the recurring motifs in the grid cell code, and can be integrated with common architectures to achieve strong OOD generalization performance on analogy and arithmetic tasks. This provides both an interpretation of how the grid cell code in the mammalian brain may contribute to generalization performance, and at the same time a potential means for improving such capabilities in artificial neural networks.

    1. Neuroscience

    Bidirectional fear modulation by discrete anterior insular circuits in male mice

    Sanggeon Park, Yeowool Huh ... Jeiwon Cho
    Research Article

    The brain’s ability to appraise threats and execute appropriate defensive responses is essential for survival in a dynamic environment. Humans studies have implicated the anterior insular cortex (aIC) in subjective fear regulation and its abnormal activity in fear/anxiety disorders. However, the complex aIC connectivity patterns involved in regulating fear remain under investigated. To address this, we recorded single units in the aIC of freely moving male mice that had previously undergone auditory fear conditioning, assessed the effect of optogenetically activating specific aIC output structures in fear, and examined the organization of aIC neurons projecting to the specific structures with retrograde tracing. Single-unit recordings revealed that a balanced number of aIC pyramidal neurons’ activity either positively or negatively correlated with a conditioned tone-induced freezing (fear) response. Optogenetic manipulations of aIC pyramidal neuronal activity during conditioned tone presentation altered the expression of conditioned freezing. Neural tracing showed that non-overlapping populations of aIC neurons project to the amygdala or the medial thalamus, and the pathway bidirectionally modulated conditioned fear. Specifically, optogenetic stimulation of the aIC-amygdala pathway increased conditioned freezing, while optogenetic stimulation of the aIC-medial thalamus pathway decreased it. Our findings suggest that the balance of freezing-excited and freezing-inhibited neuronal activity in the aIC and the distinct efferent circuits interact collectively to modulate fear behavior.