Instructed knowledge shapes feedback-driven aversive learning in striatum and orbitofrontal cortex, but not the amygdala

  1. Lauren Y Atlas  Is a corresponding author
  2. Bradley B Doll
  3. Jian Li
  4. Nathaniel D Daw
  5. Elizabeth A Phelps
  1. National Institutes of Health, United States
  2. New York University, United States
  3. Peking University, China
  4. Princeton University, United States

Abstract

Socially-conveyed rules and instructions strongly shape expectations and emotions. Yet most neuroscientific studies of learning consider reinforcement history alone, irrespective of knowledge acquired through other means. We examined fear conditioning and reversal in humans to test whether instructed knowledge modulates the neural mechanisms of feedback-driven learning. One group was informed about contingencies and reversals. A second group learned only from reinforcement. We combined quantitative models with functional magnetic resonance imaging and found that instructions induced dissociations in the neural systems of aversive learning. Responses in striatum and orbitofrontal cortex updated with instructions and correlated with prefrontal responses to instructions. Amygdala responses were influenced by reinforcement similarly in both groups and did not update with instructions. Results extend work on instructed reward learning and reveal novel dissociations that have not been observed with punishments or rewards. Findings support theories of specialized threat-detection and may have implications for fear maintenance in anxiety.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lauren Y Atlas

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    lauren.atlas@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Bradley B Doll

    Center for Neural Sciences, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jian Li

    Department of Psychology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nathaniel D Daw

    Department of Psychology, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Elizabeth A Phelps

    Center for Neural Sciences, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Research was approved by New York University's Institutional Review Board.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Timothy EJ Behrens, University College London, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Received: February 11, 2016
  2. Accepted: May 8, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 12, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 14, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 3,313
    Page views
  • 757
    Downloads
  • 69
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lauren Y Atlas
  2. Bradley B Doll
  3. Jian Li
  4. Nathaniel D Daw
  5. Elizabeth A Phelps
(2016)
Instructed knowledge shapes feedback-driven aversive learning in striatum and orbitofrontal cortex, but not the amygdala
eLife 5:e15192.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15192

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15192

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Peibo Xu, Jian Peng ... Yuejun Chen
    Research Article

    Deciphering patterns of connectivity between neurons in the brain is a critical step toward understanding brain function. Imaging-based neuroanatomical tracing identifies area-to-area or sparse neuron-to-neuron connectivity patterns, but with limited throughput. Barcode-based connectomics maps large numbers of single-neuron projections, but remains a challenge for jointly analyzing single-cell transcriptomics. Here, we established a rAAV2-retro barcode-based multiplexed tracing method that simultaneously characterizes the projectome and transcriptome at the single neuron level. We uncovered dedicated and collateral projection patterns of ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) neurons to five downstream targets and found that projection-defined vmPFC neurons are molecularly heterogeneous. We identified transcriptional signatures of projection-specific vmPFC neurons, and verified Pou3f1 as a marker gene enriched in neurons projecting to the lateral hypothalamus, denoting a distinct subset with collateral projections to both dorsomedial striatum and lateral hypothalamus. In summary, we have developed a new multiplexed technique whose paired connectome and gene expression data can help reveal organizational principles that form neural circuits and process information.

    1. Neuroscience
    Maureen van der Grinten, Jaap de Ruyter van Steveninck ... Yağmur Güçlütürk
    Tools and Resources

    Blindness affects millions of people around the world. A promising solution to restoring a form of vision for some individuals are cortical visual prostheses, which bypass part of the impaired visual pathway by converting camera input to electrical stimulation of the visual system. The artificially induced visual percept (a pattern of localized light flashes, or ‘phosphenes’) has limited resolution, and a great portion of the field’s research is devoted to optimizing the efficacy, efficiency, and practical usefulness of the encoding of visual information. A commonly exploited method is non-invasive functional evaluation in sighted subjects or with computational models by using simulated prosthetic vision (SPV) pipelines. An important challenge in this approach is to balance enhanced perceptual realism, biologically plausibility, and real-time performance in the simulation of cortical prosthetic vision. We present a biologically plausible, PyTorch-based phosphene simulator that can run in real-time and uses differentiable operations to allow for gradient-based computational optimization of phosphene encoding models. The simulator integrates a wide range of clinical results with neurophysiological evidence in humans and non-human primates. The pipeline includes a model of the retinotopic organization and cortical magnification of the visual cortex. Moreover, the quantitative effects of stimulation parameters and temporal dynamics on phosphene characteristics are incorporated. Our results demonstrate the simulator’s suitability for both computational applications such as end-to-end deep learning-based prosthetic vision optimization as well as behavioral experiments. The modular and open-source software provides a flexible simulation framework for computational, clinical, and behavioral neuroscientists working on visual neuroprosthetics.