Physical determinants of vesicle mobility and supply at a central synapse

  1. Jason Seth Rothman
  2. Laszlo Kocsis
  3. Etienne Herzog
  4. Zoltan Nusser  Is a corresponding author
  5. Robin Angus Silver  Is a corresponding author
  1. University College London, United Kingdom
  2. Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary
  3. Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Germany
  4. Université de Bordeaux, UMR 5297, F-33000, France
8 figures and 2 tables

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
FRAP of vesicles in MFTs of VGLUT1Venus knock-in mice.

(A) A VGLUT1Venus-labelled MFT near the surface of a cerebellar slice. Blue ellipse denotes xz dimensions of iPSF. Inset, lower magnification. Scale bars: 5 µm. (B) Fluorescence recovery after …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.002
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
VGLUT1Venus mice show normal MFT-GC synaptic transmission.

(A) EPSCs recorded from a GC (average of 8 recordings) in response to stimulation of a single MFT at 40, 100 and 300 Hz (100, 100 and 25 stimuli, respectively) in a VGLUT1Venus mouse. Phasic refers …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.003
Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Modulation and quantification of vesicle mobility in MFTs.

(A) Weighted average FRAP curve for control conditions (black circles; 35°C; 62 MFTs, 619 locations, 6 mice; from Figure 1D), 21°C (green circles; 36 MFTs, 414 locations, 2 mice), 10 µM …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.004
Figure 2—source data 1

Average FRAP curves for single MFTs for various conditions.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.005
Figure 2—source data 2

Average percent fluorescence recovered at 1 s and 5 s after bleaching.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.006
Figure 2—source data 3

Parameters file for best-match finite-difference FRAP simulation.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.007
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Characterization of tissue drift and correction of FRAP curves.

(A) Absolute rates of tissue drift in x, y and z directions (n = 29, 29 and 32, respectively; 35°C). Drift rates were measured by fluorescence CCD imaging of small spherical objects for 2–10 min. …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.008
Figure 3 with 2 supplements
EM measurements of vesicle and mitochondrial densities within MFTs and Monte Carlo simulations of FRAP experiments.

(A) Electron micrograph of a cerebellar MFT from adult mouse showing vesicles and mitochondria (m). Scale bar: 0.5 µm. (B) Mean density of vesicles and mitochondria (black lines) computed from …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.011
Figure 3—source data 1

Density of vesicles and mitochondria.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.012
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Ultrastructure of VGLUT1-Venus expressing MFTs and measurements of vesicle diameter.

(A,B) Low (A) and high (B) magnification EM images of the cerebellar GC layer showing a VGLUT1Venus-immunopositive MFT. The higher magnification in B shows asymmetrical synapses (arrowheads) made by …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.013
Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1

Synaptic vesicle diameters.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.014
Figure 3—figure supplement 2
Quantification of emission and confocal point spread functions.

(A) The emission point spread function (ePSF) measured from fluorescence emitted from an imaged bead as previously described (DiGregorio et al., 2007). Left: xz plane (y = 0; 4.0 × 9.6 µm) of a 3D …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.015
Figure 4 with 1 supplement
Estimation of vesicle diffusion coefficients Dshort and Dlong.

(A) Parameter search for the best match between the average drift-corrected control FRAP data (Figure 2C) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations (Figure 3C,D) across a range of Dshort and % immobile …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.016
Figure 4—source data 1

Parameters file for best-match Monte-Carlo FRAP simulation.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.017
Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Comparison of Monte Carlo FRAP curves for different vesicle step size and simulation cube size.

(A) Average FRAP curves for vesicle step size dr = 1 and 2 nm (blue and red; see Equation 3) for best-match conditions in Figure 4B (2 µm cube geometries) showing a close overlap and therefore …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.018
Figure 5 with 1 supplement
Effects of steric and hydrodynamic interactions on vesicle mobility.

(A) Effect of steric interactions on Dlong, normalized to Dshort, as a function of the vesicle volume fraction and % immobile vesicles. In the absence of immobile vesicles, the results matched those …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.019
Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Monte Carlo estimate of D(t) for an infinitely small vesicle step size.

(A) Time course of the diffusion coefficient, D(t), for dr = 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 nm, normalized to Dshort (gray lines; see Equation 3). Steady-state values (Dlong/Dshort; open black circles) were …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.020
EM measurements of vesicle density near MFT AZs.

(A) Serial-section electron micrographs containing a cerebellar MFT-GC synaptic junction (EM series #3). Scale bar: 100 nm. (B) 3D reconstruction of the synapse in A showing an AZ (red), synaptic …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.021
Figure 6—source data 1

AZ area and vesicle densities from 3D AZ reconstructions.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.022
Figure 7 with 3 supplements
Diffusion-mediated vesicle supply to 14 MFT AZs.

(A) xy cross sections through a Monte Carlo simulation of a 3D AZ reconstruction (Figure 6B; EM series #3) showing non-diffusible space (gray) surrounding the vesicle cloud and AZ (red), and reserve …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.023
Figure 7—source data 1

Vesicle supply rates and pool sizes computed from Monte Carlo AZ simulations.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.024
Figure 7—source data 2

Parameters file for one Monte-Carlo AZ simulation of EM series #3.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.025
Figure 7—figure supplement 1
Predicted vesicle mobility near the AZ.

(A) Average vesicle density near the AZ (computed in 50 nm bins for 14 AZs) at various times during the simulations of sustained release in Figure 7B for control (left), in the presence of …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.026
Figure 7—figure supplement 2
Three Monte Carlo simulation configurations for the 3D AZ reconstruction of EM series #3.

The control xy cross section (left) is from Figure 7A. For simulations with connectors (middle) vesicles <150 nm from the AZ are connected to each other if they are <10 nm from each other (orange), …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.027
Figure 7—figure supplement 3
Estimate of Monte Carlo AZ simulations for an infinitely small vesicle step size.

(A) Average rate of vesicle supply to the AZ for dr = 5 nm (blue; from Figure 7B; n = 14 AZs) and dr = 0 nm (black) computed via linear extrapolation using simulations for dr = 2, 3 and 5 nm (see Equ…

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.028
Figure 8 with 1 supplement
AZ simulations of release during a 100 Hz stimulus train with vesicle docking, priming and stochastic release.

(A) Average vesicle release rate during simulations of a 100 Hz stimulus train across 14 AZs (control geometries) each with an RRP of 1 (dark blue line) or 2 (light blue line) vesicles (i.e. 1 or 2 …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.029
Figure 8—figure supplement 1
Cartoon of the three vesicle pools and their measured transition rates for a single MFT AZ.

Vesicles docked and primed at the AZ (red) are defined as the readily releasable pool (RRP = 1 or 2 vesicles for MFT AZs). Vesicles in the RRP are reloaded from a large releasable pool (RP), where …

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.030

Tables

Table 1

Estimates of Dlong under various experimental conditions.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.009
Solution°Ct1/2 (s)Dlong (µm2/s)% Recovered
STRD (-drift)350.58 ± 0.080.025 ± 0.00367
STRD350.81 ± 0.100.018 ± 0.00577
STRD211.39 ± 0.240.010 ± 0.00273
CD + LB (10 µM)350.46 ± 0.050.032 ± 0.00380
Jaspla (2 µM)350.96 ± 0.130.015 ± 0.00276
Jaspla (5 µM)351.41 ± 0.150.010 ± 0.00184
OA (2 µM)350.12 ± 0.020.120 ± 0.01885
Rosco (50 µM)350.72 ± 0.110.020 ± 0.00377
  1. STRD: Standard ACSF. -drift: data corrected for tissue drift (Figure 2—figure supplement 1); all other measurements are not drift corrected. CD + LB: 10 µM cytochalasin-D plus 10 µM latrunculin-B. Jaspla: jasplakinolide. OA: okadaic acid. Rosco: roscovitine. Values for Dlong and t1/2 (± STDV) were computed by fitting experimental FRAP curves (Figure 2A,B) to Equation (2).

  2. The effect of OA on vesicle mobility in the MFT is in close agreement with that reported by Shtrahman et al. (2005) who report Dlong = 0.10 µm2/s for hippocampal boutons in OA. While our results do show a reduction in the immobile vesicle fraction, this reduction is not enough to account for the large increase in Dlong. Instead, the increase in Dlong is more likely due to a reduction in protein interactions between the vesicles and cytoskeleton, as suggested by Shtrahman et al., in which case the effects of OA will be reflected in a change in Dcyto. Using data from Figure 5, we estimate Dcyto = 0.515 µm2/s in OA, a four-fold increase from control conditions (0.127 µm2/s).

Table 1—source data 1

Fits of Axelrod equation to FRAP curves.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.010
Table 2

Predictions of vesicle mobility for different types of synaptic terminals.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15133.031
MFTMFTMFTNMJBoutonsRibbon
CentreCloudAZ faceAZ clusterAZ clusterCentre
Ves. density (per µm2)118103170224200
Ves. density (per µm3)3930344456524421
Total ves. volume %171725332929
Immobile vesicle %252517407313
Imm. ves. volume %44413204
Non-diffusible vol. %283629000
Dcyto / D00.010.010.010.010.010.01
Dshort / Dcyto0.470.470.390.240.190.37
Dlong / Dshort0.410.300.290.200.090.43
Dlong / Dcyto0.190.140.110.050.020.16
D0 (µm2/s)12.68212.68212.68212.76412.7649.055
Dcyto0.1270.1270.1270.1280.1280.091
Dshort0.0600.0600.0500.0310.0250.033
AZ wall hydro. (β)0.84
Dlong0.0250.0180.0120.0060.0020.014
Dlong measured0.025NANA0.0050.0040.110 (0.015)
  1. For the MFT, 3D vesicle (ves) densities were computed from 2D densities by diving by the slice thickness (0.03 µm). The total vesicle volume % was computed assuming a 44 nm vesicle diameter in fixed tissue. It was assumed the immobile vesicle volume fraction near the AZ was the same as in the MFT centre (4%). For the MFT centre computation, the non-diffusible volume (vol) is the mitochondria volume fraction; for the cloud and AZ face computations, the non-diffusible volume is the non-diffusible space within the vesicle clouds computed from the 14 AZ reconstructions. D0 was computed via the Stokes-Einstein equation assuming a 49 nm vesicle diameter for in vitro conditions at 35°C. Diffusion constants and ratios are from Results (see Figure 5). Hydrodynamic (hydro) effects from the membrane wall near the AZ were computed via Equations (9) and (10), and are average β between 50 and 100 nm from the wall, where β = (2β||+β⊥)/3. Measured Dlong near the AZ face is not available (NA): vesicles close to AZs are too small to be detected by our FRAP measurements.

  2. For the NMJ, the 2D vesicle density is the average of those reported in Mantilla et al. (2004) and Coleman et al. (2008). The total vesicle volume % was computed assuming a proportional relationship with the MFT vesicle density and volume fraction. The immobile vesicle % and measured Dlong is from Gaffield and Betz (2007). D0 was computed assuming a 49 nm vesicle diameter and 37°C.

  3. Data for the ribbon synapse is from Rea et al. (2004). The 3D vesicle density was computed assuming 250,000 vesicles with 50 nm diameter inside a hemisphere with 6 µm diameter. The non-diffusible volume was set to zero since Figure 3A of Rea et al. shows few mitochondria. D0 was computed assuming a 50 nm vesicle diameter and 22°C. Note, our estimate of Dlong is 10-fold smaller than the measured Dlong of Rea et al., but is comparable to the measured Dlong of another study of ribbon-type synapses in bipolar cells (value shown in brackets; 0.015 µm2/s; Holt et al., 2004).

  4. For the hippocampal boutons, the 2D vesicle density is from Li et al. (1995) and Schikorski and Stevens (2001). The total vesicle volume % was computed assuming a proportional relationship with the MFT vesicle density and volume fraction. The immobile vesicle % is from Shtrahman et al. (2005). D0 was computed assuming a 49 nm vesicle diameter and 37°C. Values for measured Dlong derived from fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) vary widely, depending on the model used to fit to the data (5 × 10−5 to 0.054 µm2/s; Figure 2D, pink symbols), but our predicted Dlong most closely matches that of a fit to pure diffusion (0.0043 µm2/s; Shtrahman et al., 2005) and the measured Dlong of Lee et al. (0.003 µm2/s; 2012) who tracked single vesicles using quantum dots.

  5. For all terminals, Dcyto/D0 was assumed to equal that in the MFT centre (0.01). Dshort/Dcyto was computed as the blue line in Figure 5B. Dlong/Dshort was computed using data in Figure 5A.

Download links