Sex steroids regulate skin pigmentation through nonclassical membrane-bound receptors

  1. Christopher A Natale
  2. Elizabeth K Duperret
  3. Junqian Zhang
  4. Rochelle Sadeghi
  5. Ankit Dahal
  6. Kevin Tyler O'Brien
  7. Rosa Cookson
  8. Jeffrey D Winkler
  9. Todd W Ridky  Is a corresponding author
  1. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
  2. University of Pennsylvania, United States

Abstract

The association between pregnancy and altered cutaneous pigmentation has been documented for over two millennia, suggesting that sex hormones play a role in regulating epidermal melanocyte (MC) homeostasis. Here we show that physiologic estrogen (17β-estradiol) and progesterone reciprocally regulate melanin synthesis. This is intriguing given that we also show that normal primary human MCs lack classical estrogen or progesterone receptors (ER or PR). Utilizing both genetic and pharmacologic approaches, we establish that sex steroid effects on human pigment synthesis are mediated by the membrane-bound, steroid hormone receptors G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), and progestin and adipoQ receptor 7 (PAQR7). Activity of these receptors was activated or inhibited by synthetic estrogen or progesterone analogs that do not bind to ER or PR. As safe and effective treatment options for skin pigmentation disorders are limited, these specific GPER and PAQR7 ligands may represent a novel class of therapeutics.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Christopher A Natale

    Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    Christopher A Natale, Listed as an inventor on patent applications held by the University of Pennsylvania for the use of topical estrogen and progesterone derivatives for modulating skin pigmentation.
  2. Elizabeth K Duperret

    Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Junqian Zhang

    Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Rochelle Sadeghi

    Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Ankit Dahal

    Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Kevin Tyler O'Brien

    Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Rosa Cookson

    Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Jeffrey D Winkler

    Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    Jeffrey D Winkler, Listed as an inventor on patent applications held by the University of Pennsylvania for the use of topical estrogen and progesterone derivatives for modulating skin pigmentation.
  9. Todd W Ridky

    Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    For correspondence
    ridky@mail.med.upenn.edu
    Competing interests
    Todd W Ridky, Listed as an inventor on patent applications held by the University of Pennsylvania for the use of topical estrogen and progesterone derivatives for modulating skin pigmentation.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (#803381) of the University of Pennsylvania.

Copyright

© 2016, Natale et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,505
    views
  • 1,086
    downloads
  • 94
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Christopher A Natale
  2. Elizabeth K Duperret
  3. Junqian Zhang
  4. Rochelle Sadeghi
  5. Ankit Dahal
  6. Kevin Tyler O'Brien
  7. Rosa Cookson
  8. Jeffrey D Winkler
  9. Todd W Ridky
(2016)
Sex steroids regulate skin pigmentation through nonclassical membrane-bound receptors
eLife 5:e15104.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15104

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15104

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    John Yong, Jacqueline E Villalta ... Calvin H Jan
    Research Article

    Protein aggregation increases during aging and is a pathological hallmark of many age-related diseases. Protein homeostasis (proteostasis) depends on a core network of factors directly influencing protein production, folding, trafficking, and degradation. Cellular proteostasis also depends on the overall composition of the proteome and numerous environmental variables. Modulating this cellular proteostasis state can influence the stability of multiple endogenous proteins, yet the factors contributing to this state remain incompletely characterized. Here, we performed genome-wide CRISPRi screens to elucidate the modulators of proteostasis state in mammalian cells, using a fluorescent dye to monitor endogenous protein aggregation. These screens identified known components of the proteostasis network and uncovered a novel link between protein and lipid homeostasis. Increasing lipid uptake and/or disrupting lipid metabolism promotes the accumulation of sphingomyelins and cholesterol esters and drives the formation of detergent-insoluble protein aggregates at the lysosome. Proteome profiling of lysosomes revealed ESCRT accumulation, suggesting disruption of ESCRT disassembly, lysosomal membrane repair, and microautophagy. Lipid dysregulation leads to lysosomal membrane permeabilization but does not otherwise impact fundamental aspects of lysosomal and proteasomal functions. Together, these results demonstrate that lipid dysregulation disrupts ESCRT function and impairs proteostasis.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jun Sun, Francisca Rojo-Cortes ... Alicia Hidalgo
    Research Article

    Experience shapes the brain as neural circuits can be modified by neural stimulation or the lack of it. The molecular mechanisms underlying structural circuit plasticity and how plasticity modifies behaviour are poorly understood. Subjective experience requires dopamine, a neuromodulator that assigns a value to stimuli, and it also controls behaviour, including locomotion, learning, and memory. In Drosophila, Toll receptors are ideally placed to translate experience into structural brain change. Toll-6 is expressed in dopaminergic neurons (DANs), raising the intriguing possibility that Toll-6 could regulate structural plasticity in dopaminergic circuits. Drosophila neurotrophin-2 (DNT-2) is the ligand for Toll-6 and Kek-6, but whether it is required for circuit structural plasticity was unknown. Here, we show that DNT-2-expressing neurons connect with DANs, and they modulate each other. Loss of function for DNT-2 or its receptors Toll-6 and kinase-less Trk-like kek-6 caused DAN and synapse loss, impaired dendrite growth and connectivity, decreased synaptic sites, and caused locomotion deficits. In contrast, over-expressed DNT-2 increased DAN cell number, dendrite complexity, and promoted synaptogenesis. Neuronal activity modified DNT-2, increased synaptogenesis in DNT-2-positive neurons and DANs, and over-expression of DNT-2 did too. Altering the levels of DNT-2 or Toll-6 also modified dopamine-dependent behaviours, including locomotion and long-term memory. To conclude, a feedback loop involving dopamine and DNT-2 highlighted the circuits engaged, and DNT-2 with Toll-6 and Kek-6 induced structural plasticity in this circuit modifying brain function and behaviour.