(A) A VGLUT1Venus-labelled MFT near the surface of a cerebellar slice. Blue ellipse denotes xz dimensions of iPSF. Inset, lower magnification. Scale bars: 5 µm. (B) Fluorescence recovery after …
(A) EPSCs recorded from a GC (average of 8 recordings) in response to stimulation of a single MFT at 40, 100 and 300 Hz (100, 100 and 25 stimuli, respectively) in a VGLUT1Venus mouse. Phasic refers …
(A) Weighted average FRAP curve for control conditions (black circles; 35°C; 62 MFTs, 619 locations, 6 mice; from Figure 1D), 21°C (green circles; 36 MFTs, 414 locations, 2 mice), 10 µM …
Average FRAP curves for single MFTs for various conditions.
Average percent fluorescence recovered at 1 s and 5 s after bleaching.
Parameters file for best-match finite-difference FRAP simulation.
(A) Absolute rates of tissue drift in x, y and z directions (n = 29, 29 and 32, respectively; 35°C). Drift rates were measured by fluorescence CCD imaging of small spherical objects for 2–10 min. …
(A) Electron micrograph of a cerebellar MFT from adult mouse showing vesicles and mitochondria (m). Scale bar: 0.5 µm. (B) Mean density of vesicles and mitochondria (black lines) computed from …
Density of vesicles and mitochondria.
(A,B) Low (A) and high (B) magnification EM images of the cerebellar GC layer showing a VGLUT1Venus-immunopositive MFT. The higher magnification in B shows asymmetrical synapses (arrowheads) made by …
Synaptic vesicle diameters.
(A) The emission point spread function (ePSF) measured from fluorescence emitted from an imaged bead as previously described (DiGregorio et al., 2007). Left: xz plane (y = 0; 4.0 × 9.6 µm) of a 3D …
(A) Parameter search for the best match between the average drift-corrected control FRAP data (Figure 2C) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations (Figure 3C,D) across a range of Dshort and % immobile …
Parameters file for best-match Monte-Carlo FRAP simulation.
(A) Average FRAP curves for vesicle step size dr = 1 and 2 nm (blue and red; see Equation 3) for best-match conditions in Figure 4B (2 µm cube geometries) showing a close overlap and therefore …
(A) Effect of steric interactions on Dlong, normalized to Dshort, as a function of the vesicle volume fraction and % immobile vesicles. In the absence of immobile vesicles, the results matched those …
(A) Time course of the diffusion coefficient, D(t), for dr = 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 nm, normalized to Dshort (gray lines; see Equation 3). Steady-state values (Dlong/Dshort; open black circles) were …
(A) Serial-section electron micrographs containing a cerebellar MFT-GC synaptic junction (EM series #3). Scale bar: 100 nm. (B) 3D reconstruction of the synapse in A showing an AZ (red), synaptic …
AZ area and vesicle densities from 3D AZ reconstructions.
(A) xy cross sections through a Monte Carlo simulation of a 3D AZ reconstruction (Figure 6B; EM series #3) showing non-diffusible space (gray) surrounding the vesicle cloud and AZ (red), and reserve …
Vesicle supply rates and pool sizes computed from Monte Carlo AZ simulations.
Parameters file for one Monte-Carlo AZ simulation of EM series #3.
(A) Average vesicle density near the AZ (computed in 50 nm bins for 14 AZs) at various times during the simulations of sustained release in Figure 7B for control (left), in the presence of …
The control xy cross section (left) is from Figure 7A. For simulations with connectors (middle) vesicles <150 nm from the AZ are connected to each other if they are <10 nm from each other (orange), …
(A) Average rate of vesicle supply to the AZ for dr = 5 nm (blue; from Figure 7B; n = 14 AZs) and dr = 0 nm (black) computed via linear extrapolation using simulations for dr = 2, 3 and 5 nm (see Equ…
(A) Average vesicle release rate during simulations of a 100 Hz stimulus train across 14 AZs (control geometries) each with an RRP of 1 (dark blue line) or 2 (light blue line) vesicles (i.e. 1 or 2 …
Vesicles docked and primed at the AZ (red) are defined as the readily releasable pool (RRP = 1 or 2 vesicles for MFT AZs). Vesicles in the RRP are reloaded from a large releasable pool (RP), where …
Estimates of Dlong under various experimental conditions.
Solution | °C | t1/2 (s) | Dlong (µm2/s) | % Recovered |
---|---|---|---|---|
STRD (-drift) | 35 | 0.58 ± 0.08 | 0.025 ± 0.003 | 67 |
STRD | 35 | 0.81 ± 0.10 | 0.018 ± 0.005 | 77 |
STRD | 21 | 1.39 ± 0.24 | 0.010 ± 0.002 | 73 |
CD + LB (10 µM) | 35 | 0.46 ± 0.05 | 0.032 ± 0.003 | 80 |
Jaspla (2 µM) | 35 | 0.96 ± 0.13 | 0.015 ± 0.002 | 76 |
Jaspla (5 µM) | 35 | 1.41 ± 0.15 | 0.010 ± 0.001 | 84 |
OA (2 µM) | 35 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.120 ± 0.018 | 85 |
Rosco (50 µM) | 35 | 0.72 ± 0.11 | 0.020 ± 0.003 | 77 |
STRD: Standard ACSF. -drift: data corrected for tissue drift (Figure 2—figure supplement 1); all other measurements are not drift corrected. CD + LB: 10 µM cytochalasin-D plus 10 µM latrunculin-B. Jaspla: jasplakinolide. OA: okadaic acid. Rosco: roscovitine. Values for Dlong and t1/2 (± STDV) were computed by fitting experimental FRAP curves (Figure 2A,B) to Equation (2).
The effect of OA on vesicle mobility in the MFT is in close agreement with that reported by Shtrahman et al. (2005) who report Dlong = 0.10 µm2/s for hippocampal boutons in OA. While our results do show a reduction in the immobile vesicle fraction, this reduction is not enough to account for the large increase in Dlong. Instead, the increase in Dlong is more likely due to a reduction in protein interactions between the vesicles and cytoskeleton, as suggested by Shtrahman et al., in which case the effects of OA will be reflected in a change in Dcyto. Using data from Figure 5, we estimate Dcyto = 0.515 µm2/s in OA, a four-fold increase from control conditions (0.127 µm2/s).
Fits of Axelrod equation to FRAP curves.
Predictions of vesicle mobility for different types of synaptic terminals.
MFT | MFT | MFT | NMJ | Boutons | Ribbon | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Centre | Cloud | AZ face | AZ cluster | AZ cluster | Centre | |
Ves. density (per µm2) | 118 | 103 | 170 | 224 | 200 | |
Ves. density (per µm3) | 3930 | 3444 | 5652 | 4421 | ||
Total ves. volume % | 17 | 17 | 25 | 33 | 29 | 29 |
Immobile vesicle % | 25 | 25 | 17 | 40 | 73 | 13 |
Imm. ves. volume % | 4 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 20 | 4 |
Non-diffusible vol. % | 28 | 36 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dcyto / D0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Dshort / Dcyto | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.39 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.37 |
Dlong / Dshort | 0.41 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.09 | 0.43 |
Dlong / Dcyto | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.16 |
D0 (µm2/s) | 12.682 | 12.682 | 12.682 | 12.764 | 12.764 | 9.055 |
Dcyto | 0.127 | 0.127 | 0.127 | 0.128 | 0.128 | 0.091 |
Dshort | 0.060 | 0.060 | 0.050 | 0.031 | 0.025 | 0.033 |
AZ wall hydro. (β) | 0.84 | |||||
Dlong | 0.025 | 0.018 | 0.012 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.014 |
Dlong measured | 0.025 | NA | NA | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.110 (0.015) |
For the MFT, 3D vesicle (ves) densities were computed from 2D densities by diving by the slice thickness (0.03 µm). The total vesicle volume % was computed assuming a 44 nm vesicle diameter in fixed tissue. It was assumed the immobile vesicle volume fraction near the AZ was the same as in the MFT centre (4%). For the MFT centre computation, the non-diffusible volume (vol) is the mitochondria volume fraction; for the cloud and AZ face computations, the non-diffusible volume is the non-diffusible space within the vesicle clouds computed from the 14 AZ reconstructions. D0 was computed via the Stokes-Einstein equation assuming a 49 nm vesicle diameter for in vitro conditions at 35°C. Diffusion constants and ratios are from Results (see Figure 5). Hydrodynamic (hydro) effects from the membrane wall near the AZ were computed via Equations (9) and (10), and are average β between 50 and 100 nm from the wall, where β = (2β||+β⊥)/3. Measured Dlong near the AZ face is not available (NA): vesicles close to AZs are too small to be detected by our FRAP measurements.
For the NMJ, the 2D vesicle density is the average of those reported in Mantilla et al. (2004) and Coleman et al. (2008). The total vesicle volume % was computed assuming a proportional relationship with the MFT vesicle density and volume fraction. The immobile vesicle % and measured Dlong is from Gaffield and Betz (2007). D0 was computed assuming a 49 nm vesicle diameter and 37°C.
Data for the ribbon synapse is from Rea et al. (2004). The 3D vesicle density was computed assuming 250,000 vesicles with 50 nm diameter inside a hemisphere with 6 µm diameter. The non-diffusible volume was set to zero since Figure 3A of Rea et al. shows few mitochondria. D0 was computed assuming a 50 nm vesicle diameter and 22°C. Note, our estimate of Dlong is 10-fold smaller than the measured Dlong of Rea et al., but is comparable to the measured Dlong of another study of ribbon-type synapses in bipolar cells (value shown in brackets; 0.015 µm2/s; Holt et al., 2004).
For the hippocampal boutons, the 2D vesicle density is from Li et al. (1995) and Schikorski and Stevens (2001). The total vesicle volume % was computed assuming a proportional relationship with the MFT vesicle density and volume fraction. The immobile vesicle % is from Shtrahman et al. (2005). D0 was computed assuming a 49 nm vesicle diameter and 37°C. Values for measured Dlong derived from fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) vary widely, depending on the model used to fit to the data (5 × 10−5 to 0.054 µm2/s; Figure 2D, pink symbols), but our predicted Dlong most closely matches that of a fit to pure diffusion (0.0043 µm2/s; Shtrahman et al., 2005) and the measured Dlong of Lee et al. (0.003 µm2/s; 2012) who tracked single vesicles using quantum dots.